State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04

Kansas
http://www.ksbe.state.ks.us

Districts and schools
Number of districts
(CCD)

1993-94 304

2003-04 304

Number of public schools (CCD) Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total Number of charter schools (CCD)

1993-94 875 236 359 5 7 1,482

2003-04 782 258 359 2 9 1,410 2003-04 14

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Finances
Total current expenditures
(CCD, in thousands of dollars, adjusted for inflation to 200203)

Instructional Noninstructional Support Total Per-pupil expenditures
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to

1993-94 $1,713,953 145,461 1,103,416 2,962,830

2002-03 $2,078,415 162,303 1,269,958 3,510,675

2002-03)

1993-94 $6,474

2002-03 $7,454

Sources of Funding
(CCD, 2002-03)

Title I allocation 2002-03 (ED;
Includes Title I, Part A)

$87,046,905

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Students
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)

1993-94 3,901 324,222 126,394 450,616 1993-94 1% 2 8 5 83

2003-04 2,446 309,113 142,932 452,045 2003-04 1% 2 9 11 76

Race/ethnicity (CCD) American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

1993-94 9%

2003-04 12%

Students with limited English proficiency (NCELA)

1993-94 2% 1993-94 3%

2003-04 6% 2003-04 3%

Migrant students (OME)

Eighth-grade students enrolled in Algebra I for high school credit (NAEP)

1996 -

2003 28%

Students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, 2003-04 (CCD)

175,846

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, 2003-04

(CCD)

1 school did not report

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Staff
Number of FTE teachers (CCD) Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total Number of FTE non-teacher staff (CCD) Instructional aides Instructional coordinators Administrators Other Total Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) English Mathematics Science Social Studies 1993-94 14,896 5,702 9,205 79 107 29,989 1993-94 4,178 166 2,103 19,053 25,500 2003-04 15,464 6,612 10,442 67 86 32,671 2003-04 7,085 118 2,948 21,038 31,189

1994 63% 63 78 73

2000 66% 58 73 71

Percentage of core courses taught by highly qualified teachers, 2003-04 (As defined and reported by states, collected by ED)

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Outcomes

High school dropout rate (NCES) Avg. freshman graduation rate
(NCES)

1993-94 80% 57

2000-01 3% 77 68

College-going rate (IPEDS/NCES)

NAEP state results Reading, Grade 4 Proficient level or above Basic level or above Math, Grade 8 Proficient level or above Basic level or above

1994 1996 -

2005 33% 67 2005 34% 76

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Statewide Accountability Information:
State Accountability Website: http://www.ksbe.state.ks.us/ayp/2003_Kansas_State_Assessment_Highlights.p df State assessment for NCLB accountability: Kansas Assessment Program State student achievement levels: Unsatisfactory, Basic, Proficient, Advanced, Exemplary

Grade 5 Grade 4 Grade 8 Grade 7 Grade 11 Grade 10

Reading Mathemati cs Reading Mathemati cs Reading Mathemati cs

2001-02 Annual measurable objective starting point 51.2% 46.8 51.2 46.8 44 29.1

Target 2003-04 51.2% 46.8 51.2 46.8 44 29.1

2003-04 NCLB accountability results, applied to 200405 school year
AYP outcomes and consequences Made AYP Identified for improvement: Year 1 Year 2 Corrective action Restructuring Exited improvement status (made AYP twice after missing twice or more, includes total “made” above) Title I schools 613 96% 14 2 2 3 15 2% * * * 2% All schools 1,263 93% 14 2 2 3 15 1% * * * 1% All districts 286 95% 6 0 1 0 0 2% 0 * 0 0

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Other indicator, 2003-04 Elementary Indicator: Attendance Middle Indicator: Attendance High School Indicator: Graduation rate

State target 90% or improvement over previous year 90% or improvement over previous year 75% or improvement over previous year

State outcome Met Met Met

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

NCLB choice participation Title I school choice: Supplemental educational services:

Number of Title I students 212 62

Percent of eligible students 1% 13%

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Student Achievement 2003-04
Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 3 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 3 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 4 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 4 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 80% 70 63 67 58 61 65 84

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 5 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 71% 59 53 51 50 52 55 76

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 5 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 6 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 6 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 7 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 7 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 64% 47 34 40 26 36 41 71

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 8 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 74% 59 55 44 52 53 57 78

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 8 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 11 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 61% 43 33 29 33 33 39 66

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Kansas

Kansas Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 10 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 49% 29 20 22 13 18 24 54

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available