You are on page 1of 15

DEVON AND CORNWALL AREA

Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements


Annual Report 2002-3
FOREWORD
By Paul Goggins, Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Community and Custodial provision in the
Home Office

As the recently appointed Minister with responsibility for the MAPPA, I am pleased to introduce
this, the second, annual MAPPA report. It is clear that in the last year (2002/3) the multi-agency
public protection arrangements (the MAPPA) continued to play an important role in what
remains one of this government’s highest priorities – the protection of the public from dangerous
offenders.

As someone with many years experience of working in the field of child protection, I am
particularly impressed by the important contribution the MAPPA are making to strengthen
collaboration between agencies at a local level where the focus is on the dangerous offender.
These improvements must, however, impact on the protection of children. As the tragic death of
Victoria Climbie showed, an effective multi-agency partnership is crucial and the MAPPA are an
important element.

To ensure greater consistency in the MAPPA across the 42 Areas of England and Wales, and to
prepare for the implementation of measures contained in the Criminal Justice Bill, we published
the MAPPA Guidance in April. Building on good practice, that Guidance clarified the structure of
the operational arrangements as well as the importance of formal review and monitoring – of
which this annual report is a vital part. The Criminal Justice Bill will strengthen the MAPPA in
two ways. First, it will make the involvement of other agencies part of the statutory framework.
Second, it will introduce the involvement of lay people those unconnected with day-to-day
operation of the MAPPA – in reviewing and monitoring the MAPPA. Annual reports and this new
lay involvement show the Government’s commitment to explaining how the often sensitive and
complex work of public protection is undertaken.

The Government is also strengthening the protection of the public with other measures in the
Criminal Justice Bill. They include new sentences for dangerous offenders to prevent their
release if they continue to be dangerous. Additionally, the Sexual Offences Bill will tighten up
sex offender registration, introduce a new offence of ‘grooming’, and enable sex offender orders
to be imposed on violent offenders who pose a risk of causing serious sexual harm – thereby
extending sex offender registration to them.

I commend this report to you and congratulate all the agencies and individuals who have
contributed to the achievement of the MAPPA locally in your local Area.

Paul Goggins
The National Picture
This section of the report draws attention to wider context of the operation and development
of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (the MAPPA).

The most important work undertaken within the MAPPA is done locally, led by the police and
probation – who act jointly as the ‘Responsible Authority’ in your Area – and in each of the 42
Areas of England and Wales. The experience and good practice upon which this work is
based began in the 1990s – most significantly as a result of the closer working relationship
required by the Sex Offender Act (1997). The Criminal Justice and Courts Services Act
(2000) formalised that relationship and built on the existing experience by requiring the police
and probation services to establish arrangements (the MAPPA) for assessing and managing
the risks posed by sexual and violent offenders. The Act also required the Responsible
Authority to publish an annual report on the operation of those arrangements. This report,
covering April 2002 to March 2003, is the second annual report.

The importance of partnership

Key to the development of the MAPPA in the past year has been the closer involvement of
other agencies, such as housing, health and social services, working alongside police and
probation. The truly multi-agency nature of the MAPPA and the collaboration which underpins
it is to be strengthened further by the Criminal Justice Bill. The Bill will place a ‘duty to co-
operate’ on a wide range of organisations including local health authorities and trusts; housing
authorities and registered social landlords; social services departments; Job centres; Youth
Offending Teams; and local education authorities. In addition, the Prison Service will join the
police and probation services and become part of the MAPPA ‘Responsible Authority’.

Supporting and co-ordinating the development of the MAPPA throughout the 42 Areas of
England and Wales, is the National Probation Directorate’s Public Protection Unit (PPU). This
Unit acts as a central point for advice and, increasingly, involvement in the management of
difficult cases. These include, for example, UK citizens who have committed serious offences
abroad and return to this country without anywhere to live. The Unit is also able to provide
financial support when the risk management plans make exceptional demands upon local
resources.

Involving the public

MAPPA developments in the next 18 months will also include the appointment by the Home
Secretary of two ‘lay advisers’ to each Area. The eight Areas of England and Wales which
have been piloting these arrangements since January (Cumbria, Greater Manchester,
Durham, South Wales, Dorset, Hampshire, Surrey and West Midlands) report that they add
real value. Lay advisers will contribute to the review and monitoring of the MAPPA which is
undertaken by each Area’s Strategic Management Board – the work of which you can read
more in this report.
The purpose of appointing ‘lay advisers’ is to ensure that communities understand more of
what is done to protect them and that those involved professionally with the MAPPA are
aware of the views of the community. The lay advisers will not ‘represent’ the community in
the way, for example, that local councillors do, nor will they be involved in operational
decision-making. And, given the sensitivity of much of what the MAPPA does, especially with
the few offenders who pose a very high risk of serious harm to the public, it is not practicable
for the general public to be involved. Lay advisers will, however, ensure an appropriate and a
practical level of community involvement.

MAPPA Offenders

This year the annual report provides a more detailed breakdown of the number of sexual and
violent offenders who are covered by the MAPPA in your Area. As last year, the figures include
the number of registered sex offenders. Because sex offender registration is for a minimum of
5 years (and generally for much longer) the figures are cumulative. This is why they have
increased – by 16 per cent in England and Wales. Only a very small proportion (about six per
cent throughout England and Wales) are considered to pose such a high risk or management
difficulty that they are referred to the highest level of the MAPPA – the Multi-Agency Public
Protection Panels (the MAPPP).

Figures alone do not, of course, tell the whole story. The anonymised case studies illustrate the
practical work of the MAPPA, and demonstrate the preventive action which can be taken. Prior
to the MAPPA, action of this kind was mainly taken by one agency alone, with the effect that on
occasion offenders’ behaviour which might have triggered preventative action went unnoticed.
The multi-agency approach of the MAPPA helps ensure that if an offender does breach the
condition of the licence under which they were released from prison or a court order prohibiting
certain activities, then action to enforce the condition or order and protect the public can be
taken more swiftly.

If you are interested in reading the reports of other Areas, they will be published on the National
Probation Service’s website www.probation.homeoffice.gov.uk (under the public protection
section) with all of them being available once the last Area has published its annual report in
September.
1. Area Summary

There is a history of close working and collaboration between Police and Probation in Devon
and Cornwall. The former Probation Services of Devon and Cornwall were amalgamated in April
2001, alongside the introduction of the National Probation Service. This is a large geographical
area, which consists of four Probation divisions, broadly consistent with the police Basic
Command Units.

Formal arrangements in Devon and Cornwall began in response to the Sex Offenders Act 1997,
when Police and Probation began to make joint arrangements for the assessment of registered
sex offenders. Following the implementation of the Criminal Justice and Courts Services Act,
2000, multi-agency collaboration has been strengthened, with significant developments
during the past year, which include:

• Full agreement to establish during 2003 four Police/Probation ‘Public Protection’ Teams.

• The joint appointment of a ‘MAPPP Registrar’, at middle manager level, to chair all meetings
on the ‘critical few’ offenders, oversee monitoring and quality control and management,
ensure consistency of practice and advise on policy and practice developments. This post is
managed by a probation senior manager and based at police headquarters.

• The clarification and rationalisation of risk registration, ensuring that all offenders are
managed according to their assessed level of risk of harm and avoiding ‘over-registration’.

• Specific coaching and training for probation and police staff – to be followed by further multi-
agency training.

• Revision of the Devon & Cornwall Probation Area public protection procedures.

• Revision of the Devon & Cornwall MAPPP protocol to include a wider range of signatories
(currently in process).

• Provision of a dedicated sergeant responsible for development of policies and practices


relating to the management of dangerous offenders and four additional full-time constables
{one per Basic Command Unit} directly responsible for the management of high risk of harm
offenders within Devon & Cornwall Police Authority. {Eight Constables in total}

This report will provide further details of arrangements made in Devon and Cornwall and give
contact points for any additional enquiries including agencies other than Police and Probation.
2. WHO ARE WE? principles are achieved. To fight have working arrangements with
crime effectively, resources have other agencies and close working
Police and Probation staff take a been targeted at the most active practices with the police are well
lead in the operation of MAPP offenders as well as the most established and subject to further
arrangements in Devon and serious offenders in our development, in the form of
Cornwall but they cannot achieve communities. police/probation teams at local level.
effective management of high risk of Local middle managers responsible
harm offenders without co-operation Against this backdrop of “intelligence for resettlement work line manage
and joint working arrangements with led policing” the Sex Offenders Act the probation staff, chair and
other agencies. These agencies 1997 was introduced, requiring manage the multi-agency
include social services, health, certain convicted sex offenders to conferencing process with the
housing, youth offending teams, register with their local police. For Police, review cases and oversee
prisons and others. From a the first time, Police were notified of local registers of offenders assessed
management board, which oversees sex offenders in the community, as posing a risk of harm to the
MAPPA and holds staff accountable some of whom pose a high risk of public.
for their effective implementation, to further offending. It was therefore
the operation of local multi-agency vital that an understanding of risk There are two approved premises
panels, effective communication and assessment and management was in Devon and Cornwall, where high
joint planning and management are developed, to target limited risk of harm offenders can be
central to effectiveness. resources towards the highest risk accommodated and managed within
offenders. This has resulted in a structured regime, with regular
Devon and Cornwall Constabulary increasing contact between monitoring and surveillance.
is committed to public protection, Probation, Housing, Health and
particularly of children and the most Social Services, formalised through There are three prisons in Devon,
vulnerable. The Constabulary the MAPPA. Dartmoor, Channings Wood and
regards protecting the public from Exeter. Probation and prison staff
violent and sexual offenders as a The Constabulary employs specialist within these establishments work
priority and recognises that public staff, who work closely with other together with Police, Probation and
protection work requires the agencies, particularly the Probation others in the community, to plan for
establishment of practical and Service, to assess and manage high the release of offenders under
effective co-operative measures risk of harm offenders. conditions which address the risks
amongst agencies. they pose to the public. Prison
Devon and Cornwall Probation based staff provide reports and other
The Constabulary aim for 2003/2004 Area is part of the National information, sometimes attend multi-
is: Probation Service and as such it agency meetings and ensure that
regards protection of the public as its offenders are clear before release
“Working in partnership to bring highest priority. In Devon and about any licence conditions to
about safer communities, reduce Cornwall, specialist Probation staff which they may be subject.
disorder, crime and the fear of crime are trained and experienced in the
and contribute to the delivery of assessment and management of As the Devon and Cornwall area is
justice in a way which secures and offenders who pose a risk of harm to very large and agencies such as
maintains public confidence.” the public. Staff undertaking these Social Services, Health, Housing
roles are based in each of the four and voluntary agencies have
Whilst some offenders can be divisions; they work primarily with boundaries which are not
effectively managed by the actions offenders sentenced to necessarily consistent with Police
of one agency alone, all agencies imprisonment, both during their and Probation, it is not possible to
need the co-operation of others to sentences and on release, although mention here all the agencies
discharge their public protection they sometimes manage potentially involved in local partnerships. Some
duties effectively. Today’s police dangerous offenders on community examples are:
service is founded on the principle sentences. The Probation Area also
that the prevention and detection of employs staff who are specially Health Service staff provide a range
crime is central to its purpose. trained to deliver offending of services, including community
Development of effective programmes to sex offenders, mental health, psychiatric and
partnerships is pivotal to how these domestic violence offenders and forensic assessments. Local
other violent offenders. All divisions forensic psychologists provide
assessment and treatment packages plans. Recent joint Inspectorate As part of the arrangements to
for offenders where appropriate. reports and the Laming report of the manage risk to children and
Health professionals attend multi- Victoria Climbié Inquiry have re- vulverable adults, a member of
agency meetings and contribute to emphasised the priority which must Devon Social Services works within
assessments and supervision plans. be given to the assessment and the Police Intelligence Centre. Her
management of risks to children by role is to facilitate a cross flow of
Social Services Departments in all agencies. Work is under way relevant information between the
Devon and Cornwall have a statutory through Area Child Protection agencies.
duty to provide for the protection of Committees and through individual
children and vulnerable adults. Their agency mechanisms, to review and The NSPCC has a partnership
representatives contribute to the improve the measures in place to agreement with Devon and Cornwall
multi-agency assessment and protect children. This is a priority for Probation Area. This partnership
management process in all divisions, agencies involved in the MAPP covers the provision of sex offender
attending MAPPP meetings, arrangements and work is in hand to treatment groupwork, staff training
providing written and verbal reports strengthen the links between the and consultation and appropriate
where appropriate and working Strategic Management Board for contribution to the MAPPP process.
closely with all relevant agencies in MAPPs and ACPCs, with a view to
the implementation of supervision improving operational effectiveness.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

3. WHAT DO WE DO?
In Devon and Cornwall, all offenders The purpose of these panels is to sessions aimed at challenging
falling under the MAPP make and implement decisions, specific behaviour, raising
arrangements are assessed to based upon a comprehensive review awareness of the serious, long-term
determine the levels of risk they of the available evidence about an harm such offending causes and
pose to the public. This assessment offender’s patterns of behaviour, preventing relapse. Other
is carried out primarily by staff from offending history, factors which programmes specifically address
the probation area and the police, increase and decrease risk and aggression and violence and
sometimes jointly. Validated current circumstances. In the light of substance misuse. Some offenders
methods of assessment are used this information, a plan can be pose such a high risk, they are
alongside professional judgement to devised, which aims to address the assessed as unsuitable for standard
determine those offenders who form factors which contribue to offending, programmes; these offenders will be
part of the “critical few” seen as encourages non-criminal behaviour subject to monitoring and
posing a very high risk of harm and and provides maximum protection for surveillance by police, probation and
those who, although not in the former and potential victims. other agencies. They may be
highest category, still pose a high accommodated in approved
risk of causing harm to the public. All offenders on community orders or premises designed to manage such
post-release licences are subject to offenders and they are sometimes
Once assessed, offenders in these rigorous reporting requirements, subject to electronic monitoring.
two categories are subject to risk enshrined in National Standards. In
management, through multi-agency some cases, contact is well beyond All high risk of harm offenders are
arrangements. Initial meetings are that laid down as a minimum under subject to rigorous enforcement of
held to share information and agree the standards. Many offenders are their orders or licences. Minimum
upon a clear plan of action, which required to attend nationally requirements for enforcement are
determines the roles of all relevant accredited programmes, designed to laid down by national standards but
agencies. A specific plan is defined, address their specific offending they are often exceeded where
with clear actions and time-scales behaviour. These include an offenders pose a risk to the public.
and a date is set for reviewing intensive supervision package for Offenders on post release licence
progress and amending the plan. sexual offenders, which involves a will be recalled to prison if their
combination of group and individual behaviour gives cause for concern or
they fail to comply with all the and Police, the forthcoming Scotland for an offence of
conditions of their licences release of a man with a history abduction involving a sexual
of sexual assaults was risk assault some years previously
During 2002/2003, a decision was assessed by all agencies. As was identified by police officers.
made to create specialist teams in this man had previously been Enquiries revealed he had
Devon and Cornwall, with the recalled to prison for failing to obtained a position as a bus
specific purpose of managing high comply with licence conditions, driver and was involved with a
risk of harm offenders. We are he was due to leave prison at female youth group. A MAPPP
currently in the process of the end of his sentence with no meeting was called and it was
establishing these teams in all four licence. This man was assessed established that whilst previously
probation divisions/police areas in as posing a very high risk of on temporary licence for the
Devon and Cornwall. The teams will harm to the public, taking into abduction offence, he had been
consist of probation officers working account his lengthy and serious stopped driving a car. A search
alongside police dangerous offender offending history, his evasive of the vehicle revealed items that
officers, formalising pre-existing behaviour and lifestyle and his could have been used in a future
working practices. Multi-agency risk previous responses to periods of abduction and he was recalled to
management panels (MAPPP and statutory supervision. prison. These facts prompted
RAMP) are always attended by the MAPPP to seek non-
police and probation representatives Police and Probation staff statutory disclosure to his
and primarily chaired by probation worked together to engage this employer and the organiser of
middle managers. Other members man’s co-operation and he the female youth group. His
of these panels include social agreed to meet voluntarily with association with the female
services, housing, prison staff from both organisations. youth group was terminated.
representatives and mental health He failed to co-operate as The disclosure to his employer
professionals, although this list is not agreed and it was discovered revealed he had obtained his
exhaustive. Where an offender is that he had given false employment by deception for
assessed as one of the “critical few”, information on registering under which he was subsequently
very high risk of harm offenders, the the Sex Offender legislation. He prosecuted.
panel will always be attended by a was arrested and remanded in
probation senior manager; senior custody for several weeks. The d) In 2001, a Sex Offender Order
managers from other agencies may sentence imposed for the was obtained against a man with
also attend. offence resulted in his release a history of indecency with
for time served; he then children. The Order prohibited
Case Examples relocated to another area. him from associating either in
public or private with a child
a) A high risk sex offender, who was MAPPP meetings were held under 16 years. He was also
serving a sentence of regularly during the period this required to register as a sex
imprisonment for assault, was man was in the community and offender with the police. In
assessed though the MAPPP information was shared through 2002, the police received a
process. Analysis of relevant MAPP arrangements with the complaint that a man had invited
information, including this man’s area to which he moved. two children aged 7 years and 4
behaviour in prison, indicated that Eventually, the man years into his home. The
he would pose a risk to women disappeared; however, address was identified and
on release. This man would not information sharing between through periodic police
be subject to any probation agencies enabled the police to monitoring under the Sex
supervision licence following his locate him. He was sentenced to Offender legislation, it was
release from custody. As a result a term of imprisonment for recognised it was the home of a
of the MAPPP meeting, a Sex failure to register under Sex registered sex offender and
Offender Order was sought and Offender legislation. interviews with the children
obtained by the police, with the confirmed the man had invited
purpose of limiting the risk he them into his home but had not
posed to women. sexually assaulted them in any
c) Following a disclosure from a way. Having contravened the
b) As a result of closer links member of the public, a man Sex Offender Order prohibitions,
between the Prisons, Probation who had been convicted in the man was arrested for that
offence, charged and remanded 2 years Community condition to undertake a Sex
in custody until his final court Rehabilitation Order with a Offender Programme.
date when he was sentenced to

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

4. How is the work of MAPPA made accountable?


Section 67(3) of The Criminal Justice V. To undertake serious offender Race Relations (Amendment) Act
and Court Services Act 2000 case reviews, where any relevant 2000. The Strategic Management
requires that the work of MAPPA be offender is arrested for any Board has a commitment to ensuring
subject to review and monitoring. In serious sexual or violent offence that issues of diversity are
order to comply with this and to ensure that any lessons considered in the management of
requirement, a Strategic from such reviews are dangerous offenders as well as in
Management Board has been understood and acted upon. public protection and victim
established in Devon and Cornwall. arrangements.
The Board consists of senior VI. To help improve the quality of
managers from police, probation, public protection work and inter-
health, social services, prisons, agency co-operation through
youth offending teams and housing. identifying the needs for multi-
Its terms of reference are: agency training and development
and for ensuring such training is
I. To develop and agree local delivered.
policies and procedures for inter-
agency work to exchange VII. To develop public information
information and assess and and education about public
manage offenders, within the protection issues within the local
national framework provided by area so that the public are
Home Office guidance. informed and reassured as to the
measures being taken.
II. To evaluate and review the
effectiveness of the MAPPA, with VIII. To assist the responsible
particular regard to the authority in the production of the
identification of relevant MAPPA annual report, in
offenders, the inter-agency accordance with the directions of
exchange of information, the the Secretary of State.
assessment of risk posed by
relevant offenders and the The Board meets quarterly to review
effective management of that risk. progress with MAPPP arrangements;
reports are received from staff
III. To manage objectives and working in local divisions and
performance indicators for public individual case studies of relevant
protection within the national offenders are reviewed. In addition,
framework. anonymised summaries of non-
statutory disclosures are presented,
IV. To improve local ways of working to demonstrate that such information
in the light of knowledge gained is appropriately shared to prevent or
through national and local reduce crime.
experience and research and to
make sure that any lesson These arrangements are delivered
learned is shared, understood having regard to the responsibilities
and acted upon. to meet the requirements of the
5. Work with and on behalf of victims

Devon and Cornwall Probation Area primary purposes of protecting informed decision about the
employs Victim Liaison Officers, victims and preventing further continuation of the relationship.
whose role is to consult and advise offending. Interventions described Arrangements were put in place
victims of sexual and violent earlier in this report include a range for a police domestic violence
offences, in accordance with the of facilities aimed at reducing officer to be present when the
Criminal Justice & Court Services offending by effecting behavioural disclosure was made, to provide
Act 2000 and the Victims Charter. In change, in addition to external support and advice. The
2002/2003, 95% of victims were means of restricting behaviour, such relationship ended and the man
contacted within 8 weeks of the as prohibitive conditions in prison continues to be monitored.
offender’s sentence, in accordance licences, electronic monitoring,
with National Standards and the hostel residence and surveillance
Victims Charter. This figure is based and monitoring. Protection of the
on the 9 months from 1st April to 31st public througth the prevention of b) Following a disclosure from a
December 2002. victimisation is the central and member of the public, a man who
guiding principle of the work of had been convicted for sexual
Victim Liaison Officers attend MAPPA and dependent upon assault on a child some years
MAPPP panels, to ensure that the effective multi-agency working. previously was identified by
victim’s perspective is taken into police officers. Enquiries by a
account where possible, in the Case examples: Dangerous Offender Officer
formulation of risk management revealed he had offered his
plans and to represent the victim’s a) As a result of information received services to a charity providing
interests. from concerned parties, police sailing opportunities to teenagers.
established that a woman had A MAPPP meeting was called
The protection of victims is at the formed a relationship with a man and his risk to children assessed.
core of multi-agency public prone to violent attacks on his It was concluded that the level of
protection. Recently published partners; the catalyst for these risk posed was such that his
Children’s Safeguards Reports (Joint attacks was deterioration of the involvement with the charity
Inspectorate) indicate that a range of relationship. On two such should be curtailed. A number of
agencies, including Area Child occasions he had abducted his risk management options were
Protection Committees, Police, The partners, taking them to remote considered; in the first instance
Department of Health, Home Office locations, where he would subject the man was invited to withdraw
and Youth Justice Board, them to violent and prolonged voluntarily from the organisation;
Department for Education and Skills assaults; as a result, he had he refused and therefore a non-
and the Lord Chancellor’s served periods of imprisonment. statutory disclosure was made to
Department, have to take steps to It became clear that the current the charity in question as well as
improve their practice and partner knew only of one of these to relevant Harbour Masters.
procedures in relation to the incidents. A MAPPP meeting This disclosure was aimed at
protection of children. concluded that it was necessary longer term prevention and
to disclose the details of the reduction of his activities.
Specific work with high risk of harm abductions to the current partner,
offenders is undertaken with the so that she could make an

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Statistical Information
The annual statistics reflect a small upward trend in both the number of registered
sex offenders and the number of violent and other sex offenders in relation to the
statistics published in last year’s report. During 2002/2003, one offender subject to
MAPPP committed a serious offence; this matter will shortly come to trial, therefore
we are unable to comment upon it in this report.

No. of Offenders

i. The number of registered sex offenders on 31 March 2003 637

ii. The number of sex offenders having a registration requirement who were either 44
cautioned or convicted for breaches of the requirement, between 1 April 2002
and 31 March 2003

iii. The number of Sex Offenders Orders applied for and gained between 1 April
2002 and 31 March 2003

(a) The total number of Sex Offenders Orders applied for 0

(b) The total number granted 0

(c) The total number not granted 0

iv. The number of Restraining Orders issued by the courts between 1 April 2002 1
and 31 March 2003 for offenders currently managed within MAPPA

v. The number of violent and other sexual offenders considered under MAPPA 883
during the year 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2003 (as defined by section 68 [3],
[4] and [5])

vi. The number of "other offenders" dealt with under MAPPA during the year 1 1
April 2002 and 31 March 2003 as being assessed by the Responsible Authority
as posing a risk of serious harm to the public (but who did not fall within either
of the other two categories, as defined by s.67 [2b])

vii. For each of the three categories of offenders covered by the MAPPA
("registered sex offenders", "violent and other sex offenders" and "other
offenders"), identify the number of offenders that are or have been dealt with
by:

a) MAPPP - registered sex offenders 27


b) MAPPP - violent and other sex offenders 26

c) MAPPP - other offenders 1

viii. Of the cases managed by the MAPPP during the reporting year what was the
number of offenders:

a) who were returned to custody for breach of licence 4

b) who were returned to custody for breach of a Restraining Order or Sex 0


Offender Order

c) charged with a serious sexual or violent offence 1


Contacts
Devon and Cornwall Probation Area Address Phone

Mary Anne McFarlane Queen’s House 01392 474100


Chief Officer Little Queen Street
Exeter
EX4 3LJ

Kath Morris Thurlow House 01803 213535


Assistant Chief Officer Thurlow Road
Torquay
TQ1 3EQ

Devon and Cornwall Police Address Phone

Maria Wallis Force Headquarters 08705 777444


Chief Constable Middlemoor
Exeter
EX2 7HQ

Stephen Pearce Force Headquarters


Acting Assistant Chief Constable Middlemoor 08705 777444
Exeter
EX2 7HQ

Andrew C Pierce Force Headquarters 08705 777444


Detective Superintendent Middlemoor
Crime & Operations Division Exeter
EX2 7HQ

MAPPA Strategic Management Board Members Address Phone

Stephen Pearce Force Headquarters


Acting Assistant Chief Constable Middlemoor 08705 777444
Exeter
EX2 7HQ

Andrew C Pierce Force Headquarters 08705 777444


Detective Superintendent Middlemoor
Crime & Operations Division Exeter
EX2 7HQ
Kath Morris Devon & Cornwall Probation Area 01803 213535
Assistant Chief Officer

Nichola Whiley Devon & Cornwall Probation Area / Devon 08705 777444
MAPPP Registrar/Manager & Cornwall Police

Inspector Tom Conneeley


Devon & Cornwall Police Devon and Cornwall Police 08705 777444

John Morgan
Forensic Clinical Psychologist Cornwall Forensic Mental Health Service 01208 251300
Chris Dimmelow
Child Protection Manager Devon Social Services Department 01392 386657

John Cousins Youth Offending Team 01872 274567


Manager

Ann Morecraft North & East Devon Health Community 01392 207428
Head of Devon Patient & Practitioner Services Agency /
Designated Manager for Child Protection (N&E Devon)

Ian Mulholland HM Prison, Exeter 01392 415650


Governor

Graham Davey Mid Devon Housing 01884 234286


Housing Needs & Enabling Manager

Phil Confue Plymouth Primary Care Trust 01752 315315


Director of Mental Health & Learning Disability Services

Jim Gould Cornwall Social Services Department 01872 323628


Deputy Director

Chris Nash Cornwall Partnership Trust 01726 291019


Health Visitor & Child Protection Adviser

Nick Pennell Plymouth Primary Care Trust 01752 315315


Acting Deputy Director of Mental Health & Learning
Disability Services / Rural Locality Manager

Jon Brown NSPCC 01752 235120


Area Children’s Services Manager

Devon and Cornwall Victim Support Phone


Victim Support Exeter East & Mid Devon 01392 427117

Victim Support North Devon 01271 324005

Victim Support Plymouth 01752 777118

Victim Support South & West Devon 01626 203295

Victim Support Torbay 01803 665989

Victim Support Cornwall 01872 263464