State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04

Michigan
http://www.mde.state.mi.us

Districts and schools
Number of districts
(CCD)

1993-94 558

2003-04 553

Number of public schools (CCD) Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total Number of charter schools (CCD)

1993-94 1,888 537 559 57 55 3,096

2003-04 2,115 646 675 171 262 3,869 2003-04 202

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Finances
Total current expenditures
(CCD, in thousands of dollars, adjusted for inflation to 200203)

Instructional Noninstructional Support Total Per-pupil expenditures
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to

1993-94 $7,252,204 363,713 4,892,689 12,508,606

2002-03 $8,929,871 479,990 6,264,837 15,674,698

2002-03)

1993-94 $7,821

2002-03 $8,781

Sources of Funding
(CCD, 2002-03)

Title I allocation 2002-03 (ED;
Includes Title I, Part A)

$420,799,581

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Students
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)

1993-94 15,165 1,067,300 419,468 1,468,768 1993-94 1% 1 17 2 78

2003-04 21,146 1,174,601 512,762 1,687,363 2003-04 1% 2 20 4 73

Race/ethnicity (CCD) American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

1993-94 9%

2003-04 12%

Students with limited English proficiency (NCELA)

1993-94 3% 1993-94 1%

2003-04 4% 2003-04 1%

Migrant students (OME)

Eighth-grade students enrolled in Algebra I for high school credit (NAEP)

1996 29%

2003 21%

Students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, 2003-04 (CCD)

570,422

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, 2003-04

(CCD)

492 schools did not report

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Staff
Number of FTE teachers (CCD) Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total Number of FTE non-teacher staff (CCD) Instructional aides Instructional coordinators Administrators Other Total Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) English Mathematics Science Social Studies 1993-94 35,403 15,223 20,702 1,105 721 73,154 1993-94 12,629 915 6,599 68,873 89,016 2003-04 41,865 19,623 24,154 3,249 3,040 91,931 2003-04 25,170 3,457 8,241 72,152 109,020

1994 67% 61 73 88

2000 64% 68 72 66

Percentage of core courses taught by highly qualified teachers, 2003-04 (As defined and reported by states, collected by ED)

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Outcomes

High school dropout rate (NCES) Avg. freshman graduation rate
(NCES)

1993-94 74% 60

2000-01 75% 54

College-going rate (IPEDS/NCES)

NAEP state results Reading, Grade 4 Proficient level or above Basic level or above Math, Grade 8 Proficient level or above Basic level or above

1994 1996 28% 67

2005 31% 62 2005 30% 68

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Statewide Accountability Information:
State Accountability Website: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/State_Report_Card_200304_120358_7.doc State assessment for NCLB accountability: Michigan Educational Assessment Program State student achievement levels: Basic, Below Basic, Met Exceptations, Exceeds Expectations

Grade 4 Grade 8 High school

Reading or language arts Mathematics Reading or language arts Mathematics Reading or language arts Mathematics

2001-02 Annual measurable objective starting point 38% 47 31 31 42 33

Target 2003-04 38% 47 31 31 42 33

2003-04 NCLB accountability results, applied to 200405 school year
AYP outcomes and consequences* Made AYP Identified for improvement: Year 1 Year 2 Corrective action Restructuring Exited improvement status (made AYP twice after missing twice or more, includes total “made” Title I schools 1,847 80% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a All schools 2,775 77% 218 72 74 147 n/a 6% 2% 2% 4% n/a All districts 431 80% 0 0 0 0 n/a 0 0 0 0 n/a

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

above) *AYP outcomes for this state are not available due to issues with data collection, measurement, or other reasons. For more information, please visit the state’s Web site, above. Other indicator, 2003-04 Elementary Indicator: Attendance Middle Indicator: Attendance High School Indicator: Graduation rate State target Meet or progress toward 80% Meet or progress toward 80% 80% State outcome Met Met Met

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

NCLB choice participation Title I school choice: Supplemental educational services:

Number of Title I students 340 11,444

Percent of eligible students * 11%

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Student Achievement 2003-04
Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 3 Reading or language arts
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 3 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 4 Reading or language arts
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 62% 47 40 30 61 43 48 66

Student achievement trend: Reading or language arts percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 4 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 71% 57 52 42 59 51 58 77

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 5 Reading or language arts
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 5 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 6 Reading or language arts
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 6 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 7 Reading or language arts
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 55% 38 29 20 30 34 40 62

Student achievement trend: Reading or language arts percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 7 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 8 Reading or language arts
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 8 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 61% 41 33 25 42 33 46 69

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability High school Reading or language arts
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 62% 42 27 21 27 43 46 66

Student achievement trend: Reading or language arts percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 Michigan

Michigan Educational Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability High school Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 51% 31 19 18 26 22 33 56

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available