Foreword 3
Statistical Information 14
Contacts 15
Foreword
The improvement of MAPPP procedures and processes has been the key theme in the
work of partners during this year. As Chief Officers of the responsible authority we have
been grateful for the active support of our partner agencies within the Strategic
Management Board of the MAPPP in Hertfordshire. Probation and police colleagues are
ably assisted by senior representatives of statutory and voluntary agencies, who have
played an invaluable role in the strategic development of the MAPPP in the county.
The introduction of legislation identifying partners with a duty to co-operate confirmed the
importance of the strong partnerships which were already in place, both at an operational
and strategic level. Colleagues from varied professional backgrounds, such as Children
Schools and Families, youth offending, health and the voluntary sector each bring the
expertise of their own agency to our joint planning processes.
Legislative change bringing the involvement of the Prison Service within the responsible
authority heralds an exciting time of further change and development for MAPPP and local
links with the Mount prison. They have already brought active participation from the
prison service at a strategic level. Partnership in achieving quality of risk management
work will be the keynote of further development in the coming year. The Strategic
Management Board is committed to a rigorous process of examination and improvement.
This will commence with an audit of quality and consistency of risk assessment and risk
management planning which will report to the Strategic Board in the Autumn.
The recruitment of two lay advisors to join the Strategic Management Board also
represents an exciting opportunity to develop the quality of our work by drawing on the
skill and knowledge of members of the community. The Strategic Board is proactively
pursuing this opportunity and plans are in place to begin a process of information sharing
with interested parties throughout the summer of 2004 followed by recruitment of lay
advisors by the Autumn.
We are committed to protecting potential and active victims of crime and the presence of
the Chief Executive of Victim Support Hertfordshire on the Strategic Board is a valued
contribution.
This is an exciting year in which we will work together to build on what we have already
achieved to improve quality and consistency of practice across the county in order to
better protect the people of Hertfordshire.
3
Victims Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims
Bill
The National Victims and Witnesses
Strategy aims to improve support and This Bill currently going through
protection for victims and witnesses by:- Parliament will create:-
4
Key Achievements
There have been some significant achievements this year in developing the MAPPP
in Hertfordshire Probation Area and below is an indication of our progress.
5
Engagement of partners with a duty to
co-operate within the operational
MAPPP
6
How the MAPPP operates locally
In April 2001 The Criminal Justice and The imminence of the event
Courts Service’s Act 2000 (sections 67 causing serious harm
and 68) sought to increase public
protection by building upon the existing The degree of harm which the
inter-agency arrangements. It introduced incident is likely to cause
a statutory duty on police and probation
to make joint arrangements for the Whether individuals or specific
assessment and management of the groups of people or
risks posed by relevant sexual and communities are likely to be
violent offenders, and other offenders, the victims of such an event
who may cause serious harm to the
public. No risk assessment or risk management
plan which fails to address these issues
From April 2004, the Prison Service will will be acceptable.
be a member of the responsible authority
for the MAPPP (along with Police and The Hertfordshire public protection
Probation) and will bring considerable arrangements divide the county into three
expertise on the management of areas that correspond to police local
dangerous offenders. areas: Eastern, Western and Central
Hertfordshire. In each of these areas, a
Purpose and Principles MAPPPs are chaired by a Probation
Director of Operations.
Hertfordshire operates a three tier system
comprising of a Local Risk Management Membership of the Local Risk
Panel, a higher tier referred to as MAPPP Management Panel represents
(Multi-Agency Public Protection Panel) operational management of partner
for the most dangerous offenders, and agencies with knowledge of cases and
the Strategic Management Panel. It aims procedures and the ability to commit
to ensure that each section of the resources.
community benefits from best practice
that will better protect them. All offenders Risk Assessment Processes
who present a risk of serious harm are
referred into the process. Local The MAPPP structure in Hertfordshire
arrangements are based on information involves screening arrangements to
sharing between agencies and use of the ensure all offenders are assessed to
local management panel as a forum, in gauge the risk they pose, and to enable
which a risk management plan is the panels to focus on those critical few
developed. offenders who present a high risk.
Screening is based on an assessment
Risk assessments and risk management using the probation and prison service
plans identified by Local Risk Offender Assessment System (OASys).
Management Panels and MAPPP’s must Sex offenders are assessed under the
address the following: police Risk Matrix 2000 system. Other
agencies have different methods of risk
assessment that are used to categorise
risk of harm, and may alert the panel to a
person posing a high risk.
7
Local Risk Management Panel
In a few cases, the decision may be There is a strong link between the
taken that there is very little risk posed by statutory victim contact service provided
an individual unless circumstances by probation, and victim support schemes
change significantly, e.g. a trigger factor locally. The Victim Unit keeps victims of
develops – such as homelessness, serious sexual and violent offences
unemployment or a relationship informed of the management of the case,
breakdown that could prompt an increase and provides a point of contact to enable
in risk levels. These cases are brought victims to access other services that offer
before the Local Risk Management Panel help and support. Unit representatives
in order to share information and alert attend each Local Risk Management
relevant staff to the possible need for the Panel, providing information from victims
Local Risk Management Panel to revisit and raising victim concerns. Many
the case if changes occur. victims have said that they have
benefited from the information given to
them.
8
Case Example One - The critical few
The importance of prison and health authorities involvement
in the MAPPP
Background
John (not his real name) has many previous convictions including arson and sexual
offences against children. John is one of the 280 offenders on the sex offenders register in
Hertfordshire. Before he was released from prison and reached the maximum point at
which the prison authorities could detain him, prison staff referred John to the MAPPP.
They considered him to be of very high risk of causing serious harm or death to members
of the public, not least because of his mental health problems, unless a very strict plan of
action was arranged for him on his release.
A MAPPP was set-up, whilst John was serving his sentence, with relevant partner agency
staff attending the meeting, including probation and prison staff and community mental
health specialists. A risk management plan was put into action. Health staff were able to
provide invaluable insights into the causes of his offending and trigger factors which might
indicate increased risk to the public and prison staff provided a detailed picture of his
mental health state whilst John was in prison. This invaluable information helped build a
picture for the best risk plan for John and members of the public.
Outcome
After a series of MAPPP meetings and insight into John’s mental health problems a Local
Authority mental health specialist arranged for John to be transferred straight from prison
to a psychiatric care unit under the Mental Health Act. Practitioners from the hospital he
attended came to all subsequent meetings which enabled a close review of risks posed by
him to be maintained. Police and Probation staff regularly visited John in hospital to
monitor the risk.
Further MAPPP meetings, with all professional staff involved in John’s welfare, met to
decide where he should live on discharge from the psychiatric unit. When John was
considered well enough to leave the psychiatric unit the National Probation Service and
the Public Protection Unit had already secured a place for him which provides closely
supervised residential treatment. This seamless move from the psychiatric unit prevented
any lapse in his treatment and lessoned any risk posed to the public. John remains a
resident and his treatment progresses and there has been no further offending.
Significantly in Hertfordshire, between 1st April 2003 and the 31st March 2004, none of the
offenders who have been managed by the MAPPP have been returned to custody for
breach of their licence conditions. However, the number of registered sex offenders in
Hertfordshire has increased in the last year. This is of some concern, however it should
be seen in the context that police colleagues have been rigorous in ensuring that
instances of abuse result in prosecutions, resulting in a larger number of offenders being
registered. This is a positive step for Hertfordshire as abusers can be more closely and
effectively monitored if they are prosecuted and registered as sex offenders.
9
Case Example Two
The importance of domestic violence advocacy support and drug and alcohol
counselling in the MAPPP
Background
Roger (not his real name) has previous convictions for violence including domestic
violence against his partner. He has a history of physically and psychologically abusing
women and also of drug and alcohol abuse. Roger has a two year old daughter, who has
now been adopted, but he was able to receive supervised contact with his child at the time
he was referred to the MAPPP.
Roger was of high risk of causing harm to other’s, including professional staff, who had
dealings with him. His heavy drinking and drug abuse affected his moods and could cause
him to be violent. His partner had links to the travelling community and a French passport
and there were concerns that together they might try to snatch the child and take her
abroad.
Regular MAPPP meetings were held to manage the risk to the public whilst Roger was on
licence. They identified that the risk of serious harm was escalating and that there were
specific dangers to particular members of staff who had dealings with him. Therefore
urgent action was taken to re-allocate tasks in order to protect those staff most at risk.
Colleagues on the MAPPP also tightened security at the contact centre where the
offender was seeing his daughter prior to her adoption.
In spite of all the activity taken by the MAPPP a further offence of Grievous Bodily Harm
(GBH) to a stranger, was committed whilst Roger was on licence. The MAPPP responded
by calling an emergency meeting to ensure that all possible action was taken to protect
any other possible victims in the period leading up to his court appearance.
Outcome
Roger received a custodial sentence for the serious offence of GBH. However, whilst he
was serving his sentence the MAPPP continued to meet to help prevent further offending
on his release. Part of the risk management plan was to ensure that Roger received drug
and alcohol counselling whilst he was in prison and that his partner received domestic
violence advocacy support in order to reduce the risk that he will re-offend when ultimately
released.
10
Case Example Three
The importance of housing and health agencies in the MAPPP
Background
Kerry (not her real name) has numerous previous convictions and was sentenced to a
Community Punishment Order for shoplifting. She was required to report to work to
undertake demanding unpaid labour for the benefit of the local community. However, she
committed a further offence of shoplifting whilst on her order and was sentenced to
imprisonment.
Kerry was of no fixed abode at the time of this offence. She also had psychiatric problems
but regularly failed to keep her appointments with her health worker.
Kerry was referred to the MAPPP as it was clear that due to her change in circumstances
- losing her home and not taking her medication - that she would be of high risk of re-
offending again on her release from prison.
Outcome
On Kerry’s release from prison a colleague from the National Association for the Care and
Resettlement of Offenders, who was a member of the MAPPP, secured suitable
accommodation for her which considerably reduced the likelihood of further offending.
She is now settled in her new home and is more stable not least because she is attending
her appointments with mental health colleagues and taking her medication.
Kerry is one of the 43 Hertfordshire ‘other’ offenders that were managed through the
MAPPP (1st April 2003 to 31st March 2004). ‘Other’ meaning not those offenders managed
by the MAPPP for violent or sexual offences.
11
Statistical Information
No. of Offenders
1. Category 1 MAPPP offenders: Registered Sex Offenders
iii) The number of full Sex Offenders Orders applied for and imposed
by the courts between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2004:-
4. MAPPP cases
12
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT BOARD MEMBERS
(SMB – MAPPP)
13
Much more than documents.
Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.
Cancel anytime.