Massachusetts

Massachusetts
http://www.doe.mass.edu

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$9,509 350 43

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 1,170 290 226 27 1,713

2001-02 1,202 299 288 95 1,884

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2001-02

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 89% 76 89 87 2000 83% 73 79 87

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Massachusetts

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 13,178 625,344 232,208 857,552

2001-02 20,666 678,829 273,644 952,473

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 * 5% 9 11 76 2001-02 13% 2000-01 5%

* 4% 8 9 79 1993-94 15% 1993-94 5%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Massachusetts

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2001-02 * * All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program (CCD, 2001-02)

Data Not Available

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Two years’ scores on Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS): decrease percentage of students at failing level and increase percentage at Proficient or Advanced level. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Depending on baseline performance, increase average scaled scores. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Same as statewide goal.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

Schoolwide Programs 428 39% 224 28% 203 78% $194,487,901

Targeted Assistance 661 28% 587 72% 56 22%

Total 1,089 100% 811 74% 259 24%

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Massachusetts

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 40% 73 41% 84 Grade 8 43% 81 38% 76

Massachusetts
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System. State Definition of Proficient: Students at this level demonstrate a solid understanding of challenging subject matter and solve a wide variety of problems. Elementary School Grade 4 English Language Arts Students in:
Warning Needs Improvemen t Proficient Advanced

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

10%

37%

46%

8%

36
31

47
50

15
18

1
1

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Massachusetts

Grade 4 Mathematics Students in:
Warning Needs Improvemen t Proficient Advanced

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

19%

42%

27%

12%

55
42

34
42

8
13

2
3

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Middle School Grade 7 English Language Arts Students in:
Key * —

Warning

Needs

Proficient
n/a #

Advanced

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Massachusetts
Improvemen t

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

9%

28%

55%

9%

47
30

39
47

14 22

1 1

Grade 8 Mathematics Students in:
Warning Needs Improvemen t Proficient Advanced

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

33%

33%

23%

11%

72 71

20 22

6 5

2 1

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Massachusetts

High School Grade 10 English Language Arts Students in:
Warning Needs Improvemen t Proficient Advanced

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

14%

27%

40%

19%

54 45

33 35

12 16

1 2

Grade 10 Mathematics Students in:
Warning Needs Improvemen t Proficient Advanced

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

25%

31%

24%

20%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Massachusetts

Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

60 62

25 26

12 9

6 3

1993-94
4%

2000-01
3%

1994-95
65%

2000-01
n/a

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies