South Dakota

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.state.sd.us/deca
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$6,191 176

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 612 100,054 39,971 140,025
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 1,171 85,589 40,479 126,068
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 373 Elementary 190 Middle 181 High — Combined 744 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 373 177 176 12 738 2001-02 4,441 1,947 2,768 75 9,231
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives 13% 1 Asian/Pacific Islander 1 Black 1 Hispanic 85 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 10% 1 1 1 86 — 2001-02 10% 2001-02 2%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 3%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 5%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 71 schools did not report.

357 148 102 71

State 35%

Federal 12%

Local 51%

Intermediate 2%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

96

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 73% 74% English 67 76 Math 72 72 Science 61 68 Social Studies

1993-94 1%

1993-94 4,627 2,067 2,768 — 9,462
○ ○ ○

1993-94 9%

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment School accreditation. Expected School Improvement on Assessment None. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Five percent gain from Below Basic to Basic or from Basic to Proficient.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Programs

Targeted Total Assistance

107 30% 29 Schools meeting AYP goal 20% 8 Schools in need of improvement 62%
Number of schools

254 70% 117 80% 5 38%

361 100% 146 40% 13 4%

Title I allocation

$23,961,449

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

33% 68

39% 82

34% 82

35% 78

South Dakota
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Stanford Achievement Test, Version 9. Demonstrated solid academic performance.

Elementary School
Grade 4
Reading
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Below Basic
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Reading
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Below Basic
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 11
Reading
Proficient 0

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

Basic

Proficient Advanced

Basic

Proficient Advanced

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

11% 12 18

27% 28 36

44% 43 36

18% 17 10

7% 10 13

25% 30 39

48% 44 41

20% 15 11

Students with Limited English Proficiency 38 Migratory Students 17 Students with Disabilities 28

Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

Below Basic

○○

Basic

Proficient Advanced

○○

12% 30 33

48% 47 47

27% 21 18

3% 2 2

○○

○○

○○

○ ○

39 46 38

20 29 27

3 8 7

26 14 34

47 35 60

20 38 5

7 14 *

Students with Limited English Proficiency 56 Migratory Students 50 Students with Disabilities 71

32 25 24

13 17 4

0 8 *

Grade 4
Mathematics
Students in: Basic All Schools 8% Title I Schools 9 Economically 14 Disadvantaged Students
Below
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Mathematics
Students in: Basic All Schools 24% Title I Schools Economically 39 Disadvantaged Students
Below
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade 11
Mathematics
Students in: Basic All Schools 29% Title I Schools 36 Economically 42 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency 61 Migratory Students 50 Students with Disabilities 83
Below
Proficient 0

27% 29 36

43% 44 36

21% 19 13

43% 42

29% 18

4% 1

Basic

Proficient Advanced

Basic

Proficient Advanced

Basic

Proficient Advanced

51% 48 46

17% 14 11

2% 1 1

Students with Limited English Proficiency 32 42 Migratory Students 12 48 Students with Disabilities 23 37 Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient
100 80 63 60 40 20 0 2001
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

24 33 30

2 8 10

Students with Limited English Proficiency 65 29 6 Migratory Students 43 35 22 Students with Disabilities 67 28 5 Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient
100 80 60 40 20 0 2001 2002 33 33

0 0 0

26 33 13

13 17 4

0 0 *

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

62

5%
1994-95

4%
2000-01

2002

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

50%

64%

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

97