You are on page 1of 6



Vol. 1 Number 5

It's vigilante phun day again! How get email spammers kicked off their ISPs.

So, have you been out on Usenet blasting spammers? It's phun, right?

But if you have ever done much posting to Usenet news groups, you will
notice that soon after you post, you will often get spam email. This is
mostly thanks to Lightning Bolt, a program written by Jeff Slayton to strip
huge volumes of email addresses from Usenet posts.

Here's one I recently got:

Received: from (

[]) by (8.7.1/8.6.9) with SMTP id
BAA14636; Sat, 17 Aug 1996 01:55:06 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 01:55:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <>
Subject: Forever

"FREE" House and lot in "HEAVEN"

Reserve yours now, do it today, do not wait. It is FREE

just for the asking. You receive a Personalized Deed and detailed Map to
your home in HEAVEN. Send your name and address along with a one time
minimum donation of $1.98 cash, check, or money order to
help cover s/h cost

TO: Saint Peter's Estates

P.O. Box 9864
Bakersfield,CA 93389-9864

This is a gated community and it is "FREE".

Total satisfaction for 2 thousand years to date.

>From the Gate Keeper. (PS. See you at the Pearly Gates)
GOD will Bless you.

Now it is a pretty good guess that this spam has a forged header. To
identify the culprit, we employ the same command that we used with Usenet spam:


We get the answer:

Time Warner Cable Broadband Applications (HEAVEN-DOM)

2210 W. Olive Avenue
Burbank, CA 91506

Domain Name: HEAVEN.COM

Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Zone Contact, Billing
Melo, Michael (MM428) michael@HEAVEN.COM
(818) 295-6671

Record last updated on 02-Apr-96.

Record created on 17-Jun-93.

Domain servers in listed order:


>From this we conclude that this is either genuine (fat chance) or a better
forgery than most. So let's try to finger

First, let's check out the return email address:


We get:

finger: Connection timed out

There are several possible reasons for this. One is that the systems
administrator for has disabled the finger port. Another is that is inactive. It could be on a host computer that is turned off,
or maybe just an orphan.

Newbie note: You can register domain names without setting them up on a
computer anywhere. You just pay your money and Internic, which registers
domain names, will put it aside for your use. However, if you don't get it
hosted by a computer on the Internet within a few weeks, you may loose your

We can test these hypotheses with the ping command. This command tells you
whether a computer is currently hooked up to the Internet and how good its
connection is.

Now ping, like most kewl hacker tools, can be used for either information or
as a means of attack. But I am going to make you wait in dire suspense for a
later Guide to (mostly) Harmless Hacking to tell you how some people use
ping. Besides, yes, it would be *illegal* to use ping as a weapon.

Because of ping's potential for mayhem, your shell account may have disabled
the use of ping for the casual user. For example, with my ISP I have to go
to the right directory to use it. So I give the command:


The result is: is alive
Technical Tip: On some versions of Unix,giving the command "ping" will start
your computer pinging the target over and over again without stopping. To
get out of the ping command, hold down the control key and type "c". And be
patient, next Guide to (mostly) Harmless Hacking will tell you more about
the serious hacking uses of ping.

Well, this answer means is hooked up to the Internet right now.
Does it allow logins? We test this with:


This should get us to a screen that would ask us to give user name and
password. The result is:

Trying ...

telnet: connect: Connection timed out

OK, now we know that people can't remotely log in to So it sure
looks as if it was an unlikely place for the author of this spam to have
really sent this email.

How about Maybe it is the place where spam originated? I

type in:

telnet 79

This is the finger port. I get:

Trying ...

telnet: connect: Connection timed out

I then try to get a screen that would ask me to login with user name, but
once again get "Connection timed out."

This suggests strongly that neither or are being

used by people to send email. So this is probably a forged link in the header.

Let's look at another link on the header:


The answer is:

America Online (GNN2-DOM)

8619 Westwood Center Drive
Vienna, VA 22182

Domain Name: GNN.COM

Administrative Contact:
Colella, Richard (RC1504) colella@AOL.NET
Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
Runge, Michael (MR1268) runge@AOL.NET
Billing Contact:
Lyons, Marty (ML45) marty@AOL.COM

Record last updated on 07-May-96.

Record created on 22-Jun-93.

Domain servers in listed order:


Whoa! is owned by America Online. Now America Online, like

Compuserve, is a computer network of its own that has gateways into the
Internet. So it isn't real likely that would be routing email
through AOL, is it? It would be almost like finding a header that claims its
email was routed through the wide area network of some Fortune 500
corporation. So this gives yet more evidence that the first link in the
header,, was forged.

In fact, it's starting to look like a good bet that our spammer is some
newbie who just graduated from AOL training wheels. Having decided there is
money in forging spam, he or she may have gotten a shell account offered by
the AOL subsidiary, GNN. Then with a shell account he or she could get
seriously into forging email.

Sounds logical, huh? Ah, but let's not jump to conclusions. This is just a
hypothesis and it may be wrong. So let's check out the remaining link in
this header:


The answer is:

AT&T EasyLink Services (ATT2-DOM)

400 Interpace Pkwy
Room B3C25
Parsippany, NJ 07054-1113

Domain Name: ATT.NET

Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Zone Contact:

DNS Technical Support (DTS-ORG) hostmaster@ATTMAIL.COM
Billing Contact:
Gardner, Pat (PG756) pegardner@ATTMAIL.COM

Record last updated on 27-Jun-96.

Record created on 13-Dec-93.

Domain servers in listed order:

Another valid domain! So this is a reasonably ingenious forgery. The culprit
could have sent email from any of, or We know is highly unlikely because we can't get even the login port to
work. But we still have and as suspected homes for this spammer.

The next step is to email a copy of this spam *including headers* to both (usually a good guess for the email address of the person
who takes complaints) and runge@AOL.NET, who is listed by whois as the
technical contact. We should also email either (the good
guess) or hostmaster@ATTMAIL.COM (technical contact).

Presumably one of the people reading email sent to these addresses will use
the email message id number to look up who forged this email. Once the
culprit is discovered, he or she usually is kicked out of the ISP.

But here is a shortcut. If you have been spammed by this guy, lots of other
people probably have been, too. There's a news group on the Usenet where
people can exchange information on both email and Usenet spammers, Let's pay it a visit and see what people may have
dug up on Sure enough, I find a post on this heaven scam:

From: (Matt Bartley)

Subject: junk email - Free B 4 U -
Supersedes: <4uvq4a$>
Date: 15 Aug 1996 14:08:47 -0700
Organization: Interstate Electronics Corporation
Lines: 87
Message-ID: <4v03kv$>


No doubt a made-up From: header which happened to hit a real domain


Postmasters at, and notified. has

already stated that it came from, forged to look like it came from
gnn. Clearly the first Received: header is inconsistent.

Now we know that if you want to complain about this spam, the best place to
send a complaint is

But how well does writing a letter of complaint actually work? I asked ISP
owner Dale Amon. He replied, "From the small number of spam messages I have
been seeing - given the number of generations of exponential net growth I
have seen in 20 years - the system appears to be *strongly* self regulating.
Government and legal systems don't work nearly so well.

"I applaud Carolyn's efforts in this area. She is absolutely right. Spammers
are controlled by the market. If enough people are annoyed, they respond. If
that action causes problems for an ISP it puts it in their economic interest
to drop customers who cause such harm, ie the spammers. Economic interest is
often a far stronger and much more effective incentive than legal requirement.

"And remember that I say this as the Technical Director of the largest ISP
in Northern Ireland."
How about suing spammers? Perhaps a bunch of us could get together a class
action suit and drive these guys into bankruptcy?

Systems administrator Terry McIntyre argues, "I am opposed to attempts to

sue spammers. We already have a fairly decent self-policing mechanism in place.

"Considering that half of everybody on the internet are newbies (due to the
100% growth rate), I'd say that self-policing is marvelously effective.

"Invite the gov't to do our work for us, and some damn bureaucrats will
write up Rules and Regulations and Penalties and all of that nonsense. We
have enough of that in the world outside the 'net; let's not invite any of
it to follow us onto the 'net."

So it looks like Internet professionals prefer to control spam by having net

vigilantes like us track down spammers and report them to their ISPs. Sounds
like phun to me! In fact, it would be fair to say that without us net
vigilantes, the Internet would probably grind to a halt from the load these
spammers would place on it.

OK, I'm signing off for this column. I look forward to your contributions to
this list. Have some vigilante phun -- and don't get busted!

Want to share some kewl stuph? Tell me I'm terrific? Flame me? For the first
two, I'm at Please direct flames to
dev/ Happy hacking!
Copyright 1996 Carolyn P. Meinel. You may forward the GUIDE TO (mostly)
HARMLESS HACKING as long as you leave this notice at the end. To subscribe,
email with message "subscribe hacker
<>" substituting your real email address for Joe Blow's.