Oregon

Oregon
http://www.ode.state.or.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$7,528 198 16

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 748 198 191 36 1,173

2001-02 759 222 239 47 1,267

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 12,656 5,246 7,273 529 25,704

2001-02 12,989 6,003 8,090 508 27,590

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 61% 61 93 79 2000 68% 60 74 57

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oregon

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 837 365,488 147,819 513,307

2001-02 454 378,511 167,042 545,553

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 2% 5 3 12 79 2001-02 11% 2000-01 9%

2% 3 2 6 87 1993-94 10% 1993-94 4%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oregon

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2001-02 5% 7% All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program (CCD, 2001-02)

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment School performance over 60 on 125 point index (tests, attendance, dropout rates). Expected School Improvement on Assessment Improvement by 3.3 points on index over three years. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Annual increase in percent students meeting standards in language arts, math.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

Schoolwide Programs 270 48% 229 44% 8 100% $95,200,001

Targeted Assistance 296 28% 293 56% 0%

Total 566 100% 522 92% 8 1%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oregon
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 31% 64 33% 79 Grade 8 33% 74 32% 70

Oregon
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Oregon Statewide Assessment System. State Definition of Proficient: Meets or exceeds standard. Elementary School Grade 3 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Did Not Meet Meets Exceeds

15% 17 13

36% 39 33

49% 43 53

35 37 39

46 45 38

19 18 23

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oregon

Grade 3 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Did Not Meet Meets Exceeds

23% 29 20

43% 45 41

34% 26 39

46 51 47

40 40 38

14 9 15

Student Achievement Trend Reading 3rd grade Meets or Exceeds Standard

Middle School Grade 8 Reading Students in: All schools
Key

Did Not Meet

Meets

Exceeds

36%

30%

34%
n/a # = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

High Poverty Schools

Oregon

Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

43 31

31 31

26 38

74 66 76

19 24 17

7 10 7

Grade 8 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Did Not Meet Meets Exceeds

44% 55 38

24% 23 25

34% 22 37

72 73 82

18 19 11

10 8 7

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Standard

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Oregon

High School Grade 10 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Did Not Meet Meets Exceeds

47% 59 42

35% 30 37

18% 11 20

85 82 87

13 17 12

2 1 1

Grade 10 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary
Key

Did Not Meet

Meets

Exceeds

55% 72 50

27% 20 29

18% 8 21

85 85 90

11 11 8

4 1 2

1993-94
7%

2000-01
5%

1994-95
57%

2000-01
51%
n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Oregon

enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies