North Carolina

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.ncpublicschools.org
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) 1993-94 8,469 Pre-K 798,816 K-8 305,060 9-12 Total (K-12) 1,103,876
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$6,346 121

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

2001-02 9,320 946,645 359,398 1,306,043
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 1,165 Elementary 401 Middle 304 High 24 Combined 1,894 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 1,314 456 342 75 2,187 2001-02 42,379 20,157 22,790 1,592 86,918
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives 2% 1 Asian/Pacific Islander 30 Black 1 Hispanic 66 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 1% 2 31 5 60 — 2001-02 12% 2001-02 2%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 1%
○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 132 schools did not report.

756 497 527 311

State 66%

Federal 7% Local 26%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

78

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 87% 81% English 79 64 Math 73 75 Science 88 93 Social Studies

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)

1993-94 1%

2000-01 4%

1993-94 34,008 15,990 18,645 963 69,606
○ ○ ○

1993-94 11%

93

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Sixty percent of students at or above grade level in reading, writing and math (grades 3-8); and 60 percent in reading, writing, math, science and social studies (grades 9-12). Expected School Improvement on Assessment Annual growth/gain over a baseline set for each school. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Meet growth expectations and 50 percent students at grade level, or above 60 percent at grade level without growth.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Programs

Targeted Total Assistance

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP goal Schools in need of improvement

749 70% 696 69% 12 75%

320 1,069 30% 100% 308 1,004 31% 94% 4 16 25% 1%

Title I allocation

$188,921,237

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

32% 65

28% 72

41% 85

32% 71

North Carolina
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

North Carolina End of Grade or End of Course Test. Level III—mastery of grade level subject matter and skills and are prepared for next grade level.

Elementary School
Grade 4
Reading
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Reading
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 9
English I
Proficient 0

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

Level I/II 23% 30 35

Level III 45% 47 49

Level IV 32% 23 16

Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Level I/II 15% 22 28

Level III 45% 51 53

Level IV 40% 27 19

Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Level I/II 31% 62

Level III 40% 31

Level IV 29% 7

○○

○○

○○

○○

○○

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○ ○

49 40 51

44 46 39

7 14 10

54 45 46

39 45 42

7 10 12

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

73 66 72

23 28 23

4 6 5

Grade 4
Mathematics
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Mathematics
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade 9
Algebra I
Proficient 0

All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Students in:

Level I/II 11% 16 18

Level III 46% 52 57

Level IV 43% 32 25

Students in:

Level I/II 17% 25 31

Level III 36% 42 43

Level IV 47% 33 26

Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Level III
100 80 60 40 20 0
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Level III
100 80 60 40 20 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 76 78 80 80 83

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

21 18 27

58 55 53

21 27 20

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Level I/II 21% 26

Level III 41% 37

Level IV 38% 37

○ ○

43 32 49

38 45 36

19 23 15

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

36 21 49

44 50 38

20 29 13

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

71

71

72

74

77

n/a
1994-95

6%
2000-01

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

51%

65%

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

79