Minnesota

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.educ.state.mn.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$7,645 429

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 6,656 570,324 233,253 803,577
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 9,671 563,357 278,356 841,713
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 906 Elementary 226 Middle 381 High 25 Combined 1,538 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 1,040 283 636 130 2,089 2001-02 24,442 9,631 16,007 1,301 51,381
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives 2% 4 Asian/Pacific Islander 4 Black 2 Hispanic 89 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 2% 5 7 4 82 — 2001-02 11% 2001-02 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 3%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 5%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Local 28%

Intermediate 3%

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100% 374 238 166

1,297

Federal 5%

State 61%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

58

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

^ 44 schools did not report.

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 84% 92% English 94 90 Math 97 93 Science 89 94 Social Studies

1993-94 1%

1993-94 21,817 7,983 12,809 495 43,104
○ ○ ○

1993-94 9%

73

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment For Title I schools: required score on Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments; see below for details. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Growth towards required score within six years, beginning 1998-99. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Schools must either have average scale scores of 1,420 in each subject or grade level or make sufficient growth to meet AYP. Schools not making AYP for two consecutive years are identified for Title I Program Improvement.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

232 24% 179 Schools meeting AYP goal 19% Schools in need of improvement 53 90%
Number of schools

745 76% 739 81% 6 10%

977 100% 918 94% 59 6%

Title I allocation

$103,874,297

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

37% 69

37% 78

42% 84

44% 82

Minnesota
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment. Level III.

Elementary School
Grade 3
Reading
Proficient 0

Grade
Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Middle School ^ ^

^^

High School ^ ^
Grade
Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

49 55 46

41 34 32

9 10 16

1 1 6

Grade 3
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Level I 10% 20 Level II 42% 51
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

○○

31

41

22

7

○○

○○

○○

○○

Students in:

Level I 16%

Level II 35%

Level III 33%

Level IV 16%

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

Grade
Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Grade
Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Level III 37% 24

Level IV 11% 5

28 36 30

55 48 42

15 14 19

2 2 5

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Standards
100 80 60 40 20 0
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

35

40

45

49

49

5%
1994-95

4%
2000-01

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

53%

64%

^^

Middle and high school assessment results not available for 2001-02.
F O R M O R E I N F O R M A T I O N , R E F E R T O S O U R C E S , P A G E 1 1 7

59