3/25/13

Multi-Print Viewer

MITCHELL AIRPORT An anti-regional maneuver
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (WI) - Thursday, March 23, 2006 Author: RESLER, Staff: Milwauk ee Journal Sentinel If a college political science class is looking for a classic case of how not to accomplish something worthwhile, the proposal to create a regional airport authority fits the bill to a T. People who should have known better, namely private business interests and state lawmakers, missed the runway by a mile. In drafting the proposal to create the authority, they needlessly burned political bridges and, in effect, thumbed their noses at local democratic representation. When state Rep. Jeff Stone (R-Greendale), Sen. Jeff Plale (D-South Milwaukee) and Rep. Mark Honadel (R-South Milwaukee) proposed the authority in December, they argued that Mitchell International Airport, run by Milwaukee County, is an economic regional asset and therefore should ideally be governed on a regional basis. This idea has merit. But some Milwaukee County supervisors asked why, if the county had done a good job running the airport, they should turn over the job to a regional authority. They also felt the lawmakers and the Metropolitan Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce were trying to push the county out of the picture. The county has indeed done a good job of managing Mitchell, but we suggested earlier that the supervisors should think regionally. A recent article by Journal Sentinel reporter Larry Sandler on how the legislation to create the authority took form casts a whole new light on the matter, however. The results are disquieting. Based on Sandler’s interviews and e-mails and documents obtained by Supervisor Richard Nyklewicz Jr. under an open records request, Sandler found that more than three years before the public knew about it, business lobbyists were drafting a bill to create the authority that would wrest control of Mitchell from the county. "One reason, "Sandler wrote, "for cutting supervisors out of the issue and barring the governor and county executive from appointing any elected officials to the authority’s seven-member board was the business leaders’ fear that elected officials could block future airport expansion that would likely require buying and bulldozing nearby homes." Nyklewicz and other supervisors are furious. County residents, especially those who live near the airport, should be, too. Supervisor James White, chairman of the Transportation Committee, called the move "the most anti-democratic proposal that has come through here in a long time." We agree. Stone and Tim Sheehy, president of MMAC, say the intention was not to circumvent local elected officials or their constituents, adding that the authority couldn’t levy taxes. But it would still be a public agency.
0-infoweb.newsbank.com.countycat.mcfls.org/iw-search/we/InfoWeb 1/5

3/25/13

Multi-Print Viewer

Sheehy notes that business leaders have been publicly talking about a regional airport authority for years. But this just makes all the more puzzling why this specific proposal then would be forged behind the scenes. "It’s apparent to us that, left to their own devices, county supervisors wouldn’t have initiated this," Sheehy told us. Maybe not. But going behind their backs is a lousy way to advance regionalism. A regional authority to govern the airport, a regional asset, remains an idea worth pursuing — this time, however, openly and with all stakeholders represented. Copyright 2006, Journal Sentinel Inc. All rights reserved. (Note: This notice does not apply to those news items already copyrighted and received through wire services or other media.) Edition: Final Section: A News Page: 16 Record Number: MERLIN_6853335 Copyright (c) 2006, Journal Sentinel Inc. All rights reserved. (Note: This notice does not apply to those news items already copyrighted and received through wire services or other media.)

0-infoweb.newsbank.com.countycat.mcfls.org/iw-search/we/InfoWeb

2/5

3/25/13

Multi-Print Viewer

Airport transfer born in secrecy Business leaders wanted Mitchell expansion out of county's control
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (WI) - Saturday, March 18, 2006 Author: LARRY SANDLER, Staff: Milwauk ee Journal Sentinel More than three years before the public knew about it, business lobbyists were drafting a bill to create a regional airport authority that would take control of Mitchell International Airport away from Milwaukee County government. And a key priority in those behind-the-scenes talks was ensuring that neither the County Board nor county voters would have a say in the handover. One reason for cutting supervisors out of the action — and barring the governor and Milwaukee County executive from appointing any elected officials to the authority’s seven-member board — was business leaders’ fear that elected officials would block future airport expansion that would likely require buying and bulldozing nearby homes. Those details about the failed legislation emerged from e-mails and documents released by Supervisor Richard D. Nyklewicz Jr. — after he filed openrecords requests to get them — and from interviews. State Rep. Jeff Stone (R-Greendale), Sen. Jeff Plale (D-South Milwaukee) and Rep. Mark Honadel (R-South Milwaukee) announced plans in December for a bill to create an airport authority funded by user fees, with no taxing power. But the bill’s language didn’t become public until it was introduced March 3 — just four days before a public hearing. The Assembly’s Urban and Local Affairs Committee didn’t vote on the bill, effectively shelving it for the year. Stone says he plans to bring it back in the next session. Business interests, led by the Greater Milwaukee Committee and the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce, have long pushed for the airport authority. They say airport officials could act faster outside the county bureaucracy, and that one county shouldn’t have sole control over such a major regional economic asset. Nyklewicz, whose district includes the airport, joined most other county supervisors in arguing that the county should not lose control of an airport it has managed well. Expansion opposition feared MMAC Vice President Pete Beitzel said he agreed that the county was doing a good job now, but he was concerned about future leaders. He pointed to a time in the 1980s when supervisors representing districts near the airport controlled four of seven seats on the board’s transportation committee, with the late Supervisor Daniel Cupertino Jr. holding the chairmanship. "He made a statement that ‘Over my dead body is there going to be another runway,’ " Beitzel said of Cupertino, who represented Milwaukee’s Bay View
0-infoweb.newsbank.com.countycat.mcfls.org/iw-search/we/InfoWeb 3/5

3/25/13

Multi-Print Viewer

neighborhood and St. Francis. "If the (future) committee decides it doesn’t want anything to do with airport expansion, the region is screwed." Beitzel described the airport as "probably the most important economic development asset in the state" and noted that 60% of its users live outside Milwaukee County. He said Mitchell’s future growth should not be decided by "the parochial interests of people who have every right to have a representative, but not to control the airport." Those same concerns were "absolutely" the reason why the legislation banned elected officials from the airport authority’s board, Beitzel said. Supervisor James White, the current chairman of the County Board’s Transportation, Public Works and Transit Committee, called the move to take the airport away from the county without a County Board vote or a referendum "the most anti-democratic proposal that has come through here in a long time." Stone said he understood the expansion concern but was more focused on governing the airport "in a more modern way." He said future versions of the legislation might remove the ban on elected officials. Sidestepping obstacle As early as 2002, airport authority supporters had given up hope of persuading the County Board to agree to the authority, documents show. On March 4 of that year, Richard Weiss, an attorney at Foley & Lardner, sent MMAC President Tim Sheehy his draft of a bill to create an airport authority, and asked for Sheehy’s comments. Weiss was experienced in dealing with special government districts, having represented the Milwaukee Brewers and the Green Bay Packers in the debates that led to creation of Wisconsin’s two stadium districts. Beitzel said Weiss and his firm had volunteered their expertise on the issue for free since the 1990s. In his memo, Weiss said his draft would require a referendum to create the airport authority because "it will be easier to win the referendum than to persuade the County Board to transfer the airports," referring to both Mitchell and Timmerman airports. Someone wrote "NO," "state create" and "no elected officials" in the margins of the memo and the draft. Beitzel said he didn’t know who wrote those comments. But the referendum was deleted from subsequent drafts, which called for the Legislature to create the airport authority without County Board or voter consent and with no elected officials on the authority board. The Weiss drafts may have played a role when Stone took up the idea in early 2005. E-mails between Stone aide Marsha Dake, Legislative Reference Bureau attorneys and Dana Lach, another Foley & Lardner attorney, suggest Lach and Stone had updated the last Weiss draft and sent it to the bureau as drafting instructions for the airport authority bill. Lach then worked with state attorneys as they drafted the bill, the e-mails show. Lach said it was her firm’s policy not to comment on client matters. Stone said it was common for outside interests with special expertise to be involved in drafting bills. Among those who saw the first Legislative Reference Bureau draft in October 2005 was Carol Skornicka, senior vice president for corporate affairs at Midwest Airlines. She misread the draft and warned MMAC lobbyist Steve Baas by e-mail that it would give the County Board the power to create the authority.
0-infoweb.newsbank.com.countycat.mcfls.org/iw-search/we/InfoWeb 4/5

3/25/13

Multi-Print Viewer

"Good catch," Baas replied by e-mail. "That would clearly be a problem." In an interview this week, Baas said the MMAC wanted the state to create the airport authority because "our goal was to get it done," and that was "the most efficient way to do it." Skornicka still thought in January that the legislation would put the County Board in charge of creating the district. In a Jan. 3 e-mail to Baas, she wrote, "Getting this through the Legislature will be a piece of cake compared to getting the County Board to establish the district! We need a couple of champions on the County Board asap to prevent an anti-district movement from building up steam." Those champions never emerged. Later in January, 17 of 19 supervisors signed a letter opposing the idea. Skornicka said Friday that her comments reflected her belief that supervisors’ views on the issue were important and should not be ignored. Copyright 2006, Journal Sentinel Inc. All rights reserved. (Note: This notice does not apply to those news items already copyrighted and received through wire services or other media.) Edition: Final Section: A News Page: 01 Record Number: MERLIN_6814267 Copyright (c) 2006, Journal Sentinel Inc. All rights reserved. (Note: This notice does not apply to those news items already copyrighted and received through wire services or other media.)

0-infoweb.newsbank.com.countycat.mcfls.org/iw-search/we/InfoWeb

5/5