New York

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.nysed.gov
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) 1993-94 31,687 Pre-K K-8 1,813,727 743,933 9-12 Total (K-12) 2,557,660
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$10,716 703

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

2001-02 40,184 1,907,043 789,906 2,696,949
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 2,422 Elementary 666 Middle 661 High 131 Combined 3,880 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 2,484 745 788 138 4,155 2001-02 92,161 38,934 51,025 5,687 187,807
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives * 5% Asian/Pacific Islander 20 Black 17 Hispanic 58 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 * 6% 20 19 55 — 2001-02 12% 2001-02 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 7%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 8%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 38 schools did not report.

2,146 558 505 1,051

Local 46%

Intermediate 1% State 46%

Federal 6%
KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a
= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

76

#

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 89% 81% English 84 79 Math 85 86 Science 87 95 Social Studies

1993-94 *

1993-94 82,375 32,788 42,234 5,046 162,443
○ ○ ○

1993-94 10%

0

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Ninety percent of students at or above Level 2 on English or language arts and math at grades 4,8; 90 percent meet graduation test requirements. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Improve percentage of students moving from Level 1 to 2 and Level 2 to 3, reduce specified percent gap toward 90 percent target, based on two years’ test scores. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Same as statewide goal.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Programs

Targeted Total Assistance

1,050 1,648 2,698 39% 67% 100% 308 1,271 1,579 Schools meeting AYP goal 20% 80% 59% 156 434 Schools in need of improvement 278 64% 36% 16%
Number of schools

Title I allocation

$879,083,463

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

34% 67

35% 75

33% 79

32% 71

New York
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Grades 4, 8: English Languag Arts and Mathematics. High School: Regents exam. Score at levels of at least 3.

Elementary School
Grade 4
English Language Arts
Proficient 0

Grade 8
English Language Arts Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade (Multiple)
English Language Arts Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

○○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○○

○○

○○

○○

44 14 28

42 47 41

12 33 27

2 6 4

40 9 27

56 75 60

4 16 12

* 0 1

Students in:

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

Level 1 9% 9 14

Level 2 30% 33 42

Level 3 41% 40 34

Level 4 20% 18 10

Level 1 8% 8 14

Level 2 48% 51 62

Level 3 34% 32 21

Level 4 10% 9 3

Level 1 3% 5 6

Level 2 12% 15 20

Level 3 58% 58 62

Level 4 27% 22 12

26 18 16

33 29 35

39 53 45

2 0 4

Grade 4
Mathematics
Proficient 0

Grade

8
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade (Multiple)
Mathematics
Proficient 0

Mathematics
Students in: Level 1 All Schools 20% Title I Schools 22 Economically 34 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency 54 Migratory Students 36 Students with Disabilities 50 Level 2 33% 34 39 Level 3 37% 35 23 Level 4 10% 9 4

Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Level 1 8% 8 14

Level 2 25% 27 36

Level 3 45% 45 40

Level 4 22% 20 10

Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Level 1 7% 10 12

Level 2 12% 15 21

Level 3 39% 40 44

Level 4 42% 35 23

28 14 27

43 46 36

24 31 32

5 9 5

31 40 33

13 22 16

2 2 1

24 17 17

21 24 40

35 47 32

20 12 11

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

n/a
1994-95

4%
2000-01

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

70%

64%

KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

77