Nevada

Districts and schools
Number of districts
(CCD)

http://www.nde.state.nv.us
Students
2002-03
17 17

Staff
1993-94
Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) 1,237 173,091 60,727 233,818

1993-94

Public school enrollment (CCD)

2002-03
2,426 267,067 98,118 365,185

Number of FTE 1993-94 teachers (CCD) Elementary 6,968
Middle High Combined Other Total Instructional aides Instructional coordinators Administrators Other Total 2,113 2,584 84 n/a 11,749 1,257 87 919 7,576 9,839

2002-03
10,484 3,662 4,413 116 n/a 18,675 3,220 254 1,285 8,645 13,404

Number of public schools

(CCD)

255 57 54 4 2 372 326 84 99 10 8 527 13

Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total

Race/ethnicity (CCD)
American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Students with disabilities (OSEP) 2% 4 9 14 70 10% 6% 2% 6 10 29 53 10% 14%

Number of FTE non-teacher staff (CCD)

Number of charter schools (CCD)

Finances
Total current expenditures 1993-94
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to 2001-02, in thousands)

2001-02
$1,353,806 71,003 74,190 1,498,999

Instructional Noninstructional Support Total

Students with limited English proficiency (NCELA) Migrant students
(OME)

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000
English Mathematics Science Social studies 85% 74 88 86 70% 38 78 73

$837,716 47,856 521,430 1,407,001

1%

*

Percentage of core courses taught by highly qualified teachers, 2002-03 (As defined and reported by states, collected by ED)

Per-pupil expenditures
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to 2001-02)

$5,967

$6,079

Eighth-grade students enrolled in 1996 Algebra I for high school credit n/a
(NAEP)

2003

32%

All schools High-poverty schools Low-poverty schools

50% 50% 62%
2000-01
5% 70 40

Sources of funding
(CCD, 2001-02)

Federal 6% State 32%

Local 62%

Students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced125,660 Price Lunch Program, 2002-03 (CCD) Number of schools, by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, ^ 2002-03 (CCD)
0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 84 87 70 202

Outcomes

1993-94 High school dropout rate (NCES) 10% Avg. freshman graduation rate (NCES) 73 38 College-going rate (IPEDS/NCES) NAEP state results (NCES)
Reading, Grade 4 Proficient level or above Basic level or above Math, Grade 8 Proficient level or above Basic level or above

1994
n/a n/a

2003
20% 52

Title I allocation 2001-02
(ED; Includes Title I, Part A)

$40,690,971

75-100%

1996
n/a n/a

2003
21% 60

KEY:

68

K

— n/a # FTE

* = Less than 0.5 percent

= Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = Full Time Equivalent

^

84 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
See Appendix B for Nevada’s definitions of proficient for reading and mathematics for grades 3, 8, and high school. See http://www.nevadareportcard.com/ for more details on the statewide accountability system. State assessment for NCLB accountability: Nevada Criterion Reference Tests State student achievement levels: Approaches Standard, Developing/Emergent, Meets Standard, Exceeds Standard

Nevada

S t u d e n t A c h i e v e m e n t 2 0 0 2 - 0 3
Nevada Criterion Reference Tests, used for NCLB accountability Reading Proficient level or above for: Grade 3 Grade 8 High school
All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 51% 35 16 17 24 37 34 62 56% 45 0 15 17 43 41 65 81% 72 77 39 35 72 67 89

NCLB Accountability Goals
2001-02 Annual measurable objective starting point
Grade 3 Reading Mathematics Grade 8 Reading Mathematics High school eading R Mathematics 32.4% 37.3 37 38 91 58

Target (2002-03)
27.5% 34.5 37 32 73.5 42.8

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above

100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Grade 3
51 51 56 55

81

2003 2002 n/a 2001

2002-03 NCLB accountability results, applied to 2003-04 school year
AYP outcomes and consequences*
Made AYP Identified for improvement: Year 1 Year 2 Corrective action Restructuring Exited improvement status (made AYP twice after missing twice or more, includes total “made” above)

Title I schools
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

All schools
330 (60%) 18 (3%) 7 (1%) 0 0 0

All districts
0 1 (6%) 0 0 0 0

n/a Grade 8 High School
Grade
- - - - - - - -

Mathematics Proficient level or above for: Grade 3
All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 51% 37 16 17 30 35 37 61

High school
55% 38 27 15 18 31 33 66

Other indicator, 2002-03
Elementary indicator: Attendance Middle indicator: Attendance High school indicator: Graduation rate

State target
Meet or progress toward 90% Meet or progress toward 90% Meet or progress toward 50% 252 259

State outcome
Met Met Met * *

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Grade 3 n/a Grade 8 High School
50 51 55 39

NCLB choice participation
Title I school choice: Supplemental educational services:

Number of Title I students Percent of eligible students

2003 2002 n/a 2001

*Some AYP outcomes for this state are not available due to issues with data collection, measurement, or other reasons. For more information please visit the state’s Web site, above.

69