Oklahoma

Oklahoma
http://sde.state.ok.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$6,019 544 10

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 993 341 458 1,792

2001-02 984 345 463 1 1,793

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 19,946 7,706 9,703 37,355

2001-02 20,577 8,392 11,125 22 40,116

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 78% 74 62 71 2000 57% 70 67 53

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oklahoma

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 5,456 434,412 162,511 596,923

2001-02 25,707 417,805 175,124 592,929

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 17% 1 11 6 64 2001-02 13% 2000-01 7%

14% 1 10 3 72 1993-94 11% 1993-94 4%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oklahoma

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2001-02 1% 1% All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program† (CCD, 2001-02)

† 3 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Seventy percent of students score Satisfactory on index for reading and math for 2001-02, baseline year. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Annual improvement toward Satisfactory rating. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Five percent gain in Satisfactory scores in schools with less than 50 percent Satisfactory in reading or math for 2001-02 baseline year. Meeting or exceeding statewide performanc e targets in math and reading.

Title I 2001-02

(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement

Schoolwide Programs 787 66% 761 66% 25 89%

Targeted Assistance 402 28% 399 34% 3 11%

Total 1,189 100% 1,160 98% 28 2%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oklahoma

Title I Allocation

$109,173,930

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 26% 60 22% 73 Grade 8 30% 74 20% 64

Oklahoma
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests. State Definition of Proficient: Satisfactory. Elementary School Grade 5 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Unsatisfactor y Limited Knowledge Satisfactory Advanced

15% 9

21% 16

56% 57

7% 4

17
22 56

39
40 26

41 39 18

3 3 1

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oklahoma

Grade 5 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Unsatisfactor y Limited Knowledge Satisfactory Advanced

11% 6

26% 20

47% 50

16% 10

14
17 43

29
34 37

48 46 18

9 10 3

Student Achievement Trend Reading 5th grade Meets or Exceeds Satisfactory

Middle School Grade 8 Reading Students in:
Key

Unsatisfactor y

Limited Knowledge

Satisfactory

Advanced

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oklahoma

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

10% 6

20% 16

62% 61

8% 5

19
17 47

30
32 31

48 54 22

3 27 1

Grade 8 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Unsatisfactor y Limited Knowledge Satisfactory Advanced

12% 7

26% 21

51% 48 50

13% 10 7

18 16 43

36 29 41

38 52 16

7 7 1

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Satisfactory

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oklahoma

High School Grade English II Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Unsatisfactor y Limited Knowledge Satisfactory Advanced

17% 27

22% 27

55% 47 50

7% 4 3

40 47 65

35 24 24

25 33 13

1 0 1

Grade†† Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
††High school mathematics assessment results not available for 2001-02.

High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
Key * —

1993-94
5%

2000-01
5%

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oklahoma

1994-95 Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

2000-01
50%

49%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies