New Hampshire

New Hampshire
http://www.ed.state.nh.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$7,286 178 0

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 293 91 77 461

2001-02 299 95 77 471

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 5,767 2,711 3,493 11,971

2001-02 6,721 3,534 4,393

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 90% 76 91 90 2000 73% 69 90 88

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

New Hampshire

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 1,292 134,367 49,098 183,465

2001-02 1,830 142,028 62,286 204,314

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 * 1% 1 2 95 2001-02 12% 2000-01 1%

* 1% 1 1 97 1993-94 11% 1993-94 1%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

New Hampshire

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 *

2001-02 *

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program† (CCD, 2001-02)

†6 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment No state-established goals. Expected School Improvement on Assessment None. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Improvement or stability on three-year weighted average of students at Basic, Proficient, Advanced levels (all subjects).

Title I 2001-02

(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement

Schoolwide Programs 22 9% 17 7% 5 50%

Targeted Assistance 229 28% 224 93% 5 50%

Total 251 100% 241 96% 10 4%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

New Hampshire

Title I Allocation

$23,555,296

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 40% 75 43% 88 Grade 8 40% 81 35% 79

New Hampshire
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Educational Improvement and Assessment Program. State Definition of Proficient: See Apendix A Elementary School Grade 3 English Language Arts Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Basic Proficient Advanced

24% 26 44

34% 34 34

33% 32 19

8% 7 2

# 70

# 22

# 6

# 2

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

New Hampshire

Grade 3 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Basic Proficient Advanced

20% 21 35

41% 41 43

29% 28 18

10% 10 4

# 51

# 36

# 11

# 2

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient

Middle School Grade 6 English Language Arts Students in:
Novice Basic Proficient Advanced

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

New Hampshire

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

31% 30 54

41% 41 34

23% 23 9

5% 5 1

# 76

# 20

# 3

# 0

Grade 6 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Basic Proficient Advanced

28% 27 47

44% 45 39

22% 21 11

6% 6 1

# 67

# 28

# 5

# 1

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

New Hampshire

High School Grade 10 English Language Arts Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Basic Proficient Advanced

24% 20 44

38% 40 36

31% 33 17

6% 8 2

# 68

# 28

# 4

# 0

Grade 10 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
Novice Basic Proficient Advanced

40% 34 62

34% 36 26

19% 21 9

7% 9 2

# 81

# 16

# 3

# 1

1993-94
n/a%

2000-01
5%

1994-95
Key

2000-01
n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

New Hampshire

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

56%

59%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies