You are on page 1of 1

Case: 13-70744 04/01/2013 ID: 8572746 DktEntry: 2 Page: 1 of 1 Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 105 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 1

FILED
APR 01 2013

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

In re: JAMES GRINOLS; et al. JAMES GRINOLS; et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO, Respondent, ELECTORAL COLLEGE; et al.,

No. 13-70744

Real Parties in Interest.

Before: PREGERSON, GRABER, and BEA, Circuit Judges. Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of

Fr

ie

nd s

this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED .

KS/MOATT

of

Th e

Fo

gb

ORDER

ow

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02997-MCE Eastern District of California, Sacramento

.c o

m

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK