You are on page 1of 11

Why Is Riba Al-Fadl Unacceptable?

by Dr. Khalid Zaheer

An important instruction found in narrations of the prophet of Islam (ahadith) regarding riba (interest) is reported in the following way: "If you give gold, then receive back the same gold: the same weight and the same quality; and if you give silver, then receive back the same silver: the same weight and the same quality, because the one who gives more or expects more, then (he should know that) that is exactly riba." In another narration he is reported to have said: "If you will sell gold for silver then there is a danger of interest in it. (Likewise, if you will sell) wheat for wheat, barley for barley and dates for dates, the result would be no different; (there is no way of avoiding the danger of riba in a barter transaction) except that the exchange be spot". The two narrations mentioned above along with many other similar ones have led many Muslim writers to conclude that apart from interest on credit transactions (called riba al- nasia), the prophet in these narrations, has prohibited another kind of riba: riba al-fadl (interest in excess). In their opinion this kind of riba is associated with spot exchange of dissimilar commodities. According to them, the prophet had strongly emphasized that while exchanging the same commodities like gold for gold, silver for silver, wheat for wheat, barley for barley etc. on spot it is extremely important that equal quantity and the very same quality of these goods should exchange hands. Many Muslim writers find themselves at a loss to appreciate the very suggestion that two individuals can ever contemplate the possibility of entering into an exercise of exchanging two identical commodities on spot. However, most of them still accept that riba al-fadl is another form of riba prohibited in Islam by presenting one unconvincing rationale for their understanding of the concept or another. This author very strongly believes that the narrations claimed to be condemning riba al-fadl have been incorrectly understood and that if their correct context is properly explained, they would appear to be clearly explaining the idea of the same concept of riba that is mentioned in Qur'an (riba al-nasia). This clarification about riba is extremely important for the academic world to acknowledge, because as it stands today, the literature on Islamic Finance and Economics is presenting very strange applications of the concept of riba al-fadl, which are not only unnecessarily confusing but are also being applied in areas of business and finance where their application was never intended. This paper is an academic case for unacceptability of riba al-fadl as an Islamic term.

1) Introduction
Qur’an, the primary book of guidance for Muslims, prohibits believers from entering into riba-based financial arrangements.2 The understanding of a vast majority of Muslim scholars on this injunction is that it outlaws all forms of interest-based borrowing and lending (Siddiqi 1983, 9).3 However, most Muslim scholars include within the scope of the prohibition of riba4 another type of it, which they call riba al-fadl. Since the entire understanding of the notion of riba al-fadl is based on the incidents from the life of the prophet, God’s mercy be on him,5 reported in ahadith,6 and the Qur’an is completely silent on the subject, the alleged understanding of riba is also called riba alSunnah (riba, whose understanding has been derived from the example of the prophet).7 This paper attempts to show that the prophet clarified only the meanings of the Qur’anic concept of riba. Furthermore, it also explains that some of the statements of the prophet and incidents reported from his life relevant to this area have been erroneously construed as conveying the understanding of another category of riba, the traditional Muslim understanding of which has caused unnecessary confusions.

2) What Is Riba Al-Fadl
Riba al-fadl is described as an unlawful excess in the exchange of two counter-values where the excess is measurable through weight or measure. The concept is based on some ahadith according to which if gold, silver, wheat, barley, dates, and salt are exchanged against themselves, they should be spot and be equal and specified. If these conditions are not found, this transaction will become riba al-fadl. (Usmani, I. 2002, p.253)

3) Ahadith Mentioning Riba al-Fadl

except that the exchange be spot. 215) iiib) Narrated Abu Said al Khudri: Once Bilal brought Barni (i." (Bukhari op. and similarly. ‘By Allah! You should not separate from Talha till you get the money from him. because the one who gives more or expects more. ‘Wait till my storekeeper comes from the forest. and then said. 211) iva) Narrated by Talha bin Ubaidullah: Umar bin Khattab said that the prophet said: “If you will sell gold for silver then there is a danger of interest in it. "From where have you brought these?" Bilal replied. 'The selling of gold for gold is riba except if the exchange is from hand to hand and equal in amount.e. but sell the dates of inferior quality for money. we exchange two Sa's of bad dates for one Sa of this kind of dates (i. if you will sell) wheat for wheat. Silver. "I was in need of change for one-hundred Dinars. "I had some inferior type of dates and exchanged two Sas of it for one Sa of Barni dates in order to give it to the Prophet to eat. and if you give silver then receive back the same silver: the same weight and the same quality. "The selling of wheat for wheat is riba except if it is handed from hand to hand and equal in amount. the Prophet said. a kind of dates) to the Prophet and the Prophet asked him. The Prophet said the same thing about dates sold by weight.8 Riba Al-Fadl in Gold. h. then receive back the same gold: the same weight and the same quality. 2044) 4) Consequences of Accepting Riba al-Fadl? The following are some of the implications of riba al-fadl in the contemporary commercial dealings that have been imagined by some Muslim writers: . since many of those others only repeat what has been mentioned in these ahadith. and dates for dates." Thereupon the Prophet said. Similarly the selling of barley for barley is riba except if it is from hand to hand and equal in amount. "Don't do so. barley for barley and dates for dates. (Muslim op. cit. "Are all the dates of Khaibar of this kind?" The man replied.” (Bukhari 1985. then that is exactly riba” (Muslim 1981. 2086) iib) Narrated Abu Said Al Khudri and Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle employed someone as a governor at Khaibar. "Beware! Beware! This is definitely riba! This is definitely riba ! Don't do so. p.” (ibid. and then buy Janib with the money". for Allah's Apostle said." (ibid. and he agreed to change (my Dinars)..e. cit.’” (ibid. the result would be no different. cit.) ivb) Narrated Zaid bin Thabit: The Prophet permitted selling the dates of the 'Araya for ready dates by estimating the amount of the former (as they are still on the trees). h. When the man came to Medina." On that. and the selling of barley for barley is riba unless it is from hand to hand and equal in amount. the selling of wheat for wheat is riba unless it is from hand to hand and equal in amount. He said (to them). "Whoever pays in advance the price of a thing to be delivered later should pay it for a specified measure at specified weight for a specified period. The Prophet asked him. 208) Riba Al-Fadl in the Trade of Dates: ib) Narrated Ibn Abbas: The Prophet came to Medina and the people used to pay in advance the price of dates to be delivered within two or three years. (Bukhari op.Although there are myriad ahadith on the subject of riba al-fadl mentioned in the books of hadith. is riba unless it is from hand to hand and equal in amount. 2029) iiia) Narrated Abu Hurairah: The prophet said: “If you give gold. he brought with him dates called Janib. Talha bin 'Ubaidullah called me and we discussed the matter. but if you want to buy (a superior kind of dates) sell the inferior dates for money and then buy the superior kind of dates with that money. (Likewise.’ 'Umar was listening to that and said. p. h. the following represent almost all of them. or exchange three Sa's for two.: ia)9 Narrated ‘Umar: The Prophet said. p. He took the gold pieces in his hands and fidgeted with them. 2026) iia) Narrated Ibn Shihab: that Malik bin Aus said. and dates for dates is riba except if it is from hand to hand and equal in amount.... h. Janib). Wheat etc. "(No).

There should be a ban on money-changers trading the same currency (dollar for dollar for instance) on unequal terms. The difficulty one finds in accepting this explanation is that the hadith of the prophet quoted above does mention the same quality to be exchanged along with the same quantity.i. According to another explanation presented to rationalize riba al-fadl.11 Muslims have. are those with slight variations in quality. (IIIE’s Blueprint 1999. Without any supportive evidence. It seems as difficult to understand what these ahadith have to do with the exchange of face value of coins with their intrinsic values as it is to appreciate how by banning unequal spot exchange of gold and silver their accumulation could be discouraged. Indirect means should be adopted to exchange goods belonging to the same category but having different qualities. In other words. The onus of proving that at the time of the prophet. if one quality of gold is to be exchanged with another one of a different quality. then no barter trade can ever be undertaken by Muslims since the only barter that seems to have been allowed in these ahadith is the exchange of similar goods on spot. which is a condition that can fulfil no business requirements at all. reveals another reason behind the apparent injunction: to discourage people from accumulating the commodities mentioned in the hadith because “by prohibiting riba al-fadl. Moreover.58). p.. the same author allows the exchange of the same category of animals in dissimilar numbers because he believes that there can be huge variations in the quality of the same category of animals (ibid. it looks even more unacceptable to imagine that a person would knowingly commit himself to a bargain whereby he is required to give a superior quality of his gold to another person for inferior quality gold of exactly the same weight.. never considered barter trade illegitimate.10 Goldsmiths should be required to exchange old jewellery for the new on the basis of weight (after separating the precious stones) without applying a cut for any impurity in gold or making a claim for their manufacturing costs. 5) Rational Justifications and Reasons for their Unacceptability There are numerous explanations attempted by scholars to offer rational justifications for the proscription of riba al-fadl. dates. this argument cannot be accepted as valid. How do these commodities help remove the problem of debased currency? Mawdudi has attempted to rationalize riba al-fadl differently. It would indeed be unfair to expect the former to agree to any such deal. wheat. the ‘very specific requirements’ suggested in the explanation have not been clarified by the authors any further.therefore. silver. situation has been created whereby people do not sell gold. then the ahadith require that the differences of quality be ignored and the very same quantity or weight of both should be exchanged on spot (Mawdudi 1992. according to him. 181-2). p. Surprisingly. and identical commodities. According to him.. because exchanging a like commodity for another identical one is a futile exercise” (ibid. p. a few pages later. cit. debasing of currency was actually widely practised and that he condemned exchange of debased coins with the genuine ones is on those who have made that claim. ii. and encourage people to use cash transactions in business deal” (Hardie and Rabooy. barley.275). and salt have also been involved in the list of items prohibited in the exchange allegedly causing riba al-fadl. He has argued that the commodities proposed to be exchanged in the ahadith.12 Secondly. it is not just gold and silver which are mentioned in the ahadith of riba al-fadl. Hardie and Rabooy have suggested that the injunction on riba al-fadl had the effect of discouraging barter. Ghazzali understood from the apparent restriction of riba al-fadl yet another purpose. to protect ignorant people from deception and fraud [. it was a significant step to elevate trade from narrow regional and national limits to international horizons. although falling under the same category.] it was necessary to establish certain measures to introduce well defined criteria” (Kabbara 1988. The only type of barter that seems to be legitimate on the basis of these ahadith would require the commodities to be identical in all respects. however. Another explanation presented is this: “Debasing of currency was widely practised. Indeed if the ahadith on riba al-fadl are accepted the way many of them appear in the books of hadith. The same author. unless it could fulfil very specific requirements. with each mention followed by my comments. This injunction was meant to discourage exchange of metallic coins with face values different from their real intrinsic values in international trade (Sioharvi 1984. p. This section mentions only a few of them.41) iii.174). Moreover.280). p. since gold . 81). op.

It does not serve any new purpose. Moreover. Hadith has. their sale for each other in dissimilar quantities was considered contrary to that purpose (Ghazzali n.” Likewise. a more correct translation of iva is this: “If you will sell gold for silver [on credit] then there is a danger of interest in it. then [he should know that. the result would be no different.).211).68-9).. believes that riba al-fadl has been prohibited not for its own sake but because. So much so that some of the scholars did openly admit that they failed to appreciate the logic behind it.16 I heard the late Shaikh Mahmud Ahmad.15 It is interesting to observe that some modern Muslim economists mention riba al-fadl but carefully omit to make any comments on it.. the trouble with accepting it is that. in the Fiqh literature needs reconsideration. now a thing of the past.. Vol. an enlightened Muslim economist.and silver were meant to be used as currency in the divine scheme.17 Ibn Qayyim writes that many people in his days were oblivious of the real rationale behind the prohibition of riba al-fadl. then receive back the same silver: the same weight and the same quality. pp. cit. worse still. at least. then receive back the same gold: the same weight and the same quality. p. The prophet categorically stated that the question of riba is relating to exchanges involving credit and has nothing to do with spot exchanges. The Report of the International Institute of Islamic Economics Workshop on Islamization of the Financial system says this: “ Riba is riba. and if you give silver [on credit]..] that is exactly riba. Although this explanation seems to be the least unacceptable of all. as mentioned in a hadith quoted later.204) Likewise in the contemporary Muslim writings on the subject there is a strong need expressed to do something about this concept. it could lead to the real riba al-nasia13 (Ibn Qayyim 1374 H.d. to say the least. if that is the explanation for prohibition of sale of gold for gold. p. [there is no way of avoiding the danger of riba in a barter transaction involving the same commodity] except that the exchange be spot. the translations given below arrange to insert within brackets the words that either seem to have been implied when the prophet made the statements or else were missed out in the process of communication between the individuals forming the chain of narrators during the two centuries when only the memories of the narrators were accommodating them. however.20 Thus my understanding is that the following is a more correct presentation of hadith iiia: 21. If the ahadith of riba al-fadl are properly interpreted. well within the jurisdiction given to it by the Qur’an19. The following presentation of ahadith would clarify my understanding on the subject. op. barley for [another kind of] barley and dates for [another kind of] dates.99-100)..41) 6) The Correct Understanding It is my firm opinion that ahadith have not attempted to define riba. otherwise it is very likely to cause the transaction to be riba-ridden.23 . there is no problem [of riba] in that but that which is [exchanged] on credit [and there is a variation in the value of commodities exchanged] then that is riba” (Muslim. if you will sell] wheat for [another kind of] wheat. confusing because of the danger of misreporting. unnecessarily repetitive or. 2 pp. on the contrary. The traditional dichotomy between Riba al-Nasi’ah and Riba al-Fadl (sic. riba is to be found in credit transactions alone and has nothing to do with spot exchange of commodities. Qur’ãn has done that quite adequately. expressing his inability to appreciate the reasons behind the concept of riba al-fadl and its alleged prohibition. (Ibn Qayyim 1374 H. that while dealing with loan transactions. Vol.3.18 Any further attempt in a relatively less reliable source of knowledge would have been. they serve to clarify two important aspects relevant to the prohibition of riba: one that riba is only applicable to credit dealings and. clarified Qur’anic teachings about riba by removing misunderstandings about it and explaining its application in certain areas of business. 4. and gold for silver then what about the other non-metallic commodities mentioned in the ahadith in whose case similar exchange has likewise been prohibited? Ibn Qayyim.. it is absolutely essential that what is returned by the borrower should be identical to the item he borrowed. if allowed. silver for silver. Its use as a currency has become extinct because the two metals are available in far less volume than would be necessary to meet the growing needs of the world.”22 Likewise the prophet has also been reported to have prohibited people from selling silver on credit to receive gold (hadith iva). Vol. Use of gold and silver as currency is.” (IIIE’s Report 1999. p.14 Far from helping in consolidating the prohibition of riba. [Likewise. because the one who gives more or expects more. “If you give [on credit] gold. the so-called riba al-fadl has helped in confusing the entire concept of it. He is reported to have said: “What is [exchanged] on spot. It could not have been an unalterable part of the Divine Scheme. In order to properly understand the meanings of the ahadith. two.

"Don't do so. set of rules of riba and their moral and logical justifications that normally escape comprehension of a normal. unequal amount. or exchange three Sa's for two [on credit].25 In other words. iib) Narrated Abu Said Al Khudri and Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle employed someone as a governor at Khaibar.e. The Prophet asked him. he brought with him dates called Janib. What proceeds from this explanation is the fact that it is allowed to go for a financial deal or a business transaction which involves anyone of the two conditions mentioned. The Prophet said the same thing about dates sold by weight.e. the following two ahadith can’t be accepted unless we accept that the question of time lag was implied in the statement. the Prophet said." In the hadith ia)24 the word selling should be read as “selling on credit”. In bay‘ murabaha and bay‘ salam the borrower (euphemistically called the buyer in bay‘ murabaha and seller in bay‘ salam) returns more. but if you want to buy (a superior kind of dates) sell the inferior dates for money and then buy the superior kind of dates with that money.76).Likewise. Unnecessary references to an imagined notion would clear the minds of distractions which only serve to confuse. "Are all the dates of Khaibar of this kind?" The man replied.e. "I had some inferior type of dates and exchanged two Sas of it for one Sa of Barni dates in order to give it to the Prophet to eat. quite often incomprehensible. "(No). intelligent mind. "Beware! Beware! This is definitely riba ! This is definitely riba ! Don't do so. Vogel and Hayes have concluded after mentioning the complexities of issues emerging from the concept of riba al-fadl that it “vetoes a naïve understanding of riba as simply a ban on compensation of credit. but sell the dates of inferior quality for money. credit. which is clarified in the subsequent part of hadith that allows selling them “hand to hand and equal in amount. we exchange two Sa's of bad dates for one Sa of this kind of dates [on credit]. p. When the man came to Medina. and then buy Janib with the money". the few uncalled for restrictions mentioned in Section 4 above will become unnecessary.28 ii) Freedom from Unnecessary Restrictions: Although the difficulties posed by the concept of riba al-fadl are primarily conceptual. For instance.29 8) What Are The Reasons of Misunderstanding? .” (Vogel and Hayes 1998. If that is not accepted then these ahadith are in direct conflict with the ahadith ib and ivb. A vast majority of the present-day Muslim scholars accept both as Islamically legitimate." On that. Thus it is allowed to exchange identical commodities and therefore values on credit (the possibility of indexation in a loan agreement)26 and it is allowed to exchange unequal weights and qualities of commodities on spot. "From where have you brought these?" Bilal replied. but not both. Likewise “except … equal in amount” is disallowing what doesn’t fall into this category i. iiib) Narrated Abu Said al Khudri: Once Bilal brought Barni (i./a> iii) Prohibition of Certain Forms of Financial Arrangements: Another consequence of this understanding would be that inflated price for credit sales (bay‘ murabaha) and prepaid purchases for deflated price (bay‘ salam) will have to be considered prohibited. The reason for this conclusion is that as a result of the proper placement of ahadith that were hitherto alleged to be proscribing the imaginary notion of riba al-fadl it has become obvious that in a loan transaction the obligation a borrower must discharge is the return of the same value." Thereupon the Prophet said. In fact the contemporary banking in the name of Islam (the so-called Islamic Banking) is based on bay‘ murabaha to a great extent and on bay‘ salam to a lesser degree. What has emerged as a consequence of accepting the notion of riba al-fadl is a weird.27 7) Consequences of this Understanding i) Conceptual Clarity: The correct understanding of ahadith on the subject would enable the debate on riba to be focused on the real issue of the prohibition of interest. a kind of dates) to the Prophet and the Prophet asked him. “except hand in hand” is disallowing what is not “hand in hand” i.” This expression is clarifying only the unacceptability of a commodity on credit for an inflated return.

30 As a result. they don’t have any problems in allowing ahadith to insert meanings into the Qur’anic text that its unbiased understanding can’t accept The fact of the matter is that the Qur’an cannot be altered in any manner by an external source. When a concept becomes sacred through taqlid.34 The correct way of dealing with hadith literature is to collect all ahadith on a subject together in such a way that the ones promising to be consistent with the Qur’an should be accepted while others not in line with it should be explained away in some acceptable way. a companion of the prophet did not accept riba al-fadl because.. once committed by the elders continues to pass on from generation to generation unchallenged. or there is a strong disapproval expressed by a knowledgeable companion of the prophet on it. The following are some of the reports that clarify that riba al-fadl is unacceptable: Ibn ‘Abbas quotes Usama bin Zaid who said that the prophet of Allah.i) Sidelining the Qur’an: The supporters of the concept of riba al-fadl don’t accept Qur’an as the unchallengeable original text whose meanings can’t be altered by any external source.153). or explaining a term used in Qur’an in a manner that runs contrary to its own basic understanding. may Allah’s blessings be upon him. He is also reported to have clarified that “There is no riba except on credit. like restricting meanings of its message. said: “There is no riba in spot exchanges” (Muslim op. as authentic beyond the scrutiny of all critical examination. h. or it clearly creates contradiction in the text of hadith literature. then.31 Alterations in Qur’anic text allowed by Muslim scholars have taken many forms. ii) Elevating Hadith to the Status of Unchallengeable Source: The reason why the simple and clear-cut guidance of the prophet has been so badly misunderstood is that many Muslims have tended to be too credulous in the matter of hadith. 219). cit. it hardly matters to the people of later generations whether it runs contrary to the Qur’anic understanding of riba. The notion of riba al-fadl attempts to alter the Qur’an in the last way. especially in areas where they all tend to agree. 2023)35 Moreover. When the right of forming opinions is reserved exclusively for the people of the earlier generations and any inclination to critically review their understanding is considered almost a sin. the prophet had clarified that there was no riba except in credit (al-nasia) (Ibn Rushd 1983. The prophet’s obligation was to explain the Qur’an.33 Some Muslim writers insist on accepting each word in the ahadith as if they were the very words of the prophet instead of trying to make sense out of them by carefully studying all the ahadith relating to a subject.38 9) Conclusion . cit. as has been attempted in section 6. The traditional understanding of riba al-fadl is not explaining it.” (Bukhari op.954).. It is reported that Ibn ‘Abbas. it is quite understandable that a mistake like the incorrect understanding of riba al-fadl.36 iii) Blind Acquiescence to the Views of Elders (Taqlid) The tendency amongst Muslim scholars of the later times to consider the views of earlier scholars as sacred has contributed greatly in perpetuating the concept of riba al-fadl. it is the Qur’an that should have been allowed to give meanings to ahadith. The present body of knowledge that has been conferred the title of Islamic Economics accepts the views expressed by the earlier jurists. In other words. inserting into its text what it refuses to accept. No wonder. it is adding a dimension in the scope of its meanings which has nothing to do with the original injunction. p. there are many other ahadith in the books of hadith on the same subject which do not make that point clear. the prophet is reported to have bought a slave for two slaves in a spot transaction (Abu Dawud 1985. The result is that they find themselves in difficulty in understanding some of the concepts of Islam properly.32 The correct approach in pursuing to understand the meaning of riba al-fadl should involve.37 The very fact that it has been approved by the earlier people is considered enough reason to dispel all contesting arguments against it. Although the ahadith of the prophet quoted above make it quite obvious that the arrangement condemned is relating to credit transactions alone. p. that all differences of opinion among the earlier Muslim jurists with regard to riba have been concerning riba al-fadl alone. as he said. instead. instead of allowing ahadith to dictate meanings to the Qur’an. an explanation of the meanings of the ahadith on the subject that promise consistency with the Qur’an.

206. . While mentioning the title of a book or article and quoting a text. the original wordings have been reproduced exactly as ‘it’s there’. Arabic words have been italicized in this paper except names of individuals.13. which is.The only riba prohibited in Islam is the one mentioned in the Qur’an. the contents of some of these reports got altered in a way that the basic understanding of the message was affected. pp. Also see Judgement of Federal Shari’a Court on Riba 1992. Any event or statement of the prophet that has been reported by a unique chain of narrators qualifies to be categorized as an independent hadith. See Lewis and Algaoud 2001. 4. when the loan period lapses. 7. See Zaheer 1994. References 1. As a result. and 224. Instead of finding consistency between Qur’an and ahadith on the one hand and different ahadith on the subject on the other. hadith dealt with the other two categories of it: riba al-nasia and riba al-fadl. whether the loan is taken for commercial purposes or for personal needs. even though it is illogical and. The claim is supported by the evidence of the names of the individuals who were involved in the different stages of the process of its communication from the prophet to the compiler of hadith (muhaddith).D. p. thesis “An Enquiry Into The Basic Concept of Banking As Perceived By The Spirit of Islamic Economic Justice. The distinction attempted by some writers between riba al-qurud (riba involving loans) and riba al-buyu‘ (riba involving trade) is likewise unnecessarily adding to the already existing confusion in the discipline. p. 6. ii) In case of an arrangement of credit. When placed together in the chronological sequence these names form a chain of narrators. some ahadith on the subject conflicted with Qur’an and other ahadith. My understanding is that riba al-jahiliyya – where in a lender would ask a borrower at the time of maturity if he will settle the debt or increase it for a delay – is one form of riba al-nasia. apparently extremely complex when attempts are made to bring out a consistent law of riba on the basis of it. They believe that whereas the Qur’an prohibited riba al-jahiliyya. This chain is normally mentioned in the books of hadith before the actual text of a hadith is quoted.35. Interestingly. as a result. 8. many Muslim scholars insisted that all ahadith that satisfied the condition of reliability established by the doctors of hadith called muhaddithun should be acknowledged as fully acceptable. some scholars include riba al-jahiliyya as a third category to the list of ribas condemned in Islam. See Saleh 1985.” This paper is a considerably modified version of those initial ideas. The uniqueness in the chain may sometimes involve only one new name which is distinct from those mentioned in another. See Qur’an. simply stated. the concept of riba al-fadl has come to be accepted by a vast majority of Muslim scholars. p. 5.39 His teachings and practices were later mentioned in books of hadith. See Ausaf 1995. the real riba. Since these ahadith involved chains of narrators involving four or five individuals belonging to different generations spread over a period of more than two hundred years. places. The prophet applied the understanding of riba in the practical life and taught his followers various aspects of its application.40 This paper has proposed to either do away with or modify those aspects of ahadith on the subject that threaten to be inconsistent with the Qura’nic concept of riba and read through them a message that promises to explain clearly the Qur’anic verses on the topic as a coherent message instead of confusing it. Some of the ideas mentioned in this paper were presented in their preliminary form in my Ph. Muslims are expected to invoke God’s mercy for the prophet when his name is mentioned. 50-54 2. As a result. it is necessary that the borrower should return absolutely the same value to the lender otherwise the arrangement would be riba-ridden. pp. 2:275-281 3. 219. The most plausible explanation that emerges as result of the above-stated concern is that the ahadith on riba are clarifying two things: i) Qur’anic prohibition of riba is concerned with credit exchange. interest charged by lender from the borrower.16. The distinction between the two is unnecessary. Encyclopaedia of Islamic Banking and Insurance has done the same classification as I have suggested. and books. Hadith (plural ahadith) is a report that claims that the prophet of Islam said or did something. Thus one finds at times scores of ahadith reported in the books of hadith on a single incident or statement.

p. See. there are signs in this for those who listen to His message. p. Shaikh Mahmud Ahmad hasn’t even mentioned riba al-fadl in the over five hundred pages of his book “Man and Money: Towards an Alternative Basis of Credit”.41) 24.553 18. Abduh. See Ahmad 2002. The following is an example of a Qur’anic statement falling into this category: “He is the One Who has made the night [dark] for you to rest therein and the day bright [so that you can seek His grace by making a living]. cit. The expression “except if it is hand to hand and equal in amount” is just emphasizing the same point and is not . p. The following is the relevant Arabic text: waznan biwaznin mithlan bimithlin 13. pp. See the words “the same weight and the same quality” in hadith number iiia. widely acclaimed to be the two most authentic compilers of hadith. The Qur’an tells the prophet to clarify the meanings of its text to the people: “And now We have sent down the reminder to you (O Muhammad). pp. p. 1991. W. so that you may explain clearly to mankind as to what was sent to them.254) 14. It is thus equivalent to interest. Rida. The message is that chances of riba arising are greater in loaning than in other cases…” (IIIE’s Blueprint 1999. Despite being one of the most outstanding defenders of the Islamic law proscribing riba. 19. but in different quantities. Another version of the understanding is this: An economic transaction is inflicted with riba al-fadl when: “money is exchanged for money hand-to-hand. presented their books more than two centuries after the death of the prophet. Some of the verses of the Qur’an also follow the same style of presentation wherein some words obviously implied in the text are omitted from being mentioned. there is no problem [of riba] in that but that which is [exchanged] on credit [and there is a variation in the value of commodities exchanged] then that is riba” (Muslim op. 211). the words within brackets should be omitted.. 22. cit. p. 82-88.9. I have benefited greatly from Ghamidi’s translation of the same ahadith in Urdu. which was primarily written to defend the case of Islamic condemnation of riba. As a matter of fact the understanding is quite unclear in this area of riba al-fadl as well. (Usmani op. they are necessary to give text the right meanings which cannot be correctly understood by a literal translation. While some ahadith suggest that no unequal exchange of commodities is allowed even on spot (see hadith iva) there are others that suggest exchanges of unlike commodities on spot is allowed.. cit.M 1985. Indeed. “The selling of wheat for wheat is riba except if it is handed from hand to hand and equal in amount. See Zaheer op. 12. for instance. Similarly the selling of barley for barley is riba except if it is from hand to hand and equal in amount.” (Qur’an.. “What is [exchanged] on spot. It is the real riba. Bukhari (d.26. 16:44) 20. One of the explanations offered is this: “The Ahadith with an emphatic mention of riba being in nasi’ah (or loans) are not to be taken literally. 252 H). and dates for dates is riba except if it is from hand to hand and equal in amount.28-29. Those writers who insist on accepting riba al-fadl as a definitely distinct entity find no acceptable way of accommodating this hadith.” 25.” (El-Gamal 2000. 21. 10:64) 23. and Sanhuri. Although the words inserted in brackets are not translating any Arabic equivalents in the original text. p. 16.See Saleh op.4) 11. three of the most outstanding Egyptian scholars of the early twentieth century had somewhat similar opinions on the relationship between riba al-fadl and the real riba . For literal translation of the ahadith. p. See Ghamidi. cit. 10. It refers to the premium that must be paid by the borrower to the lender along with the principal amount as a condition for the loan or an extension in its maturity. 242 H) and Muslim (d. like it is in others.. The ahadith on the subject are being numbered with a view to conveniently refer to them in the later parts of the paper. While translating this hadith and the next one. 15. Khan.” (Qur’an.25 17.

instead. (ibid. agree that the six commodities mentioned in ahadith of riba al-fadl are not the only ones that are applicable for the purpose.d. a clear understanding of Qur’anic concepts should never be compromised at the expense of accommodating each and every hadith on the subject. whereas the prophet’s example is explaining it. a vast majority of Muslim jurists believe. See for an example of this approach the claim of an eminent Muslim economist.” (Qur’an. In case they are used. The Qur’an mentions that the tendency to blindly follow the elders led to the misguidance of many people of . However. that the punishment for the married individual committing zina is stoning to death while that of unmarried individual committing the crime is hundred lashes and banishment. See Muslim op. However. Interestingly. p. These commodities have only been mentioned by way of example. A similar example of a change accepted in the Qur’anic text is in the case of the punishment of stoning to death for adultery. which nobody would contemplate doing. cit. any list of relevant commodities could be chosen to make the arrangement fair to both parties. cit. unless there is a danger that one of the parties is being exploited because of its weak position. 59). The two are mutually bound in a coherent way in that the Qur’anic text is giving the basic guidance. “O believers! Do not consume one another's wealth through unlawful means. 24:2). The Qur’an doesn’t go beyond requiring believers to pray. 72-87 29. 27. The question of exchange of unequal values on spot is not a religious issue. they cannot be used as measures of value to return loans. except a tiny minority belonging to the Zahiris. 26. See Chapra 1986. p. the reason why their point of view appears weak is that all Muslims scholars of jurisprudence. Had he relied on the Qur’an. 33... See Mawdudi op. some writers have employed the same concept of riba al-fadl to prove that indexation of financial assets is disallowed in Islam.meant to allow an exchange of identical commodities on spot. 28. cit. See Al-Shatibi n. Bay‘ Murabaha constitutes more that 70 % of the value of items on the asset side of the balance sheet of the banks that describe themselves as Islamic (See Adeel.65) 30.40-1 The line of argument these writers follow is that since the six commodities mentioned in the ahadith of riba al-fadl (see hadith iia and iva) are themselves subject to price changes over time. cit. In attempting to do so through indexation. which is a clear violation of the purpose of these ahadith. p. Danial etc. p. 4:29) As for the mention in hadith. what will be returned will either be more or less than the original value lent. p. The Qur’an says. 34. 2003.7. that even activities like of an unsophisticated entrant entrant into a market and the rigging of prices in an auction with the help of agents are riba. pp. 219. (Chapra op. Indeed Allah is Merciful to you. See sections 3 and 6. 38. Exactly the same words have been reported in the book Sahih Muslim. The prophet’s example clarifies what exactly has been required of them practically. Islamic teachings would not normally interfere in the freedom of the individual in such commercial decisions. 32...60). See Ibn ‘Abbas’s opinion in 8 ii) above. he would have certainly concluded that these activities come under the category of eating each other’s wealth wrongfully (aklummal bil batil). See Vogel and Hayes op. on the basis of ahadith.240) from a less reliable book (Sunan al Bayhaqi) to make his point. for unfolding the truth of such crimes in the marketplace. The eminent author has quoted a hadith indirectly (ibid. one can easily imagine that some narrator might have got it wrong. People buy and sell commodities on the basis of their assessment that what they are buying is more valuable to them than what they are selling. One prominent example of the prophet’s explanation of the Qur’anic text which is well within the limits allowed to him by Qur’an is his practical guidance to believers on how to say salah (formal prayers). p. The real message of these ahadith is that whenever a credit exchange takes place. every attempt should be made to return the very same value.307 37. 35. Muhammad Umer Chapra.. p. do not kill yourselves by adopting unlawful means. Whereas the Qur’an states that the punishment for zina (extra-marital sex) is hundred lashes (Qur’an. do business with mutual consent. 31. the most reliable book. 36..

English Translation with Explanatory Notes by Prof. In a way. Al-Madina Publications. Oxford Ahmed. Islamic Banking. A Case Study of Kuwait.I. See Chaudhry 1999. Almuafqat fi usul al-shari‘ah. pp. completely different.’ Well! Even if their forefathers had no sense at all and lacked guidance?” (Qur’an. Vol. J. kind of riba. Plainfield. M. (1983).). Loughborough University Khan. Darul Isha ‘at. p. p. (1991).A. (2000). (2003).’ They reply: ‘Nay! We will follow what our forefathers practiced. IhyaUlum al-Din. 4 Bukhari. Vol. S. Ishraq. Darul Ma‘rifah Littaba‘ati wannashri. The Evolution of Islamic Banking in Encyclopaedia of Islamic banking and Insurance.S. The Islamic Foundation. A. The Islamic Foundation. ‘Ilamul Muwaqqi’in ‘an Rabbil ‘Alamin. Vol. Risk.35.M. (1986). and The Islamic Investor in British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. ISNA. Towards a Just Monetary System. riba was also charged on exchange of commodities in barter transactions is correct provided that riba in barter should be understood to mean unequal exchange on credit. (1988). what emerges from the understanding of this verse is that it is a highly erroneous principle that the opinion of the elders can’t be reconsidered even if strong evidence from religious sources is available to refute it. the views expressed in this paper are a reiteration of the strong protestation made by the Egyptian scholar Rashid Rida. (1999). M. 2:170) The idea in quoting this verse is not to suggest that the elders who formed the opinion on riba alfadl were misguided. (1374 H. Towards an Interest-Free Islamic Economic System. Egypt.the earlier generations. Matba‘atus Sa‘adah. Lahore University of Management Sciences Ahmad. Al-Daral-Nadwatual-Jadidah. New Delhi Adeel. (2002). Darul Kutub al-Islamia. Vol. USA .). Lahore El-Gamal. London Al-Shatibi. 40. Bidayatul Mujtahid wa Nihayatul Muqtasid.. 2 Hardie. F. M. Institute of Islamic Banking and Insurance.d. The significant difference between the views expressed in this paper and Rashid Rida’s is that while the latter accepted riba al-fadl as a condemned practice only as a preventive measure (ibid. L. 2 & 3 Ibn Rushd. Man and Money: Towards an Alternative Basis of Credit. Islamic Banking and Finance in Pakistan. MBA Project. He believed that the large body of legal rulings developed by the jurists on riba was “irrational and unsubstantiated by scriptural authorities. Oxford University Press.). W. Leicester Chaudhry. Lahore Ghazzali.). A. Vol.A.d. Indiana Ghamidi. (1995). Islamic Banking. 39. M.‘A.M. Sahih al Bukhari. this paper emphasizes that riba al-fadl is a mistaken view that was never intended by the prophet as another. (2001). 1. Beirut. Abu Ishaq (n. Leicester Lewis. Danial. It says: “When it is said to them: ‘Follow what Allah has revealed. The claim made by some authors that during the times of the prophet. (1985).. Qanun-e-Ma‘ishat.M. A Basic Guide to Contemporary Islamic Banking and Finance. 18 No. M.J. Burhan Education and welfare trust.A. A.S. and Algaoud. Bibliography Abu Dawud (1985) SunanAbuDawud.233. (1991). Ibn Qayyim.etc.” See The Text… 1999. who believed that it was wrong to consider that Qur’anic prohibition of riba included both riba al-nasia and riba al-fadl. Abu Hamid Muhammad Bin Muhammad (n.H. Beirut.K. Karachi. and Rabooy. Piety. M. Fundamentals of Islamic Economic System.R.M. A. however. Cairo Kabbara. Edward Elgar. M. Ahmed Hasan. B.U. 1 Chapra. A.

Meezan Bank’s Guide to Islamic Banking. Khalid Ihsan Publishers. Karachi. Pakistan Zaheer. 1999) Vogel. (1981).N.Mawdudi. (1998). Lahore The Text of the Historic Judgement on Riba (Interest) 1999 Given by the Supreme Court of Pakistan (23 December. Cambridge Siddiqi. Islamic Law and Finance: Religion. Kluwer Law International. Unlawful Gain and Legitimate Profit in Islamic Law. and Hayes.A. Lahore. A. and Return. Vo. An Enquiry Into The Basic Concept of Banking As Perceived By The Spirit of Islamic Economic Justice. The Netherlands Usmani. Islamic Publications Ltd. (1994).R.H. Frank E. Daul Ishaat. (1985). Leicester Sioharvi. Issues in Islamic Banking. Sahih Muslim Sharif. (1983). The Hague. Islam Ka Iqtisadi Nizam. Lahore Muslim. N. M. (1984). Muhammad Imran Ashraf (2002). H. Sud. Risk. B. University of Wales [ Main Page ] | [ Khalid Zaheer Essay Index ] .‘A. K. Samuel L. Islamic Foundation. (1992). Cambridge University Press.. 4 Saleh. Idara-e-Islamiat.