Affirmative Defenses to Breach of Contract Claims in California
Home Sitemap Disclaimer Blog Contact

(213) 891-0777
801 S. Grand Ave., 11th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017


Contract Disputes

Business Disputes

Intellectual Property

Attorney Profiles


Contact Us

Home > Contract Disputes > Breach of Contract Defenses

Affirmative Defenses to Breach of Contract Claims in California
While the facts of every breach of contract claim are unique, defenses to a breach of contract action are generally based on one or more of the following affirmative defenses:

Ask a Question:
* Name:

* Email:

1. Economic Duress
This defense is raised when one party uses wrongful act or threat of force to compel another to enter into a contract and the reluctant party has no reasonable alternative but to consent to the contract. This defense is often raised in cases where parties have entered into a valid contract and one party uses coercive measures to force the other party to agree to modify the original contract.



2. Illegal Subject Matter
An agreement to do something in violation of the law is unenforceable. For example, one party cannot sue another for breach of a contract for failing to provide illegal drugs after receiving payment for said illegal drugs.

* Enter the code above:

3. Undue Influence
This occurs where one takes unfair advantage of another's weakness of mind or distressful situation to induce him/her into consenting to a contract or wrongfully uses his/her relationship of trust and confidence to force another into consenting to a contract. Submit
Can't read the image? click here to refresh

* Required fields.

4. Duress
Use of wrongful conduct (physical force or mental pressure) to force another into consenting to a contract and the party claiming duress did not have free will to withhold consent.

5. Against Public Policy (Unconscionability)
This defense is often raised in cases where one party lacks negotiating power and the terms of a contract are excessively or unreasonably beneficial to other party such that it shocks the consciousness of a reasonable person.

6. Fraud
Misrepresentation of an important/material fact by one party in order to persuade the other to agree to the contract and the other party reasonably relied on the misrepresentation in giving his/her consent.

7. Mistake of Fact
Defendant argues that he/she was mistaken about a material fact and the plaintiff knew that defendant was mistaken and used that mistake to take advantage of the defendant. However, to successfully use this defense, defendant must also establish that his/her mistake was not a result of "neglect of a legal duty" i.e., could not have been discovered by undertaking a reasonable inquiry.



11. sale of goods worth more than $500.com/breach-of-contract-defenses 2/2 . All rights reserved. Lack of Consideration Consideration refers to promising to do something that you are not obligated to do or refraining from doing something that you have a legal right to do.00. if consideration is not mutual. both parties substituted (either by writing. leases for more than one year. www. legal advice.3/21/13 8. All copies must include this copyright statement. contracts that cannot be performed within one year and contracts for marriage. Statute of Frauds Although oral contracts are valid and enforceable in California. 10. Thus. Hom e Attorney Profiles Resources Blog Contact Us The information you obtain at this site is not. words or conduct) a new agreement with the express intent to replace the original contract. Statute of Limitations Affirmative Defenses to Breach of Contract Claims in California This defense is raised when the lawsuit is not filed within the time prescribed by law. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your ow n personal use and for non-commercial distribution. Consideration must be mutual.contractdisputeresolution. This generally requires each party to give up something as such. contracts to pay debt of another. the contact is not enforceable. nor is it intended to be. certain contracts must be in writing: contracts involving sales of real estate. Copyright © 2013 | Fisher & Talw ar Professional Law Corporation. Novation This defense is raised in circumstances where one party claims that following the execution of the original contract. a promise to provide a gift does not qualify as a valid contract even if it is in writing. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your ow n situation. 9.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful