National Probation Service Performance Report 20 and Weighted Scorecard 2005/06

June 2006
ROGER HILL DIRECTOR OF PROBATION

1

Contents

Foreword Introduction Enforcement, Contact and Compliance High/Very High Risk of Harm and Prolific & other Priority Offenders (PPOs) Accredited Programmes Unpaid Work Drug Rehabilitation Requirements (DRRs) Basic Skills Race and Ethnic Monitoring Sickness Absence Victim Contact Court Report Timeliness Weighted Scorecard

3 10 12 16 19 21 23 27 30 32 35 37 39

2

Foreword

The year 2005/06 has been both testing and rewarding.

Eleven service delivery targets were set for Probation to reflect ministerial priorities and we have exceeded seven of them, some by a significant margin. We are within 10% of the other four, missing some by only a tiny margin (only 1% in one case). By any standards this solid performance demonstrates consistent improvement. It is a testament to the focus and commitment of many, many staff. But we must not be complacent.

Risk of Harm and Serious Further Offences

Our risk of harm assessments have been criticised by the Inspectorate and this has been an area of considerable attention over the year. It was recognised that improvement would take time to show through because performance is measured against historic data. HM Chief Inspector describes the improvement necessary as part of ‘the long haul’. It is very gratifying that the cumulative performance over the year has reached 81% with many areas exceeding the 90% target in the last three months of the year.

For balance, clearly it is unacceptable that in one area, of the 36 high risk cases monitored, only a minority met the standard. Our work on the assessment and management of risk of harm defines us an organisation in the public eye. All staff will realistically expect the rigorous attention on this target to continue in the coming years.

Media attention on the Service following the Hanson and White case has been unprecedented. I know staff have felt this acutely and have wanted to hear a clearer voice explaining the task placed upon their shoulders. This has been a very difficult situation but I am hopeful Chief Officers will able to take on that role and provide the accountability and explanatory information the public rightly demand through the media.

3

The conference of over a thousand operational managers addressed by Charles Clarke was a helpful occasion and marked a watershed in how we might go forward. Although other events have overtaken us since then, the momentum should not be lost. The change in Home Secretary is not a change in direction.

I consider the criticism we received over the Hanson and White case to be justified and I read the report with sadness. In particular, I consider that the management of Hanson was unacceptable. However, it was the exception, not the rule. I know staff to be diligent, careful, responsible and always concerned for the needs of victims and reducing re-offending. Our work with high risk offenders is complex and not easily reduced to a sound-bite. The people we are charged to manage in the community are by definition the most difficult and disaffected in the country and invariably include some of the most dangerous. We do this work with integrity, and staff rise to the challenge in a way that makes me proud of what we achieve and the crimes we prevent.

Targets and Performance

Turning back to the targets, this has been the first year that we have been able to report that the enforcement target has been met. Since hitting 91% back in January 2005, performance has not dropped below the target in any of the subsequent months and has got as high as 93% twice. In the first year of the NPS we achieved just 53% against this target and London’s performance was so poor (29% in 2002-3) that it was reported separately. The improvement in London has been considerable and we stopped having to report separately after the first quarter of this year.

The delivery of basic skills awards has been another area of massive improvement. Just three years after failing by 15% to meet a target of 1,000 awards, we have achieved almost 15,000 awards: 50% more than the target and 58% more than we achieved last year. This achievement, alongside exceeding the very stretching target on unpaid work completions when we achieved a third more completions than last year, is significant. It suggests we have tangibly increased the likelihood of offenders finding employment, a factor we know actively reduces the likelihood of re-offending.

A significant number of the offenders have difficulties in the way they solve problems and in how they think, and we know this contributes to their offending. Offenders have completed 17,127 accredited offender behaviour programmes designed to tackle these very problems (114% of the target). This must be a tremendous contribution to curbing
4

their criminal behaviour. The frequent expectation is that victims “don’t want it to happen again” and both staff and that those completing each course deserve congratulation in making progress to that end.

Overall Performance on all targets

Performance measure

2004/05

2005/06

Percentage change

Enforcement within 10 days Compliance including orders allowed to continue Offending Behaviour Programmes Unpaid work completions DTTO/DRR starts DTTO/DRR completions Basic Skills Starts Basic Skills Awards Sickness absence (average. days) Court Report timeliness Accurate and timely ethnicity data Assessment of high risk cases Assessment of PPOs

87% 79% 15,595 (104%) 38,473 (128%) 10,322 (79%) -34,199 (107%) 9,451 (118%) 12.3 -----

91% 81% 17,127 (114%) 51,026 (102%) 14,001 (88%) 3,977 (99%) 44,972 (112%) 14,930 (149%) 12.3 97% 97% 81% 82%

+4% +2% +7% +33% +36% -+32% +58% 0 -----

It should be noted that in 2005/06 the targets for: • DTTOs increased from 13,000 to 16,000 commencements • Basic Skills starts increased from 32,000 to 40,000 • Basic Skills completions increased from 8,000 to 10,000 • Unpaid work completions have increased from 30,000 to 50,000.

5

Individual Best Target Performance Some areas have delivered very strongly against target over the year. I want to recognise them here.

Basic Skills Awards - numerical target requiring 100% achievement (possible to exceed 100%).

1 2 3

Suffolk - 310% Avon/Somerset - 285% Cumbria - 213%

Enforcement - % target requiring 90% achievement (not possible to exceed 100%)

1 1 3

Warwickshire - 100% Dyfed Powys - 100% Wiltshire - 99%

Accredited Programmes completions - numerical target requiring 100% achievement (possible to exceed 100%)

1 2 3 3

Cheshire – 165% Warwickshire - 142% London South - 139% Dorset – 139%

Drugs Orders completions - numerical target requiring 100% achievement (possible to exceed 100%)

1 2 3

Suffolk - 139% South Wales - 136% North Wales - 125%

Compliance - % target requiring 85% achievement (not possible to exceed 100%)

1 2 3 3

Warwickshire - 91% County Durham - 89% Dyfed-Powys – 87% Surrey - 87%
6

Unpaid Work completions - numerical target requiring 100% achievement (possible to exceed 100%)

1 2 3 4

Derbyshire - 145% Cumbria - 136% Cambridgeshire – 126% Hampshire -123%

Timeliness of Risk of Harm assessment - % target requiring 90% achievement (not possible to exceed 100%)

1 1 3

Lincolnshire - 97% Sussex - 97% Nottinghamshire - 96%

Prolific & Priority Offender assessment - % target requiring 90% achievement (not possible to exceed 100%)

1 2 3

Staffordshire - 100% Nottinghamshire - 99% Lincolnshire - 98%

Sickness Absence – target not to exceed 9 days per year per staff member

1 North Yorkshire - 7.6 days 1 Devon/Cornwall - 7.6 days 3 Avon/Somerset - 8.7 days

Best Overall Performers

The weighted scorecard summarises overall performance and ranks the probation areas.

The top overall performer for 2005-06 was Warwickshire. Well done to Liz Stafford and all staff in that area for an outstanding overall performance, the highest performance across England and Wales for the year.
7

The Top Ten

The top ten strongest performers during 2005-6 were:

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

Warwickshire Derbyshire North Yorkshire Humberside North Wales Leicestershire and Rutland Essex Suffolk Lincolnshire Cheshire

A terrific achievement for all concerned.

Greatest Improvement over the year

I want to recognise those areas that have performed significantly better in 2005-6 than they did in 2004-5. Three areas stand out:

2004-05 Essex Devon & Cornwall North Wales 36
th

2005-06 7th 15th 5th

42nd 31st

The Weighted Scorecard

The weighted scorecard presented at the end of this report covers 2005-06. It is less volatile than previous quarters with only eight areas moving more than 10 places in either direction, compared to 17 in the previous quarter. Where areas have moved more than 10 places since the three-quarter stage of the year, a short explanation is provided.

Overall I am pleased to report that the highest ever number of areas, 35, have achieved a score above zero on the performance against target column. This
8

demonstrates, as does the rest of this report, that other than in a few instances, areas are performing at or above their targets.

I want to take the opportunity in this end of year performance report to say we must acknowledge the achievements of 2005-6 and, without change of pace, be ambitious that we can do even better in 2006-7. Working within a better-integrated NOMS environment brings us real opportunities to improve further. It has been a year where the people have worked hard and seen their efforts reflected in the robust performance against the priorities set for us by ministers. To everyone in the areas and those at NPD, thank you.

Roger Hill Director National Probation Service

9

Introduction
Enforcement 91% of relevant cases were enforced within 10 days in accordance with National Standards. Monthly performance shows that over the course of the year 93% was achieved twice (in July and February) and has not dropped below the 90% target since January 2005.

Compliance Disappointingly, performance over the course of the year remained at 81%, just 4% short of the target. However, in March alone 83% was achieved.

Offending Behaviour Programmes There were 17,127 completions of offending behaviour programmes between during 2005-06. That is 14% above target and 1,172 (7%) more than were completed last year.

Unpaid Work 51,026 completions have been achieved in 2005-06. That is 2% above the target and 12,553 (or 33%) more completions than in 2004-05.

Drug Treatment and Testing Orders / Drug Rehabilitation Requirements 14,001 DTTOs and DRRs commenced during 2005-06 meaning that 88% of the target was met. This is against a target that increased by 23% since last year’s. There were 3,679 (36%) more starts in 2005-06 than in the previous year. There were 3,977 completions of DTTOs and DRRs in 2005-06, just 23 (1%) short of the target.

Basic Skills 44,972 offenders commenced basic skills courses during 2005-06, 12% above the target. There were 10,773 more starts than last year, an increase of 32%. 14,930 basic skills awards were delivered in 2005-06, 49% above the target and a 58% increase on the number of awards achieved in the previous year.

Sickness Absence There were 12.3 days on average lost due to sickness per employee in 2005-06 – the same as in 2004-05.

Victims Performance on victims remained at the level achieved last year when 93% of victims were contacted within the 8-week standard. This exceeds the 85% target.
10

High / Very High Risk of harm cases The target is to complete 90% of risk of harm analyses, risk management plans and OASys sentence plans on high risk offenders within five working days of the commencement of the order or release into the community. Between the beginning of monitoring in August 2005 and March 2006, 81% of cases met the target

Prolific and other Priority Offenders (PPOs) The target is to complete 90% of risk of harm screenings / full analyses (as appropriate) and OASys sentence plans on Prolific and other Priority Offenders within five working days of commencement of the order or release into the community. 82% of cases between August 2005 and March 2006 have met the target.

Court report timeliness Concerns over the data quality of returns in the first quarter of the year mean that the first quarter has been omitted from the analysis of the results. The proportion of court reports completed between July 2005 and March 2006 within the timescale set by the court was 97%.

Accurate and timely ethnicity data 96% of data on offenders starting community orders was accurate and timely with respect to ethnicity, as was 94% of data on offenders starting supervision under licence. In addition, 99% of staffing records were returned on time with a valid ethnicity code, giving an overall average of 97% against a target of 95%.

Contact for enquiries For enquiries about any issues relating to this report please contact Roger McGarva, Head of Regions & Performance, Tel: 020 7217 8244; E-mail: Roger.McGarva2@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk. For enquiries about the data please contact Paris Mikkides, Head of Performance Standards & Risk, Tel: 020 7217 8812; E-mail: Paris.Mikkides@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk.

11

1.

Enforcement, Contact and Compliance – April 2005 to March 2006

NPS Performance Target 6 is that the National Probation Service takes enforcement action in accordance with the National Standard in 90% of cases where the offender has breached his/her order. To fully meet the standard, three things must be achieved: breach action taken on or before a second failure assessed as unacceptable (third failure in licence cases) the court contacted for a hearing date all of this achieved within 10 days. National Standards monitoring on enforcement uses a sample of cases commenced six months previously, so the sample for the reporting period April 2005 to March 2006 will contain cases that commenced between October 2004 and September 2005. There has been a steady improvement in performance since April 2001. Period 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 Enforced within 10 days in accordance with National Standards 53% 64% 77% 87% 91% All cases enforced 69% 77% 87% 93% 96%

The overall performance on enforcement has improved considerably and the 90% target has been consistently met or exceeded each month since January 2005. The detailed data shows that: • • • 35 areas met or exceeded the 90% for breach action within 10 days. 10 areas were within 10% of the target. No areas were more than 10% below the target.

Compliance over the period was 81% (based on the proportion of cases where there were no 2nd (or 3rd for licences) unacceptable failures or where the order was breached but allowed to continue by the court). The target was increased from 70% in 2004-05 to 85% this year. Eleven areas met or exceeded this new target whilst only one area missed it by more than 10%. Contact with offenders shows that 85% of appointments were arranged in accordance with national standards, against a target of 90% whilst 64% of appointments were attended, just short of the 65% target. In 2004-05, the figures were 85% and 61% respectively.

12

Enforcement April 2005 - March 2006
Region Area name Proportion breached Proportion breached within 10 days whether or not within 10 days 94% 100% 94% 91% 93% 91% 95% 94% 94% 95% 91% 92% 80% 84% 96% 89% 97% 97% 88% 90% 90% 90% 96% 94% 93% 82% 96% 94% 93% 92% 88% 87% 89% 91% 95% 91% 93% 88% 92% 92% 93% 94% 86% 99% 93% 86% 91% 93% 92% 90% 100% 91% 97% 88% 92% 91% 97% 100% 96% 95% 96% 94% 98% 98% 97% 98% 96% 95% 86% 95% 100% 95% 99% 99% 95% 95% 92% 95% 96% 98% 96% 88% 99% 97% 98% 97% 93% 92% 94% 98% 96% 97% 97% 92% 96% 99% 95% 98% 95% 99% 97% 92% 95% 97% 97% 95% 100% 96% 99% 95% 97% 96% Compliance

West Midlands

Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub Total County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub Total Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub Total Cheshire Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside Regional Sub Total Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub Total Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub Total Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub Total Avon & Somerset Devon/Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub Total London East London North London South London West London Sub Total Dyfed/Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub Total

86% 91% 85% 82% 84% 89% 83% 79% 83% 80% 82% 81% 77% 78% 86% 80% 84% 86% 81% 80% 77% 80% 80% 85% 80% 82% 78% 81% 82% 86% 81% 78% 81% 86% 79% 87% 78% 83% 82% 78% 82% 77% 80% 81% 80% 82% 80% 74% 83% 80% 87% 83% 84% 83% 84% 81%

North East

East

North West

East Midlands

Yorkshire & Humberside

South East

South West

London Wales

ENGLAND & WALES

13

Mar-06 Feb-06 Jan-06 Dec-05 Nov-05 Oct-05

Mar-06

Feb-06

Jan-06

Dec-05

Breach action taken within 10 days All community orders & licences

Nov-05
Sep-05 Aug-05

Oct-05

Sep-05

Compliance by Month

Jul-05 Jun-05

Aug-05

Cumulative

Jul-05
May-05 Apr-05 Mar-05 Feb-05 Jan-05 Dec-04

Jun-05

May-05

Apr-05

Enforcement and Compliance by Month

Mar-05

Feb-05

Jan-05 Actual - orders & licences
Nov-04 Oct-04 Sep-04 Aug-04 Jul-04

Dec-04

Target

Nov-04

Oct-04

Sep-04

Target

Aug-04

Jul-04 Monthly
Jun-04 May-04

Jun-04

May-04 90% 85% 80%
Apr-04 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82% 80%

75%

70%

65%

14

Performance
Performance

Appointments arranged and attended in accordance with National Standards October 2005 to March 2006
Appointments Arranged 85% 89% 86% 82% 84% 86% 91% 81% 87% 85% 71% 81% 74% 89% 92% 82% 90% 87% 92% 88% 93% 91% 88% 90% 91% 76% 83% 86% 90% 91% 91% 82% 87% 85% 92% 86% 89% 80% 86% 87% 87% 88% 78% 90% 86% 69% 65% 79% 71% 71% 86% 92% 84% 87% 87% 85% Target 90% Appointments Attended Near miss 64% Near miss 58% Near miss 62% Near miss 58% Near miss 60% Near miss 71% Above 71% Near miss 55% Near miss 67% Near miss 65% Below 53% Near miss 64% Below 58% Near miss 64% Above 63% Near miss 61% Above 71% Near miss 66% Above 72% Near miss 66% Above 69% Above 70% Near miss 67% Above 72% Above 70% Below 57% Near miss 58% Near miss 64% Above 69% Above 74% Above 71% Near miss 57% Near miss 65% Near miss 66% Above 75% Near miss 69% Near miss 72% Near miss 62% Near miss 68% Near miss 70% Near miss 71% Near miss 72% Below 59% Above 69% Near miss 69% Below 50% Below 50% Below 56% Below 53% Below 52% Near miss 65% Above 74% Near miss 64% Near miss 63% Near miss 65% Near miss 64% Target 65% Near miss Below Near miss Below Near miss Above Above Below Above Above Below Near miss Below Near miss Near miss Near miss Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Below Below Near miss Above Above Above Below Above Above Above Above Above Near miss Above Above Above Above Below Above Above Below Below Below Below Below Above Above Near miss Near miss Above Near miss

West Midlands Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands West Midlands Total North East County Durham Northumbria Teesside North East Total East of Bedfordshire England Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk East of England Total North West Cheshire Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside North West Total East Midlands Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire East Midlands Total Yorkshire & Humberside Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Yorkshire & Humberside Total South East Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley South East Total South West Avon & Somerset Devon & Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire South West Total London London East London North London South London West London Total Wales Dyfed/Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Wales Total England & Wales

15

2.

Performance on High / Very High Risk of Harm and Prolific & other Priority Offenders (PPOs)

There are two performance targets relating to protecting the public from harm and protecting the public from prolific and other priority offenders •

PT1: 90% of risk of harm assessments, risk management plans and OASys sentence plans on high risk offenders are completed within five working days of the commencement of the order or release into the community.

PT3: 90% of risk of harm screenings / full analysis (as appropriate) and OASys sentence plans are completed on Prolific and other Priority Offenders within five working days of commencement of the order or release into the community

Although measurement on these key targets began in April, data quality issues have meant that it is only from August 2005 that we have reliable data. This is shown at area level in the following pages. It is important to note that in some areas the percentages are derived from (very) small numbers. Whilst the targets on these key indicators have not been met, there has been considerable improvement since the last quarterly performance report and there have been month-onmonth improvements. The area level detail also demonstrates improvement since the previous quarter with 14 areas above target (up from 11 last quarter), a further 14 within 10% and 17 more than 10% below PT1. On PT3, 16 areas were above, 13 were within 10% and 16 were more than 10% below. Areas that perform well on PT1 tend to perform well on PT3. The following are above target on both indicators: Derbyshire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, Humberside, North Yorkshire, Sussex, Wiltshire, London North and Gwent.

16

Performance Against Target - High Risk Cases, August 2005 - March 2006 Region
West Midlands

Area

Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub-total North East

All 63 48 78 382 571 22 85 78 185 59 61 61 36 30 31 278 113 30 201 667 185 1196 136 57 34 52 134 413 209 70 127 246 652 66 70 19 31 141 327 62 45 17 55 30 209 81 110 60 108 359 52 26 53 197 328

PT 1 55 45 59 319 478 21 74 61 156 52 32 54 5 17 16 176 96 19 175 522 153 965 122 51 33 28 128 362 193 65 107 198 563 40 50 14 30 59 193 45 42 16 38 28 169 72 104 48 77 301 40 24 50 173 287

% 87% 94% 76% 84% 84% 95% 87% 78% 84% 88% 52% 89% 14% 57% 52% 63% 85% 63% 87% 78% 83% 81% 90% 89% 97% 54% 96% 88% 92% 93% 84% 80% 86% 61% 71% 74% 97% 42% 59% 73% 93% 94% 69% 93% 81% 89% 95% 80% 71% 84% 77% 92% 94% 88% 88%

Performance Near miss Above Below Near miss Near miss Above Near miss Below Near miss Near miss Below Near miss Below Below Below Below Near miss Below Near miss Below Near miss Near miss Above Near miss Above Below Above Near miss Above Above Near miss Near miss Near miss Below Below Below Above Below Below Below Above Above Below Above Near miss Near miss Above Near miss Below Near miss Below Above Above Near miss Near miss Near miss

County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub-total East of England Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub-total North West Cheshire Cumbria Lancashire Greater Manchester Merseyside Regional Sub-total East Midlands Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub-total Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub-total Yorkshire & Humberside South East Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub-total South West

Avon & Somerset Devon/Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub-total London London East London North London South London West London Sub-total Wales

Dyfed/Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub-total

England & Wales

4518

3650

81%

17

Performance Against Target - PPO Cases, August 2005 - March 2006 Region
West Midlands

Area

Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub-total North East

All 20 25 42 273 360 40 105 78 223 34 46 19 49 31 66 245 43 31 93 243 108 518 99 136 47 65 154 501 64 32 72 84 252 61 111 39 118 95 424 63 126 29 21 22 261 46 47 51 65 209 31 28 32 74 165

PT 3 20 22 33 227 302 35 95 70 200 31 30 17 7 14 32 131 38 21 79 198 96 432 93 128 46 61 152 480 62 30 60 68 220 43 66 22 115 47 293 44 106 23 14 20 207 42 44 39 51 176 22 26 26 62 136

% 100% 88% 79% 83% 84% 88% 90% 90% 90% 91% 65% 89% 14% 45% 48% 53% 88% 68% 85% 81% 89% 83% 94% 94% 98% 94% 99% 96% 97% 94% 83% 81% 87% 70% 59% 56% 97% 49% 69% 70% 84% 79% 67% 91% 79% 91% 94% 76% 78% 84% 71% 93% 81% 84% 82%

Performance Above Near miss Below Near miss Near miss Near miss Above Above Above Above Below Near miss Below Below Below Below Near miss Below Near miss Near miss Near miss Near miss Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Near miss Near miss Near miss Below Below Below Above Below Below Below Near miss Below Below Above Below Above Above Below Below Near miss Below Above Near miss Near miss Near miss Near miss

County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub-total East of England Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub-total North West Cheshire Cumbria Lancashire Greater Manchester Merseyside Regional Sub-total East Midlands Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub-total Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub-total Yorkshire & Humberside South East Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub-total South West Avon & Somerset Devon/Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub-total London London East London North London South London West London Sub-total Wales

Dyfed/Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub-total

England & Wales

3158

2577

82%

18

3.

Accredited Programmes - April 2005 to March 2006

Accredited Programme Completions against Profiled Target

Actual Profile Percent

Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 984 1993 3557 5023 6342 7588 8874 10260 11816 12690 14079 17127 777 1695 3003 4296 5427 6789 8050 9271 10804 11921 13221 15000 127% 118% 118% 117% 117% 112% 110% 111% 109% 106% 106% 114%
Accredited Programme Completions, Cumulative, 2005/6

18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Apr-05 May-05

Actual Profile

Jun-05

Jul-05

Aug-05

Sep-05

Oct-05

Nov-05

Dec-05

Jan-06

Feb-06

Mar-06

Year 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06

Target 6,267 12,000 15,000 15,000 15,000

Completions 3,431 7,716 13,136 15,595 17,127

% Achieved 55% 64% 88% 104% 114%

The detailed data show that: • • • 41 areas exceeded their target. 3 areas were within 10% of the target. Only one area was more than 10% below target. The most serious under-achievers were: • Cumbria (88%)

The best performing areas were: • • • • • Cheshire (165%) Warwickshire (142%) London South (139%) Dorset (139%) Lincolnshire (137%)

19

Accredited Programmes Completions April 2005 - March 2006

Region West Midlands

Area name Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub Total County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub Total Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub Total

Completion Actual Percent of target completions completion achieved target 285 112 272 1003 1672 207 514 239 960 145 167 352 194 199 148 1205 255 137 928 453 562 2335 261 262 157 159 343 1182 296 163 461 733 1653 422 385 157 316 413 1693 358 370 144 124 135 1131 556 490 490 691 2227 130 198 186 428 942 15000 301 159 299 1021 1780 243 636 241 1120 152 157 415 216 205 178 1323 422 121 1144 455 562 2704 306 328 215 173 449 1471 373 179 499 843 1894 474 414 157 332 458 1835 429 399 200 161 126 1315 699 529 472 961 2661 138 198 220 468 1024 17127 106% 142% 110% 102% 106%

Performance

Above Above Above Above

North East

117% Above 124% Above 101% Above 117% 105% 94% 118% 111% 103% 120% 110% 165% 88% 123% 100% 100% 116% 117% 125% 137% 109% 131% 124% 126% 110% 108% 115% 115% 112% 108% 100% 105% 111% 108% 120% 108% 139% 130% 93% 116% 126% 108% 96% 139% 119% 106% 100% 118% 109% 109% 114% Above Near miss Above Above Above Above Above Below Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Near miss Above Above Near miss Above Above Above Above Above

East

North West Cheshire Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside Regional Sub Total East Midlands Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub Total

Yorkshire & Humberside Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub Total South East Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub Total

South West Avon & Somerset Devon/Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub Total London London North London West London East London South Regional Sub Total Dyfed/Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub Total ENGLAND & WALES

Wales

20

4.

Unpaid Work, April 2005 to March 2006

Last year’s target of 30,000 completions was exceeded by 28%. This year, against the more challenging target of 50,000 completions, the NPS has exceeded the target by 2%.

Unpaid Work Completions against Profiled Target

Actual Profile Percent

Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 4001 8196 12654 17113 21152 25439 29821 34010 37820 41960 46296 51026 4166 8334 12500 16668 20835 25002 29169 33335 37502 41669 45834 50000 96% 98% 101% 103% 102% 102% 102% 102% 101% 101% 101% 102%
ECP / Unpaid Work Completions, Cumulative, 2005/6

60000

50000 Actual Profile 40000

30000

20000

10000

0 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06

Year 2004/05 2005/06

Target 30,000 50,00

Completions 38,473 50,324

Percent of target 128% 101%

Furthermore, the area breakdown shows: • • • 28 areas exceeded their profiled target 11 areas were within 10% of their target 6 areas were more than 10% below target

The best performing areas were: • • • • Derbyshire (145%) Cumbria (136%) Cambridgeshire (126%) Hampshire (123%)

The most serious under-achievers were: • • • • Northumbria (62%) Hertfordshire (72%) Avon & Somerset (72%) London South (80%)

21

Unpaid Work Completions April 2005 - March 2006

Region

Area name

Profiled ECP /Unpaid Target Work Completions 951 373 905 3344 5574 689 1714 797 3200 484 558 1172 645 664 495 4018 851 458 3094 1510 1872 7785 869 874 524 530 1142 3939 986 544 1535 2444 5510 1480 1284 524 1053 1377 5718 1194 1232 479 412 451 3768 1753 1537 1777 2353 7419 360 661 621 1428 3070 50000 999 370 866 3179 5414 569 1058 802 2429 538 704 1432 464 725 589 4452 874 624 3513 1382 1858 8251 1263 1055 550 503 1395 4766 1123 653 1405 2388 5569 1823 1487 620 1154 1375 6459 862 1233 518 346 434 3393 1919 1483 1649 1889 6940 365 752 688 1548 3353 51026

Target Achieved 105% 99% 96% 95% 97%

Performance

West Midlands

Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub-Total County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub-Total Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub-Total Cheshire Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside Regional Sub-Total Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub-Total Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub-Total Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub-Total Avon & Somerset Devon/Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub-Total London North London West London East London South London Sub Total Dyfed/Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub-Total

Above Near miss Near miss Near miss

North East

83% Below 62% Below 101% Above 76% 111% 126% 122% 72% 109% 119% 111% 103% 136% 114% 92% 99% 106% 145% 121% 105% 95% 122% 121% 114% 120% 92% 98% 101% 123% 116% 118% 110% 100% 113% 72% 100% 108% 84% 96% 90% 109% 97% 93% 80% 94% 101% 114% 111% 108% 109% 102% Above Above Above Below Above Above Above Above Above Near miss Near miss Above Above Above Near miss Above Above Above Near miss Near miss Above Above Above Above Above Below Above Above Below Near miss Above Near miss Near miss Below Above Above Above Above

East

North West

East Midlands

Yorkshire & Humberside

South East

South West

London

Wales

England & Wales Total

22

5.

DTTOs /DRRs – April 2005 to March 2006

This is the first year there has been a target on actual numbers of completions of DTTO/DRRs. In previous years the target was on commencements with a completion rate target introduced last year. The table below shows the profile towards a 4,000 completions target for the year.

DTTO/DRR Completions against Profiled Target

Actual Profile Percent

Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 260 559 877 1191 1465 1813 2124 2459 2792 3123 3487 3977 329 667 999 1332 1668 1998 2334 2669 2999 3332 3665 4000 79% 84% 88% 89% 88% 91% 91% 92% 93% 94% 95% 99%
DTTO/DRR, Completions Cumulative, 2005/6

4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05

Actual Profile

Jul-05

Aug-05

Sep-05

Oct-05

Nov-05

Dec-05

Jan-06

Feb-06

Mar-06

Year 2005/06

Target 4,000

Completions 3,977

Percent of target 99%

The area breakdown shows that there are now more areas at or above the target than below it: • • • 28 areas exceeded their profiled target. A further 8 were within 10% of meeting the profiled target Leaving 9 areas below target The most serious under-achievers were: • • • • London East (67%) London North (76%) Lincolnshire (76%) Essex (77%)

The best performing areas were: • • • • Suffolk (139%) South Wales (136%) North Wales (125%) West Mercia, Cumbria, Devon & Cornwall (124%)

23

Whilst the DTTO/DRR target for 2005-06 relates to completions, it is important that areas do all they can to maximise commencements. The table and chart below show a steady rate of improvement towards the target but it was not quite enough to meet it.

DTTO/DRR Commencements against Profiled Target

Actual Profile Percent

Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 993 1977 3137 4221 5271 6409 7626 9028 10149 11371 12631 14001 1333 2667 4000 5333 6667 8000 9333 10667 12000 13333 14667 16000 74% 74% 78% 79% 79% 80% 82% 85% 85% 85% 86% 88%
DTTO/DRR, Commencements Cumulative, 2005/6

18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05

Actual Profile

Jul-05

Aug-05

Sep-05

Oct-05

Nov-05

Dec-05

Jan-06

Feb-06

Mar-06

Year 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06

Target 6,000 6,000 9,000 13,000 16,000

Commencements 4,842 6,140 8,519 10,322 14,001

Percent of target 81% 102% 95% 79% 88%

The area breakdown shows that: • • • Eleven areas exceeded their profiled target. A further seven were within 10% of meeting the target Leaving 27 areas, below target The most serious under-achievers were: • • • • • County Durham (49%) Suffolk (52%) Cumbria (57%) North Wales (60%) Hampshire (61%)

The best performing areas were: • • • • • London West (121%) Greater Manchester (118%) Staffordshire (117%) Nottinghamshire (116%) North Yorkshire (113%)

24

DTTO/DRR Completions April 2005 - March 2006

Region

Area name

Profiled Starts Target target Achieved 72 28 74 255 429 38 112 57 207 40 27 78 49 43 31 268 50 21 286 136 152 645 65 88 41 53 87 334 99 49 129 238 515 73 88 36 96 132 425 95 63 45 29 29 261 196 160 155 174 685 39 66 40 86 231 4000 62 25 92 269 448 40 136 50 226 42 29 60 46 48 43 268 57 26 272 143 174 672 71 91 31 62 89 344 102 48 122 219 491 73 92 42 87 134 428 100 78 50 23 36 287 148 125 104 162 539 46 61 50 117 274 3977 86% 89% 124% 105% 104%

Performance Below Below Above Above

West Midlands Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub Total North East County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub Total Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub Total Cheshire Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside Regional Sub Total Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub Total Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub Total Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub Total Avon & Somerset Devon/Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub Total London North London West London East London South Regional Sub Total Dyfed/Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub Total ENGLAND & WALES

105% Above 121% Above 88% Below 109% 105% 107% 77% 94% 112% 139% 100% 114% 124% 95% 105% 114% 104% 109% 103% 76% 117% 102% 103% 103% 98% 95% 92% 95% 100% 105% 117% 91% 102% 101% 105% 124% 111% 79% 124% 110% 76% 78% 67% 93% 79% 118% 92% 125% 136% 119% 99% Above Above Below Near miss Above Above Above Above Near miss Above Above Above Above Below Above Above Above Near miss Near miss Near miss Above Above Above Near miss Above Above Above Above Below Above Below Below Below Near miss Above Near miss Above Above

East

North West

East Midlands

Yorkshire & Humberside

South East

South West

London

Wales

25

DTTO/DRR Commencements April 2005 - March 2006

Region

Area name

Profiled Starts Target target Achieved 304 119 290 1070 1784 220 548 255 1024 155 179 375 206 213 158 1286 272 147 990 483 599 2491 278 280 168 169 365 1260 316 174 491 782 1763 451 411 168 337 441 1807 382 394 153 132 144 1206 611 504 589 670 2374 138 212 199 457 1005 356 87 247 775 1465 108 385 250 743 108 141 264 160 130 83 886 167 84 1171 501 548 2471 204 309 180 162 425 1280 346 196 425 698 1665 273 311 148 253 419 1404 324 285 126 89 158 982 529 611 540 537 2217 124 227 119 418 888 117% 73% 85% 72% 82%

Performance Above Below Below Below

West Midlands Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub Total North East County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub Total Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub Total Cheshire Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside Regional Sub Total Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub Total Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub Total Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub Total Avon & Somerset Devon/Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub Total London North London West London East London South Regional Sub Total Dyfed/Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub Total ENGLAND & WALES

49% Below 70% Below 98% Near miss 73% 70% 79% 70% 78% 61% 52% 69% 61% 57% 118% 104% 91% 99% 73% 111% 107% 96% 116% 102% 110% 113% 86% 89% 94% 61% 76% 88% 75% 95% 78% 85% 72% 82% 67% 110% 81% 87% 121% 92% 80% 93% 90% 107% 60% 92% 88% 88% Below Below Below Below Below Below Below Below Above Above Near miss Below Above Above Near miss Above Above Above Below Below Below Below Below Below Near miss Below Below Below Below Above Below Above Near miss Below Near miss Above Below Near miss

East

North West

East Midlands

Yorkshire & Humberside

South East

South West

London

Wales

16000 14001

26

6. Basic Skills - April 2005 to March 2006

Basic Skills Starts
Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 4074 8385 12695 16070 19655 23239 26436 30511 33155 37238 41024 44972 2400 4800 7200 9598 11600 14402 18000 21600 25600 30000 34800 40000 170% 175% 176% 167% 169% 161% 147% 141% 130% 124% 118% 112%
Basic Skills Starts, Cumulative, 2005/6

Actual Profile Percent

50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05

Actual Profile

Jul-05

Aug-05

Sep-05

Oct-05

Nov-05

Dec-05

Jan-06

Feb-06

Mar-06

Year 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06

Target 6,000 16,000 32,000 40,000

Commencements 5,983 14,971 34,199 44,972

Percent of target 100% 94% 107% 112%

The area breakdown shows that: • • • 31 areas exceeded their target. A further eight areas were within 10% of the target. Six areas were more than 10% below their target.

The best performing areas were: • • • • • • Lancashire (186%) Gloucestershire (185%) Wiltshire (170%) Avon & Somerset (164%) Devon/Cornwall (154%) North Yorkshire (148%)

The most serious under-achievers were: • • • • • • Suffolk (64%) Hertfordshire (67%) West Yorkshire (69%) Northumbria (74%) London South (86%) Essex (86%)

27

Basic Skills Awards
Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 1415 2666 4035 5456 6588 7840 8910 10165 11133 12339 13533 14930 669 1338 2006 2675 3273 4083 4964 5844 6724 7675 8767 10000 212% 199% 201% 204% 201% 192% 179% 174% 166% 161% 154% 149%
Basic Skills Awards, Cumulative, 2005/6

Actual Profile Percent

16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05

Actual Profile

Jul-05

Aug-05

Sep-05

Oct-05

Nov-05

Dec-05

Jan-06

Feb-06

Mar-06

Year 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 • •

Target 1,000 4,000 8,000 10,000

Awards 848 2,815 9,451 14,930

Percent of target 85% 70% 118% 149%

44 areas exceeded their target Only one area, Northumbria was below target.

Northumbria Probation Board were very keen to become sub contractors under phase 1 of the new Offenders Learning and Skills (OLASS) arrangements. However, following many months of negotiation the area finally took the view that they were unable to accept the risks of the subcontract offered to it under OLASS and withdrew from the process in November 2005. The staff engaged in delivery were therefore subject to TUPE transfer over to the new providers and this process was completed by January 2006. This long period of uncertainty almost certainly affected performance and was the major contributing factor for the area not achieving their target. Had Northumbria achieved the same level of performance as last year, 101% of target, it would have been 6 places better off in the weighted scorecard. The best performing areas were: • • • • • • Suffolk (310%) Avon & Somerset (285%) Cumbria (213%) Cambridgeshire (212%) Hertfordshire (204%) London West (194%)
28

Basic Skills, April 2005 - March 2006
Region Area Profiled Starts Target 761 298 724 2675 4459 551 1371 638 2560 388 446 938 516 531 396 3215 681 367 2475 1208 1497 6228 695 699 419 424 914 3151 789 435 1228 1955 4408 1127 1027 419 842 1102 4517 955 986 383 330 360 3014 1496 1235 1442 1763 5936 346 529 497 1142 2513 40000 Starts % Profiled Performance Profiled Target against Awards Achieved starts Target 105% 110% 99% 129% 119% Above Above Near miss Above 190 75 181 669 1115 138 343 159 640 97 112 234 129 133 99 804 170 92 619 302 374 1557 174 175 105 106 228 788 197 109 307 489 1102 282 257 105 211 275 1129 239 246 96 82 90 753 374 309 361 440 1484 86 132 124 285 628 10000 Awards % Profiled Performanc Target e against Achieved awards 149% 117% 119% 144% 139% Above Above Above Above

West Midlands

Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub Total County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub Total Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub Total

800 329 715 3443 5287 551 1013 749 2313 377 494 807 345 614 253 2890 791 379 2440 2249 1412 7271 799 788 464 384 1044 3479 831 645 1206 1353 4035 1508 928 438 1041 1422 5337 1563 1516 486 610 613 4788 1439 1379 2056 1514 6388 351 732 573 1528 3184 44972

284 87 215 961 1547 232 216 303 751 119 236 429 263 168 307 1522 178 196 839 495 531 2239 197 316 192 144 286 1135 368 137 368 572 1445 375 492 131 262 447 1707 682 404 157 96 123 1462 389 601 607 604 2201 114 161 170 476 921 14930

North East

100% Above 74% Below 117% Above 90% 97% 111% 86% 67% 116% 64% 90% 116% 103% 99% 186% 94% 117% 115% 113% 111% 91% 114% 110% 105% 148% 98% 69% 92% 134% 90% 104% 124% 129% 118% 164% 154% 127% 185% 170% 159% 96% 112% 143% 86% 108% 102% 138% 115% 134% 127% 112% Near miss Above Below Below Above Below Above Above Near miss Above Near miss Above Above Above Near miss Above Above Above Near miss Below Above Near miss Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Near miss Above Above Below Above Above Above Above

168% Above 63% Below 191% Above 117% 123% 212% 183% 204% 126% 310% 189% 105% 213% 136% 164% 142% 144% 113% 181% 183% 136% 125% 144% 187% 126% 120% 117% 131% 133% 192% 125% 124% 162% 151% 285% 164% 164% 117% 137% 194% 104% 194% 168% 137% 148% 132% 122% 137% 167% 147% 149% Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above

East

North West Cheshire Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside Regional Sub Total East Midlands Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub Total

Yorkshire & Humberside Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub Total South East Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub Total

South West Avon & Somerset Devon/Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub Total London London North London West London East London South London Sub Total Dyfed/Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub Total ENGLAND & WALES

Wales

29

7.

Race and Ethnic Monitoring

Home Secretary’s Race Equality Targets – Monitoring at December 2005 At the end of December 2005, 12.1% of NPS staff were from minority ethnic backgrounds, up from 10.9% a year earlier and 9.8% in 2000. This is against a target of 8.4% set for 2009. All regional targets have been exceeded. The breakdown by region is set out below.
NPS Staff: Minority Ethnic Representation Region West Midlands North East East of England North West East Midlands Yorks & Humberside South East South West London Wales England & Wales Target set Actual 31/12/04 Actual 31/12/05 11.6% 1.4% 4.9% 5.4% 7.2% 5.1% 3.6% 2.6% 26.5% 1.7% 8.4% 16.0% 2.5% 7.1% 6.7% 12.2% 7.6% 6.0% 3.7% 35.5% 3.1% 10.9% 17.6% 2.6% 8.0% 6.8% 11.1% 7.9% 6.3% 3.8% 40.2% 3.3% 11.9% Above/Below Target Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above

Missing Data
The 16+1 census classification of race and ethnicity became mandatory in April 2003. In Performance Report 13, we published data from RDS (from Areas’ quarterly listings, formerly Form 20 returns) showing the proportion of new orders and licences made between January and April 2004 that did not have a correctly entered race and ethnic classification. We have updated and published that information in subsequent Performance Reports. Performance has improved consistently with each quarter and is now of a sufficient robustness to allow RDS to publish the number of starts of community orders by ethnicity. The target for the NPS is that 95% of race and ethnic monitoring data on staff and offenders is returned on time and using the correct (Census 2001) classifications. Data on staffing is shown alongside that on offenders on the next page. The overall figures for performance shown in the final column of the table are calculated by averaging the preceding two columns (‘All Orders and Licences’ and ‘All staff’).

30

Offenders starting orders / released on licence, April 2005 - March 2006; staffing as at end of December 2005

Region/Area

Orders % with valid ethnic code 97% 99% 98% 98% 95% 99% 96% 95% 97% 98% 97% 97% 96% 99% 100% 96% 97% 97% 98% 95% 97% 98% 93% 99% 91% 94% 98% 94% 98% 100% 97% 97% 86% 96% 98% 94% 98% 99% 95% 93% 92% 97% 96%

Licences % with valid ethnic code 98% 99% 99% 97% 97% 97% 96% 95% 95% 96% 96% 97% 94% 95% 97% 96% 93% 95% 97% 92% 94% 93% 91% 97% 88% 93% 98% 94% 94% 100% 89% 80% 87% 89% 95% 95% 98% 98% 95% 94% 89% 95% 94%

All Orders All Staff & Licences

Performance

Total starts North East Durham Northumbria Teesside North West Cheshire Cumbria Lancashire Greater Manchester Merseyside Yorkshire & Humberside Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire East Midlands Derbyshire Leicestershire Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire West Midlands Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands East of England Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk London London South East Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley South West Avon & Somerset Devon & Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Wales Dyfed Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Total 1,792 4,368 2,324 2,528 1,606 4,663 10,724 5,217 2,861 1,998 4,540 7,938 2,803 2,881 1,462 1,435 3,998 2,832 1,122 2,447 9,611 1,372 2,011 3,773 2,245 1,799 1,458 18,939 4,822 3,453 1,669 3,055 4,310 2,749 2,676 1,365 1,227 1,251 1,124 1,741 1,887 4,419 146,495

No ethnic code 47 48 45 53 79 61 453 245 88 45 155 217 107 29 2 54 136 92 24 116 300 24 150 20 198 106 27 1,153 79 8 56 92 595 105 66 82 26 12 51 129 157 149 5,679

Total starts 422 1,013 640 762 391 1,514 3,403 1,740 915 450 1,433 2,243 718 723 335 449 1,008 769 254 1,123 5,426 422 466 935 464 383 370 7,652 1,332 872 347 721 1,022 741 620 397 340 267 223 400 483 1,279 45,512

No ethnic code 7 7 7 26 12 46 145 91 46 17 58 74 41 35 9 19 67 36 7 91 331 28 44 30 55 28 7 459 77 3 39 141 134 84 30 18 8 6 12 24 51 66 2,517

98% 99% 98% 98% 95% 98% 96% 95% 96% 97% 96% 97% 96% 98% 99% 96% 96% 96% 98% 94% 96% 97% 92% 99% 91% 94% 98% 94% 97% 100% 95% 94% 86% 95% 97% 94% 98% 99% 95% 93% 91% 96% 96%

99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 99% 96% 98% 96% 100% 100% 95% 99% 99% 99% 100% 98% 100% 100% 91% 100% 99% 96% 100% 99% 94% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99%

98% 99% 99% 99% 98% 99% 97% 98% 98% 99% 98% 98% 98% 95% 99% 96% 97% 96% 99% 97% 95% 98% 95% 99% 95% 96% 99% 97% 94% 100% 97% 95% 93% 97% 96% 97% 98% 99% 98% 96% 96% 98% 97%

31

8.

Sickness Absence - April 2005 to March 2006

From 1st July 2001, local areas were required to monitor sickness absence using a standard format and provide quarterly monitoring returns to the NPD. Reporting was increased to monthly in July 2002. The target for 2002/03 was 10 days sickness absence or fewer per employee per year. This was reduced to an average of 9 days per employee for 2003/04 and has remained at 9 days since. Many areas already have good systems for monitoring and managing absence and such good practice is being shared across the national HR network. This includes: • • • • • • • • A ‘Case Management’ approach to tackling long term absence. Monthly statistical feedback to line managers. Return to work interviews. Probation Board reports. Automatic referral to occupational health. Healthy Roadshows. Stress counselling/health care services. Constant chasing.

Sickness absence is included in the weighted scorecard at the end of this report but it is measured from October onwards. Data is shown separately for April 2005 to March 2006 and October 2005 to March 2006. For the period April-05 to March-06, five areas achieved the target by having fewer than nine days sickness per employee per year, with a three six areas are achieving the old target by having fewer than 10 days.

The best performing areas were: • • • • • North Yorkshire (6.6) Avon & Somerset (8.5) Derbyshire (8.7) Suffolk (8.7) Devon & Cornwall (8.9)

The most serious under-achievers were: • • • • • West Midlands (15.5) Greater Manchester (14.7) Hampshire (14.7) London West(14.6) South Wales, Bedfordshire (14.5)

Details of area and regional performance are shown on the next two pages.

32

Sickness Absence, April 2005 - March 2006
Region Area Short Long DDA term term related sickness sickness sickness 3116 964 2496 11105 17681 1922 3858 1641 7421 1452 1432 2811 1528 2287 1326 10835 2632 1166 7368 3498 3433 18097 1717 2823 1637 1343 3220 10740 2937 1031 3636 5716 13321 4295 2169 1593 1986 4699 14742 3712 1643 1195 773 890 8213 3221 3576 3707 3748 14253 974 1764 1030 3752 7519 122821 1874 1148 1725 9808 14556 1875 3145 2293 7312 1910 875 2048 1292 1418 523 8065 1880 1029 11638 3858 4103 22510 1336 2080 693 1838 4264 10212 2316 495 2363 5267 10440 4005 3788 881 2591 2964 14228 1250 2571 1755 1085 772 7432 4336 4973 4999 5835 20144 883 1605 1416 5058 8962 123860 252 0 603 13 868 252 0 323 575 13 200 0 232 248 8 701 552 48 0 695 1024 2318 64 0 159 0 120 343 0 0 541 384 925 0 18 230 2 18 268 23 8 110 0 0 141 2 2 4 259 266 0 0 132 22 154 Total days lost 5242 2112 4825 20926 33104 4049 7003 4256 15308 3374 2507 4859 3052 3953 1857 19601 5064 2243 19006 8051 8561 42925 3117 4904 2488 3181 7604 21294 5253 1526 6540 11367 24686 8300 5975 2704 4579 7680 29237 4985 4221 3060 1857 1662 15785 7559 8551 8710 9842 34662 1857 3369 2577 8832 16634 Total Ave Ave Ave Average Performance staff days days days days (target = 9 years Short Long DDA - absence days) term term related 427 222 377 1348 2373 297 655 325 1276 232 229 447 285 283 212 1689 442 174 1290 597 777 3280 360 511 225 224 539 1859 462 230 688 1040 2421 565 470 256 388 625 2304 587 476 228 167 165 1623 580 592 676 675 2524 158 257 247 608 1269 7.3 4.3 6.6 8.2 7.5 6.5 5.9 5.1 5.8 6.3 6.3 6.3 5.4 8.1 6.2 6.4 6.0 6.7 5.7 5.9 4.4 5.5 4.8 5.5 7.3 6.0 6.0 5.8 6.4 4.5 5.3 5.5 5.5 7.6 4.6 6.2 5.1 7.5 6.4 6.3 3.5 5.2 4.6 5.4 5.1 5.6 6.0 5.5 5.6 5.6 6.2 6.9 4.2 6.2 5.9 6.0 4.4 5.2 4.6 7.3 6.1 6.3 4.8 7.1 5.7 8.2 3.8 4.6 4.5 5.0 2.5 4.8 4.3 5.9 9.0 6.5 5.3 6.9 3.7 4.1 3.1 8.2 7.9 5.5 5.0 2.1 3.4 5.1 4.3 7.1 8.1 3.4 6.7 4.7 6.2 2.1 5.4 7.7 6.5 4.7 4.6 7.5 8.4 7.4 8.6 8.0 5.6 6.2 5.7 8.3 7.1 6.0 0.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.3 0.0 1.2 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 12.3 9.5 12.8 15.5 13.9 Above Near miss Above Above

West Midlands

Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub Total County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub Total Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub Total

North East

13.6 Above 10.7 Above 13.1 Above 12.0 14.5 11.0 10.9 10.7 14.0 8.7 11.6 11.5 12.9 14.7 13.5 11.0 13.1 8.7 9.6 11.0 14.2 14.1 11.5 11.4 6.6 9.5 10.9 10.2 14.7 12.7 10.5 11.8 12.3 12.7 8.5 8.9 13.4 11.1 10.1 9.7 13.0 14.4 12.9 14.6 13.7 11.8 13.1 10.4 14.5 13.1 12.3 Above Above Above Above Above Below Above Above Above Above Above Below Near miss Above Above Above Above Below Near miss Above Above Above Above Above Above Below Below Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above

East

North West Cheshire Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside Regional Sub Total East Midlands Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub Total

Yorkshire & Humberside Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub Total South East Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub Total

South West Avon & Somerset Devon & Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub Total London London East London North London South London West London Sub Total Dyfed-Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub Total ENGLAND & WALES

London Wales

6557 253238 20618

33

Sickness Absence, October 2005 - March 2006
(used in scorecard calculations)
Region Area Short Long DDA term term related sickness sickness sickness 1614 602 1551 6394 10161 1100 1973 764 3836 769 752 1420 808 1296 719 5764 1484 597 4066 1857 1842 9845 945 1463 860 714 1870 5852 1529 550 2096 2993 7168 2436 1157 984 1150 2803 8530 1842 839 657 481 493 4312 1770 1902 1922 1992 7585 486 1037 473 2219 4215 67268 847 541 799 5151 7338 930 1581 1228 3738 860 632 1020 1031 725 245 4513 979 592 5526 1772 2535 11405 675 1301 230 761 2422 5389 1386 313 1073 2593 5364 2364 1481 454 945 1496 6740 712 1015 789 765 413 3694 1909 2360 2393 2767 9428 540 704 832 2586 4662 62273 203 0 173 6 382 121 0 64 185 2 69 0 64 100 0 235 301 32 0 243 537 1112 50 0 0 0 31 81 0 0 485 304 789 0 18 109 0 16 143 23 8 44 0 0 75 1 1 1 128 130 0 0 0 0 0 Total days lost 2664 1143 2524 11551 17882 2151 3554 2055 7760 1631 1453 2440 1903 2121 964 10511 2764 1221 9592 3872 4914 22363 1670 2764 1090 1475 4323 11322 2915 863 3654 5890 13321 4800 2656 1547 2096 4315 15413 2577 1862 1490 1246 906 8081 3679 4262 4316 4886 17144 1026 1741 1305 4805 8876 Total Ave Ave Ave Average Performance staff days days days days (target = 9 years Short Long DDA - absence days) term term related 218 124 189 687 1218 149 327 165 641 116 119 221 144 145 107 852 224 89 640 298 391 1642 179 259 113 111 282 944 237 113 344 519 1214 290 236 130 200 319 1174 297 246 119 84 89 834 302 322 357 344 1324 83 133 123 312 651 7.4 4.8 8.2 9.3 8.3 7.4 6.0 4.6 6.0 6.6 6.3 6.4 5.6 8.9 6.7 6.8 6.6 6.7 6.4 6.2 4.7 6.0 5.3 5.7 7.6 6.4 6.6 6.2 6.5 4.9 6.1 5.8 5.9 8.4 4.9 7.6 5.7 8.8 7.3 6.2 3.4 5.5 5.7 5.6 5.2 5.9 5.9 5.4 5.8 5.7 5.8 7.8 3.8 7.1 6.5 6.4 3.9 4.4 4.2 7.5 6.0 6.2 4.8 7.4 5.8 7.4 5.3 4.6 7.2 5.0 2.3 5.3 4.4 6.7 8.6 6.0 6.5 6.9 3.8 5.0 2.0 6.8 8.6 5.7 5.9 2.8 3.1 5.0 4.4 8.2 6.3 3.5 4.7 4.7 5.7 2.4 4.1 6.6 9.1 4.7 4.4 6.3 7.3 6.7 8.0 7.1 6.5 5.3 6.7 8.3 7.2 5.9 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.3 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.3 1.3 0.4 0.0 0.8 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 12.2 9.2 13.3 16.8 14.7 Above Near miss Above Above

West Midlands

Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Regional Sub Total County Durham Northumbria Teesside Regional Sub Total Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk Regional Sub Total

North East

14.4 Above 10.9 Above 12.5 Above 12.1 14.1 12.2 11.0 13.2 14.6 9.0 12.3 12.3 13.7 15.0 13.0 12.6 13.6 9.3 10.7 9.7 13.2 15.3 12.0 12.3 7.6 10.6 11.3 11.0 16.6 11.3 11.9 10.5 13.5 13.1 8.7 7.6 12.5 14.8 10.2 9.7 12.2 13.2 12.1 14.2 13.0 12.3 13.1 10.6 15.4 13.6 12.6 Above Above Above Above Above Below Above Above Above Above Above Near miss Above Near miss Above Above Above Below Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Below Below Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above Above

East

North West Cheshire Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside Regional Sub Total East Midlands Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Regional Sub Total

Yorkshire & Humberside Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Regional Sub Total South East Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley Regional Sub Total

South West Avon & Somerset Devon & Cornwall Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Regional Sub Total London London East London North London South London West London Sub Total Dyfed-Powys Gwent North Wales South Wales Regional Sub Total ENGLAND & WALES

London Wales

3131 132673 10494

34

9.

Victim Contact – April to December 2005

The NPS Business Plan makes it clear that the National Probation Service delivers services to victims as well as offenders. The National Standard for victim contact work is that probation areas should offer face-to-face contact between the victim (or family) and a member of the probation service (or agent) within 8 weeks of the offender being sentenced. The NPS target is to make initial contact within that timescale in 85% of all eligible cases. This was exceeded for the first time in 2003/04 and performance continued to improve during 2004/05 with 93% of victims contacted in accordance with the national standard. That high level of performance has been maintained in the first three quarters of 2005-06.

Period covered

Number of named victims

April 2001 to March 2002 April 2002 to March 2003 April 2003 to March 2004 April 2004 to March 2005 April to December 2005

15,041 15,904 15,647 15,539 11,548

Number of victims contacted within 8 weeks 9,523 12,949 14,276 14,504 10,716

Percentage of victims contacted 63% 81% 91% 93% 93%

Further analysis of the figures shows that:

• • •

37 areas met or exceeded the 85% target Two areas were within 5% of the target Three areas fell short of the target by more than 10%

35

Victim Contact
All Cases, April - December 2005 Region Area Performance Number of No. contacted Target named within 8 weeks achieved victims 286 269 94% On or Above 193 189 98% On or Above 204 191 94% On or Above 931 910 98% On or Above 1614 1559 97% 320 214 80 614 224 127 208 130 190 106 985 311 97 342 360 817 1927 254 238 61 118 337 1008 221 147 416 498 1282 301 265 60 244 294 1164 212 88 64 122 260 746 1620 104 121 350 13 588 315 155 77 547 201 125 182 64 181 87 840 299 87 320 316 761 1783 229 234 60 117 322 962 198 135 402 470 1205 247 248 52 238 260 1045 194 86 48 121 254 703 1520 102 113 325 12 552 98% On or Above 72% Below 96% On or Above 89% 90% 98% 88% 49% 95% 82% 85% 96% 90% 94% 88% 93% 93% 90% 98% 98% 99% 96% 95% 90% 92% 97% 94% 94% 82% 94% 87% 98% 88% 90% 92% 98% 75% 99% 98% 94% On or Above On or Above On or Above Below On or Above Near miss On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above Near miss On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above Below On or Above On or Above

West Midlands Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands West Midlands Total North East Northumbria Teesside County Durham North East Total Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Essex Hertfordshire Norfolk Suffolk East Total Cheshire Cumbria Lancashire Merseyside Greater Manchester North West Total

East

North West

East Midlands Derbyshire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire East Midlands Total Yorkshire & Humberside Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire Yorkshire & Humberside Total Hampshire Kent Surrey Sussex Thames Valley South East Total Avon & Somerset Dorset Gloucestershire Wiltshire Devon/Cornwall South West Total London Total Wales Gwent North Wales South Wales Dyfed/Powys Wales Total

South East

South West

94% On or Above 98% 93% 93% 92% 94% On or Above On or Above On or Above On or Above

England & Wales Total

11548

10716

93%
36

10.

Court Report Timeliness, July 2005 to March 2006

The aim is to improve the timeliness of the NPS reports to the magistrates' courts. National Standards 2005 specify that the report should be provided in accordance with the timescale set down by the commissioning court. The figures presented overleaf show the proportion of reports that were completed to the deadline set by the court and include fast and standard delivery reports. This is the first year that this approach has been used, so comparison with other years is not possible. Based on the new method of measurement, the NPS completed 97% of court reports within the deadline set by the court. The area breakdown shows all areas exceeding the 90% target. The table below shows performance against the previous 15-day standard for completing PreSentence Reports (PSRs). Performance peaked in 2001-02 when this was a cash performancelinked measure and fell sharply in 2003-04. Performance for 2004/05 improved to 73%. 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 55% 58% 63% 68% 75% 79% 78% 65% 73%

Year

2002/03 2003/04 2004/05

No. provided in response to request 119,875 110,712 107,172

No. provided within 15 working days of request 93,322 72,141 78,754

% meeting standard 78% 65% 73%

37

Timeliness of Court Reports July 2005 to March 2006
Probation Area
Total provided Number provided on time Performance against court's timescale

Avon & Somerset Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Cheshire Cumbria Derbyshire Devon & Cornwall Dorset County Durham Dyfed/Powys Essex Gloucestershire Greater Manchester Gwent Hampshire Hertfordshire Humberside Kent Lancashire Leicestershire & Rutland Lincolnshire London Merseyside Norfolk North Wales North Yorkshire Northamptonshire Northumbria Nottinghamshire South Wales South Yorkshire Staffordshire Suffolk Surrey Sussex Teesside Thames Valley Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands West Yorkshire Wiltshire England & Wales

3433 1098 1612 2481 1529 3007 3138 1365 2205 1280 3485 1201 10037 1491 4049 2104 2810 2797 4730 3075 1534 15043 3695 1839 1680 1763 1141 4355 4569 4992 4461 2815 1079 1471 2673 2411 2285 1127 1814 10654 6702 1241 136271

3349 1090 1584 2444 1492 2977 2926 1306 2108 1248 3475 1138 9842 1428 3921 2007 2756 2729 4585 3028 1530 14594 3559 1751 1601 1755 1110 4240 4486 4848 4371 2734 1060 1439 2633 2306 2198 1094 1659 10398 6598 1178 132575

98% 99% 98% 99% 98% 99% 93% 96% 96% 98% 100% 95% 98% 96% 97% 95% 98% 98% 97% 98% 100% 97% 96% 95% 95% 100% 97% 97% 98% 97% 98% 97% 98% 98% 99% 96% 96% 97% 91% 98% 98% 95% 97%

38

11.

Weighted Scorecard year-end, 2005-06

The Weighted Scorecard covering April 2005 to March 2006 is shown below. The table provides comparisons between the latest position and that in the previous scorecard. It shows areas that have: Moved the most places up: • • • • Cheshire Wiltshire Kent Dyfed/Powys Moved the most places down: • • • • Sussex Northamptonshire Surrey Cumbria

There were 4 areas that moved more than 10 places up and 4 areas that moved more than 10 places down since the previous quarter. In order to explain some of the volatility, there is a brief explanation next to each area whose position is more than 10 places above or below the position in the previous scorecard. Of course some areas will have moved up by virtue of general, across the board improvements.

39

Weighted Scorecard 2005-06
Performance against Target Warwickshire 89 Derbyshire 82 North Yorkshire 81 Humberside 79 North Wales 75 Leics & Rutland 65 Essex 61 Suffolk 64 Lincolnshire 58 Cheshire 68 Nottinghamshire 64 Wiltshire 62 Dorset 53 Bedfordshire 45 Devon & Cornwall 46 Kent 40 South Wales 48 Dyfed/Powys 53 County Durham 50 Greater Manchester 35 Gwent 26 Lancashire 25 Teesside 22 West Mercia 35 Merseyside 22 Avon & Somerset 15 Staffordshire 38 Sussex 28 Cumbria 32 Surrey 29 West Yorkshire 17 South Yorkshire 22 London North 7 Northumbria -1 Hampshire 5 Northamptonshire -4 West Midlands -2 London South -10 London West -13 London East -21 Cambridgeshire -14 Gloucestershire -16 Thames Valley -44 Norfolk -42 Hertfordshire -122 Grand Total 1252 Area name Perform- Overall Position Position DiffExplanation ance Perform- now last time erence against ance Average 1 1 0 53 142 2 4 2 49 131 3 2 -1 44 125 4 8 4 41 120 5 5 0 40 115 6 3 -3 39 104 7 7 0 35 95 8 17 9 31 95 9 9 0 32 90 10 42 32 Missing staffing retun previously 21 88 11 12 1 24 88 12 35 23 Turnaround in basic skills; improvement in OBPs 22 85 13 10 -3 30 83 14 13 -1 22 67 15 6 -9 21 66 16 33 17 Turnaround in OBPs; improvement in high risk and PPO 25 65 17 15 -2 15 63 18 30 12 Turnaround in OBPs and ECP; improvement in basik skills 8 61 19 18 -1 5 55 20 24 4 20 54 21 29 8 11 37 22 21 -1 9 34 23 25 2 10 33 24 23 -1 -4 31 25 34 9 7 29 26 22 -4 13 29 27 27 0 -12 27 28 11 -17 Below average compliance, DRRs and ethnic monitoring -4 24 29 16 -13 Poor OBPs, high risk, PPO and sickness -11 21 30 14 -16 PPO and high risk -10 19 31 28 -3 0 17 32 40 8 -5 17 33 26 -7 3 10 34 19 -15 Basic skills awards -14 -15 35 37 2 -21 -16 36 20 -16 Enforcement & compliance, high risk and sickness -19 -22 37 31 -6 -22 -24 38 32 -6 -19 -29 39 39 0 -21 -34 40 36 -4 -28 -50 41 41 0 -38 -52 42 44 2 -55 -71 43 38 -5 -53 -97 44 43 -1 -92 -134 45 45 0 -157 -278 46 1298

40

150

Warwickshire Derbyshire North Yorkshire Humberside North Wales Leicestershire & Rutland Essex Suffolk Lincolnshire Cheshire Nottinghamshire Wiltshire Dorset Bedfordshire Devon & Cornwall Kent South Wales Dyfed/Powys County Durham Greater Manchester Gwent Lancashire Teesside West Mercia Merseyside Avon & Somerset Staffordshire Sussex Cumbria Surrey West Yorkshire South Yorkshire London North Northumbria Hampshire Northamptonshire West Midlands London South London West London East Cambridgeshire Gloucestershire Thames Valley Norfolk Hertfordshire

100 BAND 1 50

BAND 2 0

BAND 3 -50 BAND 4 -100

)
BAND 5 -150

-200

-250

-300

41

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.