Greetings Hobot


>I was blocked trying to get an Administrative hearing on my simple no driver license case. . . told me they only had jurisdiction. . . no provision to hold a hearing on those that never applied for a driver license.

They cannot give you an administrative hearing if they do not have jurisdiction. If you don't have a license then they do not have personam jurisdiction. You should have got the case dismissed. You probably didn't know that and they are not going to tell you.

You MUST deny personam jurisdiction if you are not a 14th Amendment (US) citizen. You also should deny "subject matter jurisdiction" when you understand that "all crimes are commercial" (cross reference 27 C.F.R. 72.11). In fact, most Appeals courts WILL NOT consider the issue if you have not denied it in a lower court. If you are a State National you would also deny venue because federal court is the ONLY venue available to take an Action against a State National. Cross reference 28 U.S.C. 1331 1333.


>Driver Control under Dept. of Revenue

It is ALL about the money and the 14th Amendment... and they told you right there! You just didn't understand.

14th Amendment Section 4 states: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.―

Did you think you pay those fines and penalties with money? No, you pay them with debt. The debt shall not be questioned.

In fact.. Chapter 883. Somebody has got to pay that debt.This issue also goes to why ALL the "courts" (the BANK) are administrative. means charter parties. if the subject of controversy. Compare 15 U.― RESPONSE: .. bills of lading of. as herein defined. would be embraced within admiralty jurisdiction. Vol. or any other matters in foreign commerce which.C. 443 was enacted into law on July 5. and false and misleading representations of fact.. I just revised them into a Request for Admissions so you will see them in that format: Please affirm that the Lanham Act at 60 Stat.. 1946. means commerce among the several States or with foreign nations. III courts to Art.. IV courts.C. or between the District of Columbia and any State or Territory or foreign nation. § 1121. or in any Territory of the United States or in the District of Columbia.(codified as 9 U. You should do the research yourself.S. or between any such Territory and another. supplies. it may as well be the people who don't know their rights. RESPONSE: Please affirm that the Lanham Act conferred original jurisdiction on the district and territorial courts of the United States over federal claims of trademark infringement.. So when they revised Title 28 back in 1948 they changed the courts from Art. RESPONSE: Please affirm that Pub. I have typed this out before so it is easy for me to copy and paste. or between any such Territory and any State or foreign nation. Sixty-eighth Congress. ‘commerce’. as herein defined. XLIII. false and misleading descriptions of fact. L. February 12. 1925.S. Session II. including false designations of origin.A § 1) states “‘Maritime transactions’..

655 (1873). 511.S. edition 2.Please affirm that “charter― means “A basic document of law of a Municipal Corporation granted by the state. 274 U. 235. 438 (1929). RESPONSE: Please affirm that the District Courts. 98 (1877). Marshall’s seminal ruling). 276 U. RESPONSE: Please affirm that the United States Statutes at Large. v. Porter. whether federal or state. Keller v. Klesner. 464 (1930). 95 U.S. 242 (1828) (C. 145.. 311 (1928). 101 U.S. defining its rights. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group.S. Toombs.S. 516 .S. 1948. Clinton v. Volume 62 was signed into law by President Truman on June 25. Federal Trade Commission v. 145 (1927). 50 U. 447 (1871).S. 98 U. 80 U. 460 (1879). 154 (1878). 279 U.J.Ed.S. 261 U. U. and responsibilities of self-government. 281 U. 85 U. Swift & Co. 453. v. Good v. 382 (1932). 356 Bales of Cotton. Englebrecht. 242-243 (1850).S.S. are not Article III Judicial Courts as a result of that restructuring. 285 U. Inc. United States. Reynolds v.― See: West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Potomac Electric Power Co. Ex parte Bakelite Corporation.S. 90. United States. RESPONSE: Please affirm that legislative courts are not required to exercise the Article III guarantees required of constitutional courts. 648. Benner v. Hornbuckle v. General Electric Co. Federal Radio Commission v.. 428 (1923). ClaiborneAnnapolis Ferry Co. 26 U. after several years of committee work were needed to re-write numerous governing statutes. RESPONSE: Please affirm that Act completely re-structured the entire federal court system. O’Donoghue v.S.S. 434. All rights reserved.S. See Title 28. liabilities. 289 U. Martin. The City of Panama. United States.S. 7 L. See: American Insurance v..

RESPONSE: Please affirm that in Marathon supra. RESPONSE: Here is some proof for you (also written before and copied and pasted here): This can be proven by looking at The National Voter Registration Act of 1993. 50 (1982). "TITLE 42 THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 20 .S. 370 U..A. 14 Stat.K. RESPONSE: Please affirm that by treating the 50 States as federal Territories and by creating federal citizenship as a municipal franchise. 530 (1962). are Article IV Administrative Tribunals designed for summary judgment for all federal (A. RESPONSE: Please affirm that the District Courts.e. Zdanok. April 9. 27-30. 1866 A. Justice Brennan for the plurality reasoned that Congress could create legislative courts without Article III protections in only three limited settings: (1) territorial courts.ELECTIVE FRANCHISE SUBCHAPTER I-H . . and Northern Pipeline Co. v. Congress could effectively “broadcast― into those States a legislative court that routinely proceeds without Article III protections.L.NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION". 103-31.(1933).D. Marathon Pipe Line Co.S. P. (2) courts martial. v. 14th Amendment) that Congress created in the first instance. 14th Amendment) citizens. whether federal or state. 458 U. Glidden Co. and (3) courts deciding disputes involving public rights (i. See the 1866 Civil Rights Act.

so to speak. “The citizen cannot complain. like pay taxes. It would seem prudent to verify the definitions of other terms like "elective". "elective (Voluntary)" See: http://legal-dictionary. The obvious key words here are "specified commercial activities".― —U. . . he owes allegiance to the two departments. .thefreedictionary.S. because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government. . and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties. It is important to note the definition of "franchise": fran·chise /ˈfranCHīz/ Noun An authorization granted by a government or company to an individual or group enabling them to carry out specified commercial activities.Title 42 concerns "civil rights" otherwise known as "legislative privileges" granted to former So if one registers to vote one has "voluntarily submitted" and agreed to carry out "specified commercial activities". v Cruikshank Does this "elective franchise" make a living (white) man a corporation and responsible for "Income Taxes" and other encumbrances of "this state" including a "driver's license"? The federal government seems to have usurped the de jure States through judicial and legislative fiat of the Fourteenth Amendment and other means.

(2) it is the duty of the Federal. A privilege is. and (3) discriminatory and unfair registration laws and procedures can have a direct and damaging effect on voter participation in elections for Federal office and disproportionately harm voter participation by various groups. ought to feel the disadvantages attending it. Additionally Title 42 Sec. (my! How the tables have turned! Now de jure State Nationals are denied the "right to vote"!) (b) Purposes The purposes of this subchapter are (1) to establish procedures that will increase the number of eligible citizens who . 1973gg FINDINGS AND PURPOSES states: (a) Findings The Congress finds that (1) the right of citizens of the United States to vote is a fundamental right. He who receives the benefit should also bear the disadvantage.Here are several Maxims of Law that clarify the relationship when accepting a government benefit and the encumbrances they create. a private law. He who derives a benefit from a thing. as it were. He who enjoys the benefit. He who enjoys the advantage of a right takes the accompanying disadvantage. No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. ought also to bear the burden. and local governments to promote the exercise of that right. Any one may renounce a law introduced for his own benefit. State. Favors from government often carry with them an enhanced measure of regulation. including racial minorities.

(3) to protect the integrity of the electoral process. State. . There is clearly a nexus between voting and being required to have a driver's license: "Apply to Register to Vote You may apply to register to vote or change your voter registration name or address at any DMV office. and local governments to implement this subchapter in a manner that enhances the participation of eligible citizens as voters in elections for Federal The conclusion that must be drawn is that when one registers to vote they declare under penalties of perjury that they are a "US citizen"." See: http://www. This also indicates that there are NO occupied State Offices! They are vacant! "eligible citizens as voters in elections for Federal office" The "state offices" that exist are federal franchises. lawful State inhabitants who are not also federal citizens.asp There are also links between being a "US citizen". So despite this legislatures claims that the purpose of that Public Law is to increase voter participation there is a deliberate exclusion of State Nationals.register to vote in elections for Federal office. (2) to make it possible for and (4) to ensure that accurate and current voter registration rolls are maintained. "driver's licenses" and serving on grand and petite juries. that their political status is lowered to that of a slave and they have effectively exchanged their Natural Rights (including their Right to travel) for legislative privileges which may include the requirement of a "driver's license".

the courts. but you have to know what is going on.. I have attached a portion of the 1967 Congressional Record that details the fraud created by "Reconstruction". You have to begin to understand how Reality is. This is fraud. It is a bit more complicated than that. the agencies. You should also read Dyett v Turner: ." investigation into judicial bias. look up your "state" offices: the legislature.corporationwiki. Corporations are not concerned with justice. This goes for J and his letter to the House of Representatives requesting a "Justice Dept. traffic court. they are concerned with "just us". To show you how simple it is to prove that it is about money. other wise you will have nothing to write about in your letter that will have any value to them.When I thought I was a United States citizen I was thinking about being a Citizen of one of the 50 states not a "federal citizen" as defined by various regulations.. rather than believe what you were told Reality is. They know. Any contracts I entered into before I knew the terms and conditions of such contract are void ab initio. J is mistakenly thinking "they don't know".com/ Did you think attorneys work for you? >If you could post how you obtained Administrative due process to begin with it would be insightful. They are waiting for Americans to know.. they are all corporations. http://www.. Writing a letter to the allegedly correct "authority" is the process.

as_sdt=2. from the rank of freedom to the condition of slaves. It is based upon an accusation so vague as to be scarcely intelligible and found to be true upon no credible evidence. that is why you need attorney representation. They are waiting for you to tell them what to do but they know that they don't have to admit anything..http://scholar. The representatives of the doomed parties were excluded from all participation in the trial.000. they know they can mislead you because most of the time people will just take the easy way out and pony up the money and pay them off.000 was heard in his own defense. because you are a child and ignorant. It is not their duty to correct your thinking. They cannot not tell you that you are in Burger King "so just have a Whopper".Here is a bill of attainder against 9. It disfranchises them by hundreds of thousands and degrades them― If you don't know this.. when you are busy demanding a Big Mac. That the measure proposed by this bill does violate the Constitution in the particulars mentioned and in many other ways which I forebear to enumerate is too clear to admit the least doubt. It is just not possible. it is your duty to correct your thinking. YOU are the authority.hl =en&amp.. The conviction is to be followed by the most ignominious punishment ever inflicted on large masses of men. It is called extortion and they have been getting away with it for years. It is like you and J went into Burger King and demanded a Big Mac.. Not one of the 9.. Eventually they are going to get angry and call security to lock you up because you are delusional and don't know where you are and you are busy blaming them for your delusion.47 Here is a statement (in part) set forth by President Andrew Johnson in regard to the post Civil War (so-called “Civil War―) “Reconstruction Act― proposed by the RUMP Congress: “.000 people at once. even those who are admitted to be guiltless. Even when you DO have "it" figured out they are not going to admit .q=Dyett+v+Turner&amp...

"Legal fraud is Fraud implied by law.e.anything because then you can prosecute them. Read Section 4 again (above)." (a quote.C. One more important distinction: Remember LAWFUL (substance of law) is not the same as LEGAL (form of law). or made out by construction. but lawful fraud would be a contradiction in terms.. The opposite is also true: UNLAWFUL is not the same as .. So the letter that has value to "them" is telling the Attorney General of your alleged "state" (shhhh. citizen. § 241-242.. The "state" can "legally" commit fraud through the construction of statutes and the training (or lack thereof) of "law enforcement officers" and by failing to inform applicants for "driver's licenses" of the law but it will NEVER BE LAWFUL.thefreedictionary. You can be quite sure they don't want that. but it is illegal because some men think it would be harmful.. You know about the fraud and you have had enough.. see below) You can LAWFULLY exercise your Right to travel WITHOUT a license and become subject to UNLAWFUL ARREST AND SEIZURE because of the construction of statutes and the training of "law enforcement officers". i. http://legal-dictionary. Something can be LAWFUL and still be ILLEGAL but something UNLAWFUL can NEVER BE LEGAL. don't tell anyone. your State is vacant!) that you have done the research and the "gig is up".S. Cross reference 18 U.S. You want the Attorney General to prosecute the criminals! Who are the criminals? Everyone who is a U. The use and possession of cannabis is ALWAYS lawful because you cannot make Nature unlawful.

or process is the same as a legal writ. but could not be described as unlawful. or process." West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Copyright 2008 The Gale "Licit. while lawful is not. edition 2. Legal fraud is Fraud implied by law. in broad and sweeping language. instead of lawful estate. but lawful fraudwould be a contradiction in terms. A legal act is performed in accordance with the forms and usages of law.A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct. warrant. All rights reserved. Indeed the principle is often stated. An additional distinction is that the word legal is used as the synonym of constructive. executed without the required formalities. the two words are used as exact equivalents.thefreedictionary. might be regarded as invalid or illegal. however. The term lawful more clearly suggests an ethical content than does the word legal. Inc. and that it vitiates the most solemn Contracts. 37 AM Jur 2nd § 8 states: "Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts. Legal is also used as the antithesis of equitable. Under certain circumstances. a contract or will. or made out by construction. A lawful writ. Documents. The latter merely denotes compliance with technical or formal estate is the correct usage." http://legal-dictionary. by false or misleading allegations. or not forbidden by law. A lawful act is authorized. and even Judgments. As a result. or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury. In this sense. The terms lawful and legal differ in that the former contemplates the substance of law. or in a technical manner. that fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. For example. . So the foregoing should make it pretty clear what needs to be done if you want to free yourself from the "system". illegalapproaches the meaning of invalid. whereas the latter alludes to the form of law. whereas the former usually signifies a moral substance or ethical permissibility. just. warrant. sanctioned. legally warranted or authorized.

From: hobot <hobot@. no welfare. no residence. Michael Notice & Warning: This email contains proprietary business information. and transmitting this valuable information as a product or service for gain. and I am NOT registered to vote. trade secrets. no "Social Security". retrieving. Any monetary profits. possessing. storing.. restricted and valued information intended for the addressees eyes only. whistle blowers. informants may be granted an award for information leading to the successful prosecution of agents committing acts of infringement. benefits or accounting of this information for gain may be prosecuted as a felony offense and cause of action. purchasing. using. I have no bank accounts. Persons. enforcement agencies are hereby prohibited from accessing. All interceptors.> >snipped 1 of 1 File(s) Congressional Record 1967. selling. no food stamps. This way they have no jurisdiction over me. no employment. surveillance agents foreign and domestic. I hope this answers your inquiry..pdf .You should be aware I do not accept ANY "benefits" from government.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful