707 views

Uploaded by arbab64

A model to interpret precession of Mercury and bending of light is presented. This attribute the precession to relativistic correction to Newtonian potential.

- What will happen if an object falls inside a black hole.docx
- Characteristics of Gravity
- 50 Physics Ideas You Really Need to Know
- productFlyer_978-3-642-41991-1
- 15 oct (Recovered).docx
- Geostationary Orbits
- General Theory of Relativity
- gravity book
- Lesson Plan
- Plane Gravitational Waves with Cosmic Stringscoupled with Maxwell’s Field in Bimetric Relativity
- Free fall
- (the Great Courses) Dan Hooper-What Einstein Got Wrong-The Teaching Company (2017)
- mercury_orbit.pdf
- The four particles paradox in special relativity
- 05 Vacaru Raport Stiintific IDEI 2012
- The MCAT Physics Book
- Bot control
- genrel_2013
- Robin Collins: The Case for Cosmic Design (The Great Debate)
- set 3

You are on page 1of 5

Arbab I. Arbab

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Khartoum, P.O. 321, Khartoum 11115, Sudan

Department of Physics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Applied Science and Computer,

Omdurman Ahlia University, P.O. Box 786, Omdurman, Sudan

E-mail: aiarbab@uofk.edu

We presented a phenomenological mode that attributes the precession of per-

ihelion of planets to dipole distribution of matter and relativistic correction .

This modifies Newton’s equation by adding an inversely cube term with dis-

tance. The total energy of the new system is found to be the same as the New-

tonian one. Moreover, we have deduced the deflection of light formula from

Rutherford scattering. The relativistic term can be accounted for quantum cor-

rection of the gravitational potential on electron orbit in hydrogen atom.

In order to mimic the relativistic prediction it would be neces-

Though Newton’s theory was successful in describing gravi- sary to hypothesize a gravitational potential that is dependent

tational interactions related to the orbital motion of planets, it on the angular velocity of the test particle, not just on its posi-

fell short to account for the anomalous precession of the peri- tion. A relativistic kinetic energy correction to the Newtonian

helion of Mercury and the bending of light by the Sun. In this orbit will also have a similar contribution (i.e., ∝ r−2 ).

regard, Einstein theory of relativity predicts such extra terms. We consider in this letter a potential that varies inversely

Hence, Einstein theory of general relativity became the theory with the cube of the radial distance. This is also equivalent to

of gravitation. Objects with strong gravity like binary pul- a relativistic correction to the Newtonian potential (or force).

sars are well treated by the general theory of relativity (GTR). Calculations show that this term has a contribution exactly

According to GTR a gravitational wave is librated from these equals to the GTR prediction. The cubic term can arise in

highly spinning objects. The experimental results confirm the the Newton law of gravitation due to tidal force existing be-

theoretical finding of the GTR [1,2]. tween any two extendable objects. This term is responsible of

Careful observations of Mercury showed that the actual slowing down the spin rotation of the Earth. Notice that a cu-

value of the precession disagreed with that calculated from bic term can be added to the Schwartzchild metric of general

Newton’s theory by 43 seconds of arc per century. A number relativity. Hence, Newton law can still be hold for celestial

of ad hoc solutions had been proposed, but they tended to in- objects and becomes indistinguishable from GRT. The effect

troduce more problems. In general relativity, this remaining of this modified potential is to reduce the angular momentum

precession is explained by gravitation being mediated by the of the planet by a relativistic correction.

curvature of space-time. The GTR predicts exactly the ob-

served amount of perihelion shift. The precession of Mercury 2 The model

was the result of many interactions with the planets of the so-

lar System. Consider here the potential energy produced by a mass distri-

However, in actual physical situations, the gravitating body bution M arising from monopole and dipole radial contribu-

may not be exactly spherical. For example, if the central body tion. These terms can be written as

is spinning about its axis, it will be slightly oblate. In such a

GmM m A

case, the Newtonian gravitational field is not spherically sym- U(r) = − − 2 , (1)

metrical, and the force exerted on a test particle at a distance r r r

is not exactly proportional to r−2 . As a result, the actual orbit

1

- - -

where m is the mass of the test body in this potential energy. where h = r2 dϕ dt .

The first term the ordinary Newtonian potential energy, the The additional term will induce and extra acceleration on

second term arises due to a dipole distribution of the mass orbiting bodies.

producing the potential energy. This term also mimics the rel- The solution of Eq.(6) is given by [4]

ativistic correction of the Newtonian term. If we believe this p

r= , (7)

term embodies also the relativistic correction, using dimen- (1 + e cos γ ϕ)

sional argument, only M, G and c can be considered. Hence,

where

one can write

2mA γ 2 h2 2 2Eh2 γ2 GmM

GM 2 1 − γ2 = , p = , e − 1 = ,E = −

A=β , where β = comst. . (2) Mh 2 GM mG 2 2a

c (8)

This will lead to a force, F = − dr , on a body of mass m of

dU and E is the energy at the perihelion (ϕ = 0), so that p =

a(1 − e 2 ). The radial period P is given by P = 2π . The angular

the form ω

mGM GM 2 1 ∆ϕ of the perihelion precession during one period is

F = − 2 − 2β m . (3)

r c r3 (1 − γ)

∆ϕ = 2π ' 2π(1 − γ), (9)

The second term in Eq.(3) can be written as γ

GM 2 1 GM GmM v 2 GmM v 2 and its mean precession rate per period is given by (for γ ' 1)

m = × = = F N , (4)

c r3 rc2 r2 c r2 c β 2π GM

∆ϕ = 2 . (10)

for a circular orbit, where v = r and F N = r2 is the

2 GM GmM c a(1 − e2 )

Newtonian gravitational force. Therefore, we may treat the Comparing this equation with the Einstein formula, one ob-

second term in Eq.(3) as a relativistic correction to the New- tains

tonian force. β = 3. (11)

Notice that in electromagnetism a dipole contribution comes

Hence, Eq.(3) becomes

from the fact that we have positive and negative charges. How-

mGM GM 2 1

ever, we see here even a negative mass doesn’t exist, the sec-

F = − 2 − 6m , (12)

ond term gives the same contribution, and has always an at- r c r3

tractive nature. Such an additional attractive force will have and the corresponding potential energy∗ in Eq.(5)

its effects on the orbital motion of Earth’s satellites. This term GM 2 1

GmM

might also arise due to tidal force which is inversely related to U(r) = − − 3m . (13)

the cube of the distance of the two bodies. This force eventu- r c r2

ally leads to tidal locking of the two masses. This implies that the inclusion of a relativistic correction (and/or

The potential energy in Eq.(1) is that of a Keplerian mo- a dipole distribution) results in making the orbit precess with

tion perturbed by an inverse cube force, hence Eq.(1) can be an angle coincides with the GTR prediction [1]. This is evi-

written as dent if we use Eq.(4) in Eq.(9) so that one gets

GM 2 1 v 2

GmM ∆ϕ = 6π

U(r) = − − mβ . (5) c

(14)

r c r2

Once again, from the relativistic kinetic energy correction one which is the precession angle per period.

4 We remark here that if one included a force term, F =

2 . Hence, for v

obtains a term of the form 83 mv 2 = GM , one

c r 3GmMh2

2

1 c2 r 4

, besides Newton force, one would obtain a value close

finds a contribution ∝ GM c r 2 to the potential energy. Using to GTR precession.

the Binet formula [3], Eq.(3) can be written as

∗

A modified Schwartzchild metric would

−1

become ds2 =

2u 6G2 M 2 6G2 M 2

.

! 2 2GM 2 2GM 2 2 2

d dU 1 c 1 − − dt − 1 − − dr − r dΩ Moreover,

F = −h2 u2 +u =− , u= , (6) g = − (1 c2 r c4 r2

+ 2U/mc2 )

c2 r c4 r2

dϕ2 dr r 00

2

- - -

3 Relativistic acceleration where K = 21 mv2 is the kinetic energy of the mass m. In polar

coordinates (r , θ) this can be written as

The relativistic force in Eq.(12) (using Eq.(4)) produces an

1 2 GmM GM 2

additional acceleration on all planets of the solar system, given

E = m ṙ + r θ̇ −

2 2

− 3m , L = mr2 θ̇ ,

by 2 r c

(22)

GM 2 1 1

!

where L is the angular momentum. This can be written as an

ac = 6 3

, ac = 3.55 × 10−10 3 , (15) equation of the mass m in an effective potential (U )

c r r E

E = mṙ2 + U E , U E = 2

− , (23)

The centripetal force on a mass moving in a circular orbit 2 2mr r

under this force is given by where GmM 2

mv 2 GmM GM 1 2 L 02

= L 2

− 6 , (24)

= + 6m . (16) c

r r2 c r3

is the reduce angular momentum of the mass. Thus L0 should

Hence, the orbital velocity will be be the conserved angular momentum and not L as defined in

r ! Eq.(22).

GM 3GM 1 Using Eqs.(13) and (16) this yields

v= 1+ 2 , (17)

r c r

GmM

E=− . (25)

for an orbit r > c2 . Defining r0 = c2 = r0 = 4.4 km for all

6GM 3GM 2r

planets, Eq.(17) is transformed into This is the same as the Newtonian total energy. Thus, the

r potential we have considered is unique. This may suggest that

GM r0

v= 1+ . (18) gravity is not exactly inverse square law. What happens here

r r is that due to the extra force term, the velocity increases while

Hence, the orbital period will be the distance decreases in such a way the total energy remains

constant. Notice that if we had included any other terms in the

2

!

2r0 4π potential energy, we wouldn’t have obtained this conclusion.

T ' TN 1 − , T N2 = r3 . (19)

r GM

4 Deflection of light and Rutherford deflection

Therefore, the period will be shorter than the Keplerian pe-

riod. A significant period decay has been observed in binary Gravitational deflection of light by matter is one of the defin-

pulsars, which is attributed to the emission of gravitational ing predictions of Einstein’s General Relativity (GR) [1, 2].

waves from these pulsars [5]. According to GR, the deflection of a light ray just grazing the

The rate of energy loss due to gravitational radiation (by Sun is 1.75 seconds of arc. The deflection angle at a Sun’s rim

binary pulsars) is given by [5] b (impact parameter) is given by

!5/3

dP 48π 4π GM 4GM

=− 5 , (20) ∆θ = . (26)

dt 5c P bc2

where P is the orbital period of the binary pulsar. The light is deflected towards the Sun. GR interprets this

The total energy of a mass m orbiting in a potential given bending of light to the curvature of space-time the Sun makes

in Eq.(13) is when light passed by the Sun. However, Newton obtained a

E = K+U, (21) value halved this value, using the Newtonian laws. One of

the important events to test the bending of light was done in

3

- - -

Sudan on February 25, 1952 during a solar eclipse that had The perihelion precession frequency for an electron at a Bohr

confirmed one of the valuable predictions of GTR [6]. radius is given by ω = 19.2 arcsec/s. This is a very fast preces-

One can compare this with Rutherford scattering by α- sion and can be measured experimentally in hydrogen atom.

particle where the particle deflected away from the nucleus The second term in the potential describe in Eq.(13) (a

because of electrical repulsion. The deflecting angle is given correction to the Newtonian potential, first order in h) can be

by casted in the form

4keQ

∆θ = , (27) 3G hg 1

mr0 v2 Vg = − , (30)

c r2

where r0 is the distance of closest approach and k is the Coulomb

constant.. Using our recent analogy between electrodynamics where hg = GM2 is some characteristic Planck constant [8, 9].

c

and gravitomagnetic [7] entitles us to make the following re- Such a potential can give rise to some quantum mechanical

placement in Rutherford formula to obtain the gravitational phenomena happening at large scale having their analogues

formula, viz., at microscopic scale. We anticipate that such a term would

appear in any quantum gravity theory.

e (Q = Ze) → m (M) , k → G, (28) Owing to the gravito-electric analogy, the electric quan-

tum potential (a correction to the Coulomb potential) will be

and for massless particle (light) we set v → c. Hence one

arrives at the formula 3kh 1

Vq = − , (31)

4GM c r2

∆θ = , (29)

bc2 where h is the Planck constant. Notice that the two potentials

which is the same as GR formula with b = r0 . Therefore, are independent of the charge and mass.

this analogy is an interesting one, and one can use it to bridge This correction term would induce a precession of the electron

safely from electromagnetic phenomena to gravitomagnetic orbit in hydrogen atom like the precession of planets. It can

phenomena or vice-versa. also be compared with the Larmor precession resulting from

Notice that Schwartzchild radius of a black hole could be di- the spin-orbit interaction in the hydrogen atom. We remark

rectly obtained from the escape velocity of a non-relativistic here that the potential in Eq.(13) can be thought of as a first

gravitating object when its escape velocity is equated to the order correction to Newton potential because it involves a term

velocity of light in vacuum. G2 . We can associate a quantum electric field with the above

quantum potential on the electron by the formula Eq = −∇Vq

acting on all masses.

5 Gravito-Electric analogy and quantum potential cor-

The quantum electric field of the electron in hydrogen

rection

atom associated with the potential in Eq.(8) is given by

Owing to the electromagnetic and gravitational analogy, we 6kh 1

developed recently, we would like to raise the following ques- Eq = . (32)

c r3

tions:

• Does an electron orbit (according to Bohr theory) pre- This quantum electric field amounts to

cess like the precession of planets, and if so with what

Eq = 8.02 × 102 V/m . (33)

frequency?

• Is that frequency is the same as the Larmor precession? The electrical quantized potential in Eq.(31) contributes to the

−30

• Can we rescue Bohr model as we are doing with New- electron at Bohr radius an energy of 2.12 × 10 J. To ap-

ton? preciate this finding, recently Nesvizhevsky et al. have cal-

culated the neutron’s ground state energy and wave function

in the Earth’s gravitational field and obtained a ground-state

4

- - -

idence for quantized gravitational States of the Neutron. Be-

cause of the extra electric potential in Eq.(31), the electron

in an atom experiences an additional energy that is a result

of a quantum potential and not a manifestation of quantized

gravitational state. The difference in the two energy values

above could be attributed to the difference between the gravi-

tational acceleration and the above quantum electric field. Us-

ing perturbation theory, one can find the contribution (first

order correction) of the quantum potential in Eq(31) to the

ground state of the electron in hydrogen atom. This yields a

value of hVi0 = 4.24 × 10−30 J [12], whereas the Stark effect

contribution vanishes.

References

(CUP), (1993).

2. Hartle, J. B., An introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity,

Pearson Education, Singapore, (2003).

3. Bradbury, T. C., Theoretical Mechanics, New York Wiley,

(1968).

4. Jean Sivardiere, Eur. Phys. 7, 283 (1986).

5. Hulse, R.A., and Taylor, J.H., ApJ, 195, L51 (1975).

6. Eddington, A. S., Space, time and gravitation, Cambridge Uni-

versity Press (CUP), (1987).

7. Arbab, A. I., The analogy between electromagnetism and hy-

drodynamics, 2009, unpublished.

8. Arbab, A. I., Gen. Rel. Gravit., 36, No.11, 2465 (2004).

9. Arbab, A. I., Afr. J. Math. Phys., 2, No.1, 1 (2005).

10. V. Nesvizhevsky, et al., ”Quantum states of neutrons in the

Earth’s gravitational field,” Nature, 415 297 (2002).

11. Bowles, T. J., ”Quantum effects of gravity,” Nature 415, 267

(2002).

12. Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M., Quantum mechanics, Perga-

mon Press, New York, (1965). pp.21-24. 48

- What will happen if an object falls inside a black hole.docxUploaded byHadjer Jojo
- Characteristics of GravityUploaded byAlfido Zakaria
- 50 Physics Ideas You Really Need to KnowUploaded byKaran Doshi
- productFlyer_978-3-642-41991-1Uploaded byIsrael Emmanuel
- 15 oct (Recovered).docxUploaded byAshok Pradhan
- Geostationary OrbitsUploaded byandrej rehak
- General Theory of RelativityUploaded bySaeed Ibnu Abi Hujayr
- gravity bookUploaded byapi-300485205
- Lesson PlanUploaded bywinayasapramadi
- Plane Gravitational Waves with Cosmic Stringscoupled with Maxwell’s Field in Bimetric RelativityUploaded byIOSRjournal
- Free fallUploaded byDoctora Nourhan
- (the Great Courses) Dan Hooper-What Einstein Got Wrong-The Teaching Company (2017)Uploaded byJohn
- mercury_orbit.pdfUploaded byNikolas Quiroz
- The four particles paradox in special relativityUploaded byJavier Muñoz
- 05 Vacaru Raport Stiintific IDEI 2012Uploaded bySergiu Vacaru
- The MCAT Physics BookUploaded byichephren
- Bot controlUploaded byMuhammad Ghufran
- genrel_2013Uploaded byMárcio Fablício da Silva
- Robin Collins: The Case for Cosmic Design (The Great Debate)Uploaded byfacile princeps
- set 3Uploaded byTomble Bravo
- S.L. Dubovsky- Star tracks in the ghost condensateUploaded byJummoe
- Aether and Relativity - Einstein (1920) -rUploaded bySubhas Chandra Ganguly
- Dynamics Lecture 19Uploaded byuttam singh
- lindsay-v29-2018-pp105-152-PDF(1)Uploaded byjefflindsay
- 2016_04_13_18_39_19Uploaded byShivam Kumar
- 20180615EXP BlackholeUploaded byRavindr Kumar
- Physics to XXI Century II - The impact in the Cosmo’s analysis - Revised 05/2011Uploaded byJosé Luís Pereira Rebelo Fernandes
- project-2Uploaded byapi-411442908
- Acceleration gUploaded bytua87538
- Lecture02_orbital Mechanics 30th Aug.,2012Uploaded byBaqar Rizvi

- Gravitational radiation of a dipoleUploaded byarbab64
- Cosmic quantum mechanicsUploaded byarbab64
- Arbab Newton LawUploaded byarbab64
- Tidal dissipationUploaded byarbab64
- Miraculous creation الاعجاز الكوني في خلق الأرضUploaded byarbab64
- Planets AccelerationUploaded byarbab64
- Earth Past rotationUploaded byarbab64
- GRG_PAPERUploaded byarbab64
- analogy of electromagnetism with fluidUploaded byarbab64
- Life on Other Earth- الحياة على كوكب غير الأرضUploaded byarbab64
- Length of Day-Earth rotationUploaded byarbab64
- Viscous Dark energyUploaded byarbab64
- Cosmic accelerationUploaded byarbab64
- New Gauge MaxwellUploaded byarbab64
- Phantom energy with variable G and lambdaUploaded byarbab64
- Planets acceleration and orbital decayUploaded byarbab64
- TidalUploaded byarbab64
- Generalized Maxwell EquationUploaded byarbab64
- Generalized Einstein lagrangian -cosmological constant with viscosityUploaded byarbab64
- gravitomagnetismUploaded byarbab64

- Energy FormsUploaded byMehmet Emin Zaim
- AlexUploaded bytitukutty6032
- ch 12 solUploaded byaoeu1234
- Rotational MotionUploaded byMuhammed Sabeeh
- Intro Physics-Ch 11-Force, Displacement, and Energy TransferUploaded byFernand Brunschwig
- Klimov-Nuclear-Physics-and-Nuclear-Reactors.pdfUploaded byHarry Smart
- physics walking the plankUploaded byapi-273544280
- 7 - Circular Motion and RotationUploaded byImran Sitompul
- Physics Exman SampleUploaded byAlejandro Torrico Moreno
- Merits of c4 _coated Coconut Cover Crush_ Block Over Aggregate BlockUploaded byIAEME Publication
- 20062009üds soru+cevapUploaded bycewcew61
- Recit Solution 21-2Uploaded byMary Ann Munda
- Gravity Exploration Hands on Activity to Show Gravity on PlanetsUploaded byS TANCRED
- c12s2Uploaded byapi-261372832
- Scavengers Field GuideUploaded bybilygote
- Circular Motion2Uploaded byRashid Azeem Rafha
- Actions Induced by Cranes and MachineryUploaded byVladislavs Pozņaks
- Kinematics Multiple Choice 2013-10-13Uploaded bysk112
- Prediction of Fragmentation and Yield Curves With Reference to Armourstone ProductionUploaded byali
- psexUploaded byMarco Alfanta
- ME2307 Lab Manual[1]Uploaded byRadhaboy Karthi
- P2 Forces and Motion Questions (1)Uploaded byaby251188
- Revision Test PhysicsUploaded byAkshay Khanzode
- Phy Assignment02E iit jeeUploaded byRohit Kumar
- Faradays LawUploaded byPakardan Tea
- Trabajo Energia en una partícula EjerciciosUploaded byFabricio Espinoza Gamarra
- 260915280 Work Done by a Variable Force VerticalUploaded byUdin Anuar
- KinematicsUploaded bytai58
- NEW! Grade 11 PhysicsUploaded byelvira
- AP Physics B 2013 Practice Workbook-2Uploaded bynetsam_flixsam