Montana

Montana
http://www.opi.state.mt.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$6,726 453 0

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 487 236 173 1 897

2001-02 453 239 176 868

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 4,817 2,083 2,994 7 9,901

2001-02 4,761 2,169 3,403

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 75% 77 76 79 2000 71% 68 74 67

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Montana

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 483 115,509 46,111 161,620

2001-02 497 101,612 49,151 150,763

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 11% 1 1 2 86 2001-02 11% 2000-01 5%

10% 1 * 1 88 1993-94 10% 1993-94 5%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Montana

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 1%

2001-02 2%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program† (CCD, 2001-02)

†16 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment School accreditation process; State assessment system participation. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Under development. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Average score on reading and math above 41st percentile for two consecutive years.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement

Schoolwide Programs 121 19% 93 16% 28 65%

Targeted Assistance 515 28% 500 84% 15 35%

Total 636 100% 593 93% 43 7%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Montana

Title I Allocation

$30,980,926

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 35% 69 31% 81 Grade 8 37% 82 35% 79

Montana
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Iowa Tests of Basic Skills.. State Definition of Proficient: See Apendix A. Elementary School Grade 4 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Nearing Proficient Advanced

11% 18

14% 20

57% 53

18% 9

45
5 44

28
35 25

26 59 27

* 0 3

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Montana

Grade 4 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Nearing Proficient Advanced

14% 22

15% 19

57% 51

14% 7

45
28 47

25
17 22

28 56 28

2 0 3

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient

Middle School Grade 8 Reading Students in: All schools
Key

Novice

Nearing

Proficient

Advanced

14%

14%

56%
n/a #

15%
= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

High Poverty Schools

Montana

Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

25

20

48

7

55
33 55

25
17 22

18 33 22

1 17 2

Grade 8 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Nearing Proficient Advanced

17% 30

15% 20

54% 43

14% 7

57 17 57

20 17 24

20 56 18

2 11 1

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Montana

High School Grade 11 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Nearing Proficient Advanced

9% 21

13% 18

57% 49

21% 12

39 20 47

28 25 25

29 45 25

3 10 2

Grade 11 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary
Key

Novice

Nearing

Proficient

Advanced

12% 23

13% 18

58% 50

17% 8

43 23 55

22 5 22

30 50 21

5 20 1

1993-94
n/a%

2000-01
4%

1994-95
54%

2000-01
54%
n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Montana

enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies