Ohio

Districts and schools
Number of districts
(CCD)

http://www.ode.state.oh.us
Students
2003-04
614 661

Staff
1993-94
Pre-K 17,114 K-8 1,269,194 9-12 518,875 Total (K-12) 1,788,069

1993-94

Public school enrollment (CCD)

2003-04
22,908 1,251,103 566,351 1,817,454

Number of FTE 1993-94 teachers (CCD) Elementary 45,530
Middle High Combined Other Total Instructional aides Instructional coordinators Administrators Other Total 19,776 28,748 3,639 765 98,458 9,804 383 10,311 73,886 94,384

2003-04
49,799 24,384 32,876 3,497 978 111,534 18,274 500 12,713 89,298 120,785

Number of public schools

(CCD)

2,203 663 682 104 20 3,672 2,184 741 742 134 35 3,836 163

Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total

Race/ethnicity (CCD)
American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Students with disabilities (OSEP) * 1% 15 1 83 10% 1% * 1% 17 2 79 12% -

Number of FTE non-teacher staff (CCD)

Number of charter schools (CCD)

Finances
Total current expenditures 1993-94
(CCD, in thousands of dollars, adjusted for inflation to 2002-03) $7,284,874 Instructional 452,056 Noninstructional 4,511,545 Support Total 12,248,475

2002-03

$9,110,815 525,340 6,232,340 15,868,495

Students with limited English proficiency (NCELA) Migrant students
(OME)

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000
English Mathematics Science Social studies 74% 64 75 79 54% 77 69 70

*

*

Percentage of core courses taught by highly qualified teachers, 2003-04 (As defined and reported by states, collected by ED)

Per-pupil expenditures
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to 2002-03)

$6,777

$8,632

Eighth-grade students enrolled in 1996 - Algebra I for high school credit
(NAEP)

2003

23%

All schools High-poverty schools Low-poverty schools

93% 87% 91%
2000-01
4% 76 56

Sources of funding
(CCD, 2002-03)

Federal 6%

Local 49%

Students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced544,374 Price Lunch Program, 2003-04 (CCD) Number of schools, by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, ^ 2003-04 (CCD)

Outcomes

State 45%

1993-94 High school dropout rate (NCES) 5% Avg. freshman graduation rate (NCES) 81 51 College-going rate (IPEDS/NCES) NAEP state results (NCES)
Reading, Grade 4 Proficient level or above Basic level or above Math, Grade 8 Proficient level or above Basic level or above

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 507 515
452

1,836

1994
- -

2005
35% 69

Title I allocation 2002-03
(ED; Includes Title I, Part A)

$399,821,239

75-100%
^

1996
- -

2005
34% 75

KEY:

84

K

— n/a # FTE

*

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = Full Time Equivalent

526 schools did not report.

Ohio
Statewide Accountability Information
See Appendix B for Ohio’s definitions of proficient for reading and mathematics for grades 4, 6, and high school. See http://www.ode.state.oh.us/reportcard/state_report_card/src2004.pdf for more details on the statewide accountability system. State assessment for NCLB accountability: Ohio Proficiency Test State student achievement levels: Below Basic, Basic, Proficient, Advanced

St udent Achievement 2003-04
Ohio Proficiency Test, used for NCLB accountability Reading Proficient level or above for: Grade 4 Grade 6
All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic 71% 55 39 37 43 48 53 77 65% 46 38 25 36 40 48 70

High school
79% 61 39 36 44 58 63 82

NCLB Accountability Goals
2001-02 Annual measurable objective starting point
Grade 4 Reading Mathematics Grade 6 Reading Mathematics High school eading R Mathematics 40.5% 35.9 36 36.8 78 53.1

Target (2003-04)
40.5% 35.9 36 36.8 78 53.1

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above
100% 75% 66 66 71 50% 25% 0% Grade 4 n/a Grade 6 High School 56 65 65 87 79 2004 2003 2002

2003-04 NCLB accountability results, applied to 2004-05 school year
AYP outcomes and consequences Title I schools All schools
3,244 (83%) 352 45 31 59 31 (9%) (1%) (1%) (2%) (1%)

All districts
393 (64%) 49 (8%) 0 0 0 0

Made AYP 1,751 (83%) Identified for improvement: Year 1 175 (8%) Year 2 44 (2%) Corrective action 30 (1%) Restructuring 55 (3%) Exited Improvement status (made AYP twice 29 (1%) after being identified for improvement)

Mathematics Proficient level or above for: Grade 4
All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic 66% 48 43 38 48 39 51 72

Grade 6
66% 46 39 27 51 37 53 72

High school
68% 45 32 24 43 39 49 73

Other indicator, 2003-04
Elementary indicator: Attendance Middle school indicator: Attendance High school indicator: Graduation rate

State target
93% 93% 73.6% 1,300 3,508

State outcome
Met Met Met 1% 8%

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above
100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Grade 4 n/a Grade 6 High School 62 59 66 59 66 53 71 68 2004 2003 2002

NCLB choice participation
Title I school choice: Supplemental educational services:

Number of Title I students Percent of eligible students

85