This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
By Joseph Zernik, PhD, Human Rights Alert (NGO) The Israeli Supreme Court collected full filing fees, stamped the April 15th , 2013 petition, filed from the Occupy Tel Aviv Social Protest encampment, “Received”, but failed to register the filing of the petition. The petition documents unprecedented corruption of the Israeli courts over the past decade. Key part of the evidence in the petition originates in the case of self-immolated, social protest activist Moshe Silman, who was subjected to fraud in the Tel Aviv District Court. The electronic record systems, now implemented in the Israeli courts, are the enabling tools. These systems, implemented over the past decade in the Israeli courts, mimic systems that had been implemented in state (Sustain) and federal courts (PACER and CM/ECF) in the United States a couple of decades earlier. Corruption of the courts in both Israel and the United States is central to failing banking regulation and the current socio-economic crisis. Both in Israel and in the United States, unless the people demand concerted efforts to reform the judiciary, the current socio-economic crisis is nor going to be effectively addressed.
The April 15, 2013 petition to the Israeli Supreme Court documents fraud in the Tel Aviv District Court on self-immolated social protest activist Moshe Silman. The Israeli Supreme Court denies the right to file the petition, which provides evidence of routine fraud in the Israeli courts, including the Supreme Court itself.
The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in Israel by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations documented widespread corruption of the electronic records of the of the Israeli courts over the past decade.  The submission was incorporated in the UN Professional Staff Report (paragraph 25) with a note referring to “Lack of integrity in the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel.” For example, the Human Rights Alert submission provides documentation of numerous decisions of the Israeli Supreme Court, which were electronically certified by the late Supreme Court Chief Clerk, up to five years after his death. The evidence for large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the Israeli courts was likewise peer-reviewed and published by computer science academic journal. 
which in their essence are the same as the fraud. .They enable the routine falsification of court records by judges. the Regulations of the Courts.  In the US. pertaining to the nature of such changes. and for the judges – and denial of access to the full court records. In the petition Dr Joseph Zernik v Justice Minister Tzipi Livni and Director of the Administration of Courts Michael Spitzer (2689/13).  filed on April 15. such conditions are related to fraud in the implementation of the electronic record systems of the state (Sustain) and US courts (PACER and . . The Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR of Human Rights in the United States was in part based on review of these conditions. the Administration of the Courts was permitted to enter unspecified. as changed by the Administration of Courts in the process of implementing the new electronic record systems. . The submission was incorporated into the 2010 UPR report on the United States with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession in California”.Maintenance of double and triple. implemented in the Israeli courts over the past decade. the petitioner argues that the latest generation of electronic record systems. are the enabling tool of court corruption. Therefore.Invalid implementation of invisible electronic signatures. mimic conditions that have been established in the state and US courts a couple of decades earlier. for the Office of the Clerk. the petition asks the Israeli Supreme Court to rule that such secret changes to the Regulations of the Court.let alone. even to parties in their own cases.Attempt is made to have the Israeli Supreme Court address its own corruption Now. In developing and implementing the systems.Undermining the authority of the Clerks of the Courts. attempt is made to bring the matter before the Israeli Supreme Court itself. relative to their duties and obligations for the safeguard of integrity of court records. materially different books – for the public at large. The petition further argues that the fundamental flaws in the latest generation of electronic records of the courts of the State of Israel include: . unpublished changes to the Israeli Regulations of the Courts. for parties in the case.They violate the principle of separation of branches of government – the judiciary are not permitted by Israeli law to promulgate regulations . underlying the fable “The Emperor's New Clothes”.They violate the principle of publicity of the law – the Administration of Courts refuses to answer on a Freedom of Information Act request. since: . introduced by the judiciary are null and void. which have been established in the Israeli courts over the past decade. The petition argues that such conditions undermine the integrity of the justice system. Conditions. . .Hiding from the public the Regulations of the Courts (Office of the Clerk).
now in operation in the courts. the April 15th petition relies on the Israeli Ombudsman of the Judiciary Report (2012). violated the law and obstructed justice with impunity.  and the fabrication of court records by former Judge Hilah Cohen of the Haifa District Court. the servers for the records of the courts were removed from the offices of the clerks of the courts to one of the corporations. which dwells on the routine retroactive alteration of court records by judges. with no core supervision by State employees.In the first court file (13491/2008). .  Self-immolated Social Protest activist Moshe Silman was subjected to fraud in the Tel Aviv District Court The petition adds new evidence of such conduct by the Tel Aviv District Court in the case of self-immolated Social Protest activist Moshe Silman. the commencing paper (complaint) was supposedly registered. In the opening lines of his last letter.CM/ECF)  In fact. magistrate of the Tel Aviv District Court. the 2010 Israeli State Ombudsman's Report determines that such systems were developed and implemented in violation of the law of the State of Israel:  The Report determines that the systems. Silman tried to sue the Israeli Social Security Administration in the Tel Aviv District Court. public access to inspect and to copy court records is heavily restricted): . three requests for inspection of court files were filed (in Israel. The findings of the State Ombudsman alone should have led the Ombudsman to conclude that such systems are invalid and unacceptable as electronic record systems. were developed and implemented through the award of contracts to corporations by the Administration of Courts with no bidding. reveals three court file numbers. and with no independent examination of the final product by State employees prior to implementation. the late Moshe Silman writes: “The Tel Aviv District Court denied my access to justice. and an unknown number of persons were issued double smart ID cards. affected the dismissal of Silman's complaint. Hagai Brenner. Moreover. claiming that it had never existed.In the second court file (1752-08).  The petition also refers to media reports. Likewise. related to Moshe Silman v Social Security Administration in the Tel Aviv District Court. pursuant to Due Process/Fair Hearing rights. but the Office of the Clerk of the Tel Aviv District Court refused to accept the request to inspect the court file. in his capacity as Magistrate. with no technical specifications.” Inspection of the court files. . The Ombudsman's Report also determines that in the process of implementing the systems. which documented the falsification of court records by Deputy Presiding Judge Vardah AlSheikh of the Tel Aviv District Court. Accordingly. Hanan Brenner [sic – jz]. as noted in the April 15 petition. the Israeli electronic record systems were developed and implemented by US-based corporations – IBM and EDS.
After the Petitioner approached the Office of the Clerk for correction of the error. 2013. Likewise. 2013 petition. who appears as “Chief Clerk” of the Supreme Court. as permitted by Israeli law. who made the retroactive changes. But after the case was dismissed for failure to prosecute. purportedly on behalf of the US government. refuses to certify the decisions in Silman's court files. refused to enter a correction. Initially. Additionally. which documents its own corruption. denied Silman's appeal from Hagai Brenner's decision in court file (1752-08). the Office of the Israeli Supreme Court Magistrate refused to accept the filing of the petition. the attempt to inspect Silman's court files revealed that court decisions are routinely served unsigned by a judge and accompanied by an unsigned authentication letter by an unnamed. claiming that it was exempt. The Office of the Clerk . Administration of Courts had also refused to respond on a request. the filing of commencing record of the petition was not registered at all. The Israeli Supreme Court patronizes corruption of Israeli banking system and Israeli banking regulation through fraud on the court Furthermore. as a record of “internal deliberations”. claiming that there was “no flaw” in the registration. “Chief Clerk” of the Israeli Supreme Court. Instead. the registration was retroactively changed to show it as a “Petition”. The Israeli Supreme Court denies the right to file the April 15. Additionally. That petition originated in the unlawful seizing of Dr Zernik's bank accounts by the Israeli Bank HaPoalim. The petition in Zernik v Livni and Spitzer was filed on April 15. and also refuses to present a copy of his lawful appointment record as Chief Clerk of the Tel Aviv District Court.In the third court file (6909-01-10). Ms Sarah Lifschitz. who appears as “Chief Clerk” of the Tel Aviv District Court. together with a request for recusal of the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court. pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. and also refuses to present a copy of her appointment record as Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court. for Mr Bleich's appointment record. the petition details fraud in the the Israeli Supreme Court itself in the case of Joseph Zernik v Governor of the Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer (7650-12). filing of the petition was registered as an “Appeal”. the petitioner asks that the petition be filed through the Magistrate of the Supreme Court. the Administration of Courts refused to respond on a Freedom of Information Act request for Mr Lifschitz's appointment record. Ms Sarah Lifschitz. Mr Kobi Bleich. In response to request for correction of the latter error. and by what authority. On April 15. Requests for clarifications by the Supreme Court. the current petition documents that decisions of the Supreme Court are routinely served unsigned. remain unanswered to this date. on what date. in his capacity as Pro Tem District Judge. Hagai Brenner. “True Copy of the Original”. and referred it back to the Office of the Clerk.. and are accompanied by no authentication letter by the Clerk of the Court. Prior to that. refuses to certify the Supreme Court's decisions. “True Copy of the Original”.
to the US Supreme Court. the papers. full filing fee was collected. former US prosecutor Richard Fine.  However. During the entire period.  When attempt was made to file in the US Supreme Court evidence of the fraud on then falsely imprisoned Richard Fine. and the petition itself was stamped “Received”.8 billions in the Merrill Lynch-Bank of . were ignored by the Sheriff. is tightly linked to failing banking regulation The tight relationship between corruption of the courts and failing banking regulation in Israel was documented in the Israeli Supreme Court in Joseph Zernik v Governor of Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer. The publicity of the “not permitted” payments led to the signing in February 2009 by the California governor of “retroactive immunities” for all judges (called by media “pardons”). through the US Court of Appeals. At the same time.  Richard Fine showed that all judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court took “not permitted” payments (called by media “bribes”). which state that Fine was arrested and booked on location and by authority of the non-existent “Municipal Court of San Pedro”. from the US District Court in Los Angeles. With it. both in the US and Israel. and the Office of the Clerk appeared to receive the filing of the petition itself.  Corruption of the courts. for the release of Richard Fine. Richard Fine was arrested and imprisoned by Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca. In the US. 9th Circuit. Richard Fine's habeas corpus petitions were repeatedly subjected to fraud and denied. Similar conditions were previously documented in the US Supreme Court in the case of 70year old.refused to accept for filing the request for its own recusal. described above. Richard Fine was held by Sheriff Lee Baca under false booking records. later inspections of the electronic records of the Supreme Court later reveals that the petition record has not been registered as filed to this date. perhaps the best documentation of the corruption of the courts in matters related to banking regulation comes from the case of SEC v Bank of America Corporation in the US District Court in New York under US Judge Jed Rakoff. which were stamped “Received” were “returned” by mail by US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell (not an authorized clerk). alternatively.  The case originated in the unlawful taking by banking executives of $5. Two weeks later.  Repeat requests for correction of the false booking records.  The same conditions were documented also in the US district courts and the US courts of appeals – denial of the right to file papers that document judicial corruption in various other cases. It was provided as part of the evidence in the April 15th petition. Richard Fine was later held for 18 months in solitary confinement (considered by the UN torture) and was freed only in late 2010.  Conditions in the Israeli Supreme Court mimic condition in the US Supreme Court.
LINKS:  Human Rights Alert (NGO) Submission for the 2013 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the State of Israel by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations. and to no lesser part through remedies provided by such judicial luminaries as the “Three Musketeers” . and Harlan Fiske Stone.scribd. or lack thereof. during the infamous Robber Baron Period. J. Widespread corruption of the courts."  . Experts opine that such conditions are historically unprecedented in the United States: .Justices Louis Brandeis.  The remedy was in part through reform of the US Department of Justice.. and reform of the courts – a key to the recovery. 15th UPR State of Israel . both in Israel and in the US is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis . "Large-scale fraud in US court records is linked to failing banking regulation". and bankers especially. court system in U. the central role of the courts in the current crisis is insufficiently publicized. peer-reviewed by international computing experts". of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel" https://docs. when it comes to reporting on judicial corruption. can cheat and defraud without consequences.a system in which only the little people have to obey the law..". Both in Israel and the US. while the rich.America merger. unless the people demand reform of the judiciary through concerted actions of the three branches of government. the current crisis is unlikely to ever be effectively addressed. OpEdNews. Conditions that today prevail in the US courts are similar to conditions that prevailed a century ago.com/doc/38566837/ http://www.com/doc/108663259  Zernik.scribd. or lack thereof. J. OpEdNews. Media appear intimidated."."Integrity. Corruption of the US courts was also central to the US Robber Baron Era a century ago. in part through legislation by the US Congress – the Salary Act (1919).S.. published by the US Federal Judicial Center emphasizes the key role of the corrupt offices of the clerks of the US courts in such conditions.it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.. Review of the US court electronic records in the case documents the conduct of simulated litigation – fraud on the court.S. Benjamin N.com/articles/Large-scale-fraud-in-the-c-by-Joseph-Zernik-120922-330. The litigation of the case ended with no funds returned to the shareholders... of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel" http://www.com/doc/92826212/ Human Right Alert..com (2012) http://www.opednews. Cardozo.google. Appendix I to Submission. "Large-scale fraud in the courts of the State of Israel. "Integrity.  An historic study. There is no valid summons in the case and no valid court records for any of the proceedings.com/doc/136215148/  United Nations Human Rights Council UPR of Human Rights in the United States (2010) http://www.scribd. where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases.scribd. and no executive held accountable.. history."  However.html  Dr Zernik v Justice Minister Livni and Director of Administration of the Courts Spitzer (2689/13) – Petition in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel (Hebrew with English translation)) http://www.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU  Zernik.com (2012) .
scribd. in: A People's History of the United States.http://www. P. March 13. “Special Report: The watchdogs that didn't bark”.scribd.com/print-edition/news/judge-hila-cohen-set-to-step-down-1.com/doc/90686541/  “Judge Hila Cohen set to step down”.org/index. 2011 http://www.com/doc/41457094/  Messinger.scribd. Haaretz http://www..com/2011/03/14/opinion/14krugman. Ministry of Justice Computerization (2010) pp 693 et seq http://www.com/article/2011/12/22/us-foreclosures-idUSTRE7BL0MC20111222  Krugman. with stamps showing receipt by the US Supreme Court http://www. 2010.scribd. Federal Judicial Center (2002) http://www.com/doc/30162144/ 10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Dr Zernik's Motion to Intervene 5 Amended Appendices s http://www. Data Analytics 1:83-93 (2012) http://thinkmind.scribd.com/doc/25555341/  Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Face pages of five filings by Dr Joseph Zernik. “Another Inside Job”.com/doc/34819774/ . I Scott: Order in The Court . repeat mailing of January 8. Globe http://www.scribd. pp 62-53 http://www.html  State of Israel Ombudsman's Report 60b. S.scribd. in re Richard Fine's booking records. response from Sheriff Lee Baca.com/doc/39788364/  Zernik.com/doc/30304657/ 10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 1 Amended Motion to Intervene s http://www.scribd.scribd. 2011 http://www.scribd. Los Angeles County.com/doc/31430464/  The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment Right to File Petitions http://www.History of Clerks of United States Courts..167998  Habeas Corpus in the United States . J. New York Times.reuters.opednews. Reuters.scribd. 2010 search for records in the Courts microfilm judgments archive s http://www.Review http://www.com/doc/30161573/ 10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 2 Amended Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer s http://www.scribd.haaretz. Dec 22.html?_r=0  Zinn. http://www.com/doc/30185575/ 10-04-22 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court .scribd.nytimes.scribd. Annual Report (2012).the case of Richard Isaac Fine . "Design and Operation of the Electronic Record Systems of the US Courts are Linked to Failing Banking Regulation".com/doc/30161692/ 10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 5 Amended Appendix IX b: Zernik's Declaration in re: April 16.Dr Zernik's Declaration RE: Court Counsel Danny Bickell and Filing at US Supreme Court http://www.com/doc/50624862  State of Israel Ombudsman of the Judiciary.php?view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_3_50_60059  Paltrow.com/doc/24729084/  Supervisor Antonovich.com/doc/126609022  The Judge Alsheikh Affair – “Reconstructed Transcript” in the Tel-Aviv District Court.com/doc/30161636/ 10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 3 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records shttp://www. http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/ 10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference s http://www.com/articles/Large-scale-fraud-in-US-co-by-Joseph-Zernik-120925-643.scribd. H: "Robber Barons and Rebels"..