North Carolina

North Carolina
http://www.dpi.state.nc.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$6,346 121 93

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 1,165 401 304 24 1,894

2001-02 1,314 456 342 75 2,187

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 34,008 15,990 18,645 963 69,606

2001-02 42,379 20,157 22,790 1,592 86,918

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 87% 79 73 88 2000 81% 64 75 93

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 8,469 798,816 305,060 1,103,876

2001-02 9,320 946,645 359,398 1,306,043

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 1% 2 31 5 60 2001-02 12% 2000-01 4%

2% 1 30 1 66 1993-94 11% 1993-94 1%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2001-02 1% 2% All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program† (CCD, 2001-02)

†132 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Sixty percent of students at or above grade level in reading, writing and math (grades 3-8); and 60 percent in reading, writing, math, science and social studies (grades 9-12). Expected School Improvement on Assessment Annual growth/gain over a baseline set for each school. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Meet growth expectations and 50 percent students at grade level, or above 60 percent at grade level without growth.

Title I 2001-02

(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement

Schoolwide Programs 749 70% 696 69% 12 75%

Targeted Assistance 320 28% 308 31% 4 25%

Total 1,069 100% 1,004 94% 16 1%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

Title I Allocation

$188,921,237

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 32% 65 41% 85 Grade 8 28% 82 35% 74

North Carolina
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: North Carolina End of Grade or End of Course Test. State Definition of Proficient: Level III--mastery of grade level subject matter and skills and are prepared for next grade level. Elementary School Grade 4 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Level I/Level II Level III Level IV

23% 30 35

45% 47 49

32% 23 16

49
40 51

44 46 39

7 14 10

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

Grade 4 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Level I/Level II Level III Level IV

11% 16 18

46% 52 57

43% 32 25

21
18 27

58 55 53

21 27 20

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Level III

Middle School Grade 8 Reading Students in:
Key * —

Level I/Level

Level III

Level IV
n/a # = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

High Poverty Schools

North Carolina
II

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

15% 22 28

45% 51 53

40% 27 19

54
45 46

39 45 42

7 10 12

Grade 8 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Level I/Level II Level III Level IV

17% 25 31

36% 42 43

47% 33 26

43 32 49

38 45 36

19 23 15

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Level III

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

High School Grade 9 English I Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Level I/Level II Level III Level IV

31% 62

40% 31 *

29% 7 *

73 23 72

23 28 23

4 6 5

Grade 9 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Level I/Level II Level III Level IV

21% 26

41% 37 *

38% 37 *

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

36 21 49

44 50 38

20 29 13

1993-94
n/a%

2000-01
6%

1994-95
51%

2000-01
65%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies