You are on page 1of 5

Scope : The Mill Power_SAG Mills spreadsheet was designed to estimate the Net and Gross Power Demand (kW) of a semiautogenous grinding (SAG) mill, as a function of its known dimensions and basic operating conditions.

Theoretical Framework : The Net Power Demand of a SAG mill may be well estimated by the simple Hogg and Fuerstenau Model (“Power Relations for Tumbling Mills”, Trans. SME-AIME, Vol. 252, pp. 418-432, 1972), here expanded from its original formulation to represent the independent contribution of each component of the mill charge (balls, rocks and slurry) to the total net power draw of the mill : Pnet = h Pgross = 0.238 D3.5 (L/D) Nc rap (J - 1.065 J2) sina where : Pgross h D L Nc J a = = = = = = gross power draw of the mill (kW) = Pnet / h. electrical and power transmission efficiency, °/1. effective mill diameter, ft. effective mill length, ft. tumbling speed; expressed as a fraction (°/1) of the critical centrifugation speed : Ncrit = 76.6/D0.5. apparent volumetric fractional mill filling, °/1 (including the balls, the rocks and the interstitial voids in between such balls and rocks). = charge lifting angle (defines the dynamic positioning of the center of gravity of the mill load (the ‘kidney’) with respect to the vertical direction. Typically in the range of 40° to 45°.

and where rap denotes the apparent density of the charge (ton/m 3), which may be evaluated on the basis of the indicated charge components (balls, rocks and interstitial slurry) : rap = { (1-fv) rb Jb + (1-fv) rm (J – Jb) + rp Jp fv J } / J with : fv Jb Jp rm rp = volume fraction (°/1) of interstitial voids in between the balls (typically assumed to be 40% of the volume apparently occupied by the balls). = apparent balls filling (°/1) (including balls and the interstitial voids in between such balls). = interstitial slurry filling (°/1), corresponding to the fraction of the available interstitial voids (in between the balls and rocks charge) actually occupied by the slurry of finer particles. = mineral particle density, ton/m 3. = slurry density (ton/m 3) directly related to the weight % solids of the slurry (f s) by : 1/[(fs/rm) + (1 - fs)].

Moly-Cop Tools / 138332517.xls.ms_office

4/6/2013 / 1:45 PM

xls. the contribution to the net mill power by the balls in the charge becomes : Pb = [(1-fv) rb Jb / rap J] · (h Pgross) Similarly. the contribution of the slurry in the charge becomes : Ps = [rp Jp fv J / rap J] · (h Pgross) Data Input : All data required by the model must be defined in each corresponding unprotected white background cell of the here attached Data File worksheet.Jb) / rap J] · (h Pgross) and finally. the contribution to the net mill power by the rocks in the charge becomes : Pr = [ (1-fv) rm (J .In this formulation.ms_office 4/6/2013 / 1:45 PM . Moly-Cop Tools / 138332517. Gray background cells contain the results of the corresponding formulas there defined and are protected to avoid any accidental editing.

ms_office 4/6/2013 / 1:45 PM .xls.Moly-Cop Tools / 138332517.

xls.Moly-Cop Tools / 138332517.ms_office 4/6/2013 / 1:45 PM .

xls. kW 5142 Lift 3344 Angle.94 Mill Charge Weight.00 17. ton/m3 Balls Density. m3 129.% 10.84 Balls Interstitial Filling. (°) 1491 45.80 2.Moly-Cop Tools TM SAG MILL POWER ESTIMATION Hogg & Fuerstenau Model Remarks Example : 36'f x 17' SAG Mill.00 60.00 10286 Balls Rocks Slurry Net Total % Losses Gross Total Apparent Density ton/m3 3.79 140.% Slurry Filling.222 % Solids in the Mill Ore Density.00 9977 3.00 2.01 7.% 35. ton/m3 Slurry Density.33 62.00 28.00 rpm 9.00 Mill Power.75 Charge Volume. tons Ball O´size Interstitial Charge Rocks Slurry 215. Mill Dimensions and Operating Conditions Diameter Length Mill Speed Charge ft ft % Critical Filling.00 76. ton/m3 78.55 Moly-Cop Tools / 138332517.ms_office 4/6/2013 / 1:45 PM .