North Dakota

North Dakota
http://www.dpi.state.nd.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$6,125 234 0

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 352 34 204 9 599

2001-02 309 36 181 1 527

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 3,974 848 2,715 94 7,631

2001-02 3,887 972 2,789 38 7,686

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 80% 87 85 77 2000 66% 83 85 74

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Dakota

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 615 83,512 35,000 118,512

2001-02 721 69,733 35,593 105,326

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 8% 1 1 1 89 2001-02 11% 2000-01 8%

6% 1 1 1 90 1993-94 9% 1993-94 7%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Dakota

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2001-02 1% 1% All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program (CCD, 2001-02)

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Fifty percent of students at Proficient level or higher. Expected School Improvement on Assessment None. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Gain two points on composite assessment score.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

Schoolwide Programs 36 13% 24 10% 24 83% $23,097,242

Targeted Assistance 233 28% 217 90% 5 17%

Total 269 100% 241 90% 29 11%

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Dakota

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 32% 69 34% 83 Grade 8 39% 82 36% 81

North Dakota
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: North Dakota State Assessment. State Definition of Proficient: See Appendix A. Elementary School Grade 4 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

9% 8 14

18% 18 24

53% 53 49

21% 20 13

22
* 28

30
* 31

39
* 35

8
* 6

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Dakota

Grade 4 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Novice Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

14% 14 23

30% 31 35

37% 37 31

18% 18 11

30
* 36

38
* 38

23
* 20

9
* 6

Middle School Grade 8 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 8 Mathematics
Key n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Novice

Partially Proficient

Proficient

Advanced Proficient

14% 13 22

21% 21 27

50% 51 43

16% 16 8

53
* 47

22
* 34

21
* 18

4
* 1

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

North Dakota

Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 12 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 12 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged
Key

Novice

Partially Proficient

Proficient

Advanced Proficient

13% 12 22

46% 46 51

32% 32 22

10% 10 4

44 * 47

48 * 47

7 * 6

1 * *

High School

Novice

Partially Proficient

Proficient

Advanced Proficient

23% 22 34

27% 27 28

32% 32 26

19% 18 12

53 * 67

27 * 22

18 * 7

1 * 3

Novice

Partially Proficient

Proficient

Advanced Proficient

26% 25 40

41% 41 39

20% 21 14

13% 13 7

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Dakota

Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment

59 * 75

24 * 19

9 * 4

8 * 2

1993-94
3%

2000-01
2%

1994-95
68%
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

2000-01
69%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies