Ohio

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.ode.state.oh.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$7,571 662

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 17,210 1,268,464 517,122 1,785,586
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 22,321 1,238,888 592,116 1,831,004
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 2,203 Elementary 663 Middle 669 High 103 Combined 3,638 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 2,173 730 755 122 3,780 2001-02 49,396 24,367 34,987 2,790 111,540
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 * American Indian/Alaskan Natives 1% Asian/Pacific Islander 15 Black 1 Hispanic 83 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 * 1% 16 2 81 — 2001-02 10% 2001-02 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100% 195 513 458

2,029

State 43%

Federal 6% Local 51%

Intermediate *

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

82

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

^ 402 schools did not report.

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 74% 54% English 64 77 Math 75 69 Science 79 70 Social Studies

1993-94 *

1993-94 45,530 19,776 28,382 3,615 97,303
○ ○ ○

1993-94 10%

63

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Grades 4, 6: 75 percent or above of students proficient; grade 9: 75 percent or above of students proficient; grade 10: 85 percent or above of students proficient. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Schools must gain 2.5 percentage points on two-thirds of performance indicators not met the previous year; progress toward higher level. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Schools must gain 2.5 percent point gain from previous year on grades 4 and 6 test, reading and mathematics, or 75 percent Proficient.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

1,010 1,084 2,094 48% 52% 100% 663 989 1,652 Schools meeting AYP goal 40% 60% 79% 10 161 Schools in need of improvement 151 94% 6% 8%
Number of schools

Title I allocation

$323,923,863

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

34% 68

34% 78

36% 81

30% 73

Ohio
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Ohio Proficiency Test. Reading: Grade 4: at least 217; Grade 6: at least 222. Math: Grade 4: at least 218; Grade 6: at least 200.

Elementary School
Grade 4
Reading
Partially Students in: Proficient All Schools 34% Title I Schools 35 Economically * Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

Grade 6
Reading
Partially Students in: Proficient All Schools 44% Title I Schools 50 Economically * Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

Middle School

High School ^ ^
Grade
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

○○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

Proficient 61% 59 *

Advanced 5% 6 *

Proficient 35% 32 *

Advanced 21% 18 *

○○

○○

○○

○○

○○

57 64 52

40 34 45

3 2 3

69 66 68

22 21 24

9 13 8

Grade 4
Mathematics
Partially Students in: Proficient All Schools 38% Title I Schools 41 Economically * Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

Grade 6
Mathematics
Partially Students in: Proficient All Schools 41% Title I Schools 47 Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Grade
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Proficient 47% 45 *

Advanced 15% 14 *

Proficient 50% 46

Advanced 9% 7

49 54 54

38 38 37

13 8 9

50 58 64

40 34 33

10 8 3

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient
100 80 60 40 20 0
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 6th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient
100 80 60 40 20 0 2001 2002 61 59

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

66 56

5%
1994-95

4%
2000-01

2001

2002

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college) ^^

51%

56%

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

High school assessment results not available for 2001-02.
R E F E R T O S O U R C E S , P A G E 1 1 7

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

83