New Hampshire

Districts and schools
Number of districts
(CCD)

http://www.ed.state.nh.us
Students
2002-03
178

Staff
1993-94
Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) 1,292 134,367 49,098 183,465

1993-94
178

Public school enrollment (CCD)

2002-03
1,923 141,139 63,988 205,127

Number of FTE 1993-94 teachers (CCD) Elementary 5,767
Middle High Combined Other Total Instructional aides Instructional coordinators Administrators Other Total 2,711 3,493 n/a n/a 11,971 2,902 128 807 6,093 9,930

2002-03
6,845 3,619 4,465 n/a n/a 14,929 6,050 196 1,028 7,836 15,110

Number of public schools

(CCD)

293 91 77 n/a n/a 461 298 96 78 n/a 1 473 0

Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total

Race/ethnicity (CCD)
American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Students with disabilities (OSEP) * 1% 1 1 97 11% 1% * 2% 1 2 94 12% 2%

Number of FTE non-teacher staff (CCD)

Number of charter schools (CCD)

Finances
Total current expenditures 1993-94
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to 2001-02, in thousands)

2001-02
$1,064,917 52,283 524,179 1,641,379

Instructional Noninstructional Support Total

Students with limited English proficiency (NCELA) Migrant students
(OME)

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000
English Mathematics Science Social studies 90% 76 91 90 73% 69 90 88

$827,873 45,576 415,900 1,289,349

*

*

Percentage of core courses taught by highly qualified teachers, 2002-03 (As defined and reported by states, collected by ED)

Per-pupil expenditures
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to 2001-02)

$6,955

$7,935

Eighth-grade students enrolled in 1996 Algebra I for high school credit n/a
(NAEP)

2003

27%

All schools High-poverty schools Low-poverty schools

86% 84% 88%
2000-01
5% 78 59

Sources of funding
(CCD, 2001-02)

Federal 5%

Local 43%

Students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced32,132 Price Lunch Program, 2002-03 (CCD) Number of schools, by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, ^ 2002-03 (CCD)
0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 39 14 1 404

Outcomes

State 52%

1993-94 High school dropout rate (NCES) n/a Avg. freshman graduation rate (NCES) 81% 56 College-going rate (IPEDS/NCES) NAEP state results (NCES)
Reading, Grade 4 Proficient level or above Basic level or above Math, Grade 8 Proficient level or above Basic level or above

1994
36% 70

2003
40% 75

Title I allocation 2001-02
(ED; Includes Title I, Part A)

$29,733,465

75-100%

1996
n/a n/a

2003
35% 79

KEY:

70

K

— n/a # FTE

* = Less than 0.5 percent

= Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = Full Time Equivalent

^

15 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
See Appendix B for New Hampshire’s definitions of basic for reading and mathematics for grades 3, 6, and high school. See http://www.ed.state.nh.us/education/doe/organization/curriculum/Assessment/materials04.htm for more details on the statewide accountability system. State assessment for NCLB accountability: New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program State student achievement levels: Novice, Basic, Proficient, Advanced

New Hampshire

S t u d e n t A c h i e v e m e n t 2 0 0 2 - 0 3
New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Reading Proficient level or above for: Grade 3 Grade 6 High school
All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 77% 58 # 31 43 62 57 77 72% 53 # 26 26 60 54 72 70% 51 # 25 16 47 47 71

NCLB Accountability Goals
2001-02 Annual measurable objective starting point
Grade 3 Reading Mathematics Grade 6 Reading Mathematics High school eading R Mathematics 60% 64 60 64 70 52

Target (2002-03)
60% 64 60 64 70 52

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above

100% 75%

77

72

70

2003 n/a 2002 n/a 2001

50% 25% Grade 3 Grade 6 High School Mathematics Proficient level or above for: Grade 3 Grade 6
All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 80% 67 # 52 58 64 64 80 74% 57 # 35 36 51 56 74

2002-03 NCLB accountability results, applied to 2003-04 school year
AYP outcomes and consequences
Made AYP Identified for improvement: Year 1 Year 2 Corrective action Restructuring Exited improvement status (made AYP twice after missing twice or more, includes total “made” above)

Title I schools
201 (75%) 4 2 0 0 3 (*) (*) (*)

All schools
321 (69%) 4 2 0 0 3 (*) (*) (*)

All districts
118 (73%) 0 0 0 0 0

0%

High school
63% 44 # 20 29 41 41 64

Other indicator, 2002-03
Elementary indicator: Attendance Middle indicator: Attendance High school indicator: Graduation rate

State target
Meet or progress toward 90% Meet or progress toward 90% Meet or progress toward 75% 1 15

State outcome
Met Met Met * *

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

100% 75% 50% 25% 0%

80

74

NCLB choice participation
Title I school choice: Supplemental educational services:

Number of Title I students Percent of eligible students

63

2003 n/a 2002 n/a 2001

Grade 3

Grade 6 High School

71