You are on page 1of 10

NUTS AND BOLTS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY and TRAVELING vs. DRIVING.

Nothing in this writing is intended or presumed to be legal advice, it is a story based on learning and actual time spent in court, and actually exercising a right and is limited to the one who is intended to receive it. The jurisdiction of the courts cannot be determined because they have Military/ Admiralty/ Corporate/ International jurisdiction, all determined by the flag of the court, which is not a flag of the de jure United States of America, as the court flag has three sides with a gold fringe, with a gold ball, spear or Eagle on the pole, therefore the jurisdiction of the court defines its jurisdiction, which is foreign to the common law under the Flag, Law of. (See any law dictionary on this subject) In other words, the court is not a court of the original jurisdiction of the de jure United States of America, so what is it? ) This information is to help define Traveling on the public highways within the U.S.A. as a unregulated activity, and define how the author is now Traveling in his third automobile that is unregistered, and is therefore not subject to the commercial tax imposed on regulated automobiles, and is attempting explain the procedure as he sees it, and how he finds that the legal system that we have today works, and how to defend against it. To understand this, lets start somewhere around the beginning. The constitution is the basic organic law of this country, which was ratified by Congress. The constitution defines the rules on how the Government is to be run, and defines its Powers and Limitations, where Congress shall have the Power: Article I, Section 8, Cl. 3: To regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several States. Article I, Section 8, Cl. 10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas. Article I, Section 8, Cl. 11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water. Article I, Section 8, Cl. 14: To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land forces. Article I, Section 8, Cl. 18. To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States ***. Article IV, Section 3 Cl. 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States;

Asrticle IV, Section 4: The United Stats shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; *** Amendment X: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment VII: In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact triad by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, then according to the rules of the common law. (This means twenty dollars in gold or silver coin U.S. minted, not federal reserve notes) Constitution of State of Colorado: Article X, Sec. 3, Cl. c) Revenue: "The following classes of personal property, as defined by law, shall be exempt from property taxation: Household furnishings and personal effects which are not used for the production of income at any time;" *** Question: Is there any law that says that your auto cannot be a household item or effect? Effects: Every kind of property real and personal. (Blacks 4th Law Dictionary page 605) Title 28 U.S.C. Sec. 3002 (15)(A) United States means: (A) Federal corporation. The constitution is the same as a set of By-Laws for a corporation, and the courts have said that all governments are corporations or Associations. The constitution at Article IV, Section 4, guarantees to the States a Republican form of government, and Amendment X secures to the state or the people a Republican form of government. The only known place to claim Rights and Liberties is under the common law, and if we want rights and liberties, we must be acting under the common law, because statutory, contract or corporate law, does not have anything to do with any form of Rights or Liberties, the State statutes define the breach of duty preformed by the corporate person who is there, which the defendant is presumed to be one of their corporate citizens. The way to separate the two forms of law is this; the Common law is all unwritten law because it is Gods Law or Natural Law, and does not need to be written, as the common law allows anyone to freely travel, or make a living for himself and family without interference from government or being taxed for it, and allows anyone to do what ever he wants to do, so long as he does not deprive others of their Rights or Liberties, and is personally responsible for his actions and injures that he may cause other people, and be personally responsible for any contract obligations that he enters into. Under statutory or corporate law while dealing with commercial paper, one is subject to commercial law as he is dealing in commerce by using private commercial debt

instruments that are involved in commerce to buy and sell with, where the UCC statutes apply. A corporate person is not responsible for his injuries in the eyes of the Law as he is considered a fiction in law, and therefore must have his property registered and insured to cover any injury caused by him or his employees. Corporation: An artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. (See 13 Am Jur 154) (Ballentine Law Dictionary 1948, Page 292) All corporate names are spelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, and an ALL CAPITAL NAME, (JOHN DOE) is presumed to be a corporate person which is subject to the State statutes. A corporation or corporate fiction does not retain any Rights or Liberties, they have privileges and all privileges are defined under written State and Federal statutes and Codes. Privilege: A particular and peculiar benefit or advantage enjoyed by a person, company, or class, beyond the common advantages of other citizens. (Blacks 5th Law Dictionary, page 1077) Under the common law, one must give the other person, or the person that is about to violate the law or injure him, be given fair notice and an opportunity to stop what he is about to do, in order to give the injured party standing to bring an action if an injury is created. So, the question is, what can one do that would give that person fair notice? Congress and its representatives make rules for corporate America and for each of their citizens who wish to join them in their corporate, International foreign man made law. The Congress adopted the Federal Banking Act in 1913, which is a private corporate/ International corporation, which prints its own private currency which are called Federal Reserve Notes, which the Government and people borrow and use, which Notes are evidence of the National debt that the People have their property held for security for and are paying taxes on the corporate Value of, therefore, the debt notes are under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) because they are negotiable debt instruments dealing in commerce. All State and Federal statutes are private, copyrighted material as are the Court Rules, opinions and decisions, and to cite or quote them could mean that one is infringing upon copyrighted material, which is a crime if accused. Some court judges have put people in jail for ten days for contempt of court for the defendant even bringing up the constitution in their court, therefore the constitution must be foreign law to the courts form of law. What if, both the State and U. S. courts were the private Administrative Courts of the Federal Reserve system and were there to regulate property that their system had an interest in? Remember, the constitution gives the Congress the Power to

make rules for government and the property that they have an interest in. (See Article 4, Section 3, Cl. 2) The Courts form of law would therefore be foreign to the common law as they did not use substance but instead used federal notes which is foreign currency to the common law, which is evidenced by the flag that they fly in their court rooms, that resembles the flag of the de jure United States of America, but has a gold fringe on three sides, with a gold ball, spear and Eagle on the pole, which is listed as a military flag in the military manual. The flag is also flown in all corporate State and Federal government offices, all known corporate offices, all Banks and all law enforcement Offices. Therefore, if one is going to bring up the constitution in a Court, then by the Court Rule, he must first give the court fair notice by paper of his intention to bring up "Determination of Foreign Law" pursuant to State or Federal Civil Rule 44.1, or you lose the opportunity to bring it up later on, or if you do not, then the judge of the court does not have to take notice of any constitutional issues; the result is that the foreign law to the Court would be the constitution of the United States which the judges are required to take an oath to support. Next, is your property private property or property that corporate America has an interest in; and now the question is, are you in some act that involves commerce? Federal Reserve Notes are nothing but evidence of the National debt, and no one can claim to own any property that they gave nothing for but private, corporate federal reserve currency or debt instruments, as evidence of a debt is something that is involved with and defined under the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.). The notes are also called "slavery script" by the Courts because they lack any self sustaining face value, and can be produced out of thin air. Sovereignty: The supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable power by which any independent state is governed. (Blacks 5th at page 1252) One who can pay his bills at the end of each month. If you actually traded gold or silver coin U.S. minted which is legal tender, which is called portable property, defined under Article 1, Section 10, Cl. 1, for the car in full, and got a signed receipt for the transaction, and there were no federal debt notes (commerce) involved to invoke the commerce clause, would the corporate People of the State or its courts have any interest in the private property if the automobile was limited to the family means of private conveyance to be traveled in for family affairs, and not for profit or gain at any time? And if you are traveling in the family means of conveyance for family purposes, and not for financial profit or gain at any time, then would their be any commerce involved., and the answer must be, NO, well it might be no. When stopped for lets say, speeding, what does the person want that stopped you; it is your drivers license, proof of insurance and registration, and if you give the person your drivers license, what does that do? It gives him notice that you are a corporate person and that you are engaged in some act of commerce, or why would you give him identification that is false or misleading that indicates that you are one of them;

and then does he not draft an instrument where you agree to appear in their court at a certain date, time and place, which you accepted? So what happens if you do not give him your drivers license? We get into that later. DOES THE PERSON WHO STOPS US ON THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY HAVE THE POWER TO DO THAT? THE ANSWER TO THAT IS, YES and NO, because he could be committing an illegal act in what he does, if ground work is not laid to overcome his illegal action at the beginning of the traffic stop, in a way that would give the defendant the right to a remedy later on, or so that it can be used as a counterclaim in the original answer to the complaint pursuant to Rule 8(a), to off set the witnesses allegations by way of a counterclaim for relief pursuant to Rule 8, and then of course, the failure to deny, or bring up a counterclaim, admits to the allegations made in the original complaint. (See Rule 8(d)) And further, the person who stops us is not ever a plaintiff, is a "witness" to the events stated on the original citation which involves a fine, which involves sections under the commercial code. Question, what does one have to do in order to have standing to claim relief? Relief from a court of a foreign jurisdiction must be planned for prior to receiving a citation that you signed or accepted and agreed to appear in their court of foreign jurisdiction, not after, and that is in part by giving fair notice to the corporation by Public Notice in the corporations Public Records with the County Clerk and Recorder of your intention to Travel the public highways that involve an activity that is not regulated by either the United States or of the corporate state, in a family means of conveyance that is not engaged in any financial profit or gain at any time, without a drivers license, registration or insurance, (but you might have some documents), until you are given fair notice of a law that requires you to have the documents. There are no known documents that require one to have or show a commercial drivers license to Travel, and there is no known documents that require one to have registration papers, as the Power to tax is created by the registration of the automobile with the corporate state, which might be mandatory under the contract that you entered into by borrowing, or even by using federal notes, a check, or credit to buy the automobile with, or by those involved in commerce, or by those who voluntarily register it, although according to the state statute, there are fines for not having it registered, but there is a defense for that. Normally when in court the defendant has a hard time defending, because anything that he says in his behalf, is considered to be self-serving evidence and is not have to be heard by a judge of a court, so he must have other evidence to present in his behalf. Did the defendant have a Public Notice to enter as evidence in his behalf, as a Public Notice giving notice to the world that he intends to travel the public highways or streets as a matter of an unregulated activity, in the family house hold automobile, that the State has no interest in, is an Affirmative defense; but did you give the person who stopped you a copy of a certified copy of that public notice; if not, he can issue the citation because the public notice is what should stop everything. A public notice could go something like this. I, ___ __ ___, a natural man who can be found in the several state of Colorado, who is not a corporate person or an

employee of the U.S., or any other government system, non Military, nor insolvent, nor under any known Valid Voluntary contract, hereby gives fair notice to the world, that I acquired a 1970 _____, with a serial number of #________, which I traded one fifty dollar gold coin U.S. minted for it and nothing more, which I consider a family house hold item for the purpose of a family means of conveyance for family purposes and not for any financial profit or gain at any time, gives Notice to all that I intend to Travel the public highways without a commercial/corporate Drivers License, insurance or registration, even though I may have some of the papers because there are times that I may engage in a commercial act, but I do not intend to show them when Traveling as I am not in any known act of commerce at the time of this stop, and I believe that to be true, and therefore, if I did show them, I would be giving false information without being informed of the law or state statute that requires me to present them, and I do not want to violate any known law. Therefore, I request that the person who stopped me present the to me any document that would require me register the car, as it has no commercial value. Also the Public highways and streets are all considered to be International territory where both public travel is performed, which is unregulated, and where commerce is performed, which is regulated, and sense one is in a commercial or foreign court, he does not know what form of law the court is under, so that brings up a new problem; what if you flew a flag of the de jure U.S.A in the back window of your car on a pole, and when stopped, ask the person who stopped you to see what was in the window, and I have found that he will come back and tell me that he recognized it as a flag of the U.S.A., but be careful. (See, flag, law of, in any law dictionary) I have also found that when in court if you ask the person who stopped you, who is now a witness to the events, what he saw in the back window, he will each time (except for one time) deny that you had the flag of the U.S.A. in the window of your car, so now, the question is, why would he deny that? The flag, law of, is defined in any law dictionary, which basically says that: "In maritime law, the law of that nation or country whose flag is flown by a particular vessel. A shipowner who sends his vessel into a foreign port gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the master that he intends the law of that flag to regulate such contracts, and that they must either submit to its operation or not contract with him." Blacks 4th cites a case, where Blacks 5th the cite is removed. What flag does the court fly that you enter into when you go to court, and does court not claim jurisdiction over you when you enter before the Bar? What if the person who stops us on the public streets is acting under a type of law that is illegal, but gets away with it because the people that he stops do not know it, and therefore they fail to protect themselves or make any counterclaims in their answer or Affirmative Defenses according to court Rule 8(a) and therefore Rule 8(d) would come into play and the effect of Failure to Deny, admits to the allegations if not denied, but that brings up another problem as to deny could create a controversy, and a judge has jurisdiction to settle a controversy so that would give the court jurisdiction to hear the issues. Now I know that to answer admits jurisdiction to the court, but one has to give the court jurisdiction to hear the counterclaims, and the counterclaim is the defendants best offense.

Question: How is the Armed person who stopped you going to defend against a claim of piracy if accused of it; as there is no injury, there is no plaintiff, but he receives an interest in any fine imposed for his agency, which he is paid by, so there is a selfserving interest in you being fined, as both the court and the prosecution attorneys office also receives a percentage of any fine. Next, if the person who stops you is Armed, and you recognize him as a police officer, then he is a police officer, but if you recognize him as an Armed insurrectionist, then he is an armed insurrectionist, but that is another story that we can go into that later. The drafter of this letter has found that he cannot win in court by just defending, as he cannot be heard on anything that he says as what he might say is considered self-serving testimony, and no judge has to take notice of self-serving testimony, and since the person who drafted the citation is not a plaintiff and has not been injured, he is only a witness to the so called events and his testimony will be taken as true unless the defendant timely objects to it as being self serving testimony. If the person stopping you is Armed, in uniform and in his cruiser, then he could be piratically cruising the public highways in search of prize, (see Blacks 4th Law Dictionary page 1306), which is defined as an act of piracy which is a felony under title 18 U.S.C. Sections 1651 through 1661. It is in the drafters opinion, the piracy is established by the flag that is flown in the rear window of your family house hold means of conveyance when the person recognized as the flag of the de jure U.S.A. at the time of the stop, and the fact that he was Armed, gives the presumption of force, which could be a threat of your life and liberty. Is there a law that requires registration of an automobile? No, there is no known statute that requires the automobile to be registered unless it is the contract that you entered into to borrow the banks funds to buy the automobile with, or the use of federal debt notes which are involved in commerce. If you are sovereign, (not in debt) and you have presented a copy of your public Notice to the person who stops you that informs him of your intention, and you ask him to help you in finding a way to register the car without committing a fraud or making false claims on a legal document, and stay on that subject, and if he should claim that you are driving, or having passengers, or using the highway in some way, you must object by correcting his statements by stating that you are not doing anything but Traveling the public highways for family purposes and nothing more, and you should be more firm in being informed of how to lawfully register it according to the statute that requires you to provide registration or a drivers license when Traveling, or if not, you might ask him if he is going to make you present false or misleading documents to him for ID, or to the Motor Vehicle Clerk without knowing why, as he or some one else could charge you criminally for doing that. All highways on land and sea are there for both travel and commerce activities, and in a commercial/international court, the term commercial is presumed or intended to be used, unless it is shown to be different. If you are sovereign and have no debt, and you acquired the automobile with substance, then the automobile should fall under the protection of amendment V,

which private property is protected by law, and if you first give notice of your intent to bring up foreign law by a motion, and if you give fair notice to the person who stopped you of your public notice informing him of you intended actions, and he recognizes your flag and country, then you should have done all that you need to do to form a meaningful defense and counterclaims. I was stopped in 1996 for having a six month expired state sticker on my car, and when I gave the person a copy of my public notice, he turned to leave, but came back and asked my how often I had passengers, and I replied, that I never ever had any passengers, but I did have a guest from time to time. He turned and left. Look up guest. Many have locked themselves in their car, and refused to open the door, but with the public notice, I do not think that this is necessary if you give him the public notice and ask questions. If you get a used car for your gold coin U.S. minted, the serial number of the car is on the corporate state computer, and can be researched by the person who stopped you, so I feel that you must file your public notice and present it to the person, or you and the car can be seized for being in a car that the corporation records show that they have an interest in, and nothing to show that is your private property, and be able to have a reasonable claim as to why it is not registered, and the person can seize under the silent claim of "prize". Acquiring the automobile with gold or silver coin, removes it from the corporate system along with the flag. Without the flag, the person can still call your "prize" and seize the car and you. I think that all you need to do is to get the person to recognize it, you do not need to argue or discuss it, but the flag must be cloth and not a sticker. Now if the person drafts a citation, my question is, how did he get your name and birthday to do that? What documents did you give him to be able to do that? Remember, if you get a citation and it goes to court, you must file an answer, Affirmative defenses, and counterclaims, which will give the court jurisdiction, but to make criminal counterclaim, the court must have jurisdiction of the case. The first people who do this might be stopped, but I do not think that it will happen more than once. When a counterclaim is made, the counterclaim is to be answered first, and that is where discovery is involved, and if there is no answer to your discovery, then summary judgment is in order, and that is where Admissions are produced, and production of documents are involved. Civil Rules 26 and others, that include admissions and production of documents, if you want to go that far. Remember, the person who stopped you probably will not admit that you had the flag, and you will have to subpoena a copy of the video tape out of his car with voice, and the machine to play it on, to prove that he got and read the papers that you say that he received and read, and to support your claim that he seen and recognized your flag as a flag of the U.S.A.. The person stopping you could be drafting a negotiable instrument where by you accepting it could be under the UCC become an accommodation party to the note, which obligates you to pay the fine to off-set his debt.

"Person" has been defined as "being anyone other then a human being" by the court. The federal government spends millions of their currency each year getting the people to go into debt with their banks, and there is a common law maxim that says basically says that, "the debtor is subject to the terms of the lender". Therefore we put ourselves into a state of slavery by going into debt with the federal system of law and we subject ourselves to the jurisdiction of the federal system by contracting with them. Study and understand what you are doing before you start doing it, and plan for the things that are probably going to happen, so that you can be prepared, as the drafter of this document has found that criminal counterclaims are the only thing that the legal system seem to understand and will take notice of. . The aforesaid paragraphs seem to fall under the opinions of the following court decisions. Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. ** "Where rights secured by the Constitution are concerned, there can be no rule making or legislation that would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491. ** Courts can only regulate those in commerce, as ruled by the United States Supreme Court. Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 US 296, 297+ ** "Commerce among the several States" was defined as comprehending "traffic, intercourse, trade, navigation, * * * indeed, every species of commercial intercourse among the several States. Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 80 Led 1160, 289 US 238 (1935). Id at 298. The constitution itself is in every real sense a law -- the law makers being the people themselves, in whom under our system all political power and sovereignty primarily resides, and sovereignty primarily speaks. Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 80 Led 1160, 289 US 238 (1935) Id at 296. United States v. Cauikshank, 92 US 542, at 549 "When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation." United States v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242. Volume 20; C J S. 1785: "The United states Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state." NY re: Merriam, 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct. 1973, 41 L.Ed. 287. It is true that the property of corporations engaged in foreign or interstate commerce, as well as the property of corporations engaged in other business, is

subject to state taxation, provided always it be within the jurisdiction of the State. As said by Chief Justice Marshall in McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat, 429, "All subjects over which the sovereign power of a State extends are objects of taxation; but those over which it does not extend are, upon the soundest principles, exempt from taxation. This proposition may also be pronounced self evidence." "Only a compelling state interest in the regulation of a subject within the state's constitutional power to regulate can justify limiting First Amendment freedoms." Citing: NAACP v. Button, 371 US 415, 438, 9 l Ed 2d 405, 421, 83 S Ct 328 (1963) Williams v. Rhodes, 393 US 23, 21 L.Ed.2d 24, 89 S.Ct. 5 (1968)

You might also like