Nevada

Nevada
http://www.nde.state.nv.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$5,807 17 10

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 259 57 55 5 376

2001-02 317 79 104 10 510

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 6,968 2,113 2,584 84 11,749

2001-02 10,181 3,479 4,239 107 18,006

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 85% 74 88 86 2000 70% 38 78 73

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Nevada

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 1,237 173,091 60,727 233,818

2001-02 2,142 260,142 94,258 354,400

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 2% 6 10 27 55 2001-02 10% 2000-01 12%

2% 4 9 14 70 1993-94 10% 1993-94 6%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Nevada

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 1%

2001-02 *

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program† (CCD, 2001-02)

†89 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment More than 60 percent students above bottom quartile on assessment. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Annual improvement in rating. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Improvement on weighted percentages at four levels.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

Schoolwide Programs 85 76% 76 78% 9 75% $34,765,836

Targeted Assistance 27 28% 22 22% 3 25%

Total 112 100% 98 88% 12 11%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Nevada
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 20% 52 23% 69 Grade 8 20% 63 21% 60

Nevada
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Student consistently applies skills/strategies without need for remediation.. State Definition of Proficient: At least 60 percent above bottom quartile on assessment. Elementary School Grade 3 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Emergent/ Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard

12% 19

38% 47

29% 24

22% 11

27
34 46

50
50 39

17
12 10

6
4 5

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Nevada

Grade 3 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Emergent/ Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard

14% 20

36% 43

27% 22

23% 14

26
40 47

45
44 38

18
8 11

10
8 5

Middle School†† Grade Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Nevada

Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities ††Middle school assessment results not available for 2001-02. High School Grade 11 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 11 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically
Key

Not Proficient

Proficient

45% 61

55% 39

72 # 78

28 # 22

Not Proficient

Proficient

61% 72

39% 28
n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Nevada

Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment

80 # 89

20 # 11

1993-94
10%

2000-01
5%

1994-95
38%
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

2000-01
40%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies