1 Peter’s Reflection Upon The Death of Christ (3

)
Posted in Church, Jesus, Seminary, Spirituality, Theology, Writing ¶ Tagged 1 peter, christian doctrine,Christology, hell, Interpretation, new testament, resurrection ¶ 3 Comments ¶ Edit

Image by peterjr1961 via Flickr Continuation from 1 Peter’s Reflection Upon The Death of Christ (1), and 1 Peter’s Reflection Upon The Death of Christ (2)

Christ’s Descent into Hell
Moving on to the third and last, major text that looks into Peter’s reflection on Christ suffering, this passage follows through with the exhortation found in 2:20 that is to do good. Here, when reading through the context it speaks largely about Christ vindication by means of resurrection after suffering and dying unjustly. The main idea being played out here is that Jesus has gone to heaven. The problem that generally comes when reading through this passage is seen in v.18b-21.[1] According to Jobes, this passage is among the most difficult that is found in the NT.[2] Here, we have to deal with the issue of what Peter means by Jesus preaching to the spirits in prison to the context of Christ death or rather with the doctrine known as Christ’s descent into hell. McKnight presents the three traditional views that have always been used when interpreting this passage; “(1) the descent-into-hell view, (2) the preexistent Christ view, and (3) the triumphal proclamation over the spirit world view.”[3] Space warrants us to go into detail in explaining this as others have done well in answering this textual problem.[4] Although these difficulties are evident, it is to the third view, mentioned by McKnight above that seems to be the most likely because it follows the train of thought of the preceding verses to the passage of 3:18-22, which are 3:13-17 which gives the rationale of why it is unjust suffering is better compared to the other extreme.[5] Hence, suffering in this manner is not a stance of total defeat but rather as seen in how the passage of 3:18-22 moves, to the realization of victory and vindication, where resurrection took place.

3. Christ’s Death as Vindication (3:18-22)
We now move on to the passage in drawing Peter’s reflection on Christ’s death. V. 18, which parallels 2:21 where Christ suffers unjustly with the addition of Christ has done with suffering for sin which emphasizes the finished work he had done in his death.[6] Jesus’

”[9] Forbes renders the description of the flood and waters of baptism as a form of analogy that Peter used. the promise of vindication will surely come. by way of his substituting death on behalf of the unrighteous. BECNT. is for paving the way of coming to God. like in Jesus.20 God’s patience is the highlighting factor during the period of Noah specifically “between the sin of the angels (Gen 6:1-4) and the flood (Gen 7:11). Thus. In v. Pg 215 . Suffering unjustly does not entail defeat but rather. 1 Peter NAC. 21 completes this idea. This is where the effects of the flood destroyed the evil inhabitants on earth during that time. 19 forms the crux in which interpretation falls.sinlessness is again emphasised here where it is mentioned that “the righteous for the unrighteous” in that Jesus died on behalf of sinner. In the same way baptism is a pledge by the believer to live in response to the promise of resurrection. Christ’s unjust suffering is something that he endured following God’s will. The reason behind this death. This is only made possible by one who is sinless. But the lasting effects of being purged from evil come from a changed life not being separated by it. the conclusions that we made does not warrant an understanding that Jesus descended into hell. although I agree with him that “the water was the instrument of salvation”[10] where v. [1] Forbes. Pg 97 [2] Jobes. Asia Bible Commentary Series: 1 Peter.22). it is one that promises victory. According to Green[11] baptism forms an understanding of new birth to the saved life through the flood during Noah’s time. The proclamation made. Pg 236 [3] McKnight. The phrase that comes after this which is “He was put to death in the body and made alive in the spirit” could be understood in Jesus death and subsequent resurrection. Forbes is helpful here in that he summarizes some conclusions concerning the three major interpretive questions[8]. But his suggestion to what this means is unclear. namely those who heard this letter. during the time the ark was constructed. where Jesus’ suffering unjustly was vindicated by way of being resurrected from the dead. believers live in reality of this promised vindication by constantly continuing in living under the authority of Christ (3:15). But as mentioned earlier. which was more a victory over evil spirits or over evil powers is a more reasonable understanding that would deem correct.[7] V. rather. which is finished and substitutionary. But his death is not something marked by defeat.1 Peter. by whom was made possible by Jesus who now sits over all authorities submitting to him (v. It is also an event. The achievement of his death thus opens the way for us to God. Therefore. completed by him.

1 Peter.[5] Hence.[4] Although these difficulties are evident. 3. Pg 215-217 [5] Jobes.1 Peter. and (3) the triumphal proclamation over the spirit world view. V. The Two Horizons New Testament Commentary: 1 Peter. suffering in this manner is not a stance of total defeat but rather as seen in how the passage of 3:18-22 moves. Christ’s Death as Vindication (3:18-22) We now move on to the passage in drawing Peter’s reflection on Christ’s death. it is to the third view. [11] Green. this passage is among the most difficult that is found in the NT.[1] According to Jobes.[2] Here.[6] Jesus’ . mentioned by McKnight above that seems to be the most likely because it follows the train of thought of the preceding verses to the passage of 3:18-22. BECNT Pg 236-237 and McKnight. Pg 237 [6] Forbes. McKnight presents the three traditional views that have always been used when interpreting this passage. this passage follows through with the exhortation found in 2:20 that is to do good. Pg 97 [7] Ibid. BECNT. Pg 137 Christ’s Descent into Hell Moving on to the third and last.[4] For detailed discussion concerning this see: Jobes. major text that looks into Peter’s reflection on Christ suffering. we have to deal with the issue of what Peter means by Jesus preaching to the spirits in prison to the context of Christ death or rather with the doctrine known as Christ’s descent into hell. “(1) the descent-into-hell view. which parallels 2:21 where Christ suffers unjustly with the addition of Christ has done with suffering for sin which emphasizes the finished work he had done in his death.”[3] Space warrants us to go into detail in explaining this as others have done well in answering this textual problem. (2) the preexistent Christ view. Pg 99-100 [9] Ibid. Here. when reading through the context it speaks largely about Christ vindication by means of resurrection after suffering and dying unjustly.18b-21. The main idea being played out here is that Jesus has gone to heaven. which are 3:13-17 which gives the rationale of why it is unjust suffering is better compared to the other extreme. Pg 98 [8] Forbes asks these three question 1)Who were the spirits in prison? 2)What was the nature of proclamation that Jesus made and 3)Where was the location of this prison? Forbes. where resurrection took place. Asia Bible Commentary Series: 1 Peter. 18. to the realization of victory and vindication. Pg 100 [10] Ibid. Asia Bible Commentary Series: 1 Peter. The problem that generally comes when reading through this passage is seen in v. 1 Peter NAC.

The proclamation made. where Jesus’ suffering unjustly was vindicated by way of being resurrected from the dead.”[9] Forbes renders the description of the flood and waters of baptism as a form of analogy that Peter used. 19 forms the crux in which interpretation falls.22). by way of his substituting death on behalf of the unrighteous. 21 completes this idea. believers live in reality of this promised vindication by constantly continuing in living under the authority of Christ (3:15). This is where the effects of the flood destroyed the evil inhabitants on earth during that time. Thus. The reason behind this death. which was more a victory over evil spirits or over evil powers is a more reasonable understanding that would deem correct. [1] Forbes. According to Green[11] baptism forms an understanding of new birth to the saved life through the flood during Noah’s time. Suffering unjustly does not entail defeat but rather.20 God’s patience is the highlighting factor during the period of Noah specifically “between the sin of the angels (Gen 6:1-4) and the flood (Gen 7:11). Christ’s unjust suffering is something that he endured following God’s will. during the time the ark was constructed. the conclusions that we made does not warrant an understanding that Jesus descended into hell. which is finished and substitutionary.[7] V. It is also an event. But his death is not something marked by defeat. The achievement of his death thus opens the way for us to God. This is only made possible by one who is sinless. by whom was made possible by Jesus who now sits over all authorities submitting to him (v.sinlessness is again emphasised here where it is mentioned that “the righteous for the unrighteous” in that Jesus died on behalf of sinner. rather. Asia Bible Commentary Series: 1 Peter. is for paving the way of coming to God. it is one that promises victory. although I agree with him that “the water was the instrument of salvation”[10] where v. the promise of vindication will surely come. Pg 97 . completed by him. In the same way baptism is a pledge by the believer to live in response to the promise of resurrection. like in Jesus. namely those who heard this letter. But as mentioned earlier. But the lasting effects of being purged from evil come from a changed life not being separated by it. In v. Forbes is helpful here in that he summarizes some conclusions concerning the three major interpretive questions[8]. The phrase that comes after this which is “He was put to death in the body and made alive in the spirit” could be understood in Jesus death and subsequent resurrection. Therefore. But his suggestion to what this means is unclear.

[2] Jobes. Pg 97 [7] Ibid. BECNT Pg 236-237 and McKnight. Pg 215 [4] For detailed discussion concerning this see: Jobes. BECNT. Pg 237 [6] Forbes.1 Peter. Pg 215-217 [5] Jobes. BECNT. Pg 236 [3] McKnight. Pg 137 .1 Peter. Pg 99-100 [9] Ibid. Asia Bible Commentary Series: 1 Peter.1 Peter. [11] Green. Pg 100 [10] Ibid. 1 Peter NAC. The Two Horizons New Testament Commentary: 1 Peter. Pg 98 [8] Forbes asks these three question 1)Who were the spirits in prison? 2)What was the nature of proclamation that Jesus made and 3)Where was the location of this prison? Forbes. Asia Bible Commentary Series: 1 Peter. 1 Peter NAC.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.