This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
: to highlight the perversity of the AAP statement; to highlight the perverse reality of the enactment of the FGM-Law 1996, simply because FGM and MGM are already outlawed under current democratic rule of law long before the enactment of the FGM-Law, and the fact that this enactment is unconstitutional because it degrades the male child population to humans of lesser rights and the perversity of the authority´s refusal to also enforce the law on MGM, a refusal which violates the male child population´s constitutional right of equal protection; and to highlight the fact that the “California Assembly Bill 768” is unconstitutional … and so: to and so to inform the public highlight the fact that FGM and MGM are already outlawed equally about this fact, and to DEMAND LAW ENFORCEMENT on MGM … and to highlight the fact that the “legalization” of MGM in Germany is the crime of degradation of the male child population to humans of lesser rights and thus unconstitutional … just as one intactivist organization (actually the only one), namely the Global Symposium for an Intact Humanity www.intacthumanity.org is doing since decades. Yes, these are intactivist actions which make sense, in despite of these actions draw fierce opposition from the Pro-Circ Establishment and even amongst the intactivist movement, which until today insists to either be silent on these facts or even insist to circulate law-reality contradictive information: e.g.: the wrong and so misleading information “Only FGM is outlawed, but boys are accorded no such legislative protection (MGM is not outlawed)”. An information which of course is absolutely false! Now, there are also these two intactivist actions, which – if one is ready to admit it or not – make no sense at all: A) the call on AAP to dismiss those lunatics at APP who have come up with the AAP´s statement about male circumcision; and B) the call to contact “MSU Health” to express outrage that their employees are bragging about MGM they are witnessing at “MSU Health”. Why do these actions make no sense at all? Answer: A) We all know the fact that the “AAP-Statement” is – as the title “AAP-Statement” already expresses – endorsed by the AAP-Board from top to bottom! To call on the “AAP-Heads” to dismiss its SERVANTS (those who created this perverse statement) is the same as to call on “Hitler to dismiss the SS”. Meaning: There is obviously NO distinction between the lunacy of the AAP-Board and the AAP-Members (those who created this perverse statement). It is therefore clear, that this call on the AAP-Board is a senseless call, simply because there is NO intelligible hope that the AAP-Board will do what it is called for.
… in other words: it is naïve to initiate an action, which has no chance of success from the beginning. B) We all know the fact that “MSU-Health” is performing non-therapeutic circumcisions on male children! So it really makes NO sense to express our outrage to the address of “MSU-Health” about someone bragging about the perpetration of this child abuse perpetrated at “MSU-Health”, simply because it makes NO sense at all to express this outrage against “the bragging” about the perpetration of this crime at “MSU-Health” to exactly those perverts who PERPETRATE THE CRIME! AAP & MSU
“Rotten fish stinks from the head down”
There is obviously NO distinction between the lunacy of the “MSU-Health-Institution” (the perpetrator of this child abuse) and the “MSU-Health-Institution-Employee” (the one who brags about this child abuse being perpetrated). It is therefore clear, that this expression of outrage addressed to “MSU-Health” is a senseless action, simply because there is NO intelligible hope that “MSU-Health” will do anything about the “bragger”. … in other words: it is naïve to initiate an action, which has no chance of success from the beginning. It is the same senseless action, so as to express our outrage to “Hitler” about the “SS” bragging about the crime committed by the “Hitler Regime”. Or in other words: It makes no sense of intactivist action to “complain” to the Pro-CircEstablishment, that its members mutilate children and suck on baby´s genital, and to “petition” the child abusers to “please make your informed decision if you “wish” to mutilate the child and to suck on the child´s genital” or not. Truth is also: There are NO SECRETS to be “uncovered” about the Pro-Circ-Establishment and its satellites the AAP, the MSU-Health, etc…; the UNO, Amnesty International and all other such EVIL INSTITUTIONS, including the US-Government and its Agencies, which all act as SERVANTS (accomplices) to this Global Collective Holocaust of Forced Circumcision on Children and Adults! The Pro-Circ Establishment and its SERVANTS are NOT acting “behind the bush”! …they are BRAGGING about the CRIME they commit OPENLY and ALL THE TIME! So it is high time to take off the “white gloves”; to STOP this “diplomacy”, these “petitions” to the perpetrators of this child abuse, and also to STOP these never ending “discussions” about and “researches” into this obvious ALREADY OUTLAWED CHILD ABUSE! What is there to “discuss” and/or to “research” about cutting a healthy body part from the living body of a child? I tell you what (and I say so since decades): NOTHING! ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! „Please dear child abuser, will you pretty please make your informed decision to whether or not you „wish“ to mutilate the child or not.“
As Professor of Law, Medicine, Sociology et.al. I continue to profess: “Violence against children is NOT a private matter”, this truth is NOT open for “discussion”! (…although the Pro-Circ Circ Establishment and 99% of e.g.: US-parents US parents still think that it is up to them to “decide” to whether or not to mutilate the child) Yes I know, the Pro-Circ Circ Establishment and even 99% of the intactivist movement does NOT agree with the Global Symposium for an Intact Humanity´s Global Children´s Rights Defense Advocacy based on the fact that MGM and FGM are already outlawed and our Universal Declaration of Demand for Law Enforcement, just as is stated in http://www.intacthumanity.org/declaration-ofhttp://www.intacthumanity.org/declaration demand.html This dire reality of opposition is clearly evident in the dire fact that only 1% (391 intactivists) of the global intactivist movement has endorsed this Universal Declaration of DEMAND. This dire reality of refusal to acknowledge the fact that FGM and MGM are already outlawed under current democratic rule of law (both by constitution and penal law … and of course also the human rights of a child declaration) is most obvious in that NONE of these many STREET DEMONSTRATIONS have produced a sign that reads “MGM and FGM is ALREADY OUTLAWED under CURRENT LAW”; “WE DEMAND LAW ENFORCEMENT ON MGM TOO!!!” … and I do discover the dire fact, that 99% of all intactivist groups and organizations still insist to refuse to mention the existence of the Universal Declaration claration of Demand for Law Enforcement on MGM, MGM and refuse to link to www.intacthumanity.org While it is clear to all of us intactivists, that it is absolutely normal reaction to demand law enforcement when what is being done to the children is done to adults … (there would be a massive uproar of the public, if the authority would refuse to enforce the law on MGM done to adults), we may justifiably bly ask the question: “Why is it that also 99% of the intactivist movement refuses to endorse the Universal Declaration of Demand for Law Enforcement on MGM done to children?” This silence does not make any sense and is unforgiveable, because it only serves ves those who are most interested in this silence, namely the Pro-Circ Pro Circ Establishment and its servants. When a crime is committed and the authority refuses to enforce the law on this crime, it is every upright adult citizen´s DUTY to DEMAND LAW ENFORCEMENT. ENFORCEMEN Point Blank. Conclusion: It makes perfect sense to join these 391 fellow intactivists in their ENDORSEMENT of the Universal Declaration of Demand for Law Enforcement on MGM. It makes perfect sense to promote this global juristic advocacy and to SHOW FLAG in this respect by way of CLEAR SIGNS in EXPRESSION of THIS DEMAND, and so informing the public also on every STREET DEMONSTRATION. An intelligible reason to why not to cooperate this way does not exist. Amen. Shalom from Jerusalem, Amen Ronald Oberhollenzer-Paternoster Paternoster
Responsible Co-Scholar Scholar in the School of Humanity firstname.lastname@example.org Global Symposium for an Intact Humanity email@example.com
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.