Michigan

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.mde.state.mi.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) 1993-94 11,704 Pre-K K-8 1,106,414 423,081 9-12 Total (K-12) 1,529,495
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$8,278 561

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

2001-02 16,192 1,180,154 494,673 1,674,827
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 1,878 Elementary 535 Middle 544 High 53 Combined 3,010 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 2,153 652 678 143 3,626 2001-02 44,910 20,642 25,578 2,793 93,923
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives 1% 1 Asian/Pacific Islander 17 Black 2 Hispanic 78 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 1% 2 20 4 73 — 2001-02 11% 2001-02 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 1%
○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 406 schools did not report.

1,829 528 564 455

Federal 7% State 65% Local 28%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

56

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 67% 64% English 61 68 Math 73 72 Science 88 66 Social Studies

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)

1993-94 3%

2000-01 3%

1993-94 35,271 15,166 20,569 1,058 72,064
○ ○ ○

1993-94 9%

202

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment All students will read independently and use math to solve problems at grade level; experience a year of growth for a year of instruction; have an educational plan leading them to being prepared for success. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Each school is required to develop a school improvement plan including goals based on academic objectives for all students and strategies to accomplish these goals. In development: all schools will be assigned an improvement target. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Close gap for each school 10 percent between high and low performers.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP goal Schools in need of improvement

848 1,295 2,143 40% 60% 100% 501 1,041 1,542 32% 68% 72% 460 391 851 54% 46% 40%

Title I allocation

$377,065,119

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

32% 64

33% 76

35% 78

28% 68

Michigan
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Michigan Educational Assessment Program of Essential Skills. Reading: Satisfactory: at least 300; Math: Met Standard: at least 520.

Elementary School
Grade 4
Reading
Proficient 0

Grade 7
Reading
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 11
Reading Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Apprentice 18% Basic 11%
Proficient 0

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

○○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○○

○○

○○

○○

Students in:

○○

Low 20%

Moderate 23%

Satisfactory 57%

Students in:

Low 23%

Moderate 27%

Satisfactory 51%

Met 52%

Exceeded 19%

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Grade 4
Mathematics
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Mathematics
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade 11
Mathematics
Proficient 0

Students in:

All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Apprentice 10%

Basic 25%

Met 40%

Exceeded 25%

Students in:

All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Apprentice 24%

Basic 23%

Met 24%

Exceeded 29%

Students in:

All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Apprentice 19%

Basic 14%

Met 46%

Exceeded 21%

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Satisfactory
100 80 60 40 20 0
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

59

59

58

60

57

n/a
1994-95

n/a
2000-01

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

60%

55%

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

57