This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

# 63rd International Astronautical Congress, Naples, Italy. Copyright ©2012 by the International Astronautical Federation.

All rights reserved.

IAC-12- A3,5,13.p1,x12886 EFFECT OF NOSE CAVITY ON THE HEAT FLUXES TO REENTRY VEHICLE IN TITAN'S ATMOSPHERE Karthik Sundarraj University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India, karthik_sundarraj@yahoo.com Linsu Sebastian University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India, linsusebastian@gmail.com Rajesh Yadav University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India, upes.rajesh@gmail.com Sourabh Bhat University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India, spbhat@ddn.upes.ac.in Gurunadh Velidi University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India, guru.velidi@live.in Ugur Guven University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India, drguven@live.in The effective exploration of the outer reaches of our solar system is one of the most important objectives in the various space programs of the world. One of the more interesting objectives of such an exploration is a robotic space probe mission to Titan. There are various observational data to suggest that Titan may hold the key to various key raw elements and this can be varied with a mission that has an objective of a successful re-entry to Titan's atmosphere. A typical probe for Titan's entry with forward facing axisymmetric cavity is investigated numerically for peak heat fluxes using commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamics code. The cavities investigated are circular in shape with rounded lips while the lip radius is varied from 20 cm to 80 cm. The Martian entry vehicle chosen for the simulation is 60-deg sphere cone probe with a projected diameter of 2.7m and nose radius of 1.25 m. The flow conditions simulated in the investigation are that of ballistic descent through the Titan's atmosphere with free stream Mach No., pressure and density of 18.86, 15.62 Pa and 0.000296 kg/m3 respectively. A two dimensional axisymmetric computational fluid dynamic analysis is done for ideal gas condition and will be extended to nonequilibrium chemically reacting gas assumptions with non-catalytic wall in the further study. The non-equilibrium chemistry is simulated using thirteen species with 24 step reaction of Gokcen. The presence of large cavity at the nose is likely to reduce the maximum heating rates at the stagnation region which is extremely desirable for safe delivery of payloads. It is the objective of this paper to ensure to suggest relevant design parameters for a successful reentry mission to Titan so that it can set the trend for similar missions in the future. INTRODUCTION Titan is said to be formed in the Saturn subnebula. With the help of a model of comet nuclei, it is noticed that Titan’s nitrogen and methane makes up 50% of its mass which is in the form of ice. Thus it is assumed that as a result of accretion of icy planetesimals (i.e. particles and lumps made of rock and ice) the Titan has originated in Saturn’s sub nebula.[1] There is no direct measurement of the composition of these planetesimals. Titan’s atmosphere is produced by degassing of the icy planetesimals. Until modern instrumentation was employed it was not revealed that Titan had unusual nature. With advances in infrared instrumentations the composition shown in Table:1 was revealed in the Titan’s atmosphere.[2]Titans Atmospheric profiles as explained by Ralph D. Lorents[3] considering Huygens Engineering Sensors gives a very good understanding of Density, Pressure and Temperature variation with respect to Altitude. A.James Friedson et.al in his paper (A global climate model of Titans atmosphere and surface) gives a very clear comparison between the temperature variation with pressure. He also explains the Heating/cooling rate with increase in altitude. Tobias Owen in his work provides a detailed insight on the recent advancement in the atmospheric findings of Titan and also gives a detailed explanation to the presence of each gas in the atmosphere of Titan and the behavior of these gasses in accordance to many parameters. An excellent result produced by Bobby Kazeminejad et al on Entry and Descent through Titans Atmosphere provides an

IAC-12- A3,5,13.p1,x12886

Page 1 of 7

The velocity is then obtained using the given Mach No. pressure of 15.p1. The re-entry model considered is a forward facing axisymmetric cavity.63rd International Astronautical Congress.86 The stagnation temperature is calculated using the formula. as it is axis-symmetry. The flow conditions used for the simulations are considered by the ballistic descent through the titan’s atmosphere. 1 represents the spherically blunt cone geometry for IAC-12.9 ppm 44.61277 CH4 ~4% 16. Copyright ©2012 by the International Astronautical Federation. With this brief introduction to Titans atmosphere and its importance in the field of research. temperature variation and heat fluxes at the nose cavity. [1] The study is considered with data to suggest that Titan has raw elements and this can be varied with a mission that has an objective of a successful re-entry to Titan’s atmosphere.72315 K. it was found as 12935.015894 2.51e-4 C3H8 0. The heat capacity ratio. Weighted Molecular Species Abundance Molecular Mass Mass N2 ~95% 28. The simulations carried out using commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics softwares. P = static pressure.00964 6.02 J/kgK [1] Heat capacity ratio (γ) by taking the average weighted value of the composition is = 1.86. which gives the velocity of the free-stream for the given Mach No. [2] Where. some physical and chemical parameters of the system is essential. The model was designed by calculating the geometry for spherical cone using the appropriate mathematical formulae.x12886 Page 2 of 7 .41. The geometries created for the simulation were in 2-D.4005e-3 C2H6 15 ppm 30.7m and nose radius of 1. The Total Pressure P0 is calculated using the formula.000296 kg/m3.09592 3..0159e-3 CO ~50 ppm 28. it was found as 41722182.03745 1. All rights reserved. In order to study the effect of heat fluxes in a system. . Italy. the value of specific gas constant (R) was calculated using the weighted average of the molecular weights of chemical compositions present in the Titan’s atmosphere. with cavities in the shapes of circular and hyperbolic with the radius of the cavity being varied from 20cm to 80cm. we have considered the chemical composition as shown in Table:1. Specific gas constant. He also provides data on Density. Naples. The specific gas constant (R) and the heat capacity ratio (γ) are calculated to find the velocity of sound in Titan’s atmosphere.06924 4. Also as a part of this research and as extended work for the paper a numerical comparison between Ideal gas and Real gas condition is done along with coding chemical reactions in the flow region. of 18. The re-entry vehicle has projected diameter of 2. Temperature and Mach Number variation with respect to Altitude. where T is the Temperature at the altitude from the Titan surface for the given flow condition. [3] Where.62 Pa δ = 1.25m with 60-deg sphere cone probe. The weighted averages of the molecular weights of the compositions are as shown in the Table: 1. V = M*a. For the perfect gas conditions.62Pa and density of 0. IDEAL GAS CONDITIONS For the perfect gas conditions.1% 2.014 ppm 44.5. Thus to proceed with the study and for initially analysing.968e-5 C2H2 5 ppm 26.963e-4 CO2 0. The simulation is carried out with freestream Mach No.473 m/s.01021 1.54 Pa.04257 0.301e-4 C2H4 ~7 ppm 28. the main objective of this paper is set to study the effect of varying nose cavity geometry on the aerodynamics.64170 H2 0. insite on the aerodynamic performance of Reentry modules alongside varying altitude.2587 Table: 1 Composition of Gases observed in Titan’s atmosphere. Velocity of sound in air was calculated using. (γ) is also calculated by taking the weighted average value of the compositions. which if calculated as 5219. Various cavity sizes of the re-entry vehicle was considered for analysing the aerodynamic behaviour.A3.13.41 (Weighted value for Titan) M = 18. T = 175 K GEOMETRY Spherically blunt cone geometry is considered for this study with varying cavity size. 15.01344 26.16e-7 Average weighted molecular mass: 27.05335 1. R= R= = 305. Fig. temperature and heat flux in comparison with the spherical blunt cone modules.

rn – Nose radius (c) Nose Cavity 40cm [6] [7] [8] The Aeroshell geometry was designed using ANSYS ICEM CFD software. Naples. (d) Nose cavity 60cm Fig. Equations 4 to 8 give detailed mathematical expressions used to model the re-entry module. L of the cone is found using the formula.63rd International Astronautical Congress. Copyright ©2012 by the International Astronautical Federation.2 (a) Spherically Blunt Nose Cone IAC-12.p1. Fig. Fig. Italy.1 Spherically Blunt Nose (b) Nose cavity 20cm The Length.A3.2 (a) to (e) shows the 2D geometry of the Aeroshell considered for study.13. understanding.x12886 Page 3 of 7 .5. R = Base radius θ = cone angle The tangential points on the nose are found using equations 5 and 6. [5] Where. All rights reserved. [4] Where.

The Aeroshell wall condition is considered to be stationary with no-slip boundary layer. Axisymmetric geometry analysis is done by selecting the symmetry boundary condition as axis.25 J/kg K and thermal conductivity as 7. assigned as 0.p1. The specific heat. Aeroshell (Wall). Fig. Copyright ©2012 by the International Astronautical Federation. top and symmetry.5.0242 W/m-K. The viscosity is obtained from Huygens entry data as 2e-5 kg/m-s and Molecular weight is 27.A3. Isothermal condition is assumed over the wall at T = 175 K. x – boundary layer length The y value is calculated as 2. Inlet. 3 shows the blocking strategy used to obtain good quality structured mesh. Italy.6 shows the boundary layer mesh development.dynamic viscosity u* . The reference values for flow computation is taken Fig 4 Mesh Quality over 95% IAC-12. Fig. The mesh growth rate is taken as 1.2587.44 W/m-K.7e-4 m considering y+ as 1. The y value is calculated by using the formula. (e) Nose cavity 80cm BLOCKING AND MESH The study domain considered is 50 time’s rear. The material of the Solid boundary is considered to be Titanium with density as 4850 kg/m3. cp as 544.43 J/kgK and thermal conductivity is 0. Spalart-Almaras turbulence model is used with Prandl No.541 m and turbulence viscosity ratio as 10. outlet and top are given pressure-far-field condition with pressure being 15. δ is found to be 0.667.3398m. Fig. Multiblocking technique is used to divide the domain and for mesh concentration near the object. The fluid (air) is considered as Ideal gas with density 0. The boundary condition given are namely.13.Friction Velocity Mesh smoothing operation is carried out upto 95% starting from 0.2 times with an effective boundary layer length taken as 3. Fig.5% and the overall mess accuracy obtained is over 95%.86.6e5. [10] Where.03274 meter using the formula. The corresponding Reynolds number is 2.63rd International Astronautical Congress.5 shows the structural mesh obtained over the geometry and Fig.000296 kg/m3. 5 Structured Mesh Obtained Fig. Turbulence intensity is set to 2% with corresponding length scale as 1. cp is considered as 1006. These values are managed to approximately be the same for all geometric conditions. [9] Where. 6 Mesh Growth at Boundary Layer PRE-PROCESSOR Density based solver is used along with steady state flow with steady time. outlet. µ . 10 times ahead and 50 times above the geometry.62 pa and M = 18. The boundary layer thickness. Fig. Inlet. 4 shows the mesh quality obtained. 3 Blocking strategy Structured mesh is used for analysis with approximately 130421 mesh elements and 129600 nodes.x12886 Page 4 of 7 . Naples. All rights reserved. obtained through weighted average calculation.

static temperature variation. Negative heat flux in the plot signifies the transfer of heat into the object. The convergence criteria set is 1e-6. Flow is computed using second order accurate upwind method and turbulence is computed using first order accurate upwind method. Steering technique is used for hypersonic configuration with courant number set between 0. domain pressure variation. velocity 5219.0. 7 (a) – (e) shows the total surface heat flux plot of different geometries. In accordance with the objective of this paper it is to be proved that the cavity region shows high surface heat flux when compared to the blunt object.4. static pressure variation and Mach variation over the Aeroshell. 7 (a) Spherically Blunt Nose Cone IAC-12. SOLVER Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Equation method is used to solve the flow equations. (c) 40cm Nose Cavity (d) 60cm Nose Cavity Fig.473 m/s and specific heat ratio 1.A3.005 to 2 for cavity radius over 40m. Copyright ©2012 by the International Astronautical Federation.13. All rights reserved. Fig. enthalpy 1.00029 kg/m3.05 to 4 for cavity radius upto 40m and it is set between 0. Naples.3797 J/kg. (b) 20cm nose cavity RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Results obtained from Ansys Fluent 13 are discussed in this section.63rd International Astronautical Congress. Implicit formulation method is used with ROE-FDS flux type. Total Surface Heat Flux The total surface heat flux is studied over the entire wall boundary of the Aeroshell.5. Least square cell based discritization is used for computing the gradient.x12886 Page 5 of 7 .p1. from inlet boundary with density. The results obtained are surface heat flux analysis. Italy.

25m. All rights reserved.5m on the plot. 7 (b) corresponds to 20cm cavity. The stagnation region is drastically reduced to a sharp region in all these cases when compared to a blunt nose object. The blunt nose stagnates the flow and hence heats up the stagnation region and increases the object heating. Fig.A3.8 (a) Spherically Blunt Nose Cone From the above plots it is very evident that as the curvature of the nose cavity increases the heat flux into the Aeroshell increases.x12886 Page 6 of 7 . This is because as the cavity size increases the surface heat flux along the cavity reduces upto the sharp edge of the cavity. hence reducing the heating at the stagnation region. From the plot it can be seen that the heating at the lower surface of the cavity is less and the heat flux increases near the tip of the cavity. Mach number Contour The study of Mach number contour gives us an added insight on the position of shock and the stagnation region ahead of the Aeroshell. it can be numerically stated and proved that the presence of cavity in the nose region decreases the surface heating of the object at the stagnation region and invariably decreases the heat flux into the object. 7 (b) to (e) the cavity radius is increased gradually from 20cm to 80cm. It can be seen. as the curvature increases the heat flux into the object reduces. Position 0.5.13.63rd International Astronautical Congress.2 to 0.p1. There is high heating taking place at the stagnation point as seen in the plot. Italy. This helps the re-entry of the object to a greater extent into the atmosphere. Hence.8m on the plot is the blunt nose region. (d) shows the Mach number contours of different Aeroshell geometries.7 (a) shows the Total Heat Flux rate of a spherically blunt nose cone. (e) 80cm Nose Cavity Fig. The cavity surface starts from 0m to 0. Fig. Fig. 8 (a) to (b) 20cm Cavity (c) 60cm Cavity IAC-12. It can be seen from the plot the heat flux into the Aeroshell is high all over the blunt nose. Copyright ©2012 by the International Astronautical Federation. Fig. Fig 7 (d) corresponds to 60cm and (e) corresponds to 80cm. From Fig. In both these cases it is very evident that the surface heating is much lesser that that of a blunt cone object. Position 0m on the plot is the lower tip of the cavity at the axisymmetric axis. Naples.7 (c) corresponds to 40cm cavity starting from 0m to 0.

West. Titan atmosphere profiles from Huygens engineering (temperature and acceleration) sensors. R γ a T V M P0 T0 P 5. N°1. Claudio Sollazzo. Dr.Fabiano Oyafuso. from this study it can be concluded that the presence of cavity decreases surface heating of the Aeroshell at the stagnation region and helps in safe delivery of payload. CONCLUSION Numerical simulations are conducted for different cavity dimensions and are compared with the spherically blunt cone module. Ugur Guven for providing us with all the necessary facilities and guidance.Glenn S. 1. IAC-12. G. Lastly we also thank every individual who was a part of successful completion of this paper. Planetary and Space Science . H B Niemann. 1949-1958. Planetary and Space Science . Miguel Pe´rez-Ayu'car. The origin of Titan’s atmosphere: some recent advances. Planetary and Space Science . (2008) Bobby Kazeminejada. This will help in reducing the surface heating and burnout.David H. Copyright ©2012 by the International Astronautical Federation. REFFERENCES Tobias Owen. All rights reserved. 57. Dr. 55 . NOMENCLATURE Specific gas constant in (J/kgK) Heat capacity ratio for ideal gas Velocity of sound in air in (m/s) Temperature of air at an altitude in (K) Local velocity of the fluid in (m/s) Mach Number Total Pressure of the fluid in (Pa) Total Temperature of the fluid in (K) Static Pressure of the fluid in (Pa) We wish to thank University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES) for providing us such opportunities for research activity. Gorse. Naples.Orton . We also take this opportunity to thank our Chancellor. 3. The fluid properties considered meet that of the properties existing in the Titans atmosphere and the results validate to the Titans atmospheric conditions. Ralph D. Atkinson. Moreover. M. 1845-1876. Lorenz.p1. Bayram Celik And Prof. we would like to acknowledge the help of Prof.A3. C.Wilson. (2007). (2003). Weighted value of Heat capacity ratio Boundary layer thickness Reynolds Number Boundary layer length First node distance Dynamic Viscosity in () Friction Velocity in (m/s) Enthalpy in (J/kg) Density of the fluid in (kg/m3) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT λ δ Re x y µ u* h ρ (d) 80cm Cavity From the above contours it can be seen that the shock position is close to the Aeroshell in case of blunt nose model. 977-989. A.63rd International Astronautical Congress.Eric H. This causes compression to take place slower and at a greater region. Pro Vice Chancellor and Dr. Vice chancellor. A. whereas the shock is moving a bit away from the object in the presence of cavity. Akif Atalay. Huygens’ entry and descent through Titan’s atmosphere— Methodology and results of the trajectory reconstruction. The shock seems to be at a distance of around 1m from the re-entry module. Jean-Pierre Lebreton. Dr. The distance of the shock is that high mainly because the density of the air is very low. Turgut Berat Karyot. 2. Dr. Dr Murat Aydin. Thus. D'Angola. Capitelli Thermodynamic and transport properties in equilibrium air plasmas in a wide pressure and temperature range. 4. From the numerical simulations it is very evident that the presence of cavity at the nose drastically reduces the maximum heating rate of the Aeroshell surface. (2007).5.Robert A. A global climate model of Titan’s atmosphere and surface. 1931-1949. Prof.13. (2009). these results obtained are simulated in Titans atmospheric conditions and the behaviour of shock and heating correspond to an atmosphere similar to that of Titan. Planetary and Space Science . Colonna. 51. The European Physical Journal D Vol 46. Italy. p 129-150.James Friedson. 55 . Rustem Aslan for their past contributions in the conceptual analysis. Hence. This is a very much desired property during re-entry.x12886 Page 7 of 7 .