Crony capitalism is a term describing an economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and

government officials. It may be exhibited by favoritism in the distribution of legal permits, government grants, special tax breaks, or other forms ofdirigisme[1] Crony capitalism is believed to arise when political cronyism spills over into the business world; self-serving friendships and family ties between businessmen and the government influence the economy and society to the extent that it corrupts publicserving economic and political ideals. The term "crony capitalism" made a significant impact in the public arena as an explanation of the Asian financial crisis.[2]

State capitalism has crucial weaknesses. First, the primary purpose of this system is not to produce wealth but to ensure that wealth creation does not threaten the ruling elite's political power. Forced to choose between public prosperity and their own security, state capitalists will tighten their grip every time. For example, if commercial activity depends on access to information, if the internet provides access to that information, if the internet then enables popular resistance to an autocratic government, and if political officials have the means to (even temporarily) shut the internet down, they will shut it down. Though Western governments sometimes allow security concerns to trump growth potential too, state capitalists have many more levers to pull and buttons to push to halt the free flow of ideas, information, people, money, goods and services. This lowers the trajectory of long-term growth.

Burton W. which is taken to its maximum in the form of nationalization of industries. though typically the goals for meddling sound worthy Politicians. Corruption is inherent in the system sometimes called state capitalism.[28] Even if the initial regulation was well-intentioned (to curb actual abuses). free-market advocates refer to governmental favoritism as "crony socialism". Folsom. the mixture of business and government stifle competition. high levels of interaction between corporations and governments are considered socialist.Worst was that in India. Jagdish Bhagwati. The more a government meddles in the economy. they too try to join the powerful gang of people in politics and bureaucracy thereby giving birth to a bribery and corruption driven society. according to the Columbia University based economist of Indian origin.[29] a collusive result called regulatory capture. In his book The Myth of the Robber Barons. where the government controls major industries and markets but allows and allies with private businesses in other areas. . another example of the system. which economists call ‘rent seeking’ and ordinary laymen ‘bribery and corruption’. officials and their business allies always find ways to benefit from the government’s control or influence on economic activity and resources. When people observe that those in power could practise bribery and corruption with total impunity. Russia. it led to an immutable system of those in power trying to earn extra benefits for themselves. is rife with corruption. the more opportunity it creates for corruption.[24] "venture socialism"[25] or "corporatism.[27] In this view. a modern form of mercantilism"[26] to emphasize that the only way to run a profitable business in such systems is to have help from corrupt government officials. and even if the initial lobbying by corporations was well-intentioned (to reduce illogical regulations).

although corrupt . We should emphasize.ssrn. Yes. because state capitalism fails to identify priorities and allocate resources accordingly. however. Money is poured into projects in large amounts and economic activities start In Korea and Taiwan the balance kept corruption from swamping growth. and the new institutional economics.86 Fostering economic growth requires much more than limiting cronyism and eliminating corruption Ref: http://papers. while bandwagoning raised them in the Philippines and Indonesia.cfm?abstract_id=310592 Conclusion: Will state capitalism be the new Masters of the Universe as claimed by The Economist? Yes and no.also lowered transaction costs and made investment more credible while another set of relations did not. But in the long run? No. this study finds that if there is a balance of power among a small and stable number ofgovernment and business actors. while either too few or too many actors leads to bandwagoning politics that increases deadweight losses from corruption. that cronyism is only one variable involved in explaining developmental outcomes. long-term relationships may be difficult to create. By examining corruption and cronyism through the lens oftransaction costs. in the short run by helping a country to use all its energy and resources to produce more and more through concerted governmental action. In countries with weak legal and political institutions. So. cronyism can actually reduce transaction costs and minimize deadweight losses. whom he calls "market entrepreneurs" who succeed "by producing a quality product at a competitive price"[30] Why did corruption and cronyism impede growth in some Asian countries but not in others? Building upon theoretical advances in the fields of rent-seeking. and showing why a particular set of government-business relations.Jr. the projects are chosen . this study provides the outlines of a story that can both explain one aspect of corruption and also yields a theoretically-grounded causal mechanism that lets us distinguish between types of corruption. everyone rallies round the government and promotes state capitalism further. while Philippine and Indonesian bandwagoning never allowed for the domestic stability that permits long-term growth. transaction costs. A balance of power lowered transaction costs in Korea and Taiwan. distinguished those that engage in crony capitalism—designated by him "political entrepreneurs"—from those who compete in the marketplace without special aid from government.

bribery and corruption are bred at all levels giving birth to a corruption tolerating society and above all. in the long run. .arbitrarily on whims and fancies of rulers. resources are wasted on the projects that are so undertaken. So. creativity and innovative spirits are killed because people are not encouraged to think differently. further resources are wasted to correct errors and justify those projects when there are criticisms against them. the masters may not be able to maintain their master-ship unabated.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful