You are on page 1of 26


Prior question on procedural level, impact to compettiive equitiy. Use and abuse of fiat, no access to critic. Impact calculous proves abuse story 2.Fiat means no access to K or DA rounds, abuse in debate round.





with the critic of decisions. rulings normal means Specify which judges vote for affirmative case. skewed advantages to judges LOC is most important choosed. and then negative needs to win . More limiting checks this back and run politics link to solve back for the affirmative. Best internal link to limite debate. no meet.LOC MGC MOC A) specifiy judging voting We meet. specifity is needed for this. C) Ground: Ospec worse 1. Cant get ofense without it. a. even if you crush predictability you would get ground with new counterplan. Pic ground solves back. LOC is only way to grant strategies not overspecification and rooted in literature basis. A2 predictability: 1. Crushes speech unique in this predictability situation D) erre out of negative strategy.Can pic out of judges A. Cant pic out of judges. kill ground. prep time is important for the LOC.GROUnd checks this back. Key to limits to identifying ground.Limits most is best 4. Aff gets to challenge framework. 2. MG offense is bad No limits. any nuimber of combination of judges and advantages 3. Aff explosion of ground is worse than negative implosion of ground.

Outwigh on interpretation. No standards for why this is true. Fiat proves abuse:! 1.Reason why they don’t access to critic. . get pic ground and uniqueness ground. Ground is true. No counter interpretation or we meet with normal means 2. Specify. cant pic out of anything under aff interpretation and no access to DA Voting issue for competing interpretation Reasonability. no compete with competitng interpretations which forces you to look at entire standards debate. LOC is the most important speech. win clear in round abuse Concede that you erre negative on theory. force you to look at every specific standards. Aff chooses the framwork. and extrapolate use of fiat to spike out of critic. MOC arguments are impact turned by the PMR No offense to limits answered better.POIs always check a.can choose to not answer this question.

2. .Guaruntees links to advnatages and then negative has to guess what are the uniqueness and links to DAs Prior question to affirmative 1.Sets framework and thesis for the debate round.

Explode limits with affirmative specifiyin. negative always loses.Ground based. infinite combination of judges. Infinite ground with overspecifiying. aff would choose their DA. .LOR PMR Normal means is predictable ground. meaning negative interp is stupid.g infinite regression offense with ground and limits arguments CP ground is still eliminated when aff chooses 3. lITERATURE means that Negative always gets negative gets access to access to CP and DA their arguments with this. Negative gets fiat in this interpretaion. meaning that this is the only predictable ground. literature allows negative to choose. 2. Can choose with the aff framework with the infinite ground. ground with this. Negative should be able to choose which judges do what with literature. No limits. CP and ruling and then affirmative would chose the best one jacking them from the best arguments negative would walys lose 1.

No reason why this argument matters.Give specific in round abuse. . like voting on a potential DA Negative still gets fiat in both interpretation.

privacy is not exiplicit meaning that there is nothing preventing searches LOC MGC ADV: A) 4th amendment is battled now. put someone as the other.Leads to property and structural dehumanization. right to privacy is always battled B) abandon rights of privacy is a tipping point where it is abandonedd Racism exists because of state. make state do less step in right direction C) Ruling in favor of this means that violent and credible threats is eliminated D) Justifies racial profiling of individuals which means that this is only way that people can do racial profililing and set legal precident E) Racism causes dehumanizations.PMC Plan: US Supreme Court rule inf avor of rodney gant in gant v arizona Ruling is normal means and ruled on grounds of 4th ammendment Background: 1. no agency or society .Issue is of credible threat for cops to search your cars. Excludes an entire group based on how they are born over race 2. uniqueness cuts in direction of the affirmative.

F) creates a teleological precedent where people cant be arbitrarily killed. this is a slippery slope to killing them G) Privacy is the mandatory starting point to tyranny and dictatership and normalizes violence and no value to life H) Solvency: Guaruntee right to privacy and mandates right of privacy above all else before someone's right to person. Pragmatism is only way to stolve . No uniquenss without a pragmatic step Solvency of the case. only way to solve racism without state solvency and aciton.




Endorsement grants legitimacy meaning that It is a prior question 2. Iraq proves 3. Aff solves a a liberatory narratives better scenario 1.Bad method leads to bad policy. no knoweldge of action. cant seprate plan from ontological perspective Links: 1. udnerstanding workings of the state and see cracks and fissuers. understand how it acts. genocide is inevitable 1. utilization of fiat meaning that we pretend to be the supreme court .Debate should be open to without the state. fiat is best way to change.Symbolism frames political violence. Movement becomes corrupted without state. state is key in squo.better revolutionaries. B.Ontology is a prior question. 9/11 proves 4.better policy makers later on C. MOC Framework: Cross apply. Fiat allows roleplaying. representative democracy No eliminate rep systems.LOC MGC Fiat allows education.Aff imagines the existence of the big other Imagine state as a good actor.

Supreme court is bad.Aff assumes that the state is the only thing that can act to solve racism. debate is an activity to discuss utility of government to solve movements. creation of an enemy that we cant see but still endlessly attack State is inevtibale. coercion is far worse.20th century atrocitiy justified by biopolitical imagination and iodea of an unhuman iother to jsutify violence and realism. only prevent weapons is state.Agency to paternal figureheads which guts our agency. no solvency without the state of the affirmative Impacts: 1. State has launch codes only learn how to stop state without it . totalizing view of passivity. Triggers argument. and decides state norms stop war 5.Imagine value to life only from the lens of the state and supreme court Without state. we need to recognize that we have agency to frame external Fiat distance self from philosophies. Biggest weapons detirmines who does what 4. 3. the state 2. exclusive legalistic language that excludes people. demobalizes people because we assume that the state has dealth with the problem because the supreme court has already solved it Fiat is good.2. legal system is a facist state power. Ruling of decision allows success point allows new micrpolitics No movement withoiut state movement. invisible and more exclusive key manifistation of state power Only system with diplomacy.

Biodiversity is necessary for solving extinction 7. stop any speech 8. demobalizes us from checking caopitalsim State allows specalization. people do different things over hunter gathering. Big other preserves itself through this. Ecocide is inevitable. uniquness for critical argument. pursuit of resources. Supremem court regulates resources.3. neg frameowrk only for value to life. Govenrment solve capitalism stop ecodestruction and technology 6. 360 bombs dropped in bagdad in an hour because we don’t challnege power. physical restraint on our agency Alt: Vote Negative to imagine the big other does not exist Solve: Illegitimte ground. 4. Allows value to life. mobalize populations for violence and extirmination. Articifial uniqueness and arbitary inflation of impact arguments . Justify and create real violence. Demarcates the bounderies of our Free speech zones is GOP existnece. do not privlage ethical systems that divest agency 5. regulation of free have militia outside doors speech in zones.

Signifies a key political stance and this privaleges idea through the ballot. moots 1nc the most important speech. 3. metaforic condensation rearangment. 2. things we say and way that we say them have transformative value.Affirmation of critic itself. Severence. . 4.Requires voting negative.Demistify big other because we imagine the big other does not exist. aff assumes supreme court is a good actor.1.



only way to do it is state power Causes extinction. US military rolls over world. people rely on government and others to survive state for efficiency is inevitable Good: A.Survive. specalize create governemnt systems c.LOC MGC State is inevitabel: A. strong destroy week in aff framework. no more state Solve Eco: 1. states break down and reofrm b. deserts with temp rises MOC . exploitation is inevitalbe witohut state.Build tech to decrease C02.keep captialism from killing people through reuglation B. makes indentured servants are illegal C.






1AC i/l suck ass impacts need terminalization explain why drug plan bad 1NC 2AC .

2NC .