You are on page 1of 1

œ

300,000 COPIES DAILY Member of Audit Bureau of Circulations (Malaysia)


30 SEN for delivery to your doorstep

Award winning newspaper


for public service reporting
and opinion writing.

No. 4718 PP 2644/12/2009 (023092)

Wednesday
March 18, 2009
TELLING IT AS IT IS www.sun2surf.com

» Opposition boycotts fracas probe pg4 » Mahathir and his old school pg7 News without
PCK in borders

Kuala pg17
Lumpur Karpal pleads
not guilty to

Barred Warned Cleared sedition charge


by S. Tamarai Chelvi
newsdesk@thesundaily.com

KUALA LUMPUR: DAP national chairman


Karpal Singh was charged with sedition at
the Sessions Court yesterday for making
a statement on Feb 6 that the Sultan of
Perak could be taken to court. He pleaded
not guilty.
The 69-year-old wheelchair-bound senior
lawyer and Bukit Gelugor MP was charged
with uttering the seditious words at his
office, Messrs Karpal Singh & Co, in Jalan
Pudu Lama, between noon and 12.30pm.
The charge under Section 4(1) (b) of
the Sedition Act 1948 is punishable under
Section 4 (1) of the same act. If convicted,
Karpal can be fined up to RM5,000 or jailed
up to three years or both, for the first
offence. For subsequent offences, the jail
term goes up to five years.
Karpal is representing himself, but has a
team of 12 lawyers, including his children
Jagdeep Singh Deo, Gobind Singh Deo, Ram
Karpal Singh Deo and Sangeet Kaur, to assist
him.
Sessions judge Datuk Mohamad Sekeri
Mamat set bail at RM2,000 with one surety
and allowed an application by Deputy Public
Prosecutor Datuk Kamaluddin Md Said to
transfer the case to the High Court as Karpal
did not object. No date has been fixed for a
mention date in the High Court.
DISCIPLINARY BOARD FINDS ALI RUSTAM GUILTY OF BREACHING UMNO ETHICS Earlier, the court interpreter was 15
minutes into reading out the charge and
the 10-page attachment containing the
alleged seditious statements when the
by Maria J. Dass meted out depended on the degree of guilt. actions of those associated with him, and had judge interjected and suggested that only
newsdesk@thesundaily.com They were among 15 found guilty of to give a reasonable explanation. the underlined words (the alleged seditious
various offences, ranging from money politics, Mohd Ali’s political secretary Saadun words) be read out to save time.
UALA LUMPUR: Umno’s disciplinary

K
misuse of the media and the internet, the use of Basirun, who is also Bukit Katil division Karpal, however, argued that the entire
board yesterday barred Malacca Chief lobbyist and agents and for conduct during party committee member, was found guilty of money transcript should be read out, as otherwise
Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Ali Rustam administrative duties (see list on page 2). politics and offences related to lobbying for the passages which were not underlined
from contesting the deputy presidency at Another 14 members and contenders who votes. “He (Mohd Ali) is also presumed guilty, should be expunged. The judge then allowed
the party’s general assembly next week after were also investigated because of complaints going by the actions of Saadun,” said Tengku the interpreter to read out the attachment
finding him guilty of breaching party ethics. lodged against them were found not guilty. Rithauddeen. which took him another 30 minutes.
Umno Youth chief contender Khairy After delivering the probe findings at an Asked why Mohd Ali received a harsher This is the second time Karpal is charged
Jamaluddin got off with a warning for the same eagerly-awaited press conference at Umno punishment than Khairy, he said: “The with sedition. On Jan 15, 2000, he was
offence, while his rival for the post, former headquarters, disciplinary board chairman punishment must fit the crime. No two cases accused of uttering seditious words on
Selangor mentri besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Tengku Tan Sri Ahmad Rithauddeen Ismail are the same. arsenic poisoning while submitting in the
Toyo, was cleared of corruption and money explained that rule 10.1 stated that a principal “The degree of the offence under (rule) 10.1 Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Sukma
politics. was presumed guilty as he was vicariously could differ. It could be for money politics or for Darmawan Sasmittat Madja trial in the High
Mohd Ali and Khairy were found guilty of liable for the acts and offences committed by ‘makan-makan’. It depends on what he does.” Court. The charge was withdrawn in 2003.
breaching rule 10.1 of the party ethics, which his agent. He said the level of seriousness of these
is presumption of guilt owing to the actions of He said the allegations against Mohd Ali offences could not be equated.
a third party (who could be an agent, lobbyist were deemed as presumptions as he was not » Bar Council: It’s selective
and campaign or polling manager). The penalty caught red-handed but was still liable for the » Turn to Page 2 prosecution Page 3

You might also like