Ohio

Ohio
http://www.ode.state.oh.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$7,571 662 63

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 2,203 663 669 103 3,638

2001-02 2,173 730 755 122 3,780

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 45,530 19,776 28,382 3,615 97,303

2001-02 49,396 24,367 34,987 2,790 111,540

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 74% 64 75 79 2000 54% 77 69 70

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Ohio

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 17,210 1,268,464 517,122 1,785,586

2001-02 22,321 1,238,888 592,116 1,831,004

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 * 1% 16 8 2001-02 10% 2000-01 1%

*% 1 15 1 83 1993-94 10% 1993-94 1%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Ohio

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2001-02 * 1% All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program† (CCD, 2001-02)

† 402 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Grades 4, 6: 75 percent or above of students proficient; grade 9: 75 percent or above of students proficient; grade 10: 85 percent or above of students proficient. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Schools must gain 2.5 percentage points on two-thirds of performance indicators not met the previous year; progress toward higher level. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Schools must gain 2.5 percent point gain from previous year on grades 4 and 6 test, reading and mathematics, or 75 percent Proficient.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement
Key

Schoolwide Programs 1,010 48% 663 40% 151 94%

Targeted Assistance 1,084 28% 989 60% 10 6%
n/a # High Poverty Schools

Total 2,094 100% 1,652 79% 161 8%

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Ohio

Title I Allocation

$323,923,863

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 34% 68 36% 81 Grade 8 34% 78 30% 73

Ohio
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Ohio Proficiency Test. State Definition of Proficient: Reading: Grade 4: at least 217; Grade 6: at least 222 Math: Grade 4: at least 218; Grade 6: at least 200 Elementary School Grade 4 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency
Key

Partially Proficient

Proficient

Advanced

34% 35 *

61% 59 *

5% 6 *

57

40

3
n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Ohio

Migratory students Students with Disabilities

64 52

34 45

2 3

Grade 4 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced

38% 41 *

47% 45 *

15% 14 *

49 54 54

38 38 37

13 8 9

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient

Middle School Grade 6 Reading Students in:
Key

Partially Proficient

Proficient

Advanced

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Ohio

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

44% 50 *

35% 32 *

21% 18 *

69 66 68

22 21 24

9 13 8

Grade 6 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced

41% 47

50% 46

9% 7

50 58 64

40 34 33

10 8 3

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 6th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Ohio

High School†† Grade Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

Grade Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Ohio

Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
††High school assessment results not available for 2001-02.

High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

1993-94
5%

2000-01
4%

1994-95
51%

2000-01
56%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies