Missouri

Missouri
http://www.dese.state.mo.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$6,667 524 21

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 1,177 314 482 26 1,999

2001-02 1,244 376 494 106 2,220

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 26,009 9,764 14,939 375 51,087

2001-02 30,916 12,321 17,394 2,470 63,101

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 81% 89 70 84 2000 64% 52 70 80

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Missouri

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 23,597 601,691 241,874 843,565

2001-02 20,503 620,200 264,729 884,929

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 * 1% 18 2 81 2001-02 13% 2000-01 1%

* 1% 16 1 82 1993-94 11% 1993-94 1%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Missouri

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2001-02 * 1% All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program† (CCD, 2001-02)

†1 school did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Increase in top two achievement levels and decrease in bottom two achievement levels in all five of the Missouri Assessment Program subjects in the respective grades. Reduce the gap in the majority and minority student performances. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Three percent increase in students scoring in top two achievement levels and 3 percent decrease in bottom two achievement levels OR a Missouri Assessment Program Index change reflecting improvement of students throughout the distribution. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Five percent increase in students at highest level and 5 percent decrease in lowest level or 5 percent or less in lowest level.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools

Schoolwide Programs 393 30%

Targeted Assistance 932 28%

Total 1,325 100%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Missouri

Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement

367 28% 26 70%

921 72% 11 30%

1,288 97% 37 3%

Title I Allocation

$150,588,984

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 34% 68 30% 79 Grade 8 35% 80 28% 71

Missouri
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Missouri Assessment Program. State Definition of Proficient: See apendix A. Elementary School Grade 3 Communication Arts Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Step 1 Progressing Nearing Proficient Proficient Advanced

6% 12 11

20% 30 28

38% 38 39

34% 20 21

2%

1 1

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Missouri

Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

27
21 11

33
35 30

29
29 39

11
15 21

1 1 1

Grade 3 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Step 1 Progressing Nearing Proficient Proficient

Advanced 8% 3 3

3% 5 5

18% 30 28

41% 44 44

30% 19 20

13
6 2

32
29 28

38
49 43

14
15 23

3 1 5

Student Achievement Trend Reading 3rd grade Meets or Exceeds Standards

Middle School
Key n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Missouri

Grade 7 Communication Arts Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Step 1 Progressing Nearing Proficient Proficient Advanced

13% 26 23

22% 31 30

33% 29 31

30% 14 16

2% 1

1

48
35 18

26
30 34

14
29 30

11
6 17

1
0

1

Grade 8 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Step 1 Progressing Nearing Proficient Proficient Advanced

20% 37 35

34% 37 38

32% 20 21

13% 5 5

1% 1 1

46 31 29

30 44 39

16 19 25

7 5 7

1 2 1

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Standards

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Missouri

High School Grade 11 Communication Arts Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Step 1 Progressing Nearing Proficient Proficient Advanced

17% 35 31

18% 22 23

42% 33 35

23% 10 11

1% 1 11

63 44 25

18 6 19

17 44 38

2 6 18

0 0 1

Grade 10 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Step 1 Progressing Nearing Proficient Proficient Advanced

25% 50 44

34% 31 35

30% 16 18

10% 4 3

1% 0 0

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Missouri

Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

59 36 27

30 25 47

11 36 22

1 3 4

0 0 1

1993-94
7%

2000-01
4%

1994-95
51%

2000-01
53%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies