________________________________________________________

( )

MATLAB PITSA
.

.
:

. .

.
( )
) ( )
.(Nakamura,1989, Ergin,et al.,2004, Ansal,2004, Apostolidis,et al.,2006) (

( )
( )
( Ansal,2004, Apostolidis,et al.,2004 )
. ( )
.(Tuladhar,et al.,2004, Ansal,2004)
.

.(Cara,et al.,2003, Ansal,2004)

maj_akb486@yahoo.com

3034
 ________________________________________________________

Lermo & Chavez-Garcia, 1994, Field&Jacob,1995, Parolai,et al.,2002, Bonnefoy-)

.(Claudet,et al.,2006

. .
)
. .(

.
.( )

.
.
.
.
.

.
( )
.(Okada,2004)
.

.
(HVSR)
.

.
.(Nakamura , 1989 & 2000)
.(Lermo & Chavez-Garcia, 1994)

3035
 ________________________________________________________

()

Field & Jacob, 1995, Lachet, et al. , 1996, Cara, et al., 2003, Panou, )

.(2004, Nguyen, et al. , 2004

Kinemetrics SS-1 SSR-1

( )
. ( ) GPS
.
PITSA .
. /
.
/ Butterworth
.
MATLAB
.
.
FNS (T ) FNE (T )
R (T )
FUD (T )
- FNS R
. T FUD - FNE
( )
- +
.
.
Fourier Spec trum Plot for t01 --EW component Fourier Spect rum Plot for t01 -- UD component Fourier Spect rum Plot for t01 -- NS component 1 H/ V p lot for--t01
1 H/ V s pectrum for t he t went y segment s t01
10 10
hvrat io--ave
0 0 0
10 10 10 -st d
+std

-2 -2 -2
10 10 10
fourier amplitude

fourier amplitude

fourier amplitude

H/V amplitude
H/V amplitude

0 0
10 10

-4 -4 -4
10 10 10

-6
-6 -6
10 10
10

-1
-1
-1 0 1 10 10 -1 0 1
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
period, sec period, sec period, sec Period t , sec Period t , sec

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

- - c b a : -
e d t01

- .( )
.

3036
________________________________________________________

.
. / /
.
.( ) BB' AA'
- AA' .( ) SPT
A
. / .
A' A
SPT
SPT A'
. .
BB'
.
SPT
.

A’

A
B’

-
Cross Se ction AA' Cross Section BB'

2
3
1.8
1.6 2.5
1.4
2
period(s)

period(s)

1.2
1 1.5
0.8
1
0.6
0.4 0.5
0.2
0 0

732 162 73316 2 7 34162 73 5162 73616 2 7 37162 738 162 7391 62 740162 720000 722000 724000 726000 728000 730000 732000 734000 736000 738000 740000 742000

e as t ing
e as ting

BB AA -

f
c
m

f
c
m

BB AA -

3037
________________________________________________________

.
MATLAB PITSA
.
.
.
BB' AA' .
. SPT
BB' SPT AA'
. SPT

. - .
- . . . .
. _
. . .
.
.
Ansal,A.(Ed), 2004. Recent Advances In Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering And Microzonation, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Netherlands,pp.139-156.
Apostolidis,P., Raptakisa,D., Roumeliotib,Z. and Pitilakis,K., 2004. Determination of S-wave velocity structure using microtremors and
spac method applied in Thessaloniki (Greece), Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24, pp.49–67.
Apostolidis,P.I., Raptakis, D.G., Pandi, K.K., Manakou, M.V. and Pitilakis, K.D., 2006. Definition of subsoil structure and preliminary
ground response in Aigion city (Greece) using microtremor and earthquakes , Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 26, pp.
922–940.
Bonnefoy-Claudet , S., Cotton, F. and Bard,P.Y., 2006. The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies, Earth-
Science Reviews, doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.07
Cara,F., Di Giulio,G. and Rovelli,A., 2003. A study on seismic noise variations at colfiorito, central Italy : Implications for the use of h/v
spectral ratios, Geophysical Research Letters, 30. NO. 0, XXXX, doi:10.1029/2003GL017807.
Ergin,M., Ozalaybey, S., Aktar, M. and Yalcin, M.N., 2004. Site amplification at AvcVlar, Istanbul , Tectonophysics 391. pp. 335– 346.
Field, E.H. and Jacob, K., 1995. A comparison and test of various site response estimation techniques, including three that are non reference-
site dependent. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85. pp. 1127–1143.
Lachet, C.,Hatzfeld, D.,Bard, P.Y.,Theodulidis, N., Papaioannou, C., and Savvaidis, A.,1996. Site effect and microzonation in the city of
Thessaloniki (Greece). Comparison of different approaches, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86. pp. 1692-1703.
Lermo, J. and Chavez-Garcia F. J., 1994. Are microtremors useful in site response evaluation. Bull. Seism. Soc.Am. 84, No. 5, pp. 1350-
1364.
Mukhopadhyay,S. and Bormann, P.,2004. Low cost seismic microzonation using microtremor data : an example from Delhi, India, Journal
of Asian Earth Sciences 24. pp. 271–280.
Nakamura, Y., 1989 . A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface, Quarterly
Report of RTRI, 30, No. 1, pp. 25 - 33
Nakamura, Y., 2000. Clear identification of fundamental idea of nakamura’s technique and its applications. Proc. 12th World Conf. on
Earthquake Engineering, Auckland.
Nguyen, F. , Van Rompaey, G., Teerlynck1, H.,Van Camp, M., Jongmans, D., Camelbeeck, T.,2004. Use of microtremor measurement for
assessing site effects in Northern Belgium – interpretation of the observed intensity during the MS = 5.0 June 11 1938 earthquake,
Journal of Seismology 8. pp. 41–56.
Okada,H., 2004. The Microtremor Survey Method, Society Of Exploration Geophysicists
Panou, A.A.,2004. Ambient noise horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio for assessing site effect in urban environments: The case of
Thessaloniki city (northern greece), Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece vol. XXXVI. pp. 1467-1476.
Parolai, S. , Bormann, P. and Milkereit, C.,2002. New relationships between Vs , thickness of sediments, and resonance frequency calculated
by the h/v ratio of seismic noise for the cologne area (Germany) , Bull. Seism. Soc.Am.92, No. 6, pp. 2521–2527.
Tuladhar, R., Yamazaki, F., Warnitchai, P. and Saita, J. , 2004. Seismic microzonation of the greater Bangkok area using microtremor
observations, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics; 33. pp. 211-255.

3038