Texas

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.tea.state.tx.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) 1993-94 120,446 Pre-K K-8 2,560,607 927,209 9-12 Total (K-12) 3,487,816
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$6,539 1,040

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

2001-02 170,101 2,846,113 1,147,233 3,993,346
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 3,366 Elementary 1,293 Middle 1,056 High 348 Combined 6,063 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 3,870 1,533 1,384 813 7,600 2001-02 131,750 64,643 73,754 8,195 278,342
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives * 2% Asian/Pacific Islander 14 Black 36 Hispanic 48 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 * 3% 14 42 41 — 2001-02 11% 2001-02 5%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 12%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 14%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 150 schools did not report.

2,570 1,357 2,108 1,461

State 42%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

100

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Intermediate *

Federal 9%

Local 49%

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 71% 64% English 65 57 Math 70 57 Science 67 60 Social Studies

1993-94 3%

1993-94 108,043 50,827 55,763 6,806 221,439
○ ○ ○

1993-94 11%

241

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Above 50 percent passing on assessment for all racial and ethnic groups and low-income students. (Pass=70 percent correct in reading and math). Expected School Improvement on Assessment Pass rate increases 5 percent per year for each group. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Same as statewide goal.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Programs

Targeted Total Assistance

3,970 87% 3,725 Schools meeting AYP goal 88% 62 Schools in need of improvement 86%
Number of schools

589 4,559 13% 100% 505 4,230 12% 93% 10 72 14% 2%

Title I allocation

$786,011,631

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

27% 60

26% 71

33% 82

25% 69

Texas
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Texas Assessment of Academic Skills. Score of 70 or above on Texas Learning Index.

Elementary School
Grade 4
Reading
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Partially Proficient 9% 11 14
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Reading
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Partially Proficient 6% 8 11
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 10
Reading
Students in: All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Partially Proficient 6% 8 11
Proficient 0

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

Proficient 54% 58 64

Advanced 37% 31 22

Proficient 64% 68 73

Advanced 30% 24 16

Proficient 72% 76 79

Advanced 22% 16 10

○○

○○

○○

○○

○○

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○ ○

21 18 13

66 66 61

13 16 27

36 15 16

62 73 75

2 13 9

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

34 15 20

65 79 75

1 7 5

Grade 4
Mathematics
Partially Students in: Proficient All Schools 6% Title I Schools 8 Economically 10 Disadvantaged Students
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Mathematics
Partially Students in: Proficient All Schools 8% Title I Schools 10 Economically 13 Disadvantaged Students
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade 10
Mathematics
Partially Students in: Proficient All Schools 8% Title I Schools 10 Economically 14 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

Proficient 84% 85 85

Advanced 10% 8 5

Proficient 79% 80 81

Advanced 14% 10 7

Proficient 82% 83 82

Advanced 10% 6 4

Students with Limited English Proficiency 13 83 Migratory Students 10 86 Students with Disabilities 10 84 Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient
100 80 60 40 20 0
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

3 4 6

Students with Limited English Proficiency 29 68 Migratory Students 14 80 Students with Disabilities 19 78 Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient
100 83 80 60 40 20 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 88 91 93 93

2 6 3

29 14 28

69 83 71

2 4 1

89

89

91

91

91

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

n/a
1994-95

4%
2000-01

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

50%

53%

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

101