Archived Information

By Consortium
Question Did SCDE faculty redesign curricula to integrate technology? Response rate Yes Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Not applicable, not an SCDE How many SCDE faculty members redesigned curricula to integrate technology? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* For how many SCDE courses were curricula redesigned to integrate technology? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* For how many SCDE courses were redesigned curricula implemented to integrate technology? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.1a

204 177 16 10 1

91 87 8 5 <1

121 102 10 8 1

88 84 8 7 1

61 57 3 1 0

95 93 5 2 0

22 18 3 1 0

96 82 14 5 0

330 228 62 40 0

81 69 19 12 0

137 107 17 13 0

77 78 12 9 0

94 77 13 4 0

90 82 14 4 0

103 47 33 23 0

81 46 32 22 0

2A.1b

177 2,169 12.8 10 0 99 8

100

102 917 9.6 7.5 0 46 6

100

57 986 17.3 12 1 99 0

100

18 322 18.9 15 3 43 1

100

227 2,169 9.9 7 1 99 9

99.5

106 917 9.1 7 1 38 5

99.1

77 986 13 8.5 1 99 1

100

47 322 7.3 4 1 36 3

100

2A.1c

177 2,713 16.1 11 0 211 9

100

102 1,085 11.3 10 0 48 6

100

57 1,259 22.5 13 1 211 1

100

18 428 25.2 20 2 57 1

100

227 2,713 12.6 8 0 200 12

99.5

106 1,085 10.7 10 0 31 5

99.1

77 1,259 17.2 10 1 200 4

100

47 428 9.7 5 0 50 3

100

2A.1d

177 2,184 13.6 9 0 161 16

100

102 834 9.3 7 0 46 12

100

57 1,090 19.8 12 1 161 2

100

18 311 18.3 13 1 49 1

100

227 2,184 10.6 6 0 150 20

99.5

106 834 8.8 7 0 31 11

99.1

77 1,090 15.1 8 1 150 5

100

47 311 7.2 4 0 45 4

100

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-1

By Consortium
Question Approximately what proportion of all redesigned SCDE courses integrated the following technologies or technology-related tools? Response rate Internet or web-based materials None Less than half More than half All Data not available Multi-media None Less than half More than half All Data not available Software packages for word processing, spreadsheets, databases None Less than half More than half All Data not available Teaching tools None Less than half More than half All Data not available E-mail None Less than half More than half All Data not available Additional software packages (presentation software, reference tools) None Less than half More than half All Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.1e

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

227 4 23 98 98 4

99.5 2 10 43 43 2

106 2 9 45 49 1

99.1 2 8 42 46 1

77 0 6 38 31 2

100 0 8 49 40 3

47 2 8 18 18 1

100 4 17 38 38 2

11 95 73 41 7

5 42 32 18 3

5 48 30 21 2

5 45 28 20 2

1 32 28 13 3

1 42 36 17 4

5 17 16 7 2

11 36 34 15 4

9 46 67 94 11 54 94 38 16 25 10 17 58 136 6

4 20 30 41 5 24 41 17 7 11 4 7 26 60 3

5 19 39 38 5 22 45 21 8 10 5 3 32 63 3

5 18 37 36 5 21 42 20 8 9 5 3 30 59 3

1 16 19 38 3 17 32 11 7 10 2 7 17 49 2

1 21 25 49 4 22 42 14 9 13 3 9 22 64 3

3 12 10 19 3 16 19 6 1 5 3 9 9 25 1

6 26 21 40 6 34 40 13 2 11 6 19 19 53 2

8 60 87 61 11

4 26 38 27 5

3 29 45 26 3

3 27 42 25 3

2 22 27 22 4

3 29 35 29 5

3 11 15 14 4

6 23 32 30 9

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-2

By Consortium
Question 2A.1e (Continued) Approximately what proportion of all redesigned SCDE courses integrated the following technologies or technology-related tools? Response rate Content-specific software None Less than half More than half All Data not available Portfolio tools None Less than half More than half All Data not available Did SCDs of arts and science faculty redesign curricula to integrate technology? Response rate Yes Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Not applicable, not an SCDE How many SCDs of arts and science faculty members redesigned curricula to integrate technology? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

227 32 90 58 28 19 50 113 27 25 12

99.5 14 40 26 12 8 22 50 12 11 5

106 15 41 28 13 9 19 59 11 12 5

99.1 14 39 26 12 8 18 56 10 11 5

77 8 30 23 10 6 18 38 9 9 3

100 10 39 30 13 8 23 49 12 12 4

47 9 21 8 5 4 13 19 7 4 4

100 19 45 17 11 9 28 40 15 9 9

2A.2a

115 85 12 18 0

100 74 10 16 0

65 45 8 12 0

100 69 12 18 0

34 29 0 5 0

100 85 0 15 0

16 12 3 1 0

100 75 19 6 0

146 105 17 24 0

100 72 12 16 0

68 46 9 13 0

100 68 13 19 0

41 36 0 5 0

100 88 0 12 0

39 25 8 6 0

100 64 21 15 0

2A.2b

85 573 7.2 5 0 33 5

100

45 268 6.4 4 0 33 3

100

29 225 8 6 1 30 1

100

12 81 7.4 6 1 20 1

100

106 573 6.2 4 0 33 13

101

47 268 6.2 4 0 33 4

102

36 225 6.6 4.5 1 30 2

100

25 81 4.8 4 1 12 8

100

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-3

By Consortium
Question For how many SCD of arts and science courses were curricula redesigned to integrate technology? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* For how many SCD of arts and science courses were redesigned curricula implemented to integrate technology? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.2c

85 763 9.8 7 0 50 7

100

45 378 9.5 7 0 40 5

100

29 284 10.1 7.5 1 50 1

100

12 102 9.3 7 1 40 1

100

106 763 8.4 6 0 50 15

101

47 378 9.2 7 0 40 6

102

36 284 8.4 5 1 50 2

100

25 102 6 4 1 20 8

100

2A.2d

85 660 8.6 7 0 50 8

100

45 338 8.5 6.5 0 39 5

100

29 252 9.3 8 0 50 2

100

12 71 6.5 3 0 32 1

100

106 660 7.5 5 0 50 18

101

47 338 8.2 6 0 39 6

102

36 252 7.6 5 0 50 3

100

25 71 4.7 4 0 20 10

100

2A.2e Approximately what proportion of all redesigned SCD of arts and science courses integrated the following technologies or technology-related tools? Response Rate Internet or web-based materials None Less than half More than half All Data not available Multi-media None Less than half More than half All Data not available

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

106 3 8 39 42 14 13 28 32 19 14

101 3 8 37 40 13 12 26 30 18 13

47 2 3 15 23 4 7 12 14 10 4

102 4 6 32 49 9 15 26 30 21 9

36 0 1 18 13 4 3 11 12 6 4

100 0 3 50 36 11 8 31 33 17 11

25 1 4 6 7 7 3 5 6 4 7

100 4 16 24 28 28 12 20 24 60 28

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-4

By Consortium
Question 2A.2e (Continued) Approximately what proportion of all redesigned SCD of arts and science courses integrated the following technologies or technology-related tools? Response Rate Software packages for word processing, spreadsheets, databases None Less than half More than half All Data not available Teaching tools None Less than half More than half All Data not available E-mail None Less than half More than half All Data not available Additional software packages (presentation software, reference tools) None Less than half More than half All Data not available Content-specific software None Less than half More than half All Data not available Portfolio tools None Less than half More than half All Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

106

101

47

102

36

100

25

100

9 14 36 33 14 34 37 5 7 23 7 7 26 52 14

8 13 34 31 13 32 35 5 7 22 7 7 25 49 13

4 8 17 13 5 19 16 3 3 6 3 2 11 27 4

9 17 36 28 11 40 34 6 6 13 6 4 23 57 9

2 3 14 14 3 10 11 2 3 10 0 2 12 18 4

6 8 39 39 8 28 31 6 8 28 0 6 33 50 11

4 3 5 6 7 5 10 0 2 8 4 3 3 8 7

16 12 20 24 28 20 40 0 8 32 16 12 12 32 28

6 20 43 20 17 13 33 26 16 18 35 35 7 5 24

6 19 41 19 16 12 31 25 15 17 33 33 7 5 23

4 12 17 9 5 6 18 9 8 6 18 13 6 2 8

9 26 36 19 11 13 38 19 17 13 38 28 13 4 17

1 6 17 7 5 5 10 12 5 4 11 15 1 1 8

3 17 47 19 14 14 28 33 14 11 31 42 3 3 22

1 2 9 5 8 2 5 5 4 9 7 7 0 2 9

4 8 36 20 32 8 20 20 16 36 28 28 0 8 36

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-5

By Consortium
Question Which of the following were implemented when redesigning SCDE or SCD of arts and science curricula? Response rate Release Time Researching other models Collaboration Partnerships with K-12 schools Other partnerships Among those implemented above, which were found to be valuable when redesigning SCDE or SCD of arts and science curricula? Response rate Release Time Response rate Researching other models Response rate Collaboration Response rate Partnerships with K-12 schools Response rate Other partnerships All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.3a

178 86 115 172 158 98

100 48 65 97 89 55

102 43 66 97 91 48

100 42 65 95 89 47

58 33 34 57 50 36

100 57 59 98 86 62

18 11 15 18 18 15

100 61 83 100 100 83

235 97 140 220 186 109

100 41 60 94 79 46

108 44 69 101 94 48

100 41 64 94 87 44

79 40 43 77 59 41

100 51 54 97 75 52

51 16 30 45 36 21

100 31 59 88 71 41

86 85 115 115 172 171 158 158 98 95

100 99 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 97

43 42 66 66 97 96 91 91 48 47

100 98 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 98

33 33 34 34 57 57 50 50 36 34

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 94

11 11 15 15 18 18 18 18 15 15

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

97 94 140 140 220 219 186 186 109 105

100 97 100 100 100 99.5 100 100 100 96

44 43 69 69 101 100 94 94 48 47

100 98 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 98

40 40 43 43 77 77 59 59 41 39

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 95

16 14 30 30 45 45 36 36 20 20

100 88 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

2A.4a

Were incentives offered to encourage faculty to integrate technology into their curriculum? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Not applicable, not an SCDE

201 164 10 26 1

89 82 5 13 <1

119 92 9 16 1

86 77 8 13 1

61 56 0 5 0

95 92 0 8 0

22 17 1 4 0

96 77 5 18 0

328 219 37 72 0

80 67 11 22 0

135 102 9 24 0

76 76 7 18 0

94 76 6 12 0

90 81 6 13 0

103 45 22 36 0

81 44 21 35 0

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-6

By Consortium
Question Which of the following incentives were offered to encourage faculty to integrate technology into their curriculum? Response rate Release time Yes No Data not available Stipend Yes No Data not available Additional technological equipment for professional use Yes No Data not available Additional technological equipment for instructional use Yes No Data not available Increased professional development opportunities (e.g., workshops) Yes No Data not available Is integration of technology into curricula considered a contributing factor: Response rate In tenure decisions or career advancement Yes No Data not available In hiring decisions Yes No Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.4b

164 75 88 1 131 33 0

100 46 54 <1 80 20 0

92 34 58 0 72 20 0

100 37 63 0 78 22 0

56 29 26 1 43 13 0

100 52 46 2 77 23 0

17 13 4 0 16 1 0

100 76 24 0 94 6 0

219 82 133 4 166 52 1

100 37 61 2 76 24 <1

102 34 68 0 80 22 0

100 33 67 0 78 22 0

76 34 41 1 53 22 1

100 45 54 1 70 29 1

45 17 25 3 35 10 0

100 38 56 7 78 22 0

122 41 1

74 25 <1

66 25 1

72 27 1

42 14 0

75 25 0

14 3 0

82 18 0

148 67 4

68 31 2

72 29 1

71 28 1

57 19 0

75 25 0

21 21 3

47 47 7

138 25 1

84 15 <1

78 13 1

85 14 1

46 10 0

82 18 0

14 3 0

82 18 0

174 42 3

79 19 1

86 15 1

84 15 1

64 12 0

84 16 0

26 17 2

58 38 4

158 5 1

96 3 <1

89 2 1

97 2 1

54 2 0

96 4 0

17 0 0

100 0 0

203 13 3

93 6 1

96 4 2

94 4 2

73 3 0

96 4 0

38 6 1

84 13 2

2A.5a

200 91 90 19 144 35 21

89 46 45 10 72 18 11

117 48 57 12 84 21 12

85 41 49 10 72 18 10

61 26 28 7 41 12 8

95 43 46 11 67 20 13

22 17 5 0 19 2 1

96 77 23 0 86 9 5

325 121 157 47 202 608 55

79 37 48 14 62 21 17

134 50 67 17 90 27 17

76 37 50 13 67 20 13

94 40 40 14 62 15 17

90 43 43 15 66 16 18

103 32 53 16 52 28 21

81 32 52 16 51 28 21

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-7

By Consortium
Question Were SCDE courses delivered to students through any technological means? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Not applicable, not an SCDE How many SCDE courses were at least partially available through technological means? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* Which of the following options were available for SCDE courses? Response rate Two-way audio-video conferencing One-way audio-video conferencing Web-based courses (course completely online) Web-enhanced courses (course at least partially online) 2A.7a Were SCD of arts and science courses involved in the grant collaboration delivered to students through any technological means? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.6a

200 104 63 33

89 52 32 17

117 55 38 24

85 47 69 63

61 37 15 9

95 61 25 15

22 12 10 0

96 55 45 0

324 124 127 73 0

79 38 39 23 0

134 58 44 32 0

76 43 33 24 0

94 44 31 19 0

90 47 33 20 0

100 24 54 22 0

79 24 54 22 0

2A.6b

104 1,561 17 1 66 12

100

55 864 17.6 8 1 142 6

100

37 585 16.7 12.5 1 66 5

100

12 139 12.6 6 1 33 1

100

124 1,561 14.6 6 0 142 17

100

58 864 16.9 6 1 142 7

100

44 585 15.4 7.5 0 66 6

100

24 139 7 4 0 33 4

100

2A.6c

104 58 29 58 98

100 56 28 56 94

55 25 8 29 49

100 45 15 53 89

37 23 13 20 37

100 62 35 54 100

12 10 8 9 12

100 83 67 75 100

124 58 27 62 115

100 47 22 50 93

58 24 8 30 51

100 41 14 52 88

44 27 12 23 42

100 61 27 52 95

24 9 9 10 24

100 38 38 42 100

111 47 24 38 2

100 42 22 34 2

61 26 15 20 0

100 43 25 33 0

35 15 4 15 1

100 43 11 43 3

15 6 5 3 1

100 40 33 20 7

139 51 36 47 5

100 37 26 34 4

64 26 15 22 1

100 41 23 34 2

42 16 7 17 2

100 38 17 40 5

35 9 15 9 2

100 26 43 26 6

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-8

By Consortium
Question How many SCD of arts and science courses involved in the collaboration were available through technological means? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* Which of the following options were available for SCD of arts and science courses? Response rate Two-way audio-video conferencing One-way audio-video conferencing Web-based courses (course completely online) Web-enhanced courses (course at least partially online) 2A.8a Were models or strategies developed for SCDE faculty to use in preparing preservice teachers to integrate technology? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Were models or strategies field-tested for SCDE faculty to use in preparing preservice teachers to integrate technology? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.7b

47 291 7.7 3.5 1 66 9

100

26 126 6 3 1 29 5

100

15 144 12 5 2 66 3

100

6 21 4.2 2 1 12 1

100

40 291 7.3 3 1 66 11

100

21 126 6 3 1 29 5

100

13 144 11.1 4 2 66 3

100

6 21 3.5 2 1 10 3

100

2A.7c

47 21 15 23 46

100 45 32 49 98

26 10 6 11 25

100 38 23 42 96

15 7 5 8 15

100 47 33 53 100

6 4 4 4 6

100 67 67 67 100

51 19 14 22 49

100 37 27 43 96

26 10 6 11 25

100 38 23 42 96

16 7 5 9 16

100 44 31 56 100

9 2 3 2 8

100 22 33 22 89

201 177 12 12

89 88 6 6

118 99 7 12

86 84 6 10

61 59 2 0

95 97 3 0

22 20 2 0

96 91 9 0

326 234 46 46

80 72 14 14

135 110 10 15

76 81 7 11

93 78 7 8

89 84 8 9

102 50 29 23

80 49 28 23

2A.8b

201 128 18 55

89 64 9 27

118 66 12 40

86 56 10 34

61 45 4 12

95 74 7 20

22 18 1 3

96 82 5 14

326 153 51 122

80 47 16 37

135 74 16 45

76 55 12 33

93 53 13 27

89 57 14 29

102 28 22 52

80 27 22 51

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-9

By Consortium
Question Were models or strategies for SCDE faculty to use in preparing preservice teachers to integrate technology disseminated in any of the following ways: Response rate Locally Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No State-wide Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Regionally Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Nationally Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.8c

201 157 10 34 98 27 76 88 20 93 87 26 88

89 78 5 17 49 13 38 44 10 46 43 13 44

118 90 5 23 45 18 55 41 11 66 43 12 63

86 76 4 19 38 15 47 35 9 56 36 10 53

61 48 3 10 35 7 19 32 5 24 31 9 21

95 79 5 16 57 11 31 52 8 39 51 15 34

22 19 2 1 18 2 2 15 4 3 14 4 4

96 86 9 5 82 9 9 68 18 14 64 18 18

326 200 37 89 118 42 166 100 32 194 97 35 194

80 61 11 27 36 13 51 31 10 60 30 11 60

135 97 7 31 49 19 67 40 12 83 45 12 78

76 72 5 23 36 14 50 30 9 61 33 9 58

93 66 8 19 44 12 37 37 10 46 33 13 47

89 71 9 20 47 13 40 40 11 49 35 14 51

102 38 23 41 26 13 63 23 11 68 21 11 70

80 37 23 40 25 13 62 23 11 67 21 11 69

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-10

By Consortium
Question How were models or strategies for SCDE faculty to use in preparing preservice teachers to integrate technology disseminated? Response rate Presentation at a conference Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Article in journal or other publication Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Posting on a Web site Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Were field experiences added, expanded, or modified to place preservice students in learning environments with information technologies readily available for use with K-12 students? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Not applicable, not an SCDE How many preservice students' field experiences placed them in learning environments with information technologies readily available for use with K-12 students? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.8d

201 136 19 46 52 27 122 128 15 58

89 68 9 23 26 13 61 64 7 29

118 74 13 31 26 12 80 66 11 41

86 63 11 26 22 10 68 56 9 35

61 44 4 13 14 10 37 43 3 15

95 72 7 21 23 16 61 70 5 25

22 19 1 2 13 4 5 20 0 2

96 86 5 9 59 18 23 91 0 9

326 161 39 126 59 42 225 166 31 129

80 49 12 39 18 13 69 51 10 40

135 77 15 43 25 14 96 73 13 49

76 57 11 32 19 10 71 54 10 36

93 56 10 27 15 15 63 55 8 30

89 60 11 29 16 16 68 59 9 32

102 31 15 56 20 14 68 41 10 51

80 30 15 55 20 14 67 40 10 50

2A.9a

201 118 24 58 1

89 59 12 29 <1

118 66 13 38 1

86 56 11 32 1

61 40 4 17 0

95 66 7 28 0

22 14 7 1 0

96 64 32 5 0

326 137 53 136 0

80 42 16 42 0

135 68 17 50 0

76 50 13 36 0

93 46 11 36 0

89 49 12 39 0

102 25 26 51 0

80 25 25 50 0

2A.9b

118 15,120 164.3 62 0 2,373 16

100

66 6,523 123.1 45 2 1,147 13

100

40 5.568 185.6 90 1 2,000 10

100

14 3,738 339.8 53 0 2,373 3

100

139 15,120 145.4 52.5 0 1,600 35

101

68 6,523 123.1 45 2 1,147 15

100

47 5,568 168.7 90 1 754 14

102

26 3,738 186.9 19.5 0 1,600 6

104

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-11

By Consortium
Question Approximately what proportion of preservice students engaged in the following types of activities during their field experiences? Response rate Observe K-12 teachers modeling the use technology in instruction None Less than half More than half All Data not available Work individually with K-12 students on technology-related projects None Less than half More than half All Data not available Teach K-12 classes modeling the use of technology in instruction None Less than half More than half All Data not available Observe SCDE faculty teaching K-12 class in collaboration with K-12 teachers None Less than half More than half All Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.9c

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

139

101

68

100

47

102

26

104

4 35 60 21 19

3 25 43 15 14

1 16 26 15 10

1 24 38 22 15

1 12 24 6 4

2 26 51 13 9

2 8 11 0 5

8 31 42 0 19

7 53 48 11 20

5 38 35 8 14

3 58 22 5 10

4 41 32 7 15

1 16 20 5 5

2 34 43 11 11

3 11 6 1 5

12 42 23 4 19

8 50 45 16 20

6 36 32 12 14

5 23 22 8 10

7 34 32 12 15

1 16 18 6 6

2 34 38 13 13

2 13 5 2 4

8 50 19 8 15

37 58 15 6 23

27 42 11 4 17

19 27 9 2 11

28 40 13 3 16

8 25 5 3 6

17 53 11 6 13

11 7 1 1 6

42 27 4 4 23

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-12

By Consortium
Question Approximately what proportion of preservice students used the following technologies or technology-related tools in their field experiences? Response rate Internet or web-based materials None Less than half More than half All Data not available Multi-media None Less than half More than half All Data not available Software packages for word processing, spreadsheets, databases None Less than half More than half All Data not available Teaching tools None Less than half More than half All Data not available E-mail None Less than half More than half All Data not available Additional software packages (presentation software, reference tools) None Less than half More than half All Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2A.9d

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

139 3 31 52 35 18 4 56 47 13 19

101 2 22 37 25 13 3 40 34 9 14

68 2 12 22 21 11 1 23 24 9 11

100 3 18 32 31 16 1 34 35 13 16

47 0 12 19 12 4 1 20 17 4 5

102 0 26 40 26 9 2 43 36 9 11

26 1 8 11 3 3 2 15 6 0 3

104 4 31 42 12 12 8 58 23 0 12

4 27 46 45 17 19 56 29 5 30 3 20 42 57 17

3 19 33 32 12 14 40 21 4 22 2 14 30 41 12

2 9 27 21 9 10 28 11 2 17 1 9 19 29 10

3 13 40 31 13 15 41 16 3 25 1 13 28 43 15

1 9 14 18 5 5 21 12 2 7 1 7 16 19 4

2 19 30 38 11 11 45 26 4 15 2 15 34 40 9

1 9 7 6 3 4 8 6 1 7 1 4 8 10 3

4 35 27 23 12 15 31 23 4 27 4 15 31 38 12

7 38 49 22 23

5 27 35 16 17

2 21 22 10 13

3 31 32 15 19

3 11 19 9 5

6 23 40 19 11

2 7 9 3 5

8 27 35 12 19

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-13

By Consortium
Question 2A.9d (Continued) Approximately what proportion of preservice students used the following technologies or technology-related tools in their field experiences? Response rate Content-specific software None Less than half More than half All Data not available Portfolio tools None Less than half More than half All Data not available Was professional development provided to SCDE faculty to integrate technology in course instruction? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Not applicable, not an SCDE How many SCDE faculty members received professional development to integrate technology in course instruction? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

139 8 50 45 12 24 15 66 26 7 25

101 6 36 32 9 17 11 47 19 5 18

68 3 23 21 7 14 7 29 13 3 16

100 4 34 31 10 21 10 43 19 4 24

47 2 24 16 4 5 4 24 11 3 5

102 4 43 34 9 11 9 51 23 6 11

26 3 9 8 1 5 4 14 3 1 4

104 12 35 31 4 19 15 54 12 4 15

2B.1a

201 184 10 6 1

89 92 5 3 <1

118 107 6 4 1

86 91 5 3 1

61 57 2 2 0

95 93 3 3 0

22 21 1 0 0

96 95 5 0 0

326 251 43 32 0

80 77 13 10 0

135 117 10 8 0

76 87 7 6 0

93 82 8 3 0

89 88 9 3 0

102 56 25 21 0

80 55 25 21 0

2B.1b

184 3,682.60 20 13 1 168

100

107 1,601.60 15 12 1 70

100

57 1,416 24.8 18 2 111

100

21 747 35.6 15 1 168

100

251 3,683 14.7 10 0 90

100

117 1,601 13.7 11 1 70

100

82 1,416 17.3 13 2 73

100

56 747 13.3 6 0 90

100

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-14

By Consortium
Question Of those SCDE faculty who participated in professional development activities, what percentage received the following amount of professional development during the reporting period? Response rate 1-5 hours Total Percent receiving this training 6-10 hours Total Percent receiving this training 11-20 hours Total Percent receiving this training 21-50 hours Total Percent receiving this training More than 50 hours Total Percent receiving this training Which of the following types of professional development were implemented for SCDE faculty, and which of the following types of professional development facilitators were used? Response rate Workshops (required) Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Workshops (optional) Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2B.1c

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

251 1070.8 29 598.9 16 668.4 18 867.4 24 477.1 13

100

117 398 24.9 279.4 17.4 314.3 19.6 399.9 25 210 13.1

100

82 347.4 24.5 215.8 15.2 279 19.7 342.1 24.2 231.8 16.4

100

56 332.8 44.6 133.5 17.9 89.4 12 144.4 19.3 46.9 6.3

100

2B.1d

184 51 68 56 33 20 96 130 100 69 54

100 28 37 30 18 11 52 71 54 38 29

107 25 37 29 21 6 52 70 55 39 24

100 23 35 27 20 6 49 65 51 36 22

57 15 21 17 8 8 31 43 31 20 22

100 26 37 30 14 14 54 75 54 35 39

21 11 12 10 4 6 15 19 15 11 9

100 52 57 48 19 29 71 90 71 52 43

251 58 88 69 41 27 104 148 111 68 56

100 23 35 27 16 11 41 59 44 27 22

117 26 37 28 22 6 53 75 57 40 25

100 22 32 24 19 5 45 64 49 34 21

82 20 34 26 13 14 33 51 37 21 24

100 24 41 32 16 17 40 62 45 26 29

56 12 19 15 6 7 20 25 18 8 8

100 21 34 27 11 13 36 45 32 14 14

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-15

By Consortium
Question 2B.1d (Continued) Which of the following types of professional development were implemented for SCDE faculty, and which of the following types of professional development facilitators were used? Response rate Individual training Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Available technical support for drop-in assistance Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Mentorships Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Conferences Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Courses Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

184 28 120 88 42 78

100 15 65 48 23 42

107 17 61 44 19 35

100 16 57 41 18 33

57 4 43 30 18 33

100 7 75 53 32 58

21 7 18 16 7 11

100 33 86 76 33 52

251 27 143 98 46 83

100 11 57 39 18 33

117 17 66 45 21 36

100 15 56 38 18 31

82 4 56 38 21 35

100 5 68 46 26 43

56 6 25 16 6 16

100 11 45 29 11 29

15 136 62 19 77 8 40 64 36 36 70 62 82 43 25 22 36 42 7 9

8 74 34 10 42 4 22 35 20 20 38 34 45 23 14 12 20 23 4 5

10 75 33 11 37 4 21 33 21 14 36 29 42 20 11 10 12 22 4 4

9 70 31 10 35 4 20 31 20 13 34 27 39 19 10 9 11 21 4 4

2 43 21 5 29 3 11 20 13 17 25 22 29 17 13 9 16 11 3 5

4 75 37 9 51 5 19 35 23 30 44 39 51 30 23 16 28 19 5 9

3 19 10 3 12 2 10 13 3 7 11 12 12 7 2 3 8 9 0 0

14 90 48 14 57 10 48 62 14 33 52 57 57 33 10 14 38 43 0 0

18 161 71 22 80 8 40 73 41 36 81 71 97 50 31 22 38 41 7 9

7 64 28 9 32 3 16 29 16 14 32 28 39 20 12 9 15 16 3 4

11 77 32 11 37 4 21 33 26 14 39 30 44 22 11 10 12 20 4 4

9 66 27 9 32 3 18 28 22 12 33 26 38 19 9 9 10 17 3 3

2 56 26 7 31 3 12 25 14 17 28 29 37 24 19 9 18 13 3 5

2 68 32 9 38 4 15 30 17 21 34 35 45 29 23 11 22 16 4 6

5 30 15 4 13 2 9 18 2 8 15 13 17 5 2 3 8 8 0 0

9 54 27 7 23 4 16 32 4 14 27 23 30 9 4 5 14 14 0 0

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-16

By Consortium
Question Were SCDE faculty assessed on their level of technology proficiency? Response rate Yes Which of the following were used to assess SCDE faculty proficiency with technology? Response rate Self-assessment Observation (e.g., by dean, technology coordinator, facilitator) Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer test) Portfolio assessment All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2B.1f

184 145

100 79

107 85

100 79

57 45

100 79

21 16

100 76

251 171

100 68

117 86

100 74

82 56

100 68

56 32

100 57

2B.1g

145 139 66 14 15

100 96 46 10 10

85 83 41 7 7

100 98 48 8 8

45 43 19 6 5

100 96 42 13 11

16 14 6 1 3

100 88 38 6 19

171 164 70 14 17

100 96 41 8 10

87 84 41 7 7

100 97 47 8 8

55 53 21 6 5

100 96 38 11 9

32 29 9 1 5

100 91 28 3 16

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-17

By Consortium
Question How many SCDE faculty who participated in professional development to integrate technology were rated as technologically proficient using the assessment tool identified in the previous question Self-assessment Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available Observation (e.g., by dean, technology coordinator, facilitator) Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer test) Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available Portfolio assessment Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2B.1h

99 893 9 8 0 47

65 546 8.4 7 0 47

24 256 10.7 9.5 2 27

11 111 10.1 9 1 34

111 893 8 6 0 47

67 546 8.1 6 0 47

31 256 8.3 6 1 27

14 111 7.9 4.5 1 30

49 469 9.6 7 0 55

31 224 7.2 6 1 20

13 169 13 12 0 31

6 107 17.8 7.5 3 55

52 469 9 6 0 44

31 224 7.2 6 1 20

15 169 11.3 8 0 31

7 107 15.3 10 3 44

8 70 8.8 8.5 1 20

5 50 10 12 1 20

3 20 6.7 4 1 15

0 0 0 0 0 0

8 70 8.8 8.5 1 20

5 50 10 12 1 20

3 20 6.7 4 1 15

0 0 0 0 0 0

7 102 14.6 9 5 50

4 34 8.5 8.5 5 12

1 9 9 9 9 9

2 59 29.5 29.5 9 50

8 102 12.8 9 5 44

4 34 8.5 8.5 5 12

1 9 9 9 9 9

3 59 19.7 9 6 44

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-18

By Consortium
Question Was professional development provided to SCD of arts and science faculty to integrate technology in course instruction? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No How many SCD of arts and science faculty members received professional development to integrate technology in course instruction? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Of those SCD of arts and science faculty who participated in professional development activities, what percentage received the following amount of professional development? Response rate 1-5 hours Total Percent receiving this training 6-10 hours Total Percent receiving this training 11-20 hours Total Percent receiving this training 21-50 hours Total Percent receiving this training More than 50 hours Total Percent receiving this training All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2B.2a

110 87 6 17

100 79 5 15

61 51 3 7

100 84 5 11

34 27 1 6

100 79 3 18

15 10 2 3

100 67 13 20

140 105 13 22

100 75 9 16

64 54 3 7

100 84 5 11

41 34 2 5

100 83 5 12

37 18 8 11

100 49 22 30

2B.2b

88 1,564 17.8 8 0 242

101

52 650 12.5 7.5 0 106

102

27 645 23.9 10 2 242

100

10 272 27.2 7 1 137

100

106 1,564 14.8 7 0 165

101

55 650 11.8 8 0 101

102

34 645 19 7.5 2 165

100

18 272 15.1 4.5 1 110

100

2B.2c

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

106 686.3 44 277.5 18 194.2 12 222.9 14 183.2 12

101

55 216.8 33 145.6 22 120 18 97.6 15 70 11

102

34 342.1 53 87.8 14 66.1 10 93.3 14 55.6 9

100

18 127.4 47 44 16 8 29 32.9 12 59.6 22

100

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-19

By Consortium
Question Which of the following types of professional development were implemented for SCD of arts and science faculty and which of the following types of professional development facilitators were used? Response rate Workshops (required) Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Workshops (optional) Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Individual training Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Available technical support for drop-in assistance Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Mentorships Outside trainer SCDE or university technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2B.2d

88 28 38 26 18 11 43 61 41 22 21 13 55 37 18 32

101 32 43 30 20 13 49 69 47 25 24 15 63 42 20 36

52 14 16 12 11 6 26 35 23 16 13 7 30 22 10 18

102 27 31 23 21 12 50 67 44 31 25 13 58 42 19 35

27 8 14 5 4 3 13 19 13 4 6 5 20 11 6 9

100 30 52 19 15 11 48 70 48 15 22 19 74 41 22 33

10 7 9 9 3 2 5 8 5 2 2 2 6 4 2 5

100 70 90 90 30 20 50 80 50 20 20 20 60 40 20 50

106 28 40 24 21 12 42 68 45 22 35 13 61 42 19 23

101 26 38 23 20 11 40 64 42 21 33 12 58 40 18 22

55 14 16 12 11 6 26 37 24 16 14 7 33 24 54 19

102 25 29 22 20 11 47 67 44 29 25 13 60 44 98 35

34 8 17 5 5 3 14 23 15 4 7 5 24 13 32 10

100 24 50 15 15 9 41 68 44 12 21 15 71 38 94 29

18 7 8 7 5 3 3 9 6 2 2 2 5 5 18 6

100 39 44 39 28 17 17 50 33 11 11 11 28 28 100 33

5 56 20 7 27 1 15 20 9 15

6 64 23 8 31 1 17 23 10 17

3 35 11 4 16 1 7 8 4 7

6 67 21 8 31 2 13 15 8 13

1 15 5 1 8 0 6 6 4 7

4 56 19 4 30 0 22 22 15 26

1 7 4 2 3 0 2 6 1 1

10 70 40 20 30 0 20 60 10 10

4 60 22 7 29 1 15 21 11 15

4 57 21 7 27 1 14 20 10 14

3 36 11 4 16 1 7 9 5 7

5 65 20 7 29 2 13 16 9 13

1 20 7 1 9 0 7 8 5 7

3 59 21 3 26 0 21 24 15 21

0 5 4 2 4 0 1 4 1 1

0 28 22 11 22 0 6 22 6 6

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-20

By Consortium
Question 2B.2d (Continued) Which of the following types of professional development were implemented for SCD of arts and science faculty and which of the following types of professional development facilitators were used? Response rate Conferences Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Courses Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Were SCD of arts and science faculty assessed on their level of technology proficiency? Response rate Yes Which of the following were used to assessed SCD of arts and science faculty proficiency with technology? Response rate Self-assessment Observation (e.g., by dean, technology coordinator, facilitator) Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer test) Portfolio assessment All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

88 29 23 26 17 7 7 12 8 0 3

101 33 26 30 19 8 8 14 9 0 3

52 14 12 12 10 4 4 5 4 0 3

102 27 23 23 19 8 8 10 8 0 6

27 13 7 9 6 3 2 4 2 0 0

100 48 26 33 22 11 7 15 7 0 0

10 3 5 5 1 0 1 3 2 0 0

100 30 50 50 10 0 10 30 20 0 0

106 31 24 28 19 8 7 12 6 0 3

101 29 23 26 18 8 7 11 6 0 3

55 15 13 14 11 4 4 6 4 0 3

102 27 24 25 20 7 7 11 7 0 5

34 14 8 11 7 4 2 4 2 0 0

100 41 24 32 21 12 6 12 6 0 0

18 3 4 3 1 0 1 2 0 0 0

100 17 22 17 6 0 6 11 0 0 0

2B.2e

88 57

101 65

52 33

102 63

27 18

100 67

10 6

100 60

106 66

101 62

55 35

102 64

34 22

100 65

18 9

100 50

2B.2f

57 55 26 3 7

100 96 46 5 12

33 32 15 3 3

100 97 45 9 9

18 17 8 0 2

100 94 44 0 11

6 6 4 0 2

100 100 67 0 33

66 62 27 3 8

100 94 41 5 12

35 34 15 3 3

100 97 43 9 9

22 20 8 0 2

100 91 36 0 9

9 8 4 0 3

100 89 44 0 33

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-21

By Consortium
Question How many SCD of arts and science faculty who participated in professional development to integrate technology were rated as technologically proficient using the assessment tool identified in the question above. Self-assessment Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available Observation (e.g., by dean, technology coordinator, facilitator) Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer test) Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available Portfolio assessment Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2B.2g

40 411 10.3 6 0 106

27 324 12 6 0 106

8 64 8 7 1 21

5 44 8.8 9 2 21

44 411 9.3 4.5 0 106

29 324 11.2 6 0 106

10 64 6.4 4.5 1 21

5 44 8.8 9 2 21

19 204 10.7 7 0 74

11 60 5.5 6 0 13

5 57 11.4 11 3 21

3 87 29 9 4 74

20 204 10.2 7.5 0 61

11 60 5.5 6 0 13

5 57 11.4 11 3 21

4 87 21.8 11 4 61

3 9 3 3 0 6

3 9 3 3 0 6

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

3 9 3 3 0 6

3 9 3 3 0 6

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

5 47 9.4 6 0 20

3 8 2.7 2 0 6

1 19 19 19 19 19

1 20 20 20 20 20

6 47 7.8 6.5 0 19

3 8 2.7 2 0 6

1 19 19 19 19 19

2 20 10 10 7 13

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-22

By Consortium
Question Was professional development provided to K-12 teachers at partner schools to integrate technology in class instruction? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No How many K-12 teachers received professional development to integrate technology in course instruction? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Of those K-12 teachers who participated in professional development activities, what percentage received the following amount of professional development during the reporting period? Response rate 1-5 hours Total Percent receiving this training 6-10 hours Total Percent receiving this training 11-20 hours Total Percent receiving this training 21-50 hours Total Percent receiving this training More than 50 hours Total Percent receiving this training All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2B.3a

197 124 20 53

100 63 10 27

115 71 14 30

100 62 12 26

60 44 3 13

100 73 5 22

22 10 3 9

100 45 14 41

304 153 31 120

100 50 10 39

130 79 15 36

100 61 12 28

90 52 9 29

100 58 10 32

88 24 7 57

100 27 8 65

2B.3b

127 7,660 60.3 20 2 1,576

102

73 2,525 34.6 15 2 325

103

44 2,865 65.1 27 2 398

100

11 2,347 213.4 47 10 1,576

110

156 5,845 37.5 14.5 2 398

102

81 2,469 30.5 14 2 325

103

52 2,865 55.1 21.5 2 398

100

25 588 23.5 8 2 220

104

2B.3c

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

156 1,456.80 25 1,426.10 24 1,066.10 18 1,432.30 25 461.2 8

102

81 645.2 26 645.1 26 431.3 17 529.3 21 214.9 9

103

52 718.6 25 684 24 571.9 20 668.3 23 222.3 8

100

25 97.6 17 140.6 24 75.2 13 251.2 43 24 4

104

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-23

By Consortium
Question Which of the following types of professional development were implemented for K-12 teachers, and which of the following types of professional development facilitators were used? Response rate Workshops (required) Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Workshops (optional) Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Individual training Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Available technical support for drop-in assistance Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Mentorships Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2B.3d

127 29 34 39 26 16 47 56 55 43 31 14 38 34 29 35

102 23 27 31 20 13 37 44 43 34 24 11 30 27 23 28

73 16 15 17 15 5 24 30 27 27 13 8 24 21 19 20

103 22 21 23 21 7 33 41 37 37 18 11 33 29 26 27

44 6 12 14 8 5 18 23 22 12 13 4 13 7 7 12

100 14 27 32 18 11 41 52 50 27 30 9 30 16 16 27

11 7 7 8 3 6 6 3 6 4 6 3 2 6 4 5

110 64 64 73 27 55 55 27 55 36 55 27 18 55 36 45

156 36 37 37 27 15 50 53 52 44 29 16 40 33 26 35

102 23 24 24 17 10 32 34 33 28 19 10 26 21 17 22

81 17 15 17 14 5 26 30 27 27 13 8 25 21 17 20

103 21 19 21 17 6 32 37 33 33 16 10 31 26 21 25

52 7 14 13 8 5 19 22 21 13 13 5 14 7 6 12

100 13 27 25 15 10 37 42 40 25 25 10 27 13 12 23

25 12 8 7 5 5 6 1 5 4 4 4 2 6 4 5

104 48 32 28 20 20 24 4 20 16 16 16 8 24 16 20

12 46 26 23 28 5 16 32 27 22

9 36 20 18 22 4 13 25 21 17

6 26 15 17 14 3 8 16 16 10

8 36 21 23 19 4 11 22 22 14

4 16 8 4 11 1 7 11 9 10

9 36 18 9 25 2 16 25 20 23

3 4 4 3 4 1 1 5 3 4

27 36 36 27 36 9 9 45 27 36

14 46 25 21 27 6 15 33 26 21

9 29 16 13 17 4 10 21 17 13

6 26 15 16 14 4 8 17 16 9

7 32 19 20 17 5 10 21 20 11

4 16 7 4 11 1 7 11 9 10

8 31 13 8 21 2 13 21 17 19

5 4 4 2 3 1 0 5 2 4

20 16 16 8 12 4 0 20 8 16

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-24

By Consortium
Question 2B.3d (Continued) Which of the following types of professional development were implemented for K-12 teachers, and which of the following types of professional development facilitators were used? Response rate Conferences Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student Courses Outside trainer SCDE or university/college technology specialist Professor K-12 teacher Undergraduate or graduate student All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

127 26 21 26 28 12 5 18 19 4 3

102 20 17 20 22 9 4 14 15 3 2

73 16 13 14 16 5 5 6 7 3 1

103 22 18 19 22 7 7 8 10 4 1

44 8 6 9 9 6 0 11 11 1 2

100 18 14 20 20 14 0 25 25 2 5

11 2 2 3 4 1 0 1 2 0 0

110 18 18 27 36 9 0 9 18 0 0

156 28 22 30 29 13 5 16 16 3 3

102 18 14 19 19 8 3 10 10 2 2

81 17 13 15 16 5 5 6 7 2 1

103 0 21 16 19 20 6 6 7 9 2 1

52 9 7 11 9 6 0 9 9 1 2

100 0 17 13 21 17 12 0 17 17 2 4

25 2 2 5 5 2 0 1 1 0 0

104 0 8 8 20 20 8 0 4 4 0 0

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-25

By Consortium
Question LEAD ORGANIZATIONS ONLY: In addition to SCDE and SCD of arts and science faculty at partner institutions and K-12 teachers, how many other individuals participated in professional development? Preservice students Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Community college faculty Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum SCDE and SCD of arts and science faculty at non-consortium member schools Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Faculty in school or colleges outside the SCDE and SCD of arts and science Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Did you add or expand a graduation requirement for preservice students to demonstrate proficiency in the use of technology in teaching or learning? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Not applicable, not an SCDE Data not available 201 43 46 109 1 2 89 21 23 54 <1 1 118 21 27 68 1 1 86 18 23 58 1 1 61 15 11 34 0 1 95 25 18 56 0 2 22 7 8 7 0 0 96 32 36 32 0 0 326 43 77 191 0 15 80 13 24 59 0 5 135 21 29 84 0 1 All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2B.4a

172 13,245 77 10 0 2,400 147 260 1.8 0 0 129

76

105 7,260 69.1 10 0 2,400 87 65 1 0 0 15

76

52 4,029 77.5 12 0 1,792 45 33 1 0 0 12

81

15 1,956 130.4 3 0 1,500 15 162 10.8 0 0 129

65

These items were asked only of lead organizations

65

63

70

65

These items were asked only of lead organizations

143 1,026 7.2 0 0 578

64

84 48 1 0 0 17

61

45 131 2.9 0 0 64

70

14 847 60.5 3.5 0 578

61

These items were asked only of lead organizations

138 695 5 0 0 450

61

82 129 1.6 0 0 39

59

44 66 1.5 0 0 30

69

12 500 41.7 0 0 450

52

These items were asked only of lead organizations

2C.1a

76 16 21 62 0 1

93 15 24 52 0 2

89 16 26 56 0 2

102 7 24 59 0 12

80 7 24 58 0 12

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-26

By Consortium
Question Do you plan to add or expand a graduation requirement for preservice students to demonstrate proficiency in the use of technology in teaching or learning in the next two years? Response rate Yes No Data not available 2C.1c Which of the following abilities were new requirements for preservice students to demonstrate for purposes of graduation: Response rate To apply computers and related technologies to support instruction in teachers' grade level and subject areas Added as a grant activity Added, but NOT as a grant activity Already required Not required Data not available To plan and deliver instructional units that integrate a variety of software applications and learning tools Added as a grant activity Added, but NOT as a grant activity Already required Not required Data not available To develop technology lessons that reflect effective grouping and assessment strategies for diverse populations Added as a grant activity Added, but NOT as a grant activity Already required Not required Data not available To use computer-based technologies such as telecommunications and the Internet to enhance personal and professional productivity Added as a grant activity Added, but NOT as a grant activity Already required Not required Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2C.1b

109 63 34 12

100 58 32 11

68 41 19 8

100 60 28 12

34 18 14 2

100 53 41 6

7 5 0 2

100 71 0 17

207 103 62 42

101 50 30 20

85 45 24 16

100 53 28 19

56 28 23 5

104 50 41 9

70 32 17 21

100 46 24 30

44

102

21

100

16

107

7

100

44

102

21

100

16

107

7

100

31 4 7 0 2

70 9 16 0 5

13 1 5 0 2

62 5 24 0 10

13 1 2 0 0

81 6 13 0 0

5 2 0 0 0

71 29 0 0 0

31 1 8 1 3

70 2 18 2 7

13 1 5 0 2

62 5 24 0 10

13 0 2 0 1

81 0 13 0 6

5 0 1 1 0

71 0 14 14 0

32 3 4 2 3

73 7 9 5 7

15 0 2 2 2

71 0 10 10 10

13 1 2 0 0

81 6 13 0 0

4 2 0 0 1

57 29 0 0 14

32 0 5 4 3

73 0 11 9 7

15 0 2 2 2

71 0 10 10 10

13 0 2 1 0

81 0 13 6 0

4 0 1 1 1

57 0 14 14 14

29 3 2 6 4

66 7 5 14 9

13 1 1 4 2

62 5 5 19 10

12 0 1 2 1

75 0 6 13 6

4 2 0 0 1

57 29 0 0 14

29 1 2 7 5

66 2 5 16 11

13 1 1 4 2

62 5 5 19 10

12 0 1 2 1

75 0 6 13 6

4 0 0 1 2

57 0 0 14 29

32 3 8 0 1

73 7 18 0 2

15 1 4 0 1

71 5 19 0 5

12 0 4 0 0

75 0 25 0 0

5 2 0 0 0

71 29 0 0 0

32 1 10 0 1

73 2 23 0 2

15 1 4 0 1

71 5 19 0 5

12 0 4 0 0

75 0 25 0 0

5 0 2 0 0

71 0 29 0 0

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-27

By Consortium
Question 2C.1c (Continued) Which of the following abilities were new requirements for preservice students to demonstrate for purposes of graduation: Response rate To use software application packages to solve problems, collect data, manage information, make presentations, and make decisions Added as a grant activity Added, but NOT as a grant activity Already required Not required Data not available To know about computer and technology uses in business, industry, and society Added as a grant activity Added, but NOT as a grant activity Already required Not required Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

44

102

21

100

16

107

7

100

44

102

21

100

16

107

7

100

28 1 11 3 1

64 2 25 7 2

12 0 5 3 1

57 0 24 14 5

9 1 6 0 0

56 6 38 0 0

7 0 0 0 0

100 0 0 0 0

28 0 11 4 1

64 0 25 9 2

12 0 5 3 1

57 0 24 14 5

9 0 6 1 0

56 0 38 6 0

7 0 0 0 0

100 0 0 0 0

16 7 9 8 4

36 16 20 18 9

9 0 5 5 2

43 0 24 24 10

4 4 4 3 1

25 25 25 19 6

3 3 0 0 1

43 43 0 0 14

16 2 10 12 4

36 5 23 27 9

9 0 5 5 2

43 0 24 24 10

4 2 4 5 1

25 13 25 31 6

3 0 1 2 1

43 0 14 29 14

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-28

By Consortium
Question Which of the following means did you use to assess preservice students' performance in the graduation requirements listed in the previous question (2C.1c)? Response rate In-class demonstration Yes No Data not available Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer test) Yes No Data not available Self-assessment Yes No Data not available Portfolio assessment Yes No Data not available Performance assessment Yes No Data not available Did you add a requirement for preservice students to develop an electronic portfolio to demonstrate proficiency in selected technology competencies? Response rate Added as a grant activity Added, but NOT as a grant activity Already required Not required Not applicable, not an SCDE Data not available 201 42 24 19 108 1 7 89 21 12 9 54 <1 3 118 18 14 7 73 1 5 86 15 12 6 62 1 4 61 18 3 8 31 0 1 95 30 5 13 51 0 2 22 6 7 4 4 0 1 96 27 32 18 18 0 5 325 42 32 36 190 0 25 79 13 10 11 58 0 8 135 18 14 9 88 0 6 All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2C.1d

44 41 1 2

102 93 2 5

21 19 1 1

100 90 5 5

16 15 0 1

107 94 0 6

7 7 0 0

100 100 0 0

44 40 1 3

102 91 2 7

21 19 1 1

100 90 5 5

16 15 0 1

107 94 0 6

7 6 0 1

100 86 0 14

15 26 3 35 8 1 37 6 1 37 5 2

34 59 7 80 18 2 84 14 2 84 11 5

7 12 2 14 6 1 17 3 1 17 3 1

33 57 10 67 29 5 81 14 5 81 14 5

5 10 1 14 2 0 15 1 0 14 2 0

31 63 6 88 13 0 94 6 0 88 13 0

3 4 0 7 0 0 5 2 0 6 0 1

43 57 0 100 0 0 71 29 0 86 0 14

12 27 5 32 9 3 34 7 3 35 6 3

27 61 11 73 20 7 77 16 7 80 14 7

7 12 2 14 6 1 17 3 1 17 3 1

33 57 10 67 29 5 81 14 5 81 14 5

5 9 2 13 2 1 14 1 1 13 3 0

31 56 13 81 13 6 88 6 6 81 19 0

0 6 1 5 1 1 3 3 1 5 0 2

0 86 14 71 14 14 43 43 14 71 0 29

2C.1e

76 13 10 7 65 0 4

93 17 6 15 53 0 2

89 18 6 16 57 0 2

101 7 12 13 52 0 17

80 7 12 13 51 0 17

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-29

By Consortium
Question Does your state require preservice students to demonstrate proficiency in the use of technology in teaching and learning as a condition for graduation? Response rate Yes No Data not available Did SCDE faculty use technology (such as e-mail or the Internet) to communicate with students? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Not applicable, not an SCDE Data not available 201 128 71 0 1 1 89 64 35 0 <1 <1 118 71 46 0 1 0 86 60 39 0 1 0 61 43 18 0 0 0 95 70 30 0 0 0 22 15 6 0 0 1 96 68 27 0 0 5 326 176 140 1 0 9 80 54 43 <1 0 3 135 78 55 1 0 1 All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2C.1f

201 97 95 9

89 48 47 4

118 52 59 7

86 44 50 6

61 28 31 2

95 46 51 3

22 17 5 0

96 77 23 0

325 128 156 41

79 39 48 13

135 58 67 10

76 43 50 7

93 36 52 5

89 39 56 5

101 36 39 26

80 36 39 26

2D.1a

76 58 41 1 0 1

93 59 34 0 0 0

89 63 37 0 0 0

102 43 51 0 0 8

80 42 50 0 0 8

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-30

By Consortium
Question About what proportion of all SCDE faculty and students used the following types of technology to communicate? Response rate Email None Less than half More than half All Data not available ListServs None Less than half More than half All Data not available World Wide Web/Internet None Less than half More than half All Data not available Did SCDE faculty integrate technology in their course in new ways? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2D.1b

175 0 12 73 88 2 16 86 39 15 19 1 31 69 68 6

99 0 7 42 50 1 9 49 22 9 11 1 18 39 39 3

77 0 5 32 39 1 4 45 17 4 7 0 13 33 30 1

99 0 6 42 51 1 5 58 22 5 9 0 17 43 39 1

59 0 2 29 27 1 4 27 18 6 4 0 11 24 20 4

100 0 3 49 46 2 7 46 31 10 7 0 19 41 34 7

42 0 6 13 24 0 9 16 4 5 9 1 8 13 19 2

100 0 14 30 56 0 21 37 9 12 21 2 19 30 44 5

2D.2a

200 174 19 2 5

89 87 10 1 3

117 99 12 2 4

85 85 10 2 3

61 56 5 0 0

95 92 8 0 0

22 19 2 0 1

96 86 9 0 5

326 238 60 9 19

80 73 18 3 6

135 109 18 3 5

76 81 13 2 4

93 77 15 0 1

89 83 16 0 1

102 56 27 6 13

80 55 26 6 13

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-31

By Consortium
Question About what proportion of all SCDE faculty applied technology in their courses in the following ways? Response rate Used the Web as an online resource for syllabi, lesson plans, and course materials None Less than half More than half All Data not available Required students to use the Web to conduct research, including accessing documents and online bibliographic services None Less than half More than half All Data not available Used presentation software and multi-media (including digital cameras and scanners) to create electronic presentations None Less than half More than half All Data not available Required students to use presentation software and multi-media (including digital cameras and scanners) to create electronic presentations None Less than half More than half All Data not available Used video for preservice students to observe K12 teachers modeling integration of technology in classroom instruction None Less than half More than half All Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2D.2b

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

237

99.5

108

99

77

100

56

100

9 111 77 29 11

4 47 32 12 5

3 50 35 16 4

3 46 32 15 4

2 38 29 5 3

3 49 38 7 4

4 27 13 8 4

7 48 23 14 7

2 69 113 40 13

1 29 48 17 5

0 29 54 19 6

0 27 50 18 6

0 24 38 12 3

0 31 49 16 4

2 19 22 9 4

4 34 39 16 7

9 134 67 14 13

4 57 28 6 5

3 61 33 6 5

3 56 31 6 5

2 41 27 4 3

3 53 35 5 4

4 36 7 4 5

7 64 13 7 9

17 146 52 10 12

7 62 22 4 5

7 70 22 5 4

6 65 20 5 4

3 46 21 3 4

4 60 27 4 5

7 34 9 2 4

13 61 16 4 7

57 115 27 5 33

24 49 11 2 14

30 52 12 2 12

28 48 11 2 11

16 41 8 1 11

21 53 10 1 14

13 24 7 2 10

23 43 13 4 18

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-32

By Consortium
Question 2D.2b (Continued) About what proportion of all SCDE faculty applied technology in their courses in the following ways? Response rate Used asynchronous, editable learning modules or learning objects (interactive electronic tutorials to teach specific lessons or material) None Less than half More than half All Data not available 2D.3a Was there an increase from the previous academic year in the number of hours of available technical support for faculty, staff, and students? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Data not available 2D.3b In 1998-1999 about how many hours of technical support were available to SCDE faculty, staff, and students per week? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* In 1999-2000 about how many hours of technical support were available to SCDE faculty, staff, and students per week? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available 199 126 31 32 10 88 63 16 16 5 116 69 19 22 6 84 59 16 19 5 61 42 7 10 2 95 69 11 16 3 22 16 5 0 1 96 73 23 0 5 325 146 72 76 31 79 45 22 23 10 134 72 23 32 7 Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 237 99.5 108 All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

99

77

100

56

100

91 88 12 5 41

38 37 5 2 17

41 43 4 3 17

38 40 4 3 16

27 31 6 1 12

35 40 8 1 16

24 17 2 1 12

43 30 4 2 21

76 54 17 24 5

93 50 16 20 7

89 54 17 22 8

102 27 34 24 17

80 26 33 24 17

126 2,857 36.6 15 0 400 48

100

69 932.5 20.3 9 0 110 23

100

42 1,766 67.9 38.8 0 400 16

100

16 264.5 33.1 39 0 100 8

100

148 2,837 32.2 15 0 400 60

101

74 932.5 20.3 9 0 110 28

103

50 1746 51.4 20 0 400 16

100

27 264.5 26.5 19 0 100 17

100

2D.3c

126 6,603 64.1 40 1 460 23

100

69 2,408.50 40.8 30 1.5 205 10

100

42 3,758.50 107.4 60 1.5 460 7

100

16 650 65 72.5 1 155 6

100

148 6,578 57.2 40 0 460 33

101

74 2,408.50 40.8 30 1.5 205 15

103

50 3733.5 86.8 48 1 460 7

100

27 650 43.3 40 0 150 12

100

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-33

By Consortium
Question Who provided technical support to SCDE faculty, staff, and students during the reporting period? Response rate Outside consultant Yes No Data not available SCDE technology support specialist Yes No Data not available University technology support specialist Yes No Data not available Professor Yes No Data not available K-12 teacher Yes No Data not available Undergraduate or graduate student Yes No Data not available Did preservice students have to demonstrate proficiency in using technology in teaching? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Not applicable, not an SCDE Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

2D.3d

199 84 107 8 162 35 2 177 21 1 149 44 6 67 118 14 138 53 8

88 42 54 4 81 18 <1 89 11 <1 75 22 3 34 59 7 69 27 4

116 44 69 3 88 27 1 104 11 1 88 27 1 42 69 5 75 38 3

84 38 59 3 76 23 1 90 9 1 76 23 1 36 59 4 65 33 3

61 27 31 3 55 6 0 51 10 0 44 14 3 17 37 7 46 13 2

95 44 51 5 90 10 0 84 16 0 72 23 5 28 61 11 75 21 3

22 15 5 2 19 2 1 22 0 0 17 3 2 8 12 2 17 2 3

96 68 23 9 86 9 5 100 0 0 77 14 9 36 55 9 77 9 14

324 98 187 39 227 76 21 273 37 15 215 81 28 77 205 42 183 105 37

79 30 58 12 70 23 6 84 11 5 66 25 9 24 63 13 56 32 11

134 49 81 4 97 35 2 118 14 2 97 35 2 47 81 6 79 50 5

76 37 60 3 72 26 1 88 10 1 72 26 1 35 60 5 59 37 4

93 29 57 7 77 14 2 77 15 1 67 20 6 20 63 10 61 26 6

89 31 61 8 83 15 2 83 16 1 72 22 6 22 68 11 66 28 6

101 23 50 28 57 27 17 82 8 12 54 27 20 11 64 26 46 30 26

80 23 50 28 56 27 17 80 8 12 53 27 20 11 63 26 45 29 25

3A.1a

200 82 62 51 2 4

89 41 31 26 1 2

117 45 35 35 1 1

85 38 30 30 1 1

61 28 19 13 0 1

95 46 31 21 0 2

22 10 8 2 0 2

96 45 36 9 0 10

325 101 110 96 0 18

79 31 34 30 0 6

134 48 41 41 0 4

76 36 31 31 0 3

93 36 32 22 0 3

89 39 34 24 0 3

102 18 39 34 0 11

80 18 38 33 0 11

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-34

By Consortium
Question How many preservice students demonstrated proficiency in the following ways: To apply computers and related technologies to support instruction in preservice students' grade level and subject area focus Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* To plan and deliver instructional units that integrate a variety of software applications and learning tools Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* To develop technology lessons that reflect effective grouping and assessment strategies for diverse populations Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* 3A.1c What was the total number (unduplicated count) of preservice students that demonstrated proficiency in using technology? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

3A.1b

82 11,605 187.2 84 0 2,667 20

100

45 2,885 84.9 53.5 4 262 11

100

28 6,662 317.1 130 0 2,667 7

100

10 2,058 294 200 20 1,025 3

100

102 11,605 156.8 80 0 1,006 28

101

36 2885 80.1 47.5 2 262 12

100

27 6662 246.7 100 0 1,006 9

100

19 2,058 187.1 29 0 1,006 8

106

82 9,014 138.7 80 0 1,025 17

100

45 3,029 84.1 58.5 3 262 9

100

28 3,999 181.8 93.5 0 1,006 6

100

10 1,986 283.7 109 16 1,025 3

100

102 9,014 120.2 62 0 1,006 27

101

36 3,029 79.7 51 2 262 10

100

27 3,999 153.8 90.5 0 1,006 10

100

19 1,986 180.5 50 0 1,006 8

106

82 7,078 157,3 85 0 1,006 37

100

45 2,062 85.9 63 0 250 21

100

28 3,384 211.5 103.5 0 1,006 12

100

10 1,632 326.4 190 36 1,006 5

100

102 7,078 138.8 80 0 1,006 51

101

36 2,062 79.3 45.5 0 250 22

100

27 3,384 188 93.5 0 1,006 18

100

19 1,632 233.1 100 0 1,006 12

106

82 11,408 175.5 120 4 1,025 17

100

45 4,219 120.5 80 4 600 10

100

28 5,241 238.2 145.5 7 1,006 6

100

10 1,948 243.5 154.5 4 1,025 2

100

102 11,408 150.1 83 2 1,006 26

101

36 4,219 114 70 2 600 11

100

27 5,241 201.6 110 7 1,006 10

100

19 1,948 149.8 50 4 1,006 6

106

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-35

By Consortium
Question How many of the preservice students that demonstrated proficiency in using technology were in their graduating year? Response rate Total Mean Median Minimum Maximum Data not available* How were students' technology proficiency assessed? Response rate In-class demonstration/observation Yes No Data not available Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer test) Yes No Data not available Self-assessment Yes No Data not available Portfolio assessment Yes No Data not available Performance assessment Yes No Data not available Did you develop an assessment tool to measure preservice students' ability to integrate technology into instruction? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

3A.1d

82 4,859 85.2 40 0 1,025 25

100

45 1,389 46.3 20 0 243 15

100

28 1,986 99.3 48 0 580 8

100

10 1,484 212 62 4 1,028 3

100

102 4,859 71.5 29.5 0 1,006 34

101

36 1,389 42.1 16 0 243 15

100

27 1,986 86.3 50 0 386 13

100

19 1,484 123.7 18.5 0 1,006 7

106

3A.1e

82 78 0 4

100 95 0 5

45 42 0 3

100 93 0 7

28 27 0 1

100 96 0 4

10 10 0 0

100 100 0 0

102 92 3 7

101 90 3 7

36 45 0 3

100 94 0 6

27 35 0 1

100 97 0 3

19 13 3 3

106 68 16 16

22 52 8 65 13 4 51 25 6 70 7 5

27 63 10 79 16 5 62 30 7 85 9 6

14 26 5 35 7 3 24 17 4 37 4 4

31 58 11 78 16 7 53 38 9 82 9 9

5 21 2 22 5 1 18 8 2 24 3 1

18 75 7 79 18 4 64 29 7 86 11 4

4 5 1 9 1 0 10 0 0 10 0 0

40 50 10 90 10 0 100 0 0 100 0 0

22 69 11 71 23 8 56 38 8 79 15 8

22 68 11 70 23 8 55 37 8 78 15 8

12 31 5 35 10 3 25 19 4 37 7 4

25 65 10 73 21 6 52 40 8 77 15 8

9 25 2 27 8 1 22 12 2 31 4 1

25 69 6 75 22 3 61 33 6 86 11 3

1 14 4 9 6 4 10 7 2 12 4 3

5 74 21 47 32 21 53 37 11 63 21 16

3A.3a

200 84 21 93 2

89 42 11 47 1

117 46 6 63 2

85 39 5 54 2

61 27 10 24 0

95 44 16 39 0

22 11 5 6 0

96 50 23 27 0

325 98 39 168 20

79 30 12 52 6

134 46 9 76 3

76 34 7 57 2

93 34 14 44 1

89 37 15 47 1

102 19 16 51 16

80 19 16 50 16

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-36

By Consortium
Question What type of assessment tool did you develop to measure preservice students' ability to integrate technology into instruction? Response rate In-class demonstration/observation Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer test) Self-assessment Portfolio assessment Performance assessment Did you develop a written plan (or do you have a written plan) to continue preservice teacher training reforms in technology after termination of grant funding? Response rate Yes No Data not available In which of the following activities was the SCD of arts and science involved? Response rate Curriculum redesign to incorporate best practices in the use of technology for preservice students Integration of Web-based, multi-media resources in preservice education courses Faculty development workshops in technology Providing technical consultants/educators for the SCDE Development of student assignments reflecting use of technology All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

3A.3b

84 50 19 71 42 48

100 60 23 85 50 57

46 28 13 37 21 23

100 61 28 80 46 50

27 15 4 24 14 17

100 56 15 89 52 63

11 7 2 10 7 8

100 64 18 91 64 73

99 55 19 80 42 53

101 56 19 81 42 54

46 29 13 35 19 24

100 63 28 76 41 52

34 17 4 30 15 19

100 50 12 88 44 56

20 9 2 16 8 10

105 45 10 80 40 50

4A.1a

200 133 55 12

89 67 28 6

117 82 26 9

85 70 22 8

61 36 23 2

95 59 38 3

22 15 6 1

96 68 27 5

324 150 138 36

79 46 43 11

134 86 37 11

76 64 28 8

93 43 43 7

89 46 46 8

101 22 61 18

80 22 60 18

4B.1a

113

100

63

100

34

100

16

100

139

100

63

100

41

100

37

100

84 84 91 56 84

74 74 81 50 74

43 46 51 32 47

68 73 81 51 75

28 27 29 15 24

82 79 85 44 71

13 11 11 9 13

81 69 69 56 81

102 101 110 65 102

73 73 79 47 73

46 48 54 35 50

73 76 86 56 79

33 32 36 18 30

80 78 88 44 73

25 23 21 13 23

68 62 57 35 62

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-37

By Consortium
Question In which of the following activities were the K-12 schools involved? Response rate Providing clinical opportunities for preservice students Yes No Data not available Modeling effective use of technology in instruction by K-12 teachers for SCDE faculty Yes No Data not available Modeling effective use of technology in instruction by K-12 teachers for preservice students Yes No Data not available Providing mentors for preservice students Yes No Data not available Designing and developing of high-quality induction programs for program graduates Yes No Data not available Designing and developing of curriculum and/or graduation requirements for preservice students that reflect the technology needs of K-12 teachers Yes No Data not available Assessing the technology proficiency of preservice students Yes No Data not available Sharing software, multi-media, and other technology tools Yes No Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

4C.2a

183

100

109

100

58

100

18

100

233

100

118

100

74

100

45

100

166 15 2

91 8 1

98 9 2

90 8 2

52 6 0

90 10 0

17 1 0

94 6 0

206 19 8

88 8 3

107 9 2

91 8 2

67 7 0

91 9 0

35 4 6

78 9 13

107 68 8

58 37 4

68 38 3

62 35 3

30 25 3

52 43 5

9 7 2

50 39 11

125 90 18

54 39 8

73 42 3

62 36 3

40 29 5

54 39 7

12 23 10

27 51 22

144 24 15 117 59 7

79 13 8 64 32 4

85 16 8 66 40 3

78 15 7 61 37 3

46 7 5 37 19 2

79 12 9 64 33 3

13 2 3 15 1 2

72 11 17 83 6 11

178 31 24 144 75 14

76 13 10 62 32 6

94 16 8 70 44 4

80 14 7 59 37 3

59 8 7 48 23 3

80 11 9 65 31 4

27 8 10 28 10 7

60 18 22 62 22 16

42 124 17

23 68 9

20 76 13

18 70 12

17 40 1

29 69 2

6 9 3

33 50 17

46 156 31

20 67 13

21 84 13

18 71 11

19 52 3

26 70 4

8 22 15

18 49 33

85 85 13

46 46 7

50 52 7

46 48 6

30 26 2

52 45 3

7 7 4

39 39 22

96 112 25

41 48 11

51 59 8

43 50 7

38 33 3

51 45 4

9 22 14

20 49 31

85 85 13

46 46 7

55 47 7

50 43 6

23 33 2

40 57 3

8 6 4

44 33 22

94 116 23

40 50 10

58 53 7

49 45 6

28 44 2

38 59 3

10 21 14

22 47 31

155 22 6

85 12 3

95 11 3

87 10 3

47 9 2

81 16 3

14 3 1

78 17 6

188 31 14

81 13 6

103 11 4

87 9 3

60 10 4

81 14 5

28 11 6

62 24 13

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-38

By Consortium
Question In which of the following activities were the K-12 schools involved? (cont.) Response rate Providing professional development opportunities for current teachers to improve their technology skills through training at the SCDE Yes No Data not available LEAD ORGANIZATIONS ONLY: 5A.1a Do your state's standards for initial certification of teachers address technology? Response rate Yes How does your state's initial certification address technology? Response rate By the assessment of technology proficiency By the required completion of technology or technology-integrated courses 5A.3a Is your state in the process of reviewing initial certification or licensure requirements to add or expand technology requirements? Response rate Yes Are efforts to add or expand technology requirements for your state's initial certification or licensure part of your grant's requirements? Response rate Yes Were any technology training activities targeted to districts with high-need rural, urban, low-income, min Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

4C.2a

183

100

109

100

58

100

18

100

233

100

118

100

74

100

45

100

125 51 7

68 28 4

73 33 3

67 30 3

38 17 3

66 29 5

15 2 1

83 11 6

151 72 10

65 31 4

78 37 3

66 31 3

51 20 3

69 27 4

24 17 4

53 38 9

193 124

86 64

113 72

82 64

59 37

92 63

21 15

91 71

These items were asked only of lead organizations

5A.2a

124 48 80

100 39 65

72 27 48

100 38 67

38 15 22

103 39 58

14 6 10

93 43 71

These items were asked only of lead organizations

190 118

84 62

113 73

82 65

59 37

92 63

18 8

78 44

These items were asked only of lead organizations

5A.4a

190 33

84 17

113 23

82 20

59 7

92 12

18 3

78 17

These items were asked only of lead organizations

6A.1a

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

280 137 32 80 31

68 49 11 29 11

119 68 8 30 13

67 57 7 25 11

79 41 11 24 3

75 52 14 30 4

86 31 13 27 15

68 36 15 31 17

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-39

By Consortium
Question Were any technology training program activities targeted to students with disabilities? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Data not available Did graduating preservice teachers accept teaching positions at districts serving high-need populations? Response rate Yes, as a grant activity Yes, but NOT as a grant activity No Data not available All grantees N % Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N % All Partners N %

By SCDE
Capacity Building N % Implementation N % Catalyst N %

6A.2a

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

236 35 32 134 35

58 15 14 57 15

99 14 14 58 13

56 14 14 59 13

66 14 8 42 2

63 21 12 64 3

75 7 10 38 20

59 9 13 51 27

6B.1a

Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items.

220 10 94 7 109

54 5 43 3 50

93 5 44 1 43

53 5 47 1 46

60 4 26 4 26

57 7 43 7 43

70 1 25 2 42

55 1 36 3 60

Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data. * Responses not included in summary statistics

B-40

Do your state's standards for initial certification of teachers address technology?

How does your state's standards for initial certification address technology? By the required completion of By the assessment of technology technology or technologyproficiency? integrated courses?

Is your state in the process of reviewing initial certification or licensure requirements to add or expand technology requirements?

State
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Vermont Washington Wisconsin West Virginia Wyoming Outlying areas

No 3 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 3 2 4 2 2 3 3 2 1 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 4 3 0 4 2 0 5 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 69

Yes 1 1 2 0 17 1 0 0 1 1 6 1 2 1 1 3 2 3 1 0 2 3 1 6 2 4 3 0 0 1 4 3 4 6 1 6 2 0 4 1 2 0 3 8 2 5 0 2 2 2 1 0 124

No 0 0 1 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 48

Yes 2 1 1 0 8 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 0 0 1 4 2 2 1 0 6 2 0 4 1 2 1 3 4 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 76

No 2 0 2 0 14 0 0 0 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 3 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 2 1 0 3 2 0 2 0 2 1 3 5 2 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 80

Yes 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 4 2 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 1 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 44

No 1 1 1 0 6 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 3 0 2 0 1 1 2 1 5 2 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 1 3 0 3 1 4 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 4 0 3 1 1 0 0 71

Yes 3 0 2 0 12 1 0 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 1 2 5 1 4 1 5 1 2 4 3 6 2 1 0 1 3 3 6 3 1 3 1 0 5 0 3 1 1 12 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 2 118

Total

B-41