Nevada

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.nde.state.nv.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$5,807 17

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 1,237 173,091 60,727 233,818
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 2,142 260,142 94,258 354,400
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 259 Elementary 57 Middle 55 High 5 Combined 376 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 317 79 104 10 510 2001-02 10,181 3,479 4,239 107 18,006
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives 2% 4 Asian/Pacific Islander 9 Black 14 Hispanic 70 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 2% 6 10 27 55 — 2001-02 10% 2001-02 *
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 1%
○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100% 42 84 84

218

Local 66%

State 29%

Federal 5%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

68

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

^ 89 schools did not report.

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 85% 70% English 74 38 Math 88 78 Science 86 73 Social Studies

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)

1993-94 6%

2000-01 12%

1993-94 6,968 2,113 2,584 84 11,749
○ ○ ○

1993-94 10%

10

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment More than 60 percent students above bottom quartile on assessment. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Annual improvement in rating. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Improvement on weighted percentages at four levels.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP goal Schools in need of improvement

85 76% 76 78% 9 75%

27 24% 22 22% 3 25%

112 100% 98 88% 12 11%

Title I allocation
Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

$34,765,836

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start,

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

20% 52

20% 63

23% 69

21% 60

Nevada
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Grade 3: Nevada Criterion-Referenced Exam. Grade 11: High School Proficiency Exam. Student consistently applies skills/strategies without need for remediation.

Elementary School
Grade 3
Reading
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Proficient 0 Emergent/ Approaches Meets Exceeds Developing Standard Standard Standard

Grade
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○ ○ ○

Middle School ^ ^

High School
Grade 11
Reading
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Not Proficient Proficient 0 Proficient

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

○○

○○

○○

○○

12% 19

38% 47

29% 24

22% 11

45% 61

55% 39

○○

○○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

Grade 3
Mathematics
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Proficient 0 Emergent/ Approaches Meets Exceeds Developing Standard Standard Standard

Grade
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

27 34 46

50 50 39

17 12 10

6 4 5

72 # 78

28 # 22

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade 11
Mathematics
Proficient 0

14% 20

36% 43

27% 22

23% 14

Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Not Proficient

Proficient

61% 72

39% 28

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

26 40 47

45 44 38

18 8 11

10 8 5

80 # 89

20 # 11

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

10%
1994-95

5%
2000-01

^^

Middle school assessment results not available for 2001-02.

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

38%

40%

KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

69