Oklahoma

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://sde.state.ok.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$6,019 544

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 5,456 434,412 162,511 596,923
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 25,707 417,805 175,124 592,929
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 993 Elementary 341 Middle 458 High Combined 1,792 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 984 345 463 1 1,793 2001-02 20,577 8,392 11,125 22 40,116
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives 14% 1 Asian/Pacific Islander 10 Black 3 Hispanic 72 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 17% 1 11 6 64 — 2001-02 13% 2001-02 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 4%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 7%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Federal 10% State 59%

Local 29% Intermediate 2%

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 3 schools did not report.

374 335 689 413

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

84

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 78% 57% English 74 70 Math 62 67 Science 71 53 Social Studies

1993-94 1%

1993-94 19,946 7,706 9,703 37,355
○ ○ ○

1993-94 11%

10

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Seventy percent of students score Satisfactory on index for reading and math for 2001-02, baseline year. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Annual improvement toward Satisfactory rating. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Five percent gain in Satisfactory scores in schools with less than 50 percent Satisfactory in reading or math for 2001-02 baseline year. Meeting or exceeding statewide performanc e targets in math and reading.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

787 66% 761 Schools meeting AYP goal 66% Schools in need of improvement 25 89%
Number of schools

402 1,189 34% 100% 399 1,160 34% 98% 3 28 11% 2%

Title I allocation

$109,173,930

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

26% 60

30% 74

22% 73

20% 64

Oklahoma
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests. Satisfactory.

Elementary School
Grade 5
Reading
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Reading
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 10
English II
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

○○

○○

9

16

57

4

○○

6

16

61

5

Unsatis- Limited Satisfactory Knowledge factory 15% 21% 56%

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

Adv. 7%

Students with Limited English Proficiency 17 Migratory Students 22 Students with Disabilities 56

39 40 26

41 39 18

3 3 1

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Unsatis- Limited Satisfactory Knowledge factory 10% 20% 62%

Adv. 8%

Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Unsatis- Limited Satisfactory Knowledge factory 17% 22% 55% 27 27 50

Adv. 7% 3

○○

○○

○ ○

19 17 47

30 32 31

48 54 22

3 27 1

Students with Limited English Proficiency 40 Migratory Students 47 Students with Disabilities 65

35 24 24

25 33 13

1 0 1

Grade 5
Mathematics
Unsatis- Limited SatisStudents in: factory Knowledge factory All Schools 11% 26% 47% Title I Schools Economically 6 20 50 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency 14 Migratory Students 17 Students with Disabilities 43
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Mathematics
Unsatis- Limited SatisStudents in: factory Knowledge factory All Schools 12% 26% 51% Title I Schools Economically 7 21 50 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency 18 36 38 Migratory Students 16 29 52 Students with Disabilities 43 41 16 Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Satisfactory
100 80 65 60 40 20 0 2000 2001 2002 63 64
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Grade^^
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Adv. 16% 10

Adv. 13% 7

29 34 37

48 46 18

9 10 3

7 7 1

Student Achievement Trend Reading 5th grade Meets or Exceeds Satisfactory
100 80 60 40 20 0
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

68

66

63

5%
1994-95

5%
2000-01

2000

2001

2002

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

49%

50%

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

^^

High school mathematics assessment results not available for 2001-02.
R E F E R T O S O U R C E S , P A G E 1 1 7

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

85