2013-05-03 Taitz v Astrue Appeal - Per Curiam ORDER - Gov.uscourts.cadc.11-5304.01207492436

USCA Case #11-5304

Document #1434248

Filed: 05/03/2013

Page 1 of 1

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 11-5304

September Term, 2012
1:11-cv-00402-RCL Filed On: May 3, 2013

Orly Taitz, Dr., Appellant v. Michael James Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Appellee

BEFORE:

Rogers, Griffith, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges

Upon consideration of the motion to recall mandate, styled as a “motion for reconsideration due to new evidence and decisions”; and the motion styled as a “motion for judgment in favor of the appellant,” it is ORDERED that the motions be denied. See Goland v. CIA, 607 F.2d 339, 370 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (“[A]n appellate opinion is based on the record before it, and hence cannot be set aside on the basis of newly discovered facts outside the record.").

of

nd s

Th e
ORDER

Fr

ie

Fo
Per Curiam BY:

gb
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk /s/ Jennifer M. Clark Deputy Clerk

ow

.c o

m

____________

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful