100%(5)100% found this document useful (5 votes)

267 views12 pagesfinally an answer to EVERYTHING - Quantum Field Gravity - BRAIDS

© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

finally an answer to EVERYTHING - Quantum Field Gravity - BRAIDS

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

100%(5)100% found this document useful (5 votes)

267 views12 pagesfinally an answer to EVERYTHING - Quantum Field Gravity - BRAIDS

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

You are on page 1of 12

Sundance O. Bilson-Thompson∗

CSSM, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of Adelaide,

Adelaide SA 5005, Australia

Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics,

Waterloo, Ontario N2J 2W9, Canada,

and

Department of Physics, University of Waterloo,

Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada

(Dated: February 28, 2006)

We show that a class of background independent models of quantum spacetime have local excita-

tions that can be mapped to the first generation fermions of the standard model of particle physics.

These states propagate coherently as they can be shown to be noiseless subsystems of the microscopic

quantum dynamics[2]. These are identified in terms of certain patterns of braiding of graphs, thus

giving a quantum gravitational foundation for the topological preon model proposed in [1].

These results apply to a large class of theories in which the Hilbert space has a basis of states

given by ribbon graphs embedded in a three-dimensional manifold up to diffeomorphisms, and the

dynamics is given by local moves on the graphs, such as arise in the representation theory of quantum

groups. For such models, matter appears to be already included in the microscopic kinematics and

dynamics.

I. INTRODUCTION point of view about how the low energy limit of a quan-

tum gravity theory may be expected to emerge [2]. The

idea is to study the low energy limit of a background

Ever since the notion that geometry is dynamical was

independent quantum theory of gravity by asking how

advanced in the 19th Century and, even more since that

the states of elementary particles remain coherent when

idea was realized in general relativity, there has been a

they are continually in interaction with the quantum

dream: to unify matter with geometry and gravity by

fluctuations of the microscopic theory. The answer is

demonstrating that matter arises from singularities or

that they are protected by symmetries in the dynamics.

topological defects in geometry. In this paper we find

We can then analyze the low energy physics in terms

that this expectation may be realized in a certain class of

of the symmetries that control the low energy coherent

quantum gravity theories.

quantum states rather than in terms of emergent clas-

In these theories, states are labeled by diffeomor- sical geometry. In [2] it was shown that one can ap-

phism classes of embeddings of ribbon graphs in a back- ply to this the technology of noiseless subsystems, or

ground topological space and the dynamics is gener- NS, from quantum information theory[3]. In this frame-

ated by local moves on those graphs. We show that work, subsystems which propagate coherently are iden-

in such theories non-geometrical conserved quantum tified by their transforming under symmetries that com-

numbers arise which label emergent degrees of freedom mute with the evolution. These protect the subsystems

and which may naturally be identified with elementary from decoherence[4].

particles. This is because, under the commonly used

Given a particular theory of dynamical quantum

evolution moves, there are conserved excitations related

geometry, however, it is not immediately apparent

to the braiding of the states. Using a recent proposal

whether it has any such NSs. We show that in a large

by one of us which maps precisely these excitations to

class of theories, it does. These are theories in which

quantum numbers of the standard model[1], we find

the microscopic quantum states are defined in terms of

that, under certain mild assumptions, these theories al-

the embedding, up to diffeomorphisms, of a framed, or

ready contain elementary particles which can be iden-

ribbon, graph in a three manifold and in which the al-

tified with particles of the standard model so that the

lowed evolution moves are the standard local exchange

symmetries of the standard model are symmetries of the

and expansion moves[5, 6]. Such ribbon graphs occur

dynamics of the quantum geometry.

in the representation theory of quantum groups[7], and

To obtain these results we find very helpful a new arise in topological field theories and in quantum grav-

ity models with non-zero cosmological constant [8, 9].

The procedure described in [2] reveals emergent degrees

∗ Electronic

of freedom related to the braiding of the graphs. This is

address: sbilson@physics.adelaide.edu.au the first main result of this paper.

† Electronic address: fmarkopoulou@perimeterinstitute.ca

‡ Electronic address: lsmolin@perimeterinstitute.ca Our second main result is that the simplest emergent

2

sumptions about the dynamics, precisely the first gen-

eration quarks and leptons of the standard model. To

show this we employ the results of [1] where a topo-

logical formulation of preon models[10] was given. In

essence, our results amount to an embedding of the

topological preon model in [1] in a class of background

independent quantum theories of gravity. FIG. 1: A trinion and a trinion decomposition of a 2-surface S.

Preon models, first proposed in the 1970s, are mod-

els in which quarks, leptons, and in some cases vector

bosons and Higgs, are composite particles, made out of

we suggest in VIII is then in essence different from LQG

just two or three elementary preons[10]. The main chal-

even though it shares the same state space and micro-

lenge they faced was to provide a consistent mechanism

scopic evolution moves.

binding preons into chiral fermions. Unlike hadrons,

the light quarks and leptons are much lighter than the The outline of this paper is as follows. In the next sec-

inverse of the largest experimentally allowed binding tion we define the class of theories we will study. Sec-

scale for their proposed subcomponents. This made it tion II contains the definition of the type of theories we

challenging to bind such hypothetical subcomponents are considering. Section III is devoted to the derivation

by means of ordinary gauge interactions[11]. The bind- of the first main result, which is the existence of con-

ing mechanism proposed here operates at Planck scales, served quantum numbers, preserved by the local dy-

below the scales at which effective field theory would namics of the quantum geometry, associated with the

be a good description. The states are bound here, not by braiding of edges. Section IV then presents the basics of

fields, but by quantum topology, because the configu- the physical interpretation of the braiding states which

rations that we interpret as quarks and leptons are con- arises by use of the results of [1]. In sections V we then

served under the dynamics of the quantum geometry. develop some tools for characterizing the details of the

That is, the states are bound because there are conserved conserved quantities and the action of symmetry oper-

quantum numbers that measure topological properties ations, which allow us in section VI to present the de-

of the states. tails of the identification of the simplest braiding states

with the fermions of the first generation of the standard

The theories we study here are related to Loop Quan- model. A possible identification for the higher genera-

tum Gravity (LQG) and spin foam models, but differ in tions is the subject of section VII. Section VIII is devoted

that the graphs which comprise the states are framed, so to discussion of several key issues including locality, the

they are represented by the embedding of a two surface mass matrix, interactions and anomalies after which we

in the spatial manifold. This is known to be required conclude in Section IX with a list of open questions.

when the cosmological constant is non-zero[8, 9]. They

also extend the description of quantum geometry used

in LQG in that it becomes optional whether or not to

put labels on the graphs, and the labels may be chosen II. THEORIES ON RIBBON GRAPHS

from the representation theory of an arbitrary quantum

group. We start with a compact three manifold Σ. Given a

When these results are applied to loop quantum grav- two-dimensional surface S in Σ, we can regard S as a

ity they answers a question which goes back to the first union of trinions: 2-surfaces with three punctures that

papers on that subject, where it was shown that the dif- connect to other trinions (Fig.1). Choosing a maximal

feomorphism invariant states were characterized by the set of non-intersecting cuts on S gives a particular de-

knotting and linking of loops and graphs[12–14]. The composition, or scoring, of S into trinions. We shall

question is this: what features of geometry do the knot- call a scored 2-surface a ribbon graph Γ. It is a graph in

ting and linking measure? This has been mysterious be- the sense of the obvious deformation of S into a ribbon

cause observables sufficient to label the degrees of free- graph with a node for each trinion and a connecting rib-

dom of quantum geometry were identified in the area bon edge for each score.

and volume operators, which measure combinatorial A map from a ribbon graph to a quantum system can

and labeling information, but which are insensitive to be made by associating a finite-dimensional state space

the topology of the embedding. The results we describe Ht to each trinion t and the tensor product operation to

here show that some of the information in the embed- trinion gluings. The specific map from a trinion t to its

ding may have nothing to do with geometry, but instead Hilbert space may depend on the choice of a quantum

describes emergent particle states. group Gq . In this case one labels each open edge of a

However, as we discuss in section VIII, the most nat- trinion with a representation of Gq and t with the asso-

ural interpretation of the underlying states is not a ge- ciated intertwiner. For the present work, we just need a

ometric one, in the sense of a quantization of general functor that assigns a finite-dimensional vector space to

relativity, but a pre-spacetime theory. The interpretation each trinion. Thus, the state space associated to a given

3

Γ is

O

HΓ = Ht , (1) A1 =

t∈Γ

A2 = (5)

over labels (if they are present). Nothing that follows de-

pends on the choice of Gq , so we make the trivial choice

of no labels.

The state space of the theory is A3 =

M

H= HΓ , (2)

Γ

FIG. 2: The three generators of evolution on the ribbon graph

where the sum is over all topologically distinct embed- space H. They are called expansion, contraction and exchange

moves.

dings of all such surfaces in Σ with the natural inner

product hΓ|Γ0 i = δΓΓ0 .

Some specific examples of theories with such state

spaces are: graphs labeled by quantum groups (where

representations of the quantum group Gq label the edges

and Ht is the space of Gq -invariant tensors on S), topo-

logical field theory, Loop Quantum Gravity in both 2 + 1

and 3 + 1 (in which case the algebra is SUq (2) and the

quantum deformation is defined in terms of the cosmo-

2π 6π

logical constant Λ by q = exp{ k+2 }, with k = GΛ [9])

and, in general, the functorial construction of topologi-

cal quantum field theories when the source category is

2-dimensional surfaces S.

Local dynamics on H can be defined by excising sub- FIG. 3: These two graphs are not distinguished by the usual

graphs of Γ and replacing them with new ones. The gen- trinion decomposition of H.

erators of such dynamics are given graphically in Fig.2.

Given a ribbon graph Γ, application of Ai results in

X Thus, any physical information encoded in the braiding

Âi |Γi = |Γ0αi i (3) will be conserved under this evolution.

α Let us first state the precise sense in which the braid-

ing is conserved. It is easiest to do so using the notion

where Γ0αi are all the ribbon graphs obtained from Γ by of a noiseless subsystem from quantum information the-

an application of one move of type i (i = 1, 2, 3). ory [3]. Given a finite-dimensional state space

Together with the identity, these moves generate the

evolution algebra H = HA ⊗ HB ⊕ K, (6)

A evol = {1, Ai } , i = 1, 2, 3 (4) where K is the orthogonal complement of HA ⊗HB in H,

and a completely positive map E on H, the subsystem

on H .

B is noiseless under E if, for all ρA ∈ HA , ρB ∈ HB , there

This is a basic description of such theories which will

exists σ A ∈ HA such that

suffice for the purposes of this paper.

E ρA ⊗ ρB = σ A ⊗ ρB .

(7)

III. CONSERVED DEGREES OF FREEDOM That is, HB viewed as a subsystem of H is conserved un-

der E and any information encoded in HB will be pro-

Note that the decomposition (2) of the state space H tected under E.

sums over topologically distinct embeddings of the sur- Given H and E, it is a non-trivial exercise to find the

faces in Σ. For example, the two graphs of Fig.3 may decomposition (6) that reveals the noiseless subsystem.

correspond to the same state in HΓ but correspond to Some of the literature devoted to this task can be found

distinct states in H. They are distinct physical states be- in [3]. In our case, however, it is easy to find a noiseless

cause they are braided differently. subsystem in the state space we are considering, when

The basic point of this paper is a simple one and E is in A evol . Let us write HΓ as

can be summarized as follows. The braiding content of

states in H remains invariant under the action of A evol . HΓ = HΓT ⊗ HΓB (8)

4

twist in a ribbon represents charge ±e/3.

three ribbons and two crossings, as in Figure 5. It

is remarkable that with a single condition, these

map to the first generation of the standard model

[1]. This is seen in Figures 16-19 and will be re-

called in more detail below.

the model of [1] into quantum geometry. We will need

FIG. 4: The new decomposition is in terms of untwisted and a more detailed description of the conserved quantities,

unbraided trinions and braids connecting them. which we will develop in the next section. For exam-

ple to understand the identification of twist with charge

we have to understand how charge conjugation sym-

where HΓT =

N

t∈Γ Ht contains N all trinions (unbraided metry acts on braids. There is also an issue concerned

and untwisted) in Γ and HΓB = t∈Γ Hb where Hb are

with the localization of the braids. As the quantum ge-

state spaces associated with braids and twists in be- ometry evolves the conserved structure represented by

tween the trinions (as illustrated in Fig.4). H then be- the braiding will not necessarily remain localized with

comes respect to the graph. In general as a graph evolves

M a configuration that appears initially to be a localized

H= HΓT ⊗ HΓB . (9) braid becomes “spread out”. Nevertheless there is a

Γ conserved quantity associated with the braiding. This

is to be expected and is discussed in detail in the penul-

We do not, at this stage, need to be explicit about the timate section.

different kinds of braids that appear in the second factor.

Our task will be to find out what the physical content of

the HΓB may be. V. INVARIANTS OF EMBEDDINGS, SYMMETRIES

With the new decomposition, it is straightforward to AND CONSERVED QUANTUM NUMBERS.

check that operators in A evol can only affect the HΓT and

that HΓB is noiseless under A evol . This can be checked We saw in Section III that braiding and twisting are

explicitly by showing that the actions of braiding and preserved under the evolution moves, giving rise to the

twisting of the edges of the graph and the evolution emergence of the topological preon model from models

moves commute. of quantum gravity. To ensure that the precise topolo-

Note that this decomposition also makes explicit the gies used in the topological preon model of [1] are dis-

fact that, starting with a graph Γ and applying moves in tinct states of quantum gravity it is very helpful to

A evol on it, one cannot reach any other graph but only work with explicit topological invariants which can eas-

graphs with the same braiding content as Γ. ily be proved to be invariant under the evolution moves

shown in Figure 2. This is the task of the present sec-

tion. We will need the reduced link invariant of a ribbon

IV. THE PHYSICAL CONTENT OF HB graph embedding and the discrete symmetries on the

braids which we define next.

We have seen that the braiding and twisting of the

ribbon graphs is conserved under evolution. As was

pointed out in [2], a noiseless subsystem (or nearly A. The reduced link invariant

noiseless) in a background independent theory means

that there are degrees of freedom that are noiseless un- Let L[Γ] denote the the link of a ribbon graph embed-

der the Planckian evolution A evol and therefore should ding. This is the set of curves in Σ obtained by consid-

appear in the low energy theory. The question is of ering each edge of the ribbon graph as a curve in Σ. We

course what is the physical content of the braids and the define the reduced link of a ribbon graph embedding, de-

twists. noted RL[Γ], to be L[Γ] minus any unlinked unknotted

It is remarkable that the noiseless subsystem we un- closed curves.

covered fits very naturally with the recent proposal by As an example, consider the simple piece of a ribbon

one of us of a preon model for the first generation of graph shown in Figure 5. Its reduced link is shown in

the standard model based on ribbon braids[1]. The ba- Figure 6. We see it evolved in Figures 7 and 8. It is easy

sic idea of that proposal is to give the following physical to verify that the reduced link is unchanged. We empha-

interpretation to the braids: size that, although the state does change (because two

5

FIG. 5: A simple braid inside a ribbon graph FIG. 8: Further evolving the braid by expansion moves.

FIG. 6: The reduced link of the braid in Figure 5. FIG. 9: The effect of a parity transformation on a braid.

states that differ by a local move are orthogonal under there are conserved quantum numbers emergent from

the inner product), the reduced link does not. dynamical quantum geometries.

Figures 10 to 12 further illustrate the construction of

the reduced link of a ribbon graph. The reduced link

can be simplified by using the standard Reidemeister B. Subsystems of ribbon graphs

moves.

It is easy to see that both the link, and the reduced link

There are cases where the reduced link of a portion of

of a ribbon graph are unchanged by the action of an ex-

the graph gives a closed link, unlinked and unconnected

change move. While an expansion move does change

to the rest of the graph. This is illustrated in Figures 10

the link of a ribbon graph, it does not change the re-

to 12. Since topological invariants of the reduced link

duced link. An example of this can be seen by compar-

are preserved under evolution, this feature is conserved.

ing Figure 10 and Figure 12. We thus see that the re-

This gives us an invariant definition of a subsystem. We

duced linking number RL[Γ] is an invariant, preserved

can then consider the reduced link of such a subsystem.

under the local moves.

We can define,

We can define operators that represent the reduced

link invariants. Let K be a link in Σ and let J(K) be any

RLS (Γ) = RL(ΓS ). (12)

complex valued link invariant. Given a ribbon graph Γ,

let RL(Γ) be its reduced link invariant. Then define

J|Γi

b = J(Γ)|Γi. (11)

FIG. 10: Constructing the link of a ribbon graph. The blue line

served by the evolution moves, we deduce that Jb is

is a boundary which separates the region of interest from the

in the commutant of A evol . This result tells us that rest of the ribbon graph.

FIG. 7: A possible evolution of the braid under an exchange FIG. 11: The reduced link, taken by excluding unlinked, un-

move. knotted curves from the link obtained previously.

6

FIG. 14: The basic braiding moves on three strands, and the

FIG. 12: The reduced link of a ribbon graph is unaffected by basic twisting moves.

expansion moves.

C. Discrete symmetries of braids

discrete symmetries which can act on subsystems of the

kind just described.

Parity. Let T [Γ] be any projection of the embedding of

the graph onto a two-dimensional plane. Let PT [Γ] be

its parity inversion, which for a braid is equivalent to a

left-right inversion, while not affecting the handedness

of any twists on the strands. This is the projection of a

graph P[Γ] which is the parity inversion of Γ. If P[Γ] is

diffeomorphic to Γ we say that the chirality of Γ is even.

FIG. 13: Local structures, consisting of a braid joined on each Otherwise the chirality is odd, because it will be true

end by nodes. One or both sets of nodes are connected to the that P 2 [Γ] ∼ Γ. We then arbitrarily label the chirality of

rest of the ribbon graph. either Γ or P[Γ] to be left-handed, so the other is right-

handed. It is easy to show that the chirality of a ribbon

graph embedding is invariant under both exchange and

expansion moves.

By the same logic as before, this is preserved under evo- Charge Conjugation. To define charge conjugation pre-

lution moves. Hence given any link invariant J we have cisely it is helpful to recall the braid algebra, which are

again an operator the discrete operations that generate braids[7]. Braids

(as in Figure 13) are generated by a finite set of braiding

JbS |Γi = RLS (Γ)|Γi. (13) and twisting moves, displayed in Figure 14. We can call

a braid move (either a braiding or a twisting) generically

m. A generic braid on n strands generated by p braid

This implies that given the consistent splitting, JbS also moves is then of the form of B = mp ....m2 m1 . The pos-

is in the commutant of A evol . This means that we sible braid moves form an algebra, which is described

have conserved quantities connected with subsystems. in [7]. The identity in the algebra 1n consists of n un-

This is true in spite of the fact that there are evolution braided and untwisted strands.

moves which generate interactions between the subsys- Let us fix n and the sets of nodes at the two ends. Then

tems and the rest of the ribbon graph. the possible braids that can come in the box define a

Hilbert space, Hnbraids within which the possible braids

We may note that the subsystems cannot in general

B give a basis |Bi. The generators bi and ti are repre-

be considered “localized” as they may become arbitrar-

sented by unitary operators in this space [? ]. There is a

ily large and complex as the quantum geometry evolves.

natural vacuum |0i = |1n i which is n unbraided strands.

But nevertheless, there is a notion of subsystem and it

Any braid is then defined by a sequence of braid moves

will be useful to give some simple examples. Let us then

acting on |0i,

consider a system defined by a simple set of local con-

figurations of the form of Figure 13. They are a braided |Bi = mp ....m2 m1 |0i. (14)

set of n edges, which are joined on both ends by a set of

connected nodes (or just one node.) At least one of the For each choice of n and end nodes, Hnbraids defines

sets of nodes is connected to the rest of the ribbon graph. a possible system’s Hilbert space to describe emergent

We will call them encapsulated braids. particle states.

We can now describe how the discrete symmetries act

It is clear that the form of Figure 13 is preserved under on the braids. We have already defined the parity oper-

the evolution moves. Local invariants of the braidings ator P. This easily restricts to an operator on Hnbraids .

then label persistent structures of the kind discussed in There is also a natural charge conjugation operator, C,

[2]. The commutant of the interaction algebra will then defined by

include elements of the braid group that connect braids

with distinct reduced link invariant. C ◦ B = B −1 = m−1 −1 −1

1 m2 ...mp (15)

7

each move, in the reverse order. It is straightforward to

show that P and C commute with the evolution rules,

and are hence observables.

It follows from (15) that

(C ◦ B)B = 1. (16)

charge, and C with charge conjugation. As noted above,

we in fact identify twist with U(1) charge.

FIG. 15: The simplest three strand braids. The ovals signify

nodes.

VI. IDENTIFICATION OF THE FIRST GENERATION

FERMIONS OF THE STANDARD MODEL

join to the environment through the bottom as shown in

Figure 15.

We have now all the structure we need to present the

We therefore begin by analyzing these. Let us first ne-

second main result, which is the embedding of the topo-

glect twists. Assuming that the twists on all generators

logical preon model of [1] in the class of quantum grav-

are zero, the possible non-trivial topologies are shown

ity theories we defined above.

in Figure 16. We see that two possible mirror-image

To do so we need to make the following additional

states can be formed, which we may call left-handed

assumptions, which are common also to preon models,

and right-handed states. The remarkable fact that the

including that in [1].

simplest braids come are chiral will allow us to propose

• The lightest states are the simplest non-trivial the identification of them with chiral fermion states.

braids made of ribbons with no twists (no charge) We now allow any or all of the strands to carry a single

or one full twist (positive or negative charge). twist, with either positive or negative orientation. This

gives rise to 2 × 33 = 54 states.

• Quantum numbers are assigned only to braids Let us call this space of states V3 for the states of three

with no positive and negative charge mixing. strand braids. It is the sum of the left- and right-braided

Such a rule is necessary in preon models as sectors:

discussed[1].

V3 = V3L ⊕ V3R (17)

Ultimately such rules have to arise from the dynam-

ics. However to study them we need to have access to We note that

the effective dynamics so that we can study the mass P : V3L → V3R (18)

matrix of the theory. In Section VIII, we discuss this fur-

ther, for the present, these remain ad hoc assumptions. and vice versa.

We will consider braids of the form of Figure 13. For However, the rules given above tell us to ignore those

each number of strands n ≥ 3 there are an infinite num- braids that contain both plus and minus charges (or

ber of states in the corresponding state space, Hnbraids . twists). We then define the reduced subsector V3red

These can be ordered in terms of minimal numbers of which do not mix positive and negative twists, and

crossings required to create the braid. A common way which only have single twists. Using the results of [1]

to understand this is to represent a graph by a projec- we now see that the states in the reduced subsector cor-

tion T [Γ]. For every ribbon graph embedding Γ there is respond to the 15 fermions of the first generation of the

a minimal number of crossings, in any such projection, standard model of particle physics. It is straightforward

m[Γ]. to show that these 15 states have distinct reduced link

Our first assumption above amounts to considering invariants, hence together with parity these distinguish

minimal crossing number m[Γ] to be a measure of the the 30 distinct chiral states of the first generation of the

complexity of a graph so that the braids with the lowest standard model. The preceeding arguments then estab-

crossing number will become the first generation. We lish that symmetries of the standard model, which trans-

then analyze the structure of the braids with the lowest form these states among themselves, are conserved un-

crossing numbers. der the dynamics of the quantum gravity theory.

There are no non-trivial two strand braids with cross- From [1], we can classify these states in terms of

ing number less than three. (By non-trivial we mean that twists:

they are distinct from unbraided edges.) But for three

strands there are non-trivial braids with two crossings. • There are four fully-charged states, that is, states

The simplest structure these can have is a single node with a single twist on each strand, shown in Fig-

at the top tying the strands together, while the strands ure 17. It then makes sense to identify twist t with

8

charged states. FIG. 19: The three colours of left-handed up states.

FIG. 17: The electron and positron — four maximally charged FIG. 20: A possible identification of the muon neutrino as a

states. three crossing state.

electric charge,

generators of the standard model symmetries, G =

e SU (3) × SU (2) × U (1) acting in the standard way

t= . (19)

3 on the 30 dimensional space V3red .

In this case we can identify the fully charged states These results suggest identifying V3L with left-handed

with the electron and positron. chiral fermions and V3R with right-handed chiral

• There are two neutral states, one left-braided, one fermions.

right-braided, which we can identify with the neu-

trino and antineutrino, shown in Figure 16. We

VII. A POSSIBLE IDENTIFICATION OF THE SECOND

note that they are both C and P conjugates of each GENERATION AND THE VECTOR BOSONS

other.

• There are the partially charged states, with one We have seen that the states which can be imbedded

and two +’s, and the rest zeroes. These are shown with a minimum number of crossings – i.e. two cross-

in Figures 18 and 19. These are the quarks, with ings – give the fermions of the first generation of the

total charges ± 31 and ± 23 . In each of these there standard model. We note that there are exactly the 15

is an “odd strand out” - one that is different from states of the original standard model, with no place for

the other two. The non-trivial nature of the braid a right-handed neutrino. This is consistent with present

means that there are three distinct positions in data.

the braid which the “odd strand out” can occupy. It is natural to hypothesize then that the second gen-

Hence each of the partially charged states comes in eration standard model fermions come from the next

three versions. We will equate these permutations most complicated states, which have three crossings.

with colour. There are two kinds of three crossing states. There are

three stranded braids, such as shown in Figure 20. It is

• Given these identifications, we can also define straightforward to see that by adding twists to this state

one gets a repeat of the pattern for the first generation.

However, this appears to imply no upper bound on the

number of allowed generations.

It is interesting to note that there is a second kind

of three crossing state, which is the simplest single

stranded knot-the trefoil, shown in Figure 21. The tre-

foil comes in both left and right versions. Each is an

SU (2) × SU (3) singlet. Whether this results in the cor-

rect phenomenology of neutrino masses is unclear to us

at this point.

FIG. 18: The left-handed down states-showing tripling of In [1] it is also proposed that the gauge vector bosons

states for fractional charge.

of the standard model are composite, and are repre-

9

tee that these two notions of locality will coincide?

This seems indeed unlikely, because the quantum states

which are expected to represent classical spacetimes are

to be constructed from superpositions of graph states

each of which carries its own notion of locality.

The noiseless subsystem viewpoint we have used

FIG. 21: A possible identification of the right handed muon here brings in new physical understanding of this ques-

neutrino as a trefoil. tion. The braids are indeed not local with respect to the

micro-locality defined by the generators of A evol . There

is, however, no reason that this micro-locality coincides

sented by triplets of ribbons with no crossings. Braids with the macro-locality of the effective spacetime. In-

with three ribbons and no crossings are mapped to the stead, the notion of macro-locality should be defined di-

bosons of the electroweak interaction. The electroweak rectly from the interactions of the noiseless subsystems

interactions between the fermions and the photon and that we identify with the elementary particles.

vector bosons are then described by cutting and joining Indeed, it is perhaps misleading to describe H as a

operations on 3-ribbon braids. These preserve the rele- quantum spacetime. It is quantum but also it is pre-

vant quantum numbers. For more detail, see [1]. How geometric. The idea is then to not try to regard the quan-

these are incorporated into quantum gravity is presently tum geometry as a “bumpy” or “quantum” spacetime.

under study, so we will restrict ourselves here to re- Instead, we simply regard {H, A evol } as a quantum in-

marks below. formation processing system. When we do, a new pos-

sibility appears of a dual viewpoint: the locality of the

spacetime is to be given and identified by the braid in-

VIII. DISCUSSION teractions in HB . It is A evol that is non-local with re-

spect to our spacetime!

Before closing we want to discuss several issues To see the advantage of this approach we should con-

which bears on the interpretation of these results. sider that for one of these models of quantum gravity

to have a good low energy limit it must be the case

that the emergent symmetries that act on the space of

A. Locality noiseless subsystems includes an approximate transla-

tion invariance in space and time. In this case the

Locality is a tricky issue in background independent conserved quantities will include momenta and energy.

quantum theories of gravity because there is no back- From the present NS perspective these translation sym-

ground metric with which to measure distances or inter- metries should emerge as additional symmetries which

vals. And it is non-trivial to construct diffeomorphism protect the degrees of freedom we have identified as el-

invariant observables that measure local properties of ementary particles. This will guarantee that the interac-

fields. tions among the particles conserve the emergent notions

This is brought out by the topological nature of the of energy and momentum. It is this possibility that al-

conserved degrees of freedom we have described here. lows us to use topological conservation numbers to rep-

The reader may ask the following question: It is com- resent matter.

mon to encounter such topological degrees of freedom The test of this approach will be whether it can be

but doesn’t their topological nature mean they are of worked out in detail, so we will not say more here about

limited interest? And to what extent will they interac- how translation invariance is to emerge. But we may

tions be able to be characterized as local? note that this scenario is very different from the one that

The origin of these issues is that there are two notions has been commonly assumed in many discussions about

of locality that may be relevant. In a given graph or rib- how space and time are to emerge from background in-

bon graph there will be a notion of locality: two trinions dependent models of quantum geometry. It makes no

are neighbors if they are connected, or in a graph two use of the common assumption that the quantum geom-

nodes are neighbors if they are connected by a link. We etry describes a bumpy classical geometry so that the

can call this microlocality. In the theories we study here, micro-locality of A evol ought to coincide with that of the

as well as in loop quantum gravity and spin foam mod- effective spacetime up to Planck scale corrections.

els generally, the dynamics is generated by moves that In summary, there are distinct ways for a spacetime

are local in this microscopic sense. geometry to emerge from a quantum theory. At one end

But if this is to be a good theory there should be a no- of the spectrum lies the expectation that classical space-

tion of classical spacetime geometry that emerges from time geometry will emerge as the classical/low energy

the quantum geometry. This will give rise to another no- limit of quantum general relativity (as in Loop Quan-

tion of locality, which we may characterize as macrolocal- tum Gravity) or a discrete and quantum version of Ein-

ity. stein’s theory (as in Causal Dynamical Triangulations

10

[18]). Matter fields are to be added and coupled to the of macrolocality that emerges from the interactions of

quantum geometry. At the other end, one may expect the approximate noiseless subsystems. Both possibili-

that the emergent spacetime is the collection of events ties are under investigation.

that are the interactions of the excitations of an under-

lying pre-spacetime quantum theory, with matter being

also emergent as these same excitations. That such an D. The anomaly issue

emergent spacetime can be dynamical has recently been

investigated in [19, 20]. Finally, we recall that in standard preon models

anomaly matching conditions need to be satisfied [11].

This is because the fundamental theory that binds

B. The mass matrix the preons is a conventional, background independent

quantum field theory. In the present setup, the “preon-

In order to arrive at the standard model fermions we like” objects appear only at the level of the quantum

have had to make two assumptions about the mass ma- pre-geometry. Individual ribbons do not exist as per-

trix. These should be justified in a fundamental theory. sistent states and hence will not appear in an effective

To discuss this we have to notice that the mass matrix field theory that describes the dynamics of the persistent

can only arise at the level that an effective dynamics in states below the Planck scale. So while there can be no

spacetime emerges. As we noted above, this requires anomaly in that effective field theory, we already know

that there be in the low energy limit an emergent trans- there is none, as it is the standard model. As the preons

lation invariance in space and time. This will imply the are bound by the dynamics of quantum geometry rather

conservation of energy and momentum for small ex- than gauge fields, no issue of anomaly matching arises.

citations around the ground state. When the effective

Hamiltonian H is evaluated on the states described here

at zero momentum it will give us a mass matrix. IX. CONCLUSIONS AND OPEN ISSUES

The only thing we can say about the mass matrix at

this stage is that it should be constructed from topo- The results presented here tell us that theories that sat-

logical invariants of the states which are preserved un- isfy the conditions described in section 2 above, may be

der evolution. Motivated by the spectrum of stan- already unified. Most remarkably, with rather mild condi-

dard model particles we make the following hypotheses tions imposed, the emergent particle degrees of freedom

about the mass matrix in this class of theories: (1) Given include the first generation fermions and vector bosons

two braids as just described, which have the same num- of the standard model.

ber of strands and twistings, but differ by the number It is worth noting that this result has been achieved

of crossings, the mass will increase with the number of through a combination of quite conservative steps. On

crossings. (2) Non-trivially braided states with both pos- the other hand, there are many open questions to be re-

itive and negative twisted strands incident on the same solved if this proposal corresponds to reality. We here

vertex should have a heavy mass M . All other states are list a few.

light relative to the scale M .

• How may an effective low energy dynamics

emerge? As we discussed in the previous sec-

C. Emergence of interactions tion, if the microscopic dynamics is contained in

the evolution algebra, it acts trivially on the sec-

Another feature of the present proposal that we tor of the theory that contains braids and twists,

would like to discuss is the fact that the invariant quan- meaning that (what we call) the effective theory is

tities we find are quantum numbers and not individual completely decoupled from (what we call) the mi-

identified particles. That is, the in and out states (pre- croscopic theory. One would like to know the con-

serving the relevant quantum numbers) of a Feynman sequences of a more realistic setup, presumably in-

diagram are equivalent. More precisely, the very fact volving an enlargement of A evol so that the sector

that we are getting HB as a noiseless subsystem means containing the standard model quantum numbers

that A evol commutes with operators on HB and hence is approximately noiseless. This case would also

A evol cannot tell us anything about the Standard Model give results on the effective dynamics.

dynamics. In order to describe interactions we will have • How does the usual quantum statistics arise? This

to weaken the notion of a noiseless subsystem to a more is an important open problem, whose solution

realistic notion of an approximate noiseless subsystem. may require a further specification of the dynam-

There are two ways that this could be done. The first is ics so as to satisfy conditions of the topological

that additional local moves need to be added to A evol to spin statistics theorems.

give the standard model interactions. The second, more

elegant possibility is that the gauge interactions are also • How bound are the quarks and leptons? Does the

emergent and arise at the level that we have a notion theory predict the existence of exotic states such as

11

stable fractionally charged particles? used in loop quantum gravity can then be re-

garded as composites of fundamentally topologi-

• Is there a composite Higgs or some other mech- cal properties. This gives a very attractive unifica-

anism for dynamical symmetry breaking? The tion in which both the geometry observables and

states described here naturally are CP invariant. the quantum numbers of the elementary particles

How may CP violation enter the theory? Is there a are reduced to simple topological properties such

derivation of the mass matrix in terms of topolog- as twisting and braiding of edges.

ical invariants?

• Alternatively, if the spacetime geometry is to be

• These results seem to show that the emergent

constructed from the collection of events that are

particle like degrees of freedom arise whether or

the interactions of the conserved degrees of free-

not representations of a quantum group labels the

dom, one has to show how gravity and the Ein-

graphs and even independently of the actual am-

stein equations will appear.

plitudes for the different evolution moves. How

then should these be chosen? Regarding the choice

of quantum group, we would favor the minimal

choice, which is that there is no group. There Acknowledgments

are still states that correspond to products of rep-

resentations of the spacetime SU (2)L ⊕ SU (2)R , We are very grateful to Stephon Alexander, Olaf

but they must be built up by hand from braided Dreyer, Laurent Freidel, Paul Frampton, Louis Kauff-

triplets of edges. It is then possible that all the man, Jaron Lanier and Shahn Majid for criticism and en-

quantum numbers, including the geometric labels couragement during the course of this work.

posite preons, hep-ph/0503213. [10] J. C. Pati, A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D10, 275 (1974); H. Harari,

[2] D. W. Kribs, F. Markopoulou, Geometry from quantum Phys. Lett. B86, 83 (1979); M. Shupe, Phys. Lett. B86, 87

particles, gr-qc/0510052. F. Markopoulou and D.Poulin, (1979); H. Harari, N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B98, 269 (1981).

Noiseless subsystems and the low energy limit of spin foam [11] G. t Hooft, in Recent Developments in gauge Theories,

models, unpublished. G t Hooft et al ed. (Plenum Press, NY, 1980) p. 135;

[3] P.Zanardi and M.Rasetti, Phys.Rev.Lett.79 3306 (1997); S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby and L. Susskind, Nucl. Phys.

14; D. A. Lidar, I. L. Chuang and K. B. Wha- B173 (1980) 208; Albright, Carl H.; Schrempp, Barbara;

ley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998) [arXiv:quantph/ Schrempp, Fridger, Composite quarks and leptons from re-

9807004]; E.Knill, R.Laflamme and L.Viola, Phys.Rev.Lett. stricted anomaly matching, Physical Review D 26, , 1982,

84 2525 (2000); J. Kempe, D. Bacon, D. A. Li- pp.1737-1749;

dar and K. B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. A 63, 042307 [12] Carlo Rovelli, Loop Quantum Gravity, Living Rev.Rel. 1

(2001); J.A.Holbrook, D.W.Kribs and R.Laflamme, Quan- (1998) 1, gr-qc/9710008; Quantum Gravity, Cambridge

tum.Inf.Proc.2, 381 (2004); J.A.Holbrook, D.W.Kribs, University Press, 2004.

R.Laflamme and D.Poulin, Integral Eqnts. & Operator [13] L. Smolin, An invitation to loop quantum gravity hep-

Thy, 51, 215 (2005). th/0408048.

[4] The application of NSs to constrained hamiltonian sys- [14] C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Knot theory and quantum the-

tems like quantum gravity is discussed in T. Konopka, F. ory, Phys. Rev. Lett 61(1988)1155; Loop representation of

Markopoulou, Constrained Mechanics and Noiseless Subsys- quantum general relativity, Nucl. Phys. B331(1990)80-152.

tems, gr-qc/0601028. In this approach the environment is [15] Another approach to the emergence of matter in spin

the gauge degrees of freedom and the noiseless subsys- foam models is S. Alexander, L. Crane, M. D. Shep-

tem is found to be the gauge invariant states. peard, The geometrization of matter proposal in the Barrett-

[5] Fotini Markopoulou, Dual formulation of spin network Crane model and resolution of cosmological problems, gr-

evolution, gr-qc/9704013. qc/0306079.

[6] Fotini Markopoulou, Lee Smolin, Quantum geometry [16] A. Perez, C. Rovell.Physical effects of the Immirzi pa-

with intrinsic local causality, Phys.Rev. D58 (1998) 084032, rameter gr-qc/0505081;Lay Nam Chang, Chopin Soo,

gr-qc/9712067. Massive torsion modes, chiral gravity, and the Adler-Bell-

[7] LH Kauffman, Knots and physics - 1991 - Singapore; Tea- Jackiw anomaly, hep-th/0303147, Class.Quant.Grav. 20

neck, NJ: World Scientific; S. Majid, Foundations of quan- (2003) 1379-1388; Laurent Freidel, Djordje Minic, Tatsu

tum group theory, 1995, Cambridge University Press. Takeuchi, Quantum Gravity, Torsion, Parity Violation and

[8] L. Smolin, Quantum gravity with a positive cosmological all that, hep-th/0507253, Phys.Rev. D72 (2005) 104002;

constant, hep-th/0209079. Stephon Alexander,A Quantum Gravitational Relaxation of

[9] S. Major and L. Smolin, Quantum deformation of quan- The Cosmological Constant , hep-th/0503146, Phys.Lett.

tum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B473, 267(1996), gr-qc/9512020; B629 (2005) 53-59.

R. Borissov, S. Major and L. Smolin, The geometry [17] Laurent Freidel, Etera R. Livine, Effective 3d Quan-

of quantum spin networks, Class. and Quant. Grav.12, tum Gravity and Non-Commutative Quantum Field Theory,

12

hep-th/0512113; Carlo Rovelli, Graviton propagator from [19] S. Lloyd, A theory of quantum gravity based on quantum com-

background-independent quantum gravity, gr-qc/0508124. putation, quant-ph/0501135.

[18] J. Ambjorn and R. Loll, Nucl. Phys. B536 (1998) 407 [hep- [20] F. Markopoulou and O. Dreyer, The steps from a back-

th/9805108]; J. Ambjorn, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll, Phys. ground independent quantum theory to the Einstein equation,

Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 924 [hepth/ 0002050]; Nucl. Phys. in preparation.

B610 (2001) 347 [hep-th/0105267]; R. Loll, Nucl. Phys. B [] Note that the subscript i on mi refers to the ith move in a

(Proc. Suppl.) 94 (2001) 96 [hep-th/0011194]; J. Ambjorn, sequence, while the subscripts on bi and ti refer to which

J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 044011 strand in the braid is being acted upon.

[hep-th/0011276]; Emergence of a 4D World from Causal

Quantum Gravity, hep-th/0404156.

Skip section### Trending

- Officer Off LimitsTessa Bailey
- The Duke's Shotgun WeddingStacy Reid
- OpalJennifer L. Armentrout
- To All the Boys I've Loved BeforeJenny Han
- Point of Retreat: A NovelColleen Hoover
- Cinder: Book One of the Lunar ChroniclesMarissa Meyer
- A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to School...Davide Cali
- Brown Bear, Brown Bear, What Do You See?Bill Martin, Jr.
- Same, Same But DifferentJenny Sue Kostecki-Shaw
- Bad Kitty Gets a BathNick Bruel
- The Bell Jar: A NovelSylvia Plath
- Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Diary of a Wimpy Kid, Book 1Jeff Kinney
- The Long WalkStephen King
- The Baller: A Down and Dirty Football NovelVi Keeland
- Little House In The Big WoodsLaura Ingalls Wilder
- All Your Perfects: A NovelColleen Hoover
- This Is How You Lose The Time WarAmal El-Mohtar
- Nothing to See HereKevin Wilson
- Pete the Cat and the Perfect Pizza PartyJames Dean
- TomboyAvery Flynn
- Scoring the Player's BabyNaima Simone
- The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of ColorblindnessMichelle Alexander
- Marriage on Madison AvenueLauren Layne
- RageBob Woodward