State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04

New Hampshire
http://www.ed.state.nh.us

Districts and schools
Number of districts
(CCD)

1993-94 178

2003-04 179

Number of public schools (CCD) Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total Number of charter schools (CCD)

1993-94 293 91 77 n/a n/a 461

2003-04 298 96 78 0 1 473 2003-04 -

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

Finances
Total current expenditures
(CCD, in thousands of dollars, adjusted for inflation to 200203)

Instructional Noninstructional Support Total Per-pupil expenditures
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to

1993-94 $824,001 45,362 413,921 1,283,284

2002-03 $1,156,573 54,792 570,229 1,781,594

2002-03)

1993-94 $6,923

2002-03 $8,579

Sources of Funding
(CCD, 2002-03)

Title I allocation 2002-03 (ED;
Includes Title I, Part A)

$29,733,465

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

Students
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)

1993-94 1,292 134,367 49,098 183,465 1993-94 * 1% 1 1 97

2003-04 2,221 139,320 65,325 204,645 2003-04 * 2% 1 2 94

Race/ethnicity (CCD) American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

1993-94 11%

2003-04 13%

Students with limited English proficiency (NCELA)

1993-94 1% 1993-94 *

2003-04 1% 2003-04 *

Migrant students (OME)

Eighth-grade students enrolled in Algebra I for high school credit (NAEP)

1996 -

2003 27%

Students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, 2003-04 (CCD)

33,805

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, 2003-04

(CCD)

15 schools did not report

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

Staff
Number of FTE teachers (CCD) Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total Number of FTE non-teacher staff (CCD) Instructional aides Instructional coordinators Administrators Other Total Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) English Mathematics Science Social Studies 1993-94 5,768 2,711 3,493 11,972 1993-94 2,902 128 807 6,093 9,930 2003-04 6,806 3,658 4,578 68 15,110 2003-04 6,380 186 1,074 8,078 15,718

1994 90% 76 91 90

2000 73% 69 90 88

Percentage of core courses taught by highly qualified teachers, 2003-04 (As defined and reported by states, collected by ED)

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

Outcomes

High school dropout rate (NCES) Avg. freshman graduation rate
(NCES)

1993-94 n/a 81% 56

2000-01 5% 78 59

College-going rate (IPEDS/NCES)

NAEP state results Reading, Grade 4 Proficient level or above Basic level or above Math, Grade 8 Proficient level or above Basic level or above

1994 36% 70 1996 -

2005 39% 75 2005 35% 78

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

Statewide Accountability Information:
State Accountability Website: http://www.ed.state.nh.us/education/doe/organization/curriculum/Assessment /materials04.htm State assessment for NCLB accountability: New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program State student achievement levels: Novice, Basic, Proficient, Advanced

Grade 3 Grade 6

Reading Mathemati cs Reading Mathemati cs Reading Mathemati cs

2001-02 Annual measurable objective starting point 60% 64 60 64 70 52

Target 2003-04 60% 64 60 64 70 52

High school

2003-04 NCLB accountability results, applied to 200405 school year
AYP outcomes and consequences Made AYP Identified for improvement: Year 1 Year 2 Corrective action Restructuring Exited improvement status (made AYP twice after missing twice or more, includes total “made” above) Title I schools 194 78% 24 2 1 0 1 10% 1% * 0 * All schools 336 73% 69 2 1 0 1 15% * * 0 * All districts 102 76% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

Other indicator, 2003-04 Elementary Indicator: Attendance Middle Indicator: Attendance High School Indicator: Graduation rate

State target Meet or progress toward 90% Meet or progress toward 90% Meet or progress toward 75%

State outcome Met Met Met

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

NCLB choice participation Title I school choice: Supplemental educational services:

Number of Title I students 1 15

Percent of eligible students * 13%

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

Student Achievement 2003-04
New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 3 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 73% 53 62 32 31 53 45 74

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 3 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 84% 72 62 60 59 72 67 85

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 4 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 4 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 5 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 5 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 6 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 74% 54 25 31 27 63 45 75

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 6 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 72% 53 25 35 40 55 47 73

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 7 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 7 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 8 Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability Grade 8 Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Trend Data Not Available

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability High school Reading
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 78% 60 <10 37 23 60 55 79

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I, 2003-04 New Hampshire

New Hampshire Educational Improvement Assessment Program, used for NCLB accountability High school Mathematics
Proficient Level or above for: All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic students Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic students 65% 44 <10 24 20 44 40 66

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above

Key

* — FTE

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Full Time Equivalent

# n/a

= Sample size too small to calculate = Not available