Tennessee

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)
○ ○

http://www.state.tn.us/education
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$5,687 138

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 9,976 603,041 236,542 839,583
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 639,837 241,844 881,681
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 942 Elementary 237 Middle 246 High 49 Combined 1,474 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 969 282 283 67 1,601 2001-02 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 * American Indian/Alaskan Natives 1% Asian/Pacific Islander 23 Black 1 Hispanic 76 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2001-02 12% 2001-02 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 *
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Data not available.

Federal 9% State 44%
KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a
= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Local 47%

98

#

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 73% 73% English 59 51 Math 52 53 Science 81 69 Social Studies

1993-94 *

1993-94 25,506 8,256 12,754 1,549 48,065
○ ○ ○

1993-94 12%

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Above 50th percentile in reading and math on assessment. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Attain value-added score of 100, over three years improvement on test scores. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Improve mean performance level across grades by average of .05.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Programs

Targeted Total Assistance

561 69% 499 Schools meeting AYP goal 67% Schools in need of improvement 109 96%
Number of schools

249 31% 249 33% 4 4%

810 100% 748 92% 113 14%

Title I allocation

$145,324,689

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

26% 57

26% 69

23% 69

21% 59

Tennessee
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Tennessee Comprehensive Achievement Program, grades 3-8. Tennessee’s Gateway test, high school. Proficient or above.

School Elementary School**
Grade 3-8**
Reading
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Step 1 Progressing Nearing Proficiency Proficient Adv.

Grade
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

School Middle School **

High School School
Grade ^ ^
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

20% 25

27% 31

31% 29

16% 12

6% 4

Students with Limited English Proficiency 44 Migratory Students 39 Students with Disabilities 58

33 30 25

17 22 12

5 9 4

1 1 1

Grade 3-8**
Mathematics
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Step 1 Progressing Nearing Proficiency Proficient Adv.

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

○○

○○

○○

○○

○○

○○

Proficient 0

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

Grade
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Grade 9-12
Mathematics
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Below Proficient 23% 40 Proficient 77% 60

Proficient 0

26% 32

31% 32

29% 25

11% 8

4% 2

Students with Limited English Proficiency 43 Migratory Students 35 Students with Disabilities 60

31 39 24

18 20 11

5 4 3

2 1 1

46 29 47

54 71 53

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

5%
1994-95

4%
2000-01

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

54%

62%

KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

^^

**Data disaggregated by grade level not available. High school reading assessment results not available for 2001-02.
F O R M O R E I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

99