You are on page 1of 3

Sava ihtimali, ran ve NATO...

Arap Baharnn rzgrlar Suriyeye dayandnda Baas rejimi panikledi. Bilhassa Kaddafinin bana gelenler, Bear Esedi ok etkiledi. Trkiye hemen n ald. Suriyenin, Libya gibi olmamas iin o dnemde Dileri Bakan srarc olundu. Suriye derin devleti, iktidar brakmaya yanamad. Oul Esedi ne kartp, kendi insanlarn oluk ocuk demeden ldrmeye baladlar. 30 bin can gitti. Yz binlerce Suriyeli Davutolu, evinden daha ok ama gitti. Genel seim nerdi. Halkn setii ynetim etrafnda bir zm aranmas iin komu lkelere, bu arada Trkiyeye snd. Suriyedeki diktatrlk, Msr gibi, Libya gibi neden dmedi? nk Amerika ve AB mesafeli durdular. Trkiye insani adan, en uzun kara snrnn nemi asndan ne kmak zorundayd. Trkiyenin hatas, ok ne kt ve yalnz brakld. kincisi, Libyay destekleyen yoktu. Hlbuki Suriye, BM Gvenlik Konseyinin daimi iki yesi in ve Rusya tarafndan desteklendi, destekleniyor. Ama asl nemli olan rann Suriyeye salad silah ve mhimmat desteidir. Nedense Trkiyenin, muhaliflere desteini dile getirenler rann, zellikle Irak zerinden salad silah desteini grmezden geliyor. Suriye zerinde kresel aktrlerin hangi hesaplarla ve nasl bir ittifak iinde olduklarn bilmiyoruz. Uluslararas ilikilerde grnenden ok, grnmeyen siyasetin arl vardr. Perde gerisinde srail, ABD, Almanya, ran, Irak, Suriye ne yapyor, bilemezsiniz. Blgemizde ve uluslararas ilikilerde gelecein en nemli lkelerinden biri Trkiyedir. Trk dnyasnn ve slam corafyasnn yldz parlayan lkesi Trkiyedir. Trkiye, kresel bar iin anahtar lkedir. Trkiye ne karsa, Trk dnyas, slam corafyas ve Afrika lkeleri ne kar. Savalardan, smrden, alktan, adaletsizlikten mecali kalmam dnyamz iin hayr ve bar adna yeni bir denge unsuru doar. ABD ve genelde Bat, Rusya, in byle bir denge unsurunu ister mi? Mesela, Saddam bahane ederek Irak meflu hale getiren ABD politikasnn, imdi sper bir yalan olduu ortaya kt. Saddamn, dnyay tehdit eden nkleer gc bulunmadn herkes grd. Ama sonu ne oldu? Irak, ABDnin deil, rann kontrolne geti. Zahirde rana kar grleyip esen ABD d politikas, blgede ran glendirmi oldu. Acaba, Trkiyenin nnn kesilmesi adna, srail lobisinin zamirinde arzu ettii gereklemi olamaz m? Zira rana bir srail-Bat mdahalesi, Trkiyeyi blgede birinci g haline getirir Asl soru udur: Byle bir Trkiye istenir mi? Dolaysyla rana bir mdahaleden daha ok, ran ile Trkiyeyi, Suriye zerinden kar karya getirme ihtimali daha yksektir. Mesele Suriye, Suriyedeki rejimin devrilmesi meselesi falan deildir. Dnyann en kritik ve stratejik blgesinde g oyunlar oynanyor ve hepsinin ortasnda, byyen Trkiyenin nnn kesilmesi planlar var. Trkiye ve ran, asla kar karya gelmemelidir. ran, Suriyenin ar tahriklerine engel olmaldr. Suriye, randan cesaret almasa, Trkiye topraklarna tek bir top mermisi atamaz. Suriye bizim topraklarmza mermi atmadka da, Trkiye karlk vermez ve sava ihtimali ortadan kalkar. Bugn Suriyenin tahrikleri sonucu gerilim trmanr, sava boyutuna geilirse, bunun en byk vebali rann olur. Mslman lkeleri (ran ve Irak) daha nce on yl harp ettirenler, bugn bir benzeri iin asla tereddt etmezler. NATO Genel Sekreterinin Trkiyeye dnk destek aklamasn, olumlu bulalm ama samimiyetini de sorgulayalm. Sava Trkiyenin, rann, Suriyenin ve Irakn, kimsenin yararna deildir Ama sava istemiyoruz deyip, ne istediini sylememek de zm deil. Keke Sayn Erdoandan 50 yl

nce bir Babakan; ister isen sulhu salah, hazr ol cenge... deseydi de, milli savunma sanayimizi kurabilseydik. Tank tamiri iin sraile, heronlar iin Amerikann gznn iine bakmasaydk

Possibility of war, Iran and NATO


The Baath regime panicked when the winds of the Arab Spring arrived in Syria. What had happened to Muammar Gaddafi in Libya influenced Bashar al-Assad. As conflict loomed in Syria, Turkey took preventive measures. Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutolu made frequent visits to Syria to ensure that it would not become another Libya. He suggested general elections. He was insistent on a solution based on the will of the people. However, the Syrian deep state did not consider leaving; they threw their weight behind Assad and started killing people. Since that time, around 30,000 people have died, while thousands of others have sought refuge in neighboring countries, including Turkey. Why hasn't the dictatorial administration in Syria fallen? It has not fallen because the US and the EU have remained indifferent to the problem. Turkey did not have this option; it was forced to take action for both humanitarian and security reasons. Consequently, Turkey's faults have attracted attention around the world. But in the end, it was left alone in this matter. It is also true to say that nobody was supporting Libya, but Syria has been backed by two UN Security Council members, China and Russia. And, most importantly, Iran supplies arms to Syria. Those who criticize Turkey's support of the opposition forces ignore the fact that Iran has been supplying arms through Iraq to the Syrian regime. We are not fully aware of the alliances and considerations between global actors occurring in the Syrian issue, and the invisible politics have had greater influence than the visible activity in international relations. You cannot know what Israel, the US, Germany, Iran and Syria are doing behind the scenes. Turkey is one of the most important states in the future of the region and in international affairs, a rising star in the Turkic world and the Muslim world, a key country for the attainment of global peace. If Turkey makes progress, the Turkic world, the Muslim world and also African nations will become more prosperous. This changes the balance in terms of peace in a world suffering from wars, exploitation, hunger and injustice. But do the US, the West, Russia and China want such a balance, with Turkey in a key role? It has become evident that the American policy of intervention in Iraq was based on a lie: Saddam Hussein did not have nuclear weapons that posed a threat to international security. And what was the result? Iraq fell under the control of Iran. Since that time, American foreign policy, which seems to be waging a war against Iran, has strengthened Iran's position in the region -- and I am wondering if this in fact fulfills the desires of the Israeli lobby, entailing as it does the decline of Turkey in the region. An Israeli or Western intervention in Iran would make Turkey the strongest actor in the region, and the question is whether this is a desired outcome for the rest of the world. With this in mind, a clash between Turkey and Iran over Syria is a greater possibility than

intervention in Iran. The issue is not the removal of the regime in Syria. A power struggle is occurring in the most strategically important region in the world; and the real issue in this situation is the development of plans to prevent the rise of Turkey. Turkey and Iran should not confront each other. Iran should prevent Syria's grave provocations. Syria will not be able to fire a single mortar into Turkish lands without the support of Iran, and Turkey will not retaliate unless Syria fires a bullet, so such a system would eliminate the possibility of a war. Iran will be responsible if tension escalates due to the provocations of Syria. Those who made sure that Muslim countries (Iran and Iraq) went to war in the past would not hesitate to do the same this time around. We should consider the NATO secretary-general's statement expressing support for Turkey as constructive, but we should also question its sincerity. War is not in the best interests of Iran, Turkey, Syria or Iraq, but stating that you are opposed to war is not an alternative to expressing what it is you do want. I wish a prime minister of this country had tended to the creation of a national defense industry five decades ago. That way, we would not need the help and support of Israel and the US in the field of defense and in the fight against terrorism.